The evidence relating to the vote of Donald Meee was then read. Mr. McGOWAN.—This vote has undergone more exami- | nation than say other during the scrutiny. Jt ia well known that the land on which he voted does not belong to bia ; it belongs to the Priest; McBee works it for him. Hoa. Mr. heard this man’s title questioned. The value of the land was the question at the Sheriff's Court. The first evidence, Jona Mills, could not state the value of the property at first, but afterwards says it is pot worth 100/. He says that 10 years ago it was offered for 30). Ji isa very dif- ferent thing to get a picce of laud in Georgetown now from what it was 10 years sgo. Mille winds up by saying that he would not swear that Mefee could not get 100/ for his property. The next witness says there is not a better culti- vated picee of land ia King’s County. Now, we know that # piece of land ia the neighbourhood of Georgetown, and highly cultivated, is very valuable. This witness says the jeod is worth 120/. I think if it were set up at suction to- morrow it would briog thatamount. He sgys the crop taken off MeFee's land two years ago was worth 60j. The next witness, Robertson, says he is a good judge of land, but does vot koow that Mclee’s lund is worth 1002. He does not know whether there wasa crop on the land last year. He then mentions a jot that was sold for 30. I koow that lot, end I consider 40/ a high price for it. If it is worth 302, McFee’s should be worth 3007. Then Mr. Moore, another witneas, says he would give 1002 for the lot to-morrow. One witness swears it is worth 100), and an- other swears it is worth 120/. None of the other witpesses eay positively that it is not worth 100/. Hoo. Mr. ANDEHRSON.—The first witness says there are no byildiggs on the Lot. He values it at 70/. Two witnesses value it at less than }] 00/, Hon, Mr. BEER.—[ think the sitting member baa mis- reprerented the evidence of Mr. Moore. [le merely says if he wanted a place he would give 100) for it. Hon. Mr, WALKEB. —I owo a Pastare Lot near the game place. [t is in 3 wilderuess state, and | was offered 407 for jt five or six yegrs ago. Hon. Mr. BEER.—[ understood that Lots in 9 wilderness state in Georgetown Royalty poyld be purchased for 200. Hon. Mr. DINGWELL.—~— We kuew that a Lot consisting of 14 acres of land near Georgetown, in a high state of cul- tivation, is very yaluable. Taking the whole evidence into account, | do pot know how we cea say it is not worth 100/. Hon. Mr. YEO — If we take the ayerage of the price named by the three witnesses who have yalyed the property iz will not make J002. Hon. the PRESIDENT —I do not think the evidence throws any doubt on the title. Robertsoo says he under- stood till lately that the land belonged to the Kev. Mr. Me- Donald, That is v0 evidence, Hos. Mr. GOFF —I never understood that the land belonged to McFee. I thought he was only 8 managing man‘ for the Priest ; but be has probably been saving money and investing it in land. 1 do pot say that McPee js pot the owner. Hoo. Mr. WALKER-—Mr. Moore mentions ap ynoulti; vated jot containing 7 acres for which 40/ were paid ; surely it would take 10% to pyt it in 9 bigh state of cultivation. McPee's lot contgins 14 acres. Hon. Mr. YEO—Jand near Summerside is worth more in 3 wilderuess state than when cultivated. Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL—I regret, your Honors, that we are placed in such « difficult position, but we must get through this business the best way we can. Que of the witnesses says, [| thought till lately that the property be- Jonged to the Rey. Mr. McDonald. That is no evidence. The first witness says, * I think 701 is the yalue of the pro- "Phat is not positive evidence. Another witness says he paid 402 for an uncultivated lot containing 7 acres jn 1861. That is strong evidence; it shows that the first witness has not given @ correct estimate of the property. This witness says it ia “ iohly ” worth 120/. Looking at the whole evidence — taking the positive statements of the witnesses—aod considering ali thy advantages pointed out, { cannot come to the conclusion that the property is not worth 100/. The evidence on this vote was very Jengthy. His Honor the Attorney General read it through carefully, and made some gtseryations an it as he proceeded. Hon. Mr. YEO—One of the witoesses sgys that if any man will give five or siz pounds ap acre for land near Georgetown, he will give too much. If we take the average of the value given by all the witnesses, it will noc make £100. lion. ATTORNEY GENERAL — It will make £96 some shillings. Hon. Mr. YEO — Well, I cannot make £100 out of £96 gome shillings, any way } can fix it. (Laughter.) Hon. My. Yeo submitted a resolution to the effect that it did not appear by the evidence before the Committee that the qualification of Donald McFee was sufficient to entitle him go vote. The question being put thereon, the Committee divided : Cowtents—Hon. Messrs. Yeo, Anderson and MeLaren—3. Noy. convents — Hon. Messrs. Attorney General, Ramsay ,Beer, Henderson, Walker, Dingwell and Prosident—s. So it passed in the negative. The evidence relating to the yote of Daniel McDonald was then read Mr. McGOWAN—~It appears fram the evidence that this man only held the property on trust. He held # Trust Deed to save the property from others. At first he refused to take she oath, but he afterwards came forward and done so. Hon. Mr, McDONALD—If that had been the case it would have been easy to prove it. perty was conveyed to McDonald three years ago. Well, if # man holds a conveyance of a property, that property is hie Stewart sgys the deed was executed three years ago; hut it gan be seen that it wae registered in 1355. Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL ~T think enongh has been piated by the witness, Donald Stewart, to throw a doubt on shis yote. Le says the land to Mr. McAulay, and he (Stewart) advised bim to make it over to McDonald to pare it from his creditors. | think it was incumbent upon the other party to remove this doubt. If the case were taken to the Court of Chancery, McDonald would be compelled to give up the Deed. MeAulsy lives on the land, and with the knowledge of MeD: has sold @ part of it since the Deed was conveyed. That showd that Mr. McDouald is only a pominal owrer. Hon. Mr. Beer moved the following resolution : . eeoalene, ‘Tuat the yote of Daniel McDonald is not sufficient ‘The question being put thereon, it passed in the affirmative. Tie evidence relating to the vote of Roderick McAulay was then read. flon Mr. McDONALD —In this case we have Donald Stewart again ae @ witness, He says it is good wood land. ‘Then James McAulay, a brother of the voter, expresses his Purprise that Stewart should give such evidence. He says there are from 12 to laden dee, and some more fit to break in. lie saya his brother rose 200 bush. and 70 of oats op it last year. He says he would give £2 an sere for the land. Add the yalye of the olear land to that, sod you baye oyer £100. | conceive that the vote is perfectly substantiated. _ Hon. Mr. YEO—Fifty aeres of land with pretty fair build- ings on it would be worth £100; but I do not think that 50 acres on Lot 49, and an old house with the raiters blown off, are worth that mach. toes, 12 of wheat Hon. Mr. REER ~ 4 ig that neighbourhood sells high. ree nouns proof thas it is worth very close upon . ifno uite. Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL — I think it is sufficiently near the mark te warrant us in cor luting that the vote is lon. Mr. Beer submitted a resolution to the effect that the vote of Koderick McAulay is euffiaient in law. ‘The questivn wae put thereon, and it passed im the affir- mative. The President then resumed the chair, and the House adjourned, Arterxoon Sirtixe. Hon. Attorney General presented to the House the Blue Book for 1861. Aleo the Public Accounts, the Aceounts of the Public Lands Office, and the Warrant Book for 1862. Ordered, that they do lie on the table, The Committes of privileges and elections was thon resumed. Evidence relating to the yote of Roderick McDonald rea. Hon. Mr. McDONALD stated that the object of the evidence wes to show thet the word ‘‘swourn’’ had been improper!y entered in the poil book. His Uypor contended that evidenve could not be received by the Committee ip opposition to the 1 book for that purpose. "i WV GEN ERAL—It might not be proper to lion. ATTORN receive verbal evidence, bat in this case we have written evidence, and I think it may be received strictly in aonfor- mity with the rules of law. When evyidenge ia committed to writing, it is pot generally permitted to parties to gonteadict it, but yet it is open to show that there has beeq some mistake or fraud. For ipatonee, an action might be brought against # Sheriff for « false return. The Poll clesk might sey his book was correet. Surely evidence might be brought to show that there was an error im the book in such a case. Take for instance the case at the peeent election at St Eleanor's. If evidenae could not have been brought in that case the poll beok would have stood as it was, Hon. Mr. McDONALD — The egse at St. Eleanor’s was different. In thet case the your was enfered in the wrong column. That was ogsily done; but [ do pot see how the word «‘sworn’’ eould be entered after the man's name, if the Clerk did not get directions ta de so. lion. Mr. BEER—Leaying aut the question about the error jo the poll book, I du not see that the pan's yote can be sus- tained, for a doubt is thrown on it by the avidence, and there is no evidence on the other side to pemmpye that doubs. Hon. Mr. NeDONALD—The question at the Sheriff's Vourt, was the error ip the pol) book, I do not think the Lord, Mr. Stewart says that the pro-+ ESS a | evidence throws the slightest doubt qn the vote. The voter | | bad receipts and other documents to show that he bad beep in possession of the property a sufficient length of time to ac- | quire @ legal title. Mr. MeNoill, the poll elerk, says that | neither of the candidates of their representatives directed him to erase the name from the poll book. Jion. the PRESIDENT — If the man refused f take the fcDONALD.