g M. Martin, Barrister. l'el>1‘98Q.11l.111B,9 the Continuing Presbyterianei .**;g'.i “...-wt I'll" ,, 5 promo bourl ’§::_§i::.';'.‘;°.§$ii2: . . - -——- Before or during m‘ page’ " n li ‘ l ‘ viltadrowa. v1" "l"! 111111vaut provi l f “or 1 i°°“"““°d _ o eL-‘lllilf. “million. p gg 1;; '1111-111¢u1>ns (81310 111.1919 o1 1 ‘mehdmentl and additions, if any, No. 2s. ne Vauey. “mp whpcfh the Amending Act of de to this Act in or-‘No. Zib-Brooliileld. ‘lmld be :1 ‘an equitable adjust- No. 21.--l-lartsr11le. ' "l Nmwllhstailuing anything d°r:$h‘:1‘ndiai'ision'of the congreslr‘ 0119 81111110011911 V" “lmmmml” herambewr‘ “ml-"llled- Where i11 figs“ properties concerned." 1y rejected, .1182 Ne. 2. Lot 14, 101‘ w’ °°'“"""11.1v. the entry iato Unl- _ t i d i] 0n or non-entr i to Pursuant to said Act m: Com nllllelliili/l-lllt 1v ‘ma, 21:11“; v3: congregation o1 cznggiéh-tpqg: hi3 ' ‘ alleged‘ “"°“°'§,,‘;§§f|,,§§”°‘f:§d "hllfifisg: under ‘ e United Church of 1°“ 11 11111101111’ ‘$1311 of Canada. andthe-C l 11* l l AMWL‘ q“°'tl°“ m” “m” c“ P esbyterlans. and they p Mn Jpadmss Pagmpr. ‘Elli-- h thi , omm ss oaer. fit. 192s it rm made-toevvqilr W m, Legislatllrfi that the power! 11 61f I011 to decide. l p. Mills following cases no two duties of the co iuiun were-lie. p, , , z r:::::i:'i..f::.1; ‘;.¢l‘....*:..-1-‘ §Qi-1?i1'*‘151'““"'“° 01110-10 function! -'~ ' ‘ b “The amelldllllllll 1492a “ma!” %il1illilr'§iiiiirlr“lrfr’ rstauhope. . ~ re-‘ id “the;“bills?!iltngdlllllzlfigilegclilillst-,Ne. ‘lei-Long River or ‘-. 1 .~ l l, Lillssglasubsbiltlqlli (a)_ to (111) 111 excepplglglazf ‘p0 p: to up, cepmpery ‘ property here ua er re erre .0. The.“ewnseilionsfilrlgpilgilglls h: 1n the cases next mentioned set. Commmouera i‘: i under the Act tlement. was arrived. at by counsel hlullilblliendgglllil-e: elhat Mr Palmer and approved by all the Commis- o . _' _ 1 ‘ shall be the Chairman of the (am ganglion,“ Ewen . "'““‘°“' ""4 ‘my "m mm- 11:110. r1 -—South Granville. than!“ should conatlfuwdghquthlillodll' Ill 1.119 Chile 01 Clyde River. tlin “A llzyaixlcllalibllildlgtbllxcurrgd aulllagreelnent in writing as set forill ' I having been illled the Commission’. as ilnnlly constituted ccusisltid 01. three ..- 911111011- V": H‘ J2me’ h 't lid conditions thereof an Palms" K16" chairmanl Keane“! ‘rdelflbrlxillis Cour-twill be made mi vestingitlleprollerlty affected ac- _- - ' ‘t; oding y. Plum? rljfiiiltagdnllailurfihc I llffitlneélailljn- c llr-the cash of Soilth Granville an lllllibllllh proceeded with its work up ‘licstlon was inado by the Coli- and with the aid of legal _ " (lcalt with all the cases submitted to it, examined many witnesses. ‘viva voce and on the 11th day _of December, .1926, submitted three sev-lzrul roporis in writing setting and Geddio 1° by this Court and effect will he C claiming alriilterest in the Manse situate at Brsdalbaile. Bradalbanc, Rose Valley and South Granville, as Presbyterian congregations, had formerly. composed one charge. forth ihc ilnilinlz. 11001611111011 or Rose Valley "and llradalbailc cou- nwurd of cuch Commissioner scp- gregations voted Union and South ‘which; Eat-h rcport deult with all Glunville against Union. thc cases submitted to the Com- ' T1116 9-11111109-11011 Walidfol‘ a oile- mlifliglllll the hearing before this Mr. Whitehead, counsel for the Court it was expressly agreed by United congregations of Rose Vul- counsel representing respectively ley and Brsdslbane, recognized the three has lull ownership or powcr oi‘ dis- ipp ih-eshyiei-ians that ho Qxcepflui] dertook -that the sum of $801) would should be taken to the validi-ty oi’ be 1111111 therefor Within cam . the-jurisdiction of the Commis- 6 Pelflbuubly convenient church-or meeting-house in which to wor. 8:111). arid where by a proper m“ “on”. agreed upon a hm]. s on or allocation of church proper. d consequently no action can 110B 01‘ 111011611)’ in such locality 01 _ -hy~ this Court in respect 01111111101111)’ Buch minority can be " Provided with all existing church 11161111111-110111111. and other ' P1011611)’ without depriving the ma. 10111)’ of a reasonably convenient chllrch m‘ meelllllbhouse in which a’ 1111811811112 with their use case the Culnmissi _ mine slid order lltlllnllllllllyllldiltleifll manner slich church proppt-tigg m- 910110111’ shall be ullocniell so as to render substantial justice, hriv. lug regard to all thc cquitieh voted inlllurlzult to cousiilvi" by what priii- ciplcs K111111111 l0 lllcil" stivcriil conclusions. ject the owhership and ddmlnant I . use of the same property "in tho the bearing