=
      wse
      =
      se
     
    
   
   
    
     
      &
      @!
      S42
      4
      SS
      BSABASL
      GH
      SES
      FF
      SY
      OFF
      BLT
      ee
      SS
      SF
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
      Webster
      in
      court
     
     
      by
      Chris
      McCarron
     
    
   
   
    
     
      On
      Jan
      9/92,
      UPEI
      Professor
      Gary
      Webster,
      was
      back
     
     
      in
      court
      appealing
      his
      drug
      trafficking
      conviction.
     
     
      Courtroom
      |
      was
      open
      to
      the
      public
      and
      the
      trial
      took
     
     
      place
      all
      morning
      and
      after
      the
      lunch
      break
      continued
     
    
   
   
    
     
      until
      2:30.
     
    
   
   
    
     
      In
      this
      portion
      of
      the
      trial
      the
      prosecution
      was
      stating
     
     
      its
      ‘‘case’’
      against
      Mr.
      Webster.
      Mr.
      Webster’s
     
     
      lawyer,
      Mr.
      MacDougall
      was
      allowed
      to
      cross
      exam-
     
     
      ine
      the
      crown
      witnesses
      but
      Mr.
      Webster
      will
      not
      take
     
    
   
   
    
     
      the
      stand
      until
      April.
     
    
   
   
    
     
      Mr.
      MacDougall
      questions
      the
      validity
      of
      the
      first
     
     
      crown
      witness.
      The
      first
      witness
      described
      smoking
     
     
      grass
      with
      the
      accused.
      Mr.
      MacDougall
      asked
      the
     
     
      witness
      to
      give
      specific
      details
      and
      to
      describe
      the
     
     
      very
      first
      time
      he
      had
      smoked
      grass.
      The
      witness
     
     
      said
      he
      could
      not
      remember
      because
      of
      his
      memory
     
     
      loss
      due
      to
      continual
      use
      of
      grass.
      Mr.
      MacDougall
     
     
      rested
      after
      scoring
      this
      point.
     
    
   
   
    
     
      The
      second
      crown
      witness
      was
      a
      former
      acquaintance
     
     
      of
      the
      accused
      who
      is
      now
      a
      salesman.
      Defence
     
     
      lawyer
      Mr.
      MacDougall
      tried
      to
      accuse
      the
      second
     
     
      witness
      of
      sharing
      his
      own
      drugs
      with
      young
      children.
     
     
      He
      accused
      the
      witness
      of
      lying
      to
      the
      police
      in
      the
     
     
      hopes
      of
      saving
      himself.
      Mr.
      MacDougall
      then
      got
     
     
      quite
      emotional
      when
      he
      yelled
      out
      ‘*my
      client
      is
     
     
      facing
      life
      imprisonment
      for
      these
      allegations’’.
     
    
   
   
    
     
      The
      third
      crown
      witness
      was
      an
      RCMP
      drug
      enforce-
     
     
      ment
      officer.
      His
      role
      was
      to
      be
      known
      as
      the
      drug
     
     
      expert.
      He
      gave
      some
      information
      about
      the
      drugs
     
     
      being
      talked
      about
      in
      this
      case
      but
      he
      didn’t
      talk
      about
     
     
      any
      persons
      and
      he
      was
      not
      testifying
      for
      any
      signifi-
     
     
      cant
      amount
      of
      time.
     
    
   
   
    
     
      Thus
      ended
      the
      crown’s
      case
      against
      the
      accused.
     
     
      Judge
      Gerald
      Fitzgerald
      then
      adjourned
      the
      court
      until
     
     
      13th
      of
      April
      at
      10
      am.
     
    
   
   
    
     
      This
      will
      be
      when
      the
      accused,
      Mr.
      Webster,
      will
      be
     
     
      able
      to
      defend
      himself.
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
      oma
     
     
      +
      Pr
     
    
   
   
    
     
        
     
    
   
   
    
     
      IDGE
     
    
   
   
    
     
      by
      Mike
      Goshko
      and
      Rob
      E.
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
      Unfortunately
      for
      the
      Zo
      ons,
      Meir
     
     
      full-scale
      INVASION
      of”
      Carth
      hap
      pened
     
    
   
   
    
     
      to
      coincide
      with
      the
      Whippel
      Frisbee
      Contest
     
    
   
   
    
     
      (
      CONTINUED
      FROM
      PAGE
      21
      )
     
    
   
   
    
     
      constitutes
      as
      proof
      that
      the
      university
      environment
      is
     
     
      alienating
      to
      women
      (in
      the
      manner
      that
      Women’s
     
     
      Studies
      courses
      are
      alienating
      to
      men).
     
     
      |
     
     
      Affirmative
      action
      is
      a
      case
      where
      the
      ends
      (which
     
     
      may
      not
      always
      turn
      out
      the
      way
      they
      are
      supposed
      to)
     
     
      are
      used
      to
      justify
      immoral
      means
      (anyone
      who
      cannot
     
     
      make
      the
      distinction
      between
      the
      means
      and
      the
      ends"
     
     
      in
      this
      case
      exhibits
      the
      intelligence
      ofa
      walnut).
      As
     
     
      such,
      with
      the
      problems
      affiliated
      with
      affirmative
      —
     
     
      action,
      and
      the
      facts
      regarding
      the
      numbers
      of
      females
     
     
      being
      hired
      onto
      university
      faculties,
      we
      strongly
     
     
      recommend
      that
      those
      on
      the
      UPEI
      faculty
      who
      are
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
     
       
     
     
       
     
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
       
     
    
   
   
    
     
      UPEI
      X-P
      RESS
     
    
   
   
    
     
      January
      23,
      1992