—This is the first time that || oath the presiding officer should not have gllowed his name! He wag liable to a fine for not) to remain on the poll hook. removing it. Hon. Mr. McLAREN.—I do not remembar anything about | this note, bat when I heard the circumstance which has been | mentigned, [ made some enquiries aboot it. [ had poll clerk, aud on referring to his book, I find that McDongld’s name was }erased from it. [t was not masked ‘* sworn.’’ Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL.—It is quite competent for § candidate to bring evidence to shew that there is an error in the poll hook. He should not be hound by the errors ef an officer oyer whom he bas no control. Perhaps the retyrning officer would not be allowed to give evidence to proye that his own act was au error. Ifa man refuses to take the ogth, his yote is consjdered yoid. The following pesolution was submitted by his honor the Attorney General, and it passed in the affirmative ;—~ Resolyed, That it is the opjnion of qis Committee that the vote of Rodeftck McDonald was jllegally allowed to remain on the poll book, and should be steuck off. The evidence relating to the vote of Angus McFee, polled for Mr. MeGowan, was theo read. The above named vote was found insufficient in law, and the Committee resolved accordingly. ‘Phe President then resumed the Chair, and the House adjourned. Wepysspar, March 25. Hon. Mr. Anderson presented a petition of certajn in- habitants of St. Eleanor's, praying for an Act to prevent horses, cattle and sheep from running at large in the streets of that village. The Committee of Privileges and Blections was then re- sumed. Evidence relating to the vote of Thomas Ring read. Mr. McGOWAN.—It appears from the evidence, your Honors, that this map has go title te the property on which he claimed to yote. His father died intestate. Hie mother is living, and there gre a number of sons. It ig undivided property. There is no authority for dividing it, unless it is an order from the Probate's Office. Hon. Mr. McDONALD.—'The petitioning candidate says that there was no authority for dividing the property. It is very true that the voter's father was in debt wheg he died, but the greater part of the debts have since been paid off. It has been said that the mether pyid the assessment on the land, and that therefore the property must be her's. Phat j# no evidence at all, for it is a common thing for one person to send his assessment with another. Mr. McGQW AN.—lI apprehend that the proporty that this man voted on is the same as that on which Donald McKinnon voted. Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL.—It appears that the title to this property was disputed. Thomas Ring voted on an interest in six lots. He alleged himself to be exclusive owner of Town Lot 169. It appears that he only pays tax for thir lot: his mother pays for the rest. Mr. Aitken says he al- ways understood that the property belonged to hig mother. If the property was divided, it is strange that Thomas would have four lots out of six, when there is a large family. fhe had a title, I do not see how there could be any difficulty in poying it at the Sheriff's Court. The mother pays the tax in her own pame, aod Thowas pays in his own name, for one lot. Hon. Mr. Beer proposed the following resolution, and it passed in the affirmative. Resolved, that there is not sufficient evidence before this Commamittee to substantiate the vote of Thomas King. Evidence relating to the vote of Patrick Stephens read. fHon. Mr. McDONALD .—I do not think it is necessary to say much about this vote. The evidence brought by the petitioning candidate, has confirmed Mr. Stephens’ right to vote. Mr. Sanderson, who is an Auctioneer, says he svld a part of Mr. Stephens’ property for £425. He cannot say whether the wharfs were sold or not. ‘The next witness says, there was something said at the time of the sale about wharfs, but does not know whether they were sold or not. The next witness says he pays £25 rent to Mr. Stephens. He would not take £100 fur the part not sold. He believes the sale to haye been a sham. Mr. McGUWAN.—It appears by the poll book that Mr. Stephens voted upon property liable to a mortgage, but al! the witnesses say he voted upon a piece of reserved land. It is Mr. Sanderson had instructions to sell Mr. Stephens’ pro- perty, and he done so; but it is alleged to have been @ sham sale. There is no evidence beture the Committee to show that it was a sham sale. It was sold at public auction, and knocked down to the highest bidder. 1 do not know much about this little piece of reserved land, that is so very valu- able. Indeed, it appears to haye existed only in the brains of the witnesses. Hoo. Mr. HENDERSON.