four ‘"1161’ 8101111- ' 5T8 i Kroup, whether con- "1118 0r non-concurring, without church worship and other church p.m_ thcn and iu every such (K) Where any property is hold by or ill trust for or to the use oi “V” 01' mule ‘Jillll-‘Hulatiolis out of m‘ n peduh A pemup h; cophnhed the same purciil church r ' ‘ common purpose llll(l mic Ill‘ lilorel elven thereto. Upon fulfilment of Such congregations ollicrcll lhc 1'11- for nn y 611 Church. untl cite or morchavc not ' to enter lilo United hurch, the (Jonnnissiou mav hp. Dortlon or olllerwjsc llenl with ihpi use of such property so hi; u, run,- tlor substantial juslicc, having m. . . . "ltoalltlic - ii-~ - till in Presbyterian congleguilon 15"" _. tqu l cs. and mo) _, _ g lnukc such orilcl" with rcsilcct lhci'c.-""H"‘ltm" “a pa“ of the to as it may llocm proper. As to tllc first qncslion. viz: What properly was subject‘ to a1. Imam)“ by [he Cumlmslsoll’ ‘ll l“ its property with it. Tho Metilodistlcllllrfll congrcgaitlmis all acquiesced in 111011111110 l" 113V" 1110 $111110 P1111115 phiulgod pphnh)“ of their properlylthe- use of 1111113100035 to lllc comcq “s “hi hmpy of we presbytel-iuiip-telfi’ lit West llivcr as they l'i)i‘lll('.l‘- i-oogrlegaiions. Some of the latterhly enjoyed phi] Church Union. lilo (lomiiiissioilcdws \\‘i.'l‘(‘ The learned (lhuiriiulil thus iluilil- ‘mm shape p‘ the Manse propel-up es his uililcrstaiulllig of what pro- perly ‘was brought undcr ilic juris- diction of the Comnlissioir “in my opinjoil," hc s t is l fl l I m C l i n mumps hue‘. “pal settlanheut. M‘; posul over any mngrcgzilioluil pro- glgllillgsalbne (tallato ttaogllmls- Mc-Kluuomioi- the congregation 111' Pa“ l" ""1"" l" lbs"! "w (‘um- sioners had reported severally and 5011111 01811111110. 1111111911 l0 11000111 not jointly. . Thhhowei-g-hhd duties or thhhproved the settlement, which the gum-t hm ihh _ Bet (oi-iii ih the Court coniirins and fixes the time misslonis uuihilriiy to illloruiir. Tllv the offer and the Commission 1111' amlmflll’ l" 311110101)’ 11ml cviilcnt- ly established with ihe intention of relieving lhc hardship ol‘ thc Ari Statute of 1925, sub-section (Bl: lot "final settlement” as the date oi‘ 111 111V"? 01 11111101111’ groups and rum-- ally finding, declaration or swarm. 159011 Payment 01 1110 911111 51"“ shall of its own motion’ submit the of $800. ‘as agreed. 1116 0011810811‘ same for the consideration of the 110118 01 R0118 V6116)’ 61111 1311111111" Court of Appeal in Equity of this bane will on application therefor be Province, which Court shall in thisellllllfid l0 1111 011101‘ °1 "115 0°11" behalf have all the powers, execu-l tive or otherwise. of its Courts of title t0 the said Manse 9101161111111 b original jurisdiction, and the .saidl1l1l'l11161109 <11 the 5111111111- Court upon‘ such application, shall _ _ _ ‘ 811111111116 the Bald 1111111115. declsra Cemetgrlgg, yented dby Ltfllfllilflll-llllilll I of itspip ‘heir findings mp intention pmhtion and a Cllélffih building and plll-_ Schedule 5 “on m. award, and may examine I V p ormel enoin nut ouil _ status» Olleffe(:[ m- the Statute as h, the phppsonage of he fclmer Methodist the evidence, documents, and state- The aDDll°5ll°“s— ‘ ownership I" my 01mm“ ‘l ‘vmllllpei-ty which it brought under the 9111157955-7-1011- » N°' 5' “Nth T"Y°" men-is upon which the same wasNo. 20.—Olifton. based, nod may vary or alter tbc N0. Zlr-LORS Rlvel‘ said finding, declaration or award Memorial. 111111 as seems just and equitable, or may NO- 22-—-T'l11l1l01‘ Rive!‘- cd or varied or altered, as thiahcaseeii of _t1l_i_,(0_ll9WB:-.- 1111114311. shall. be made, ‘or included in a decree of the said Court of Ap- sud submitted to ‘the Commissions. i111"- COIIKPG-lfililolis. golui.’ 11110 lilo-iii“, Sh"... pruperiy locality, chilrch buildings oi‘ same present denominational status‘ , - . _ are so closely situate as m fldmwLillllpllllllfifl of and its clear lnten of the use of one only of them bv the vesting in paid congregations the the former occupants of both, the allocation of the other. which pro- ably might be the least desirable strangers 9 nfludl firh-"iicsiiiéfif - and/llemart Nourishing Bread There naagoln ' l K firmilrfyfd bake provided the flour from which it ls mp4s - kilns: Irena auality of wink. EGAL FLOUR. had IGIpofl-Qii n: g! calorific you . I ‘tamarind n Iii-l»..