con'fv from 
     
    
   
   
    
     that the dinner this year, 
     
     with few exceptions, will 
     
     be attended by freshmen 
     
     and sophcmores, the major- 
     
     ity of whom will be in the 
     
     Arts program. This is not 
     
     representative of the uni- 
     
     versity faculties and it 
     
     is not giving credit where 
     
     credit is due." Do you 
     
     realize that, out of the 
     
     Universitity's total en- 
     
     rollment of 1478 students, 
     
     1002 are in the faculty of 
     
     Arts? Why then, shouldn't 
     
     the Arts students form the 
     
     majority at the dinner, 
     
     since they are clearly the 
     
     majority at the university? 
     
    

    
     Also, (perhaps I am over- 
     
     sensitive), but I detected 
     
     a hit of condescention in 
     
     the mention of Arts fresh— 
     
     man and sophomores.- The 
     
     first years in any faculty 
     
     are not as easy as some 
     
     like to think. - And Arts 
     
     is a respectable a faculty 
     
     as any. (While we're on 
     
     the subject, I would here- 
     
     by denounce any and all 
     
     who ridicule the Arts pro- 
     
     gram; it gives one a much 
     
     better liberal education 
     
     than any faculty. - and 
     
     I invite any arguments on 
     
     this statement!) . 
     
     L Annmyulwwldtsinply. . 
     
     - like to  all orange 
     
     ; who  an invitation 
     
      fortl'EY.r 
     
      recog- 
     
     niticn. I agree with the 
     
     senior in question that 
     
     it is indeed unfortunate 
     
     that the cutbacks were made. 
     
     Iwouldevemgoas faras 
     
     to. suggest that the event 
     
     does not qualify for the 
     
     title "Dean‘s Dinner", as 
     
     it does not include all 
     
     those on the Dean's list. 
     
     (Call it the "Food for fa- 
     
     vored few" or "Hoedom for 
     
     100") 
     
    

    
     “But, seriously, to say 
     
     that the. invitations do 
     
     not give "credit where 
     
     credit is due"? I Really, 
     
     that is going too far. 
     
    

    
     signed. .' 
     
    

    
     A lard-working 
     
     sophomore Artsie 
     
     (of course) 
     
    
   
   
    
     Dear Editor, 
     
    

    
     This is just a note of 
     
     appreciation both the the 
     
     authors and to your news— 
     
     paper for the excellent 
     
     and thought provoking ar— 
     
     ticle on abortion which was 
     
     featured in last week's is- 
     
     sue of the SUN. ' 
     
    

    
     How can any compasSion— 
     
     ate human being even consi— 
     
     der the injustice of the 
     
     seal hunt and remain aloof 
     
     from the ceaseless slaugh— 
     
     ter of human infants? 
     
    

    
     It is time for each of 
     
     us to set his priorities in 
     
    
   
   
    
     .p.4, 
     
    
   
   
    
     order and to take a stand 
     
     on the real dilemes that 
     
     confront contemporary soc- 
     
     iety. let us not pretend 
     
     to shmf our charity and con- 
     
     cern by feighm'ng to be ap- 
     
     palled at such a compara- 
     
     tively insignificant issue 
     
     as the seal hunt. Save our 
     
     energies for demonstrations 
     
     and appeals against the 
     
     deadliest atrocity we are 
     
     faced with today - the mur— 
     
     der of innocent unborn hu— 
     
     man beings! 
     
    
   
   
    
     Sincerely, 
     
     Keith Kennific 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     'Ihe UPEI SUNLmursday,Nhrch16,I978,page 5 
     
    
   
   
    
     The solution to this 
     
     murder would be not to con- 
     
     ceive.Use of birth control 
     
     devices;oral contraceptives 
     
     such as the pill, prophylac— 
     
     tics, and the IUD(which we , 
     
     found does not prevent con— 
     
     ception, are nessary for 
     
     those married couples who 
     
     do not wish to raise nore 
     
     children than they can pos- 
     
     sibly manage to support.0r 
     
     at least I would hope this 
     
     is the case. (I might add 
     
     here that most birth control 
     
     devices are not 100% ful- 
     
     proof and may have harmful 
     
     side effects.oral contra- 
     
    

    
     c o n ’ f o . 7 
     
    
   
   
    
     Dear Editor, 
     
    
   
   
    
     First of all I'd like to 
     
     contend Marsha Gaudet and 
     
     Valerie Nbore regarding 
     
     their excellent article on 
     
     abortion.In view of 'the 
     
     right for life' most uni- 
     
     versity students must real—- 
     
     ize that abortion is the 
     
     actual killing of somebody; 
     
     that was conceived of man 
     
     and wanan, by the will of 
     
     God thru the marvels of 
     
     nature. The reason that 
     
     this person was killed is 
     
     because he(she) was conceived 
     
     out of lust and not love! 
     
    

    
     L e f t e r s 
     
    
   
   
    
         
     
    
   
   
    
     A ’7 can COURIER 
     
    
   
   
    
     * KIIIIIAKE 
     
    
   
   
    
     SWEEPSTAKES 
     
     » ALS 
     
    
   
   
    
     HANG GLIDERS 
     
     AND 
     
     KODIAK BOOT 
     
    
   
   
    
     Jammeomph-uumymmonmmlmu ism— ‘ 
     
    
   
   
    
     ‘ Mummy-mania: 
     
     . mgywflmm 
     
    
   
   
    
     I. Fo mm: m cum 0! (M most, albums In! bu mm 
     
     M 1. l9" W was, in 
     
     no a [an m 
     
     mum 3W 
     
     ‘ ‘ m- 
     
     her. black WI hood. and cus- 
     
     m re-o-hmy Wm 
     
     Munoz" Kill! (I! am) HEW 
     
     “In W Inldflvu's WM and m '71 IM numb" ol minis mound This comm vs 
     
     mm hm must M W I! “HIM I! I mm: s» N All men! PVDMMHI Ind “WI! Laws 
     
     mm no sumnnmns vamnd Mm M W: :s I. I In IOIIIS me his! 200 wnmums whose 
     
     mums an mum :1 ma cams: moms mu a: main. 
     
     WWI!” DIIWWMMWUIQM . KW l'mflmlhesmimddwfl onmwcomostemry 
     
     EMMY“ “I. With WMIB. um Ind Div. low" Ml?! Inn“. 
     
    
   
   
    
     5A’78FORD 
     
     COURIER 
     
    
   
   
    
     . . V .  .. APT NO 
     
     CIW:..,   . POSYCODE ‘ 
     
    
   
   
    
     TELEPHONENO ..  .. V 
     
    
   
   
    
     ENTER EARLV . FIRST 200 TO RECEIVE A KODIAK T»SHIRT 
     
     Civcle me suze and sex of your chance 
     
     T-SHIRT SIZE: S, M. L, XL - MALE « FEMALE 
     
    
   
   
    
     YS3 
     
    
   
   
    
     Contest closes Apm I, 1978