THEVUPE'I _SUN, Thursday, November 15,: 1979’, page 1: 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
          
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     ed Hora I  "  
     
     . '~ 2 a p "The UPEI‘SUN is amber “De’ac'iine' fox-all .' 
     
    

    
     Hats off to-the people who organized Symposium of the Canadian University submissions is Mpndgy 
     
     '79. All their work showed through when the actual Press (CUP) with.exc1u31ve noon..‘ ' “ , 3, ' ~» 
     
     event took place, and everything seemed to go without national advertising'v_' I The staff meeting is 
     
     a. hitch. . ‘ , rights held by Ymrthstream, every Monday at ‘7 PM 
     
    

    
     Watching Symposium '79 was a pleasure because every * 310 Davenport Road, ’ 'in The SUN'B office. 
     
     event had value. First came the lecture from Dr. ' Toronto, ont§r10.' ~ fourth floor Main, 
     
     Leslie Harris which suggested what a university The UPEI SUN aims to East ends 3; ' 
     
    

    
     Should be, and set the stage for things to come. 7 .be';E‘E;aE§;;aént. ~ V A sincere.thank you . 
     
     That was followed the next morning by entertaining r ‘ . ‘nhubpaper published and‘ a helluva lot.9f , 
     
     and thought provoking speeches from a panel of _ \, weekly thrOushout the ‘ gratitude to: ' ' he 
     
     students. The afternoon agenda featured a panel of . academic year by the: w ‘ ANN HlGPON. 
     
    

    
     faculty and community people, and they, too, handled UPEI Student union, 'MAUREEN HARTMAN 
     
     themselves well. ~Scheduled around the panels were Printed by the Journfii_f gAUREEN MURRAY 
     
     question periods and discussion groups in which Pionéer in Sumn;;;§§;‘;nd v ALERIE WALKER 
     
     Symposium spectators got involved. The final step 333E;Eshtéd throughout ' LAUCHLAN MACQUARRIE 
     
     was the presentation of resolutions from the discussion the campus. . CLAIR ROBERTSON 
     
     groups. 5 . Contents are the SE? ifiggfiaAM 
     
    

    
     The entire Symp031um was a success and so were each ' responsibility of the - KEVIN GAUTHIER ’ 
     
     of the events in it. Why? Partly the success was editor.. opinions are DEfiWIN BANKS 
     
     because of good organization, but more importantly, those of the Persons ,* TODD MACLAUGHLAN 
     
     it was because of good attendance. Students, faculty, . expressing them. All RICHARD LEE 
     
     and various administrative personnel attended _ letters and articles‘ ‘ PATRICK KELLY 
     
     Symposium '79. Their presence and their participation imust be signed even ,for all the work the 
     
     made it a time of lively discussion, deep thought and 'if the hafié is £0 be' ~:did on this veek's .y' 
     
     shared ideas. The result was that no one present \ 'withheld from Publication_ .1ssueg‘ up ' 7 
     
     thought the day was a waste. * V a , ‘7 _ l . / 
     
    

    
     So the Symposium was a success, you're thinking, , _ _".-lgglt9r;' John 5‘ Catrns . 
     
     but what results will it achieve? That is a difficult " ’ ShotosrsphetsrésDerWln Banks »- 
     
     question to answer, yet at least the Symposium (i , r \ A . T?dd MaCLaughlan: 
     
     resolutions are on record for posterity. They may ‘/ ,7 rRlcpard Le? ~’ -- 
     
     mean nothing immediately, but in the long run some AdvertiSing Manager — KeVianaUthier 
     
     of them may bring change. In addition, the Symposium 'TYPiSt - Pat Ingraham ' 
     
     certainly told some students why they are at university, *x' 'P??°f%SEE§5-La22}an MacQuarrie 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     and doing that was the reason it was all organized. I _ 7 
     
     Even if students didn't learn why they are here, ' ' ' 
     
     however, they were still exposed to limitless 
     
    

    
     theory about what a university is supposed to do. 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
        
     
       
     
        
     
        
     
    
   
   
    
     This week's letters;) 
     
     are continued on page 6 \\ 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     The Symposium was able to educate in a way both ’,_5§\__W 
     
     more unique and more profound than the ordinary -===:;:t;$;} 
     
     .£:::“;’_:::; , 
     
    
   
   
    
     Classroom experience. 
     
     To conclude my comments I've got one criticism and one: 
     
    
   
   
    
     one last compliment. The criticism is for residence 
     
     students for not attending in the numbers they might 
     
     have. The compliment goes again to the Symposium 
     
     organizers, and because I think they deserve so 
     
     much credit I'm going to list their names in the 
     
     newspaper one last time. Here they are. 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
         
     
    
   
   
    
     Rory Beck Dan LeClair 
     
    

    
     ‘Alan Buchanan Barry MacDonald 
     
    

    
     Marsha Gaudet Holly MacDonald 
     
    

    
     Larry Green Kent Osborne 
     
    

    
     Bob Kelley Joanne Peters , .a 
     
    

    
     Mark Ledwell Don Stewart ‘ 
     
    

    
     to the editor ' 
     
     Mr- Editor: interested in their dispute.. _ 7 _ 
     
     Regarding the boring Albania is NOT a burning 7%,. h, \ v ’. ‘.» V L. a” 
     
    

    
     GXChange 0f abuse between issue on the UPEI campus. A" ¢fl ' . "' 1' 1 I N. WV, , 
     
     Kate O'Connell and Kevin Disint'erested ! LEI-19‘s 1  Epfl'm. . _ 5 ' (v 
     
     Gauthier may I suggest. Student ’ _"‘V " ' ' ." '*' A J 7 \i ‘- ~‘ - 
     
     that they correspond, P.S. Who can tell?...It " ' 
     
     one to another, inasmuch might be the Start of a 
     
     as nobody else seems ’ romance_..... .' 
     
    
   
   
    
         
     
        
     
    
   
   
    
           
     
          
     
         
     
          
     
         
     
          
     
          
     
    
   
   
    
     EDITOR'S NOTE — CORRECTION V 
     
     Several weeks ago a SUN story about the UPEI 
     
     security force included the sentence, "And, as an 
     
    

    
     added surprise, three officers are qualified 
     
     provincial police." The word "three" should have 
     
     been replaced by "these". All UPEI's security 
     
     officers are really qualified provincial police. 
     
     This particular miscue was not the fault of the 
     
     person who wrote the article. It was instead the 
     
     result of a mistake in lay—out. 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     IF YOU FIND MISTAKES j a w 
     
    

    
     in this publication, please, consider that they are 
     
     there for a purpose. we publish_something‘for 
     
     everyone, and some people are always looking 
     
    
   
   
    
     . t,f92 mistakes; ..._l; , it ,:_ a. , r r M.