- y riutritieus lozf o‘ bread ‘any oi‘ the negotiating ' and the recipients thereof and oth awards oh the Commission as have; ean con rmed by this Court, butl- reserving power to amend the same’ o u o in the description of the property ' erwise as may_be deeemed neces- ‘sary to give effect to the fruel. meaning and effect‘ of the said Stat- utes and the findings, declarations 6-11 uni» aim semi-v Ima- and awards of the said Commis- ‘dmfifl’ '5""“7“""“"""' 1111m- . ' . _CARTER'S'PILI.S |should be confirmed and the pro- pperly in question vested according- 0a behalf of the Congregation lily‘ I The United Church of Canada 8t,- . Clyde River, we agree to transfer; and hand over to Trustees repre -i seating the non-concurring minori- _ ty M ‘he 1mm" Prfibyl-erlll" 09"‘? This ‘is an application of tile non- grrgiglyltrgiizlltumcytil: htivgr tor-me; cobturrifli; members ‘of the Pres- pmds Bppurtenantrah “t “g ‘i: byterlan ‘Church the former ‘topowm ' °'°_°- °n ° Presbyterian Church and mnnse in . l; conditions, viz. _ Kenpmglmp 'prg'spxgll_iame “Ztllgdqmlkcpilllsglrlgfi The property subject to the con- cmms which they ma have m any ll‘0l of the ‘0011111118151011 consisted other Church proper; up the Com oi‘ the former Presbyterian Church gregauo“ of‘ west River d C] do and manse and the former Metho- ‘River a“ y dist church and parsonage. ' _ _ i The cllalrlilail of the Comlnlssion l plispzéllffinthgoizlllfl N°""""“'“""‘g found that the former Presbym-r- ' ' gwgmlm‘ “mm M‘ inn Church should be allocated to - “A” m" j Clyde River Apollo-r (No. 1.) . l v . S, hedule 3 No. 5. Kensington ‘:l‘l[u‘l Chm-ch of Canada Act" ugjfillllle and pay any indebtedness ‘of h _ N _, _ , l nnicnded provided that subject tiivtlllllllld! r i t u 1 N‘ on Lonumlng Helbywndua certain cxcciltions all property res ' 111-1’ ll 01' rellu rs o ie iorse p h l h I and personal within the Provincelfilleil =11 Clydc River Church. c u” “gm ‘er w m belonging to or held in trust for or 3- lo tho use of any congregation ofiberli 01' 1110 churches , Presbyterian fromer congregation for the “pd that llle former Methodist the parse;- Ia-ge and the lnanse should be allo- cated to t-ho Unionists. This find- ing was concurred in by Commis- rllolzel" Martin. That the United Church mem- formcr Clydc River Congregation shall‘ Arr-arm's“ datc of filing hereof grant s vesting" ‘m’ -' 1 order in accordance with such re-1l Si spective llndings declarations or! / - Q Gal-hr’: 1.181s Liver Ila ‘ \ i of pdson “W12.- mgfvr lhzvarandoctofs rsl|()\l‘(l pp hehh used and udmipisflcoiltinue to hiivc the same rights, ‘lPYULl- for the benefit of such con- 1° “l” "i"! 01' 11ml ‘"0055 10 Upped ceinctcry at Clydc River," as they [Fhurl-h. but it was open to every formerly 0111014111 11010101110 11010011 lsliCll congregation, by menus lndi- Clllllfi-‘ll 111110"- cnlctl by tllc Statntepto vote itself 4- T111" 1111.- N1m_-c1lli1=ui'l'ilii= pm m- ihp Uphed Church hpd tuke|lll8lllll8fs of tho West River United‘ llltllc Schedule 4 ln my opinion lhc finding oi‘ thc, onrnlissloil ‘should be _lln<i the properties in question vcsi- od accordingly. coilfirnicd voted themselves ,_ (fliurch and regained their ancient ipropcrty status us if the Church iiTuion Acts, icllcrnl and provincial. But all ‘ihc hictliodist congregational pro- the Unionist had iicvcr bccn passed. l|)1.‘l'l_\' und -lh-.tt of been ilroiigllt into the i('lllll‘(‘.ll by the Proflncial Statute of 15125 and having remained there, is subject to be dealt with by the ‘Foninlissioil which takes its origin Land powers from the same Statute. ,lt was this Statute which gave rise ‘to the hardships and inequalities tion is to provide as adequate a the circum- ircluedy therefor as [stances would allow. ‘ ln my opinion the chairman of the Commission and Mr. Martin to the minority, should not be pre- correctly interpreted and followed d‘ G dd! 1152135312125‘ itli-ilel‘ flhlllllrlllllllli”control of the Commission for allot- hp ‘ 9 g .. . > urmcr r 0 lili IS , _ _ coilgregationul i)i‘(li)l‘.l'l)', in shod-mm“ ‘that the Mcilioilisl. confirm the same, and such llndlug. solar as they related to the acceslfwele 0°11$l1'"01l1’0ll' lleclaruiion or award as so conllrm- and use of Cemeteries are dispos- As to ihc sci-om] question upon pesl in EqultyQ-which decree shall lnemorandumin "respect of all ap- ""1"" 01 11")’ 111111161‘ 110111101 Migrant) or gcilerally to o. joint or be final and conclusive on all per- plications from minorities as to B11011 Presbyterian or lllctiloilist l“)n'icol“nlon use with divided respopsi. sons in any manner interested, and right of use‘ and access to Ceme- 619551-1005 0W1‘ 111011‘ 10111101’ i"'°‘1bility as to maintenance and care, said proved and ordered as follows:— ner as any othlh- decree of All present plot holders