, . . . . : ‘ ‘ ~ a . 
     
    
   
   
    
     ) 
     
    
   
   
    
     ‘versity is losing 
     
     re money each 
     
     idence (partic— 
     
     ) because of the 
     
     applicants.So 
     
     mop up these 
     
     osses? Hit the 
     
     t? we're easy to 
     
     ith and are al- 
     
     . suggestion, ‘ 
     
     monetary onesi 
     
     everyone knows 
     
     residence fees 
     
     aised another 
     
     9 third year inku 
     
     curse this most 
     
     5 another dec— 
     
     idence students 
     
     ently another in- 
     
     the following ’ 
     
     Chain reaction 
     
     tedly continue 
     
     are no resident 
     
     all. Who can 
     
     y that they can 
     
     50(single) for 
     
     - Memorial Hall? 
     
     y sane people 
     
     at. 
     
     ke to suggest a_ 
     
     mliCY that should 
     
     plicatedra long 
     
     garding the mar- 
     
     cies that the 
     
     ion‘uses toward 
     
     ces, because 
     
     usiness iSn't it: 
     
     ration sells its 
     
     rthe student, in 
     
     e services of 
     
     If my calculations 
     
     the administrat- 
     
     ave been much r~ 
     
     if they would 
     
     e residence fees 
     
     l of three years 
     
     lor double accom- 
     
     f$850 for single) 
     
     {in this instance 
     
     is of my example. 
     
     a capacity of app- 
     
     108 students. 
     
     ‘ltiply this num- 
     
     "you get a fig— 
     
     000 which is gross 
     
     he University. 
     
     ~ent situation, 
     
     5 students in 
     
     at $900 a head 
     
     figure of $49,500. 
     
     loss of $31,500 
     
     ‘this increase in 
     
     ‘fee hikes are 
     
     vCreased costs. 
     
     _his increase in 
     
     ' in itself? 
     
     ‘h is under the 
     
     that the residen- 
     
     fused to capacity 
     
     S assumption can 
     
     fl by the fact 
     
     "not get anything 
     
     W much less than 
     
     Year.So why can— 
     
     Ces‘be filled to 
     
     zksy, just keep 
     
     SXed and stop 
     
     terms Of rais- 
     
     ‘ed fees every 
     
     > all, have you 
     
     7%ney growing 
     
    
   
   
    
     ien Belliveau 
     
    
   
   
    
     THE CADRE, APRIL 3, 1973, PAGE 7 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     my: 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     .Due to the contemporary 
     
     structure of our Society, 
     
     with its values,institutions, 
     
     and so on, educational opp- 
     
     ortunity was provided for 
     
     all so far as theory is con— 
     
     cerned: however, the econ- 
     
     omics structure was (and id 
     
     such, that to maintain its- 
     
     elf, it required the dom—- 
     
     ination of a few over the 
     
     majority which contribut— 
     
     ed enormously to the inL 
     
     equality of the citizens. 
     
     Educational opportunity 
     
     was, due to its control 
     
    

    
     by economics, very great- 
     
     ly limited. 
     
    

    
     we have the rich and the 
     
     poor-one is necessary for 
     
     the other. Most men must 
     
     therefore work for the few. 
     
    
   
   
    
     'In order for the few to 
     
    
   
   
    
     maintain themselves as 
     
     sneh, it is necessary there— 
     
     fore to keep the majority, 
     
     (the ordinary worki g man) 
     
     poor and, uneducated(the 
     
     reason for this being that 
     
     an educated, enlightened 
     
     man will give the "few" 
     
     trouble by asking questions 
     
     about their state of pov- 
     
     erty and so on. This makes 
     
     it difficult for the few 
     
     (or management to maintain 
     
     control). 
     
    

    
     Whenever the mess "get 
     
     out of line", management 
     
     may resort to such tactics 
     
    
   
   
    
     ‘ ON WORKING NTAN's OPPRESSION 
     
    
   
   
    
     Stan Dalton 
     
    
   
   
    
     as l. changing the rules 
     
    

    
     so as to give the mess 
     
    

    
     less rights, 2. exert 
     
     various fbfms of pressure 
     
     to shut them up"(E.G. 
     
     making them buy their own 
     
     uniforms When before they 
     
     got them free: making them 
     
     adhere strictly to rules 
     
     which they were before all- 
     
     owed to be lax about, etc.) 
     
     All of these tactics are 
     
     designed to put pressure on 
     
     the working man to make him 
     
     keep his mouth shut. It 
     
     doesn't matter whether he 
     
     is not making enough money 
     
     to support his family pro- 
     
     perly, all that matters to 
     
     management is that it runs 
     
     smoothly. Obviously this is 
     
     inhuman in every sense. 
     
    

    
     In its stupiditv,manage- 
     
     ment fails to realize that 
     
     a happy, contented, worker 
     
     will be more efficient and 
     
     effective and will, in the 
     
     long run, enable manage- 
     
     ment to run smoothly be- 
     
     cause everyone concerned 
     
     will be able to devote 
     
     himself to his particular 
     
     function since insecurity 
     
    
   
   
    
     and fear for his family‘s 
     
     welfare is not "hanging 
     
     over his head." 
     
    

    
     Workers, how can you allow 
     
     this domination of manage- 
     
     ment to continue?