""5-i'r` ill Inf' -1 also -1 ......- ’ :Si - "1" TU»sDAY -» Sllllrell-te Court reslimhd its ees- ‘P alone yesterday morning at eleven °'¢l0¢k. when _the case of the King Z. Geor E. Lod J d 0 . or rea ng, 'uterine md stealing iron". the store “I-1111s F of Morris 5 Fyfe. Stanley Bridge, on "In list September, 1910, was brought muluw - ment and th V h~ I d- when F - - e s oems we ave .a . . r. “km¢° vwlent wld' While the gift" we oller is of lady °'_i"¢“mm°°uy' P°|P"‘“‘ ‘°dlR‘r:'?eMr. Smith accepted the call.- on. The jury was empanelled as fol- meh u lows: Edmund Toomhs (foreman), The” Robert Palmer, win. Auld, John Mr- breathing Guigan, Wm. McKinlev, Frank Cur- aceompn rle, Owen King, Wm. McLeod, Ed- rnn¢y_nnl mund Carr, Alex. Campbell, George . l Gorveatte, John Larkins. mm “N The Attorne -General s k b ‘eil The” Y P00 l’l y pointing out the inet that the prison- Pneumon era had been sean shortly before the lust as robbery with no parcels going in the vqnrnny direction or M me a Fyi ' sto ' o e s ie. Next evening they were seen with and em” bundles. The clothing found on them Mm- G e s ore e prisoners wlneh en if innocent, had not attempted to ex- mom, plain where they had procured the ning of goods; neither had they challenged very eas'l Mr. Morris' statement in Suinmerside I was un that the boots, underwear, etc., beard .found on their persons was that however taken from their store. He said the W00\il'11 circumstantial evidence in this case l18