shall‘ Court, and shall vest the title-or 1. shall be enforced in the same man- tel-lee, which the Commission ap-i P0111’- ln return they arc given use of such property as it shall pur- have the same use and access as 0056B 11111111101161 1110119111’? port to deal with in accordance heretofore irrespective of the pro- wlth the terms of the said decree, visions of The United Church of notwithstanding anything to the Canada Act. contrary contained in the said 2. And Commissioner Martin says: "The only possible reason for en- l again refer to the reports of the c°ulr°l l" Unllell Clinch _°°ll5"°'lCllali‘n1ail and Commissioners. gations over the some and ill some; ' The. Chairman and Commissioner iMartln for the reasons which they ‘have set out st length in their re- ifllllllftlVe reports, both reach the 3911119111 01 1119 Pl'°"l"¢‘l"l Ulllledk-oiitvlusioil that the wopdlng of the Each member of the majori-icllulcll A01 W68 l0 011901 1119 "lllflnstzttutc precludes them from divid- "The United Church of Canada iy or minority congregations shall 161‘ l0 1119 111111611 1311111611 0i Cull-Hing the use of ally church or meet- Act" ihave equal rights as to purchase ofidfl 1°? wllfllellilllflillll lilllilp Clllilcllliig-liolise: 1. P68 DPODGHY Will ll lie 1'01’ llCU-B t] r y uh] apply thig 3,5 g, ggii- p . a ‘or to establish ill such church dis-infill; ,‘§.’,,,L.{’y,_ii is in (act the Qnly they 5111111111111161-11811‘ 16111118111011 111 Ne. 9110. Hampton and Bonshaw "The said Commission may siib- and access to plots whether mit to the Court and the said ready purchased or to be purchas- Court lilay review any single mat- ed. .ter of enquiry or several or all oh 3. tho matters of ourilliry together. whether concurring or ilonconcur- "lt professed to di-sl with and and us many decrees may be mlulo ring. may hhvc a vole‘, h, {he man: slter the title oi‘ Methodist i-oilgrv- us’ to the Court may seem meet." lflflfilllfillt- of a cemetery, a commit- 8011011111 I11 4 Phc Commission reported that’ tee of ‘management. shall be uirllylbflflll- T110121 l8 110 V1111 "l ‘lldhvcll. they had received in all twenty- pointed on which‘ thc minority in A01 111111 1111011’! 611.1’ illllulilull“ l" sovcn applications for relief ideuti- either case ‘shall have rcpresenta- Y0 11611 by nulnc-s and serial nunlhcrd tlou. ' ‘ l6 as hereunder, namely: 4. A separate account of uii disposal of the Leglslniilrt- ll“ l-"slllllulflfllfillllt funds subscribed for. or collected Presbyterian 11101191115" hu- -_..——Lot 1 for plots, or for ‘the upkeep ofscem-- , p l\o. .l,—Alberton, , 019g}! hhaii he hep; and miy “whey; er Bentley held that “illc illcliuulls:;,,g,-Q,.,,|,i.,, l N0- 4.~West Pbint,‘ ' ‘ how on hand or hep-ppm“ m he cpl. congregation by coloring lhc ifluloili No. fh-Kensingtoh, lected m- flubacrlbud gm- thu puf- stood to lose no properly 111‘ 111' l N111 ‘Fr-Freetown. p033, shhii he used only for camp. perty rights Wlllfill ii iii-hi hold ho. 7.—Cly_do River, ' "tel-y pni-poheii, the Union, but it rcliliiii-il all hi1. h,_-'rrymi, _. The cmnmittcil oi’ manage- M '-'- 101111 Nu- lih-rlluullltou 1111111110111. shall Drepuro and submit to vested lll it illrcctly or |li'lil b,1"i'oi' b)’ no)’ 1111111-r1ty sroun—tuc1uu- Boilshuw. tho respective Sessions of the con- 11111110011 101‘ 11-‘1 1101112117‘ Nv- 1l".—Bradalbano and Rose Vul-gregstlons represented on it an an- T110 01111111111111 ""11 17“"""l““l""""‘ v ‘I015 "‘ nual statement covering the Ceme-‘Murtln ill piirsliniu-c of tlii-ir lolcrqous groups coilccrncil tllore is noi. kvll- lzr-SOIJUI Granville, tery account; imretation of filo Stiliiltc lizivvi 1N0. 13,—Ncrth Rustlco and . New The order of the Commission is agreed in n irumbt-i‘ of crows iu ul-u-ill as ivcultl luau them voluntarily .-l"B°“'- unanimous and under ‘the terms of 1011115 former Methodist. or roost-rod agree lll all prvlwi" cases upou N214" 1111111111111. the 29th Section of "The United Presbyterian D1‘0l101‘1l' 11> <=11111"1"‘ No. 15.— oust Stewart, Church of Canada Act" operates 111E Presbyterlsns in the w cs No. 16.—- ontague. directly upon the pppperuep ‘mend, where if seemed to thi-ni not-lessor)‘ ' 17'“ 9"" liflrbvl‘. ed to be affected thereby. in regard l0 Annandale, with n the said Statute but not cov- parties. Commissioner Bcirtlcy’ ‘m. Nll- l"-—C0ve Ilead and Stanhope eredlby this order the Court sug- the other hand. following 11b 111101"! Nu‘ lmrcmwm ‘ ' Keats legislation as the appropriate P10111110" 01 1110 510ml“- “""‘l" "ml N“ “ml-bug River and Ceddle remedy - allot to the Coniinuiuit i‘1'cub.vl1’1'1" Memorial, . in ihh remglning ch59; the chair. ans the exclusive use of any church N0 22.—Huuter'ltiver l man and Commissioner Martin 01‘ 0l111r0ll P109611!’ l" ‘lllmlllm’ l" 11:11- 23.—-'l‘ylie Valley, ' agfggd the third Cgmqiiggigngr not these cases, whether u had llocll ° ' ' or formerly - Ziw-Cardixqa, » concurring ' 25¢“? u- , These cases are:- . .. , » pio- .§--Nl161'1°11- , o. c-l-Welt ' Point, do. i-Keasington, lo. 8. reetown, lo. 8.-- yo Pr . --1-~._.___.._..__... , Piss rpmomber thht we l" the I e agents for all of pa. ALLENS 1. awmxt- v ,- ljox REMEDIES slid they have beveliqtlliidldhlijll lINvln to be the t In the world for the treatment he all ‘ Ciao ow . "Nor-Jlwefilllllleldr No. ilk-Mount Stewart. - 0 ‘initiator... will rox nrssassé If you Qva not already. "in! them. do so, new and lest lhcm an their MERITSr id the tions are- _ v for. o Uni ill-eh when! ulst- is titty-or om thepsaid fladi p . _ '- . 0a sxamlputloamtgppépg: L ‘~ m" p 9r diver-come p,’ '**"‘=='_‘”?MDN‘I - :71 on; w‘ ""°1mr§o§'11'il“ot'§§ , u ss subjeoti to - liirbnndus, Bridgetown and to all other cernete y properties 6516 distribution of tho church pro-i formerly Methodist Counsel for the contended that Mcthoflist proiwPl-l’ ‘ was not covered by the Act at uil-— that in no event could hletllodlst _ h, property be subject to allocation Oil 1N0. 9 and IOl-Hampton and Bon- 11111161011 by 1116 Cllmmlsslm“ M" r phpm _ reference 1 No. 1B.-~North Rustico and New 6111111111 =11 _ der to the effect. -. 1 By reference to ute it appears that it differs funds- lneniafly from the Statute of this Province in this respect. 1116i‘ 111° former Statute only 111111119610 “-°"‘ - gregatioas out of the same P1116111 ' ’ * ‘ church." and does not contain i116 i» “ ‘ provfbions of ss. (f) of the P. E. l- “f “quot tdtute, which are wide enousil i" eolaratioas- or aw6%' 11:2 1 " - - ‘.1 lgrhd to belonging to any 111 1116, eiotiatingwchurehes. Prior to the M the‘ statute or the Dominion of buds passed la 1024 and known 1 -§'3§-~" tinder sulssectlgiawloll ‘ ~ ii » a i‘ witliirrnl excl qivl Jurisdiction 111 no. rrovfr - '11 gard Methodist properly as hello: iho auihoritiliiri- lllilll u»! property whoihol‘ ilu- sami- wci'1'.;,i||_t- ioiir in ivliicll ii. was npplicll do so in order to iusko an i‘i[ll11' eshyterian property. United Chllrcll as made to the Ontario the decisions thereun- the Ontario Stat- de and are obviously intended, oluda all the properly 111616111. tment of The United Church of " da Act of 1925 as amended in hboth Methodist and Presby- dongrsntional property 111 ‘ viacememainsd unaffected _Tl16 Unit .0hu,rch of- 01111116 was roomy in 111 ti IN. A. Act was . w. 1111111 .. labial billets abvm as The _ _ icoulti be uo hope of success iinlessi 0n the other hand, 1Yuululuiuuulfboth imrlics were ugrecli und kept. ~ things more certain than that to while Commissioner ~ ciplluary and other trusts and lil-lpemedy which he.pl'opnsefl undel- ih ordai- thh; ti", minoi-iiypversions lll ‘said roill propcrti‘. [the Stuiulc. Al. first glance ltlooks ‘like n solvent of the most. dlillciili.1""‘l'°" lilrolili-niii ilrescuicil by iiloslscasias.’ ‘Q0611!’ 111i 1'1"?" 11" P""~“‘ b i ‘l H0111 ilol stand cxsnlinuilon; _ l u I (Flidm ii one party would“ The lhml nlllmbal‘ "1’ 11"‘ 9°1l11st Hampton. hold iiic property and have the (lo-h niiuanl right in lis llHi‘. the other would only used! when the domin-I aiii group dill iini ruqulro ii. 'l‘hcl'l' I llui in all the cases brought bc-' fnrc lhc (ionlmission there was not our in which both parties were ilgrcied lo such n divided use, and jorily lll ouch irllse opposing. ll‘ in lilo congregations or religi- SllPll a. spirit. of justice and gond- a divided use. then there are few link lhcm together by compulsion oi‘ law in tho use of one church ill which onc would have a dominant and thc (ithor a scrvient use would provide fl never-ending source of sirlfc. lt would at best be a dan- gcrolls oxllerlnlent, and its failure would only increase the mischief which the Statute was intended to remedy. ’l‘he four applications for a divid- cd use worc made by Unionist min- orltles of Continuing Presbyterian congregations in the following 0850B! No. 20.——Gllfton. No. 23.—~'l‘yne Valley, No. Z-L-Cardiganslld Lorne Val . ' ley. » No. 26.-—Lot 11.