INT’RAMURALS' ‘ HOCKEY IQLLEYB BROOMBALL TUESDAY, KEEP FIT CLASS(Women) 7:00‘-’$OPHMORE. 8:15 - BUS-VETS TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20 "TT—MDNDAY, NOVEMBER 19 VS BLANCHARD VS DEACONS 7:00 - MEAN MACHINE VS ENGINEERS 8:15 - FRESHMEN 7:00 - MEAN-MACH VS MARION WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21 INE VS SOPHMORE 8:15 - FRESHMEN VS DEACONS 'THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 22 8:15 - BUSrVETS VS MARION 7:00 — ENGINEERS BASKETBALL 7 M ND Y, NOVEMBER 19 “ . DAY STUDENTS vs MARION 7:30 - 8:30 - 9:30 - BLANCHARD 6:00 - vs BLANCHARD_ VS WORRIORS WESTERNS VS ENGINEERS NOVEMBER 20 DAY STUDENTS VS 2ND FLOOR BERNARDINE ‘WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21 ‘ 6:00 - BLANCHARD VS 3 & 4 FLOOR BERNARDINE THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 22 6:00 - BIOLOGY CLUB: ALL. "EAWEELLED - p . . ‘BECAUSE'OF-VARSITY BASKETBALL ACADIA vs U.P.E.I. V Monday 11:30 - 12:30 ; 12:30 - 1:30 Wednesday. '11:30 - 12:30 ; 12:30 - 1:30 Friday 11:30 - 12:30 ; 12:30 - 1:30 FENCING ’ Tuesday / 7:30 - 9:30,p.m. Saturday 9:00 - 11:30 a.m. KARATE " v' Tuesday 7:30 p.m Thursday 7:30 p.m Sundayy.v ."1:30 p.m RIFLE SHOOTING (R.C.M.P.) ~ » ‘ rr Wednesday 6:30 - 9:30 p.m. SWIMMING (Y.M.C.A.) Monday: 4 r Co-ed Swim 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. ,Ladies Swim ‘ 2:15 - 3:00 p.m. A Co-ed Swim " 8:15 - 9:30 a.m. Tuesday A ‘ Ladies Swim 10:15 - 11:00 a.m Co-ed Swim 12:00 1:00 p.m Co-ed Swim 8:30 - 9:30 p.m Wednesday . Co-ed Swim 12:00 1:00 p.m Ladies Swim ' 2:15 3:00 p.m - Co-ed Swim 8:15 9:30 p.m Thursday _ ‘ f _ T ‘ Ladies Swim 10:15 11:00 a.m « Co—ed Swim 12:00 1:00 p.m Co-ed Swim' 8:30 9:30 p.m Friday ~ Co-ed Swim . 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Ladies Swim‘ ~ 2:15 3:00 p.m. 'Co-ed Swim - 8:30 9:30 p.m. 1§ATING ' Monday 2:00 - 3:30 p.m Tuesday. 2:00 - 3:30 p.m _ Wednesday 2:00 — 3 30 p.m . Thursday ‘ 2:00 - 3'30 p.m Sunday 7:00 - 8:30 p.m IOCKEY(RecreatiOna1) ’ i ' Monday 8:30 — 11:00 a.m. Tuesday 8:30 - 11:00 a.m. Wednesday 8:30 - 11:00 a.m. Thursday ~ 8:30 - 11:00 a.m. Friday 8:30 - :00_a.m. . their win over Second Floor Bernadine. of the intramural department. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21‘, 8:00 P.M. THE UPEI SUN, Thursday, November 15, 1979, page 19 Z'IN'I‘RAMURALS WOMEEV'S INTRAMURAIS by Shelly Pepler A NEW RULING GOOD OR BAD? : Before I get involved in the question of whether the new rule, instituted by the intra- mural departnent this week pertaining to wmenfs broonball, will be beneficial or detrimental to the sport as a whole, I would first like to report on a couple of games Whidl were played last week in the league. cm Wednesday night, Third Floor Bernadine looked impressive in Paula Bradshaw lod<ed good for the winners, and could easily become the leader of this team. Ch Tuesday night, the Day Students and Blan— chard failed to ice complete teams, so a mini- match was held between those who did show. Iod<ing around the league, people with definite potential in this sport include Gail Arsenault of Blanchard, Pat VII/bran of Second Floor Bernadine, and Lena Cassley of the Day Students. Each of these girls have contributed in a lot of different ways to their respective teane. Now, a: with the new rule. In effect, the rule says that 'only girls who are out for ' solely recreational purposes may participate 'in the intramural brocnball league." 'Ihis ruling, then, does not allow anyme who plays in the P.E.I. Senior Women's Broonball League to also play in the intramural league. This new rule affects about fifteen people, the najority of whom play for the Lady Panthers in the P.E.I. League. I personally feel the rule has both advantages and disadvantages for the intramural league, and those'who have participated regularly in both over the past season. The disadvantages seem to work in this manner. The people who participate in intramurals usually ' participate in each intramural activity, and not restrict themselves to one sport, or area of finesse. As a result you have a pretty good mixture of athletes and mam-athletesscqnpetingiin a relaxed environment. Now, if you say that people who play ocupetitiirely‘are not allowed to also play recreationally, you seem to be gearing yourself towards a situation in which all intramurals will become accessible only to those who are not especially skilled in the particular sport being played. It in effect dictates that a person can play one or the other, i.e. recreat- icnally or ompetitively, but not both. This would seem to eliminate a lot of people who have been carbining the two successfully over the past couple of years. In fact, in nest instances these people were very often the life and breath Can the league survive without these people seems to be the biggest questicn left by the ruling. V In defense of the intramural department, - it is understandable why such a rule would be in- stituted. The department is scared, and justifiably so, that intranmrals will become a breeding ground for competitive athletics and this is not the philosophy behind intramurals. fluarare,<11the<nher1mmd,there1x>pnmdde students who don't possess the necessary skills or who do not want to play competitive athletics an avenue of participation. As it stands now, the level of ability of those who play ‘ catpetitive brodnball in relation to those who play only recreational, is only slightly higher., However, as filese players '- gain experience in . the conpetitive leage, this gap will omtinue to urxeaen unil:n:no kxgertecame a relativelyIrmrrenous4group: I hope, for e’veryone's‘sake, since future INTRAMURALS COHTUEL anPAGE 20 nu: