4; ~- .. ’m‘5ierI shape: r .,, *at eeét: "\ it *FROM THE IHMTOR7$ DESK Va EEDWHAE " This is the sixth SUN this term, and each one has brought our staff the satisfaction of a job completed. Unfortunately, we have also felt frustration, frustration, from mistakes made. Mistakes are bad anywhere, but in the newspaper business they are especially irritating. That is because once the paper is in print they are beyond -correction. >They simply settle within the pages defying staff and misinforming readers. ‘ This editorial has been inspired by specific blunders in last week's SUN. The first of them, we're told, has upset the home economics department. The faux pas in ‘ question was‘in the article entitled, "Dalton Hall Meals." There appeared a sentence which read, "As the home economics students are leaving the managerial process and intricate workings of a food service behind, you will be able to dine in style for just the costs of ingredients and preparation." Does that make sense? Maybe so, but it should read this way. "As the home economics students are learning the managerial process and intricate workings of a food service business, you will be able to dine in style for just the costs of ingredients and preparation." That was mistake number one, and we hope that now we have properly corrected it. The second.major error was on the same page. It was in the Fall Fest Schedule, just where we wanted it least. Whoever laid out the schedule (probably,the editor) omitted part of it. The result was the jumbling of Thursdays and Friday's events creating a confused and downright misleading situation. Hopefully we didn't spoil anyone's week—end, and.we assure everyone that it won't happen again, at least not during Fall Fest. The secret in newspaper work is to minimize mistakes. Gripping that secret is one goal of the SUN, and it is a goal which may eventually be reached. Pat Ingraham, Lachlan MacQuarrie, and the rest of our staff are helping us get there. Pat's typing is frequently flawless, and the copy she doesn't handle is carefully scanned by Lachlan and our other proofreaders. Some errors survive this process, but we usually don't make the same ones twice in a row. At least we're learning. Not often do newspapers acknowledge mistakes, but there you go, the SUN has done it. Our redeeming qualities are that we try to correct ourselves and that we invite our readers to join both the SUN and the struggle to improve it. If we're lucky maybe someday the eagle at the bottom of this page won't be necessary.‘ - if I IE YOU FIND MISTAKES there for a purpose. We publish something fer everyone, and some people are always looking for mistakes. - ,/ The UPEI ‘SUN ie a member of the Canadian University A Press (CUP) with exclusive "Deadline for all}w y submissions is Monday* noon.. 'g national advertising 310 Davenport Road, Toronto,\0ntario.' ; be 'an independent newspaper published weekly throughout the academic‘year by the UPEI,Student‘Uhion,V printed by the Journal- 'distributed throughout the campus. ' . ' Contents are the responsibility of the editor. Opinions are ‘ those of the persons expressing them. All ,letters and articles must be signed even if the name is tote rights held by Youthstzfeam, The URI SUN aims to Pioneer in Summerside and withheld from publication. ‘ toreiiohnsycams- . ;M'°r‘t_5-Bing.<flamse' I 3'nw'Gurt‘ . bier" ,. j Typist"-_-Pat’1ngrahm ‘ -' Macmmarr'ie The staff meeting is every Monday at.3 PM‘- in Thgg§g§fs office, fourth floor Main, ' 'East‘end. ‘ ~‘j I A sincere thankyou ' ‘and a helluva lot of . gratitude \to : Ann Maureen George ' J . ' Jan : Richard ’Pat / ‘ ‘Kevin ' Phillip for all the work they I ' did on this week's » - ' issue. hers -_ DerivinBanis-“r 4 "‘ Todd MacLaughlan "Richard Lee in this publication, please, consider that they are‘ - Letters git-Opinions To the Editor: The following is a letter in response to the Personnel Board's rebuttal in the 5th issue, 11th volume of the SIN. 'I'here is a section in the SUN Whid’l is entitled "letters and Qainions". This is where any student " of UPEI is allowed to ' voice an opinion or H"beef" to the happenings around made openly to therest of the student body. Opinims expressed in this manner can harbour some resentment anongst certain individuals without ' meaning to. myself to write to the SUN (previous issue) express my opinion with ations by the Personnel ‘ 'Board. This opinion was purely intended to tell " the-student body that a parti ar function, thei. Personnel Boardinwas not, neant to single out and board.’ I » - , As a result of the which were sent to the editor regarding this I was not the only who felt this way. ‘ If I took it regard to recent recomen’de properly run*\ but was not ~ ~ . abuse any menber of this I; I ' creased nunber of letters situation, this proved that these students ‘allr wrote concerning the sane matter, then sonethjng must be wrcng. ’ In the past Septenber issues of the SUN, letters to the editor (if there were any) never ‘dealt with any specific function on campus. With recent ' attention all turned to- ward the Personnel Board, maybe the Student Union Executive will clearly , analyze the situation and deal. accordingly. If the executive reaches- an agreement regarding the P.'B. ,even if revisions do not occur, I would ask if their deCisicn- be made public to the student body. Very few, if any, ofthe student. body attend the open councilrreetings, so this is I." ask of the council ‘serVe the student regarding this i . Sincerely, / e ’ “Patti .Brgdlsy _mei.eit., Letters to . the Editor cont’dgpihgaf ~ r