‘ . p . in each case -the Presbythrlan congregation had voted itself and its property out of-the Union. It is not necessary for‘ this Court with its limited Jurisdiction to de ermine whether such property was ubjeci Congregaiioil shall con- w’ No. 6. Freetown This ls an applicntiml by n uiin- , uriiy consisting of tllc non-concur- Um vow ‘ring members of the Presbyterian isizd.) s. s. whalohesd,‘°°"g"°g“ll°" i" Fw-“Owll 111111 lucv Fm. Clydc Rival. Upped may have ullotted to them their Church Congregation. Oil behalf of the Non-concurring we? by the Unlleil Chllrlll- _ Presbyterian Congregation of Clydc H“ property “l ‘lllesmnl “"“~‘"$l“ Rive“ we hereby accept the above or two churches, one former P1138- 0891. up the conditions attached llyterlan and one formci‘ Mclhtnliis-z. thereto‘ at a very short distance from one (SgdJ Donald McKinnen, ,‘"1°“"-‘1~ _ - Fm- tho Nhipcopcpppipg: The chairman of the 1C0llll1llSSlOl1, Presbyterian Copprmpp with the concurrence of Comrnis-i “pp m» Clyde Rive“ sinner hfnriiu found that the form- cr Presbyterian Church should he allocated l0 the llon-coilcurring Prcsbyterians and that the Metho- ‘distt Church should be allocated to the United Church. . i ‘This is a. very clear case. The The church properties considerqllmllllg 01' the ‘(301111711551011 1111011111 ed by zthe Commission for allot- be 0011111111911 61111 1111! 1111c l0 1116 ment consisted of a church build- 111011011168 1n 11116-511011 118811111 lic- ing. hull. manse and horse shed of‘001‘11l11§l1'- the former Presbyterian congrega- bcforc on Sept. 17 ,191G. - Schedule i. Case Ne. 3, Alherten. The Chairman of the Commisslonj with the concurrence of (Jommisq ‘T1115 l“ all flDpli-caitlon by‘ the mou- sloner Martin found that this pro- Concurring Plbfillytcrlair congrega- t-ongrcgutiiols‘whihh (he (imphppsipp dlvldedvvlz: perty should be allocated as fol-jtivll 0f Tryou that. the former Pres-g _ "Nthc powci- or iluiy of the Commisq ' e pmmmkm- "l m“ Am- Clelwly-siiui to itlloczlio lhc partial use of cwholo lcnor oi‘ tho Sistine (lP-iu Uh‘ll":h u, one group hupjeut ‘Option comma] on both hides prepared prives ‘the l'l‘(li1ill_\'lt’l'lii|l iliiil Mtilllililthn pwpprfihil, up“ (lmpipppt pp-e of:cllllr(:h| horse shed and hall togeib-i D _ h] m” other er with tho former Methodist par-‘Wlth the co currence of Conrnlis-I Menage, and zto the non-coilcurrlng sioner Marta found that the Mcth-, lows: _ ‘ybYléfllill ‘Church together To the United Church cougrega-grlharo in the manso at Hampton the former _ Prosbyteriairbc allocated to them. The chairman of the Colnnl-lrisioil lclrurch, and Presbyterian manse allocated to the United Church and ‘subject to the indebtedness upon the former Presbyterian church to the latter property. the non-concurring -Pre's.byterisns.‘ The said Chairman and Commis- The question of the manse was re-j sloner further found “that the Un- ferrcd to the allocation of Hump- ltcd Church congregation should be ton and Eozishaw. (rich p) p privileged to require, the former The finding of the ‘Commission Methodist Church to be removed should be confirmed and the title -from its site and placed upon the to the proper-ties in (lugst-lfln vestq ilot owned by the Non-concurring ed accordingly, I Presbyterians before the . . . . . . . ..j day of . . . . . . . . ... 1927, provided! i Schedule 6 l writing before the 15th of January.| 1927. and that tile reasonable and, This is pp application from the‘ 9x11911110 01 0111111 T0m°Val Conliuiuing Preebytcrians of Ila-inp- snd relocation shall be borno by h,“ and Bonghaw gm- tho [oi-mel- ‘the United Church congregation." p-rp-n-zhymqu-iap gilhwh and mums‘; mission. Ml‘. Bentley, made no find- Tho chairman of ‘tho floininisslon ~ . with the coilciirrencc of Com-infra. No evidence was given before hippo‘. pqapptl‘ rel-used w gram the this Court as to what action if any pmym. 0t h“, ‘lppllcuu‘u and hail been iiaken under ihc further found that mp (“hum Chump mp finding above set out and conse- jomy mm“ up, formal. hrwppym, qucntly the principal ilnillu should hm Chump m“ me same Should b“ confirmed by ‘hm Cw“ ‘mbject Ibo allocated to them, and that the l“ ‘wen moluflwum‘ ‘mly “a may manse should be allocated lo the bc necessary in case the provisions Umonpsla . contained iii the further finding ro-p The iihdilng of tho ‘Conrmissionl lilting to ‘the removal of the illeill-sppupl ‘be cOpl-irlnpd and the “he odist church are carried into effect“) we pmperples m question vepp| within a reasonable time. ied accordingly A vesting ordler should boi mode, ‘ . as and when tie special crcum- _ ,1 stuuccs in this case rcquirc. l schedm’ 7 ‘ Schedule 2. No. 4, West Point. This is an application by non-concurring minority of Presbyterian congregation for . ‘No. i3. Rustico and New Glasgowl This is rm application on behalf