J00 much on birds 
     
    
   
   
    
     It's so nice to get mail. R.B. MacLaren, long—time Natural History . 
     
     Society member from Charlottetown, sent the following letter: 
     
    

    
     "I‘m often tempted to write but rarely do. However, my feelings must 
     
     be expressed at this time. Not long ago the newsletter indicated that 
     
     too much attention was given to birds. I should have written at that time 
     
     because I do feel that birds occupy too much space in the newsletter. I'm 
     
     not against birds, far from it, but it seems to me that we should have 
     
     more about mammals and plants. Each of us has his favorite subject, mine 
     
     happens to be plants, but I should like to know more about our mammals, 
     
     especially the smaller ones, mice, voles, moles etc. 
     
    

    
     May I go back to the birds? In the last newsletter there Was one 
     
     mention of double-crested cormorants at Point Prim. Have none of our bird- 
     
     watchers crossed the Hillsborough Bridge lately? A few years ago when one 
     
     crossed the bridge it wasnatural to see two or three dozen cormorants. I'm 
     
     unable to even estimate the number one sees today. On the other hand one 
     
     sees fewer terns. Have the cormorants displaced the terns? 
     
    

    
     I should like to relate a story told me by my sister, Mrs. Alice 
     
     Poole of Lower Montague. 'Mrs. Poole lives in sight of what I would call 
     
     the inner part of Georgetown Harbour. Late in August she, her son and a 
     
     guest saw a flock of cormorants, up to maybe 400, trap a school of fish. 
     
     None of the party was able to identify the fish but they were probably 
     
     smelts with a few tinkers along. One thing for sure they were not stickle- 
     
     backs! The cormorants fed for at least 3/4 of an hour and, when they left, 
     
     many of the birds were so full they could not get airborne. There is no 
     
     question in my mind that these birds need to be controlled. 
     
    

    
     Early in the letter I mentioned that plants are high on my list of . 
     
     natural subjects. Early this summer I was fortunate enough to find a 
     
     species not previously reported in P.E.I. The name is Cardamine flexeuosis. 
     
     It is a real thrill to locate a species not previously known in the pro— 
     
     Vince. _ 
     
    

    
     Sincerely, 
     
     R.B. MacLaren 
     
    
   
   
    
     I would like to thank Bruce for taking the time and an interest in 
     
     the Island Naturalist. The newsletter has a decided bias towards birds 
     
     not because of this or past editors' preferences but because most of the 
     
     articles submitted deal with birds, and because the printing of Bird 
     
     Reports often takes up over one quarter of the newsletter. 
     
    

    
     For this issue I would like to devote the six or seven pages that?:’ 
     
     the Bird Reports would have taken up to other articles and press releases, 
     
     some local and some national. The miscellaneous reports are short and are 
     
     quite interesting this issue and so they will be included. Please continue 
     
     to send in your bird sightings. They will be invaluable to future revisions 
     
     of the field check list (all are saved) and unique sightings will be pub— 
     
     lished. 
     
    

    
     And once again I'd like to ask readers to write in and suggest articles 
     
     or send in their own. Everyone has some special interest, perhaps a fav- 
     
     ourite plant or knowledge of the natural history of an area. The newsletter 
     
     is a good place to share these things. I hope you enjoy it. 
     
    

    
     Gary Schneider 
     
    

    
     (P.S. - Our house is taking shape and we have a new mailing address 
     
     and phone number if you have something for the newsletter — RR#6, Cardigan,' 
     
     COA 1G0 838—2678).