Editorial The opinions expressed in this column do not necessarily reflect those of the staff of this publication or the Student Union. us, and now’s the time when a lot of students step back, evaluate their performance, and figure out what kind of effort is required in the days to come. The university itself may be doing some re-evaluation too, and by now most magazine buffs will know why: Maclean’s maga- zine recently issued its second annual rank- ing of Canadian universities, and we were not amused. We finished (ahem) seventeenth among “primarily undergraduate universities’’ in a field of eighteen universities exam- ined, leaving us only the cold comfort of edging out that Rodney Dangerfield of the uni- versity set, the oft-ma- ligned UCCB. What ex- actly does this mean? For the moment, all it seems to be doing is adding fuel to the eternal flame of inferiority complexes on our little island, but we should ask ourselves first why, if at all, we should bother trying to compare ourselves to our Mainland counterparts and whether Such comparisons are either fair or useful. T he end of yet another semester at UPEI is creeping up on There is, to be sure, some merit in the idea of an independent, impartial rating of Canadian universities. A compilation like that in Maclean’s gives the prospective stu- dent some inkling of the educational choices in this country, all at a glance and for $2.50. It’s the ‘‘ata glance’’ aspect that is worrisome, though, because it risks creating a university’s reputa tion within a arrow definition and may affect how objectively some stu- dents look at certain schools. In short, it risks labelling our Schools in one way or another , which can be hurtful to Universities and misleading for students -- if they don’t look beyond those labels. No study, not even in Maclean’s, should be taken as gospel. Perhaps a more important point is whether an institution like UPEI should be judged within such a far-ranging study as this. For the geographically challenged who may not have realized it, this place is sitting smack-dab in the middle of a small Atlantic island. The university’s chief mandate, as Maclean’s acknowledges, is to serve the Island population, and about ninety percent of our enrolment is drawn, from the PEI popu- lation. It’s a comparatively small community to draw from, and it’s only natural then that we be a comparatively small university within it. We simply can’t match the enrolment, facili- ties, and funding of universi- ties within larger centers since we neither have nor need the access to those -kinds of resources. UPEI is well-suited to meet- ing the needs of PEI, and more than a few out-of-province stu- dents also find our services satisfac- tory. While we may not be king of the ‘‘prima- rily under- graduate universi- ties’’, the subgroup in which UPEI was judged, we can take comfort not only in our unique situation as an island university but also in being a small university of the types largely typical in this category of schools. We can see some of the advantages of small scale in © Sackville’s Mount Allison University, which finished first in our subgroup of primarily undergrad institutions. Some of the benefits of small universities mentioned in Mount A’s favor are applicable here to some degree as well, including the comfort of smaller classes and the opportunity for undergrads to be taught by and have more one-on-one contact with pro fes- sors personally. Small universities like ours can be a lot more human, and consequently a healthier and happier place to develop academically even if we aren’t top-heavy with PhD’s onstaff. A university is above alla place to grow, and at UPEI you have lots of space to do it in. Sean McQuaid, Editor-in-Chief