the Continuing Rrclsbyterians at North pppulusiico and New Glasgow request- sllocation to them of the formcri-“g that m9 Commission uuocme‘ Presbyterian church at West Pointfm the pelmlmers the mrmeryws’ The Chairman of the commlsmonlbYtfldull churches 8J1. North Rust- witb the concurrence of Commis-llc‘) M“! New - GIEWQW mgfiher sinner Martin in his report says: iwm‘ a “ha” l“ m“ mange P1099" ty at Cavendish. "The United Churchhave taken} and now occupy three ch‘hlnches‘ The chairman of the 'Comnlisslon West Point, Millburn and Bethely-wllh ‘the (‘mculrmwe 0t ‘O°m'mlS‘ leaving up other church or churchblcner Mantis declined t0 8111-1111116 property o, ‘he mippruyy Apdpapplicatloa and round thxst the Unit- he finds that the Commission shouldfiil Church 011mm 1'6"!“ m” ‘"111 order that this church be given to lW° Cllllfclles and man”- the applicants. Commissioner Mar- T110 1111114111! 1111119 9011111143510" m, conch,‘ should be oonlflrmed and the pro- This is a. case in which complete WPl-Y-in 111106110111 11001611 110001111118- justice could only be executed bylv- a tribuiial having poweffo award’ exact compensation for the proper» 3¢l1¢1111|fl 3 1y ‘affected by virtue of the Statute. Neither the Ne. i4. Mai-airfield Cthmmission nor this Court, nor bot together. can do- more than reduce the injustice to al ‘T1116 111 1111 Mllllicstion of a. min- mflfliflum in oseh case, iority ‘group consisting of Continu- to the Commission at all. 1t is eufllcient that the Commis- sion has madeta negative finding. refusing to give to any of these ap- plicants the use of the property 1n question. This‘ is not such a find- ing as this Court can vary or alter and the Statute gives us no ap- points power. If the question were open for consideration you the merits l think the findingxshould not he disturbed. The Schedules annexed marked consecutively 1 to 11 set forth the disposition wh ch in my opinion should be made of- the remainial oases. i~iwsvlrvr‘~""** ln each tame epiaslheredlhhefe: all‘ 0T Bf I I“ 0P I §’§,°',';§,,I,7,'¢'§§h ow; em on u. mitlod w a by moo-oer, reached m: 0%. to its pom-mo ioolrsloo s: to the Registrar's eonal wltbia a i-easqaable time from tbsooacur. pllcatloa mad! This ocmgregation divided on the ins‘ Presbyterians claiming the uuestioh of Chuch union, as it: had librmer Presbyiterlsn Church and s perfect right to do. It would be manse with Giobfl land and Ceme- unjnst in those who were Presby- lerlans sad will) wiished to remain so for cmseieaee lie-ire. that theft T111! W86 ‘is 8111111111) 10 ‘W661 church should be darken from them P011111- 111 11-8 180111118 1061511105 I110 by a vote cl ‘the majority and that the dnadority or the commission they should be left homeless orlrealched their conclusion by apply- have to accept s servient position in! I110 881110 llfllwllllfll- Their ‘in the house that than! ‘been their 111111111: 1s that t-he former Presby- ifmthen’: and 1t is also unjust that terinn Church of Marshilield 605%!» chose who for consclease sake sn- 61‘ V1111 i110 1116.116 0111i 01-1161‘ 011111111 chi-oh hhQjRihltQd ghm-qh ‘liquid ihelproperty held therewith be restor- iobflgbfl w” gmmy hghdgd, Ie and allocated to, the Continuing The Commitslon doubtless real-ffflbfwfii-lll- ilairlpr-iteqllldilations under the ‘lam ‘i: m! 0911111011 i118 1111111118 01 11116 via; s. better opportunity of-Commllmll by the‘ mlbrity of its the evidence directly sub. members should be confined ex- Church. r la whic mailer? mama fornler church now takcn ulnd occu» with ill ‘Presbytcrians the former Methodist od-lst church at Tryon should be.‘ tsry now taken over .by the United - P. 5 G- Soap . . . . .. 4 for 26c _ Silva . . . . .. 110g Gold Soap . 4 for 26c Icing sugar . .._ .. 2hr‘ l Sunprlss Soap . . 4 for 25c Bruno . . . . . . .. .. 1 for 25o Lenox Soap .. 8 for 25c Lifebuey Seep . 3 for 26o Feis-Naptha . 3 for 26c '0'6edlr Polish 1 for 25¢ sllflliiht .. 4 for 25o wsn Paper Ciuner 1 ior 25c Ne-Rub 6 fer 26c Raialnsi bulky 2 the. (pr 26o Classy Cleaner .. 3 fer 25c Prunes . . . . . .. . . . . . 810i‘ 25o Bath Brick . . .. .. a fer 25c Macaroni .. 2 for 25o Pearline . . . . .. .. 3‘ for 26c Cocoa ... . 21er- 28c Rlflle (small) . . . . .. 3 for 25c. Rice .. ,_ 3 Idi- 25¢ 5 Rinse (large) . . . . .. 1 for 25c _Bflns .. . 4 for 25o I Ohlpso . . . . . . . . . 3 for 25c Barley . . . 4 fei- 26s , Potash . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 for 25c Onions . . . . . .. , 3 for $9 W. Wash Brush 1 for 25c lulk Dates 8 fora: - Scrub Brush .. 1 for 25c gqllykppgzd;"" - 4'7" 35° 2 cums s“p_ H2’ 25 uc u ng....3for25c p. mmopve __ 3 f: 25: Shredded Wheat 2 (or 25c L“ Top“ 3 for 25c Lemato soup . . . . ..2 for 25c Guest ivory . . . . . .. 6 for 25c Calla‘ ' - ' I ' ' H 1 a ‘or 25c Mixed Starch . . . . .. 2 for 25c Gelunpm. .. 2 or 25o White Starch . . . . . . 2 for 25c Lemon H 2 (for 25° Corn Starch . . . . .. 2 for 25c Variiiis Extract 1 ' 211: i? Head Lettuce 1 for 25c Sifto Salt .... ' 2 to: as: CflBry . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 for 25c Salt (bags) . .. . . 4 for 25¢ cal“; Flour _ _ I _ _ U; 1 ‘or 25c Corn Flakes .. , z for g5,- National I Canned Tomato Week l Nat""°'l 511N119 Tonic-Canned Tomatoes TOMATOES .......... ...-2Tins 28c PEAS . . . . ........._......2Tin-s28c CORN... . . . . . ..- . . . . . . . HZTHISZQC p» ‘ RILCHARDS . . . . . . .. 2 Til1s28¢ . CLAMS 2Tins 28c PEAS . . . . . . . . . . .........2Tins35c PEACHES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Tins 45c MAPLE CREAM SUGAR . . . . . .- . 50c MAPLE SUGAR . . . . i NEW PICKLES Made in Amherst, N. S. Sweet Mixed, Sweet Mustard 'and Chow-Chow 40c Per Bottle. ORANGES Real good size 28c doz. 4 doiz. for $1.00 PINEAPPLES Large Size 20c Each Robin Hood Flour With every 24 lb. bag Robin Hood Fleur purchased the Robin Hood Company give a free pencil box-with 98 lb. bags one bread pan. Robin Hood Flour 98's . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._ $4.75 Robin Hood Flour 24's . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $1.25 Queen City Flour 98's . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $4.50 Queen City Fleur 24's . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $1.20 Buy Robin Hood today and get your premium as sup- ply is limited. a t» [it]! ’ dianidlis asoll lid.‘ GROCERS M the general agreement .llCl‘(:lll bc- mizxoliiiy group consisting of thc fore ‘sot forth. 1n oihcr rcspccts ffoiiliniiinpo duesbyterians of Dilli- mp property should hi- vcstcd lirdst-a, llriilgolown and Almandalc accordance with the isulil finding. that the iornirr Presbyterian church at lhindas and a sllurc in fthc inilnsc lm allocated L0 them. l 'l‘hc church ilroperiy in that com. fllllllllly subject to (livisloil or\ullo- iii this case the minority group cation .by the Commlssioit coilsisi- consisting of the Nolwoncurring ed of the former Presibytcriuil Pissbyterians cf Mount Stewart church at ‘Dundee, a share in the and immediate vicinity applied f0l"lll£vse at Dundns, a former duct-lio- schedule 9 No. 15. Mount Stewart “mo: the minority group Wllslbtlnfi °1 nit order of the Commission allolat- lliist church st Dridgcitown. lug to them the former Presbyi-cr-| The chairman of tile Commission inn church and nlairse at Mountiwith the concurrence of Commis- Stewart. lisioncr Martin found that lhc lfmlt» The chairman of the Conimissionhetl Church should retain the form- with the concurrence or Commis- er Presbyterian Church at Dundas phone]. Mpmp mum] 11m; the form. together with the manse and that or Presbyterian "Church and manse the former Methodist church at should he retained .by tihe United Bridgetiowm 'l)e allocated to the ap- Church 8nd "that the Methodistlillfilnllfl- Church together wit-h the Methb- The finding 0f the Commission dist parsonage should be allocated should be oonflirmed and ‘tho titles to ‘the Non-concurring Presbyier-‘IO the properties in question vest- ian-h ed accordvngly. 1n my opinion the finding of the "“ Commission should be confirmed and ‘the title -to t-ho properties ini question vested accordingly. ‘ l Sehedufq to . ‘ A No. 1o, Montague i; T-h-is ls air application lay-the Cou- ‘ "‘ .. tlnu-lng ‘Presbyteriansiof Montague i;or an order of the Commission that the former l, Presbyterian Chart-h mild mause be given to one We are now discharging regular- 1111711011-11116- iy. ears of nloe fresh mined Deal of The chairman of the Com-mission wltirthe concurrence o: Commis- sioner Martin found tbllt the ‘Unit- ed Church should‘ retain the‘ form- er PresbyterlanChull-ch and manse and that: the Methodist Uburcb and personage be allocated to the Presbyterlsns. ._v'l'*he finding of the Commission should be confirmed and thatltle high standard quality, namalyi. one BYDNEYJOREENED SPRINOHILL sensual: luvsaussa scaséuse ALBION our ALBION srovs to the properties la question vested , ' oooordioqiy. 1.:- _. ,, ‘Film c1 your rlnultmem p ‘up’, p ._ brlesspgvsasenabls. Infill! service. . '- i ' * Ne. 1|, Dundee, ;. _. -_ s- 1 ill-lemma and Mull-heals a on mam-it will lthlalg mi tlldr dram’ should i» vubmt t» the o; l. trliu so application groin m F‘ _. . \