—Thbe circumstance of the land being sold at public auction, and which has not been denied, raises a reasovabla doubt on Mr. Stephens’ vote. If there was a mortgage on the Jand, he should have shown that he had an interest in it, oyer and above the amount of the mortgage, sufficient to entitle him to vote. | it. due, why did not the petitioning candidate get Mr. Haviland to prove that euch was the ease. It has already been shown during this serutiny that back rent on o farm did not — the vote when there was other means of paying it. ‘The farm) cannot be taken for ren$ while there is persong] property op The eyidence does not show that this individuy had no other means of paying his rent. The second witness swears positively that the farm ia worth £100. ; Hon. the PRESIDENT.—The elector has sworn to his | qualification, and the witness brought forward by the peti-| tioning candidate does not know the yalue of the property. | There may be moveable property enoagh to pay the back rent. | Mon. ATTORNEY GENERAL.—I do not think the first | witness raises a doubt ca thia yote. ‘The question rests alto- | gether on the gmount of reat due, but in regard to that we ‘have nothing but hear say evidence. If there 18 4 large ‘amount of back rent due, Mr. Hayiland should have been | brought to prove it. [tis only admitted that there are £10 ldue Even suppose there are £80 due, it does not follow that the man has no vote. It has not been decided - whether the rent up to 1858 has not been swept off by the Award of the Land Commissioners. Even if we were to go into a valu- ation of the property, { think the yote would be sustained, for one eyidence says that there are 25 acres cultivated, and he says the buildings are worth £20. But I go altogether on the weakness of the first evidences. Hon. Mr. BEER.—J do not know if his Honor the Attorney General has taken potice that the word ‘‘arrears’” is entered as an objection in the poll book, I think that raises a doubt, and the ‘apposing candidate should have shown that the ar- rears was no objection. Eyen supposing there were po arrears, I do not think the property is worth £100. Hon. Mr. YEQ.-<1 do not think there are many 50 acres of jeasebold land in the country, similarly zituated, worth £100. L have sold a great many farms through the country, and I always considered £2 an acre a good price for freehold land. Hon. Mr. Walker submitted the following resolution, and it passed in the affirmative on the division as given below. Conrents — Hon. Messrs. Attorney General, President, Ramsay, Walker, Dingwell and Lord—6. Nov—contents — Hon. Messrs. Yeo, Anderson, McLaren, Beer and Henderson—9. ash The evidence relating ta the vote of Patrick Grimley, polled for Mr. MeDPonwld, was then read. it was found insufficient to sustain his yate, and the Committee resalyed accordingly. Arrernoon SitTinc. A message was brought from the Iouse of Assembly by the Hon. Col. Secretary, with a Bill relating to steam nayigation with this [sJand Also by Mr. John Yeo, Hiram Lodge, No. 1128, of free and acce St. Eleanor’s. The Committee of privileges and eleetions was then resumed. Evidence relating ta the vate of Hugh McQuade was read. Mr. McGUWAN —This man is 4 leaseholder, your honors, but there is a clause in the original lease, which was taken by his father, to prevent it from being transferred without the the consent of the proprietor. Hon. Mr. MCDONALD—The evidence shows that this man holds a lease from his father. As to the clause in the lease to prevent its transfer, it ia all hearsay. If the proprietor had a claim against any poe on that account it would be | against hig father. The fact that the proprietor receives rent from the son, is an acknowledgement that he is accepted as & tenant. ‘here is po proof that there is such 4 cundition in the lease. Hon. Mr. ANDERSON—If there was a clause in the lease forbidding its transfer without the congent of tho proprietor, and thas clause not complied with, I think it would disqualify the present holder from voting under it. Hon. Mr. BEER — Mr. Hamilton swears that the consent of the proprietor was not given to the transfer of the lease. 1 think that throws sufficient doubt upon the vote to call for evidence from the opposing candidate to show that the vote is good. Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL — The witners says there was a clause in the lease prohibiting its transfer without the consent of the proprietor. If that is the case, and the con- sent of the proprietor was not obtained, then tle transfer would not be Jegal. But the question. is, did the lease con- tain such a clause. We have no evidence that itdid. If we had it would raise a doubt on that vote. Hon. Attorney General snhmitted a resolution to the effect that the vote of Hugh MeQuade had not been disproved by any evidence belore the committee, and it passed in the | affirmative. : The evidence relating to the vote of Jola Germley wae then read. with a Bill to incorporate King pted Masons of very strange that he did not give in this piece of reserved land | jyyn Mr. McDONALD—Mr.Hamilton.who is again brought | at the election, and not vote on property liable toa mortgage. | forward as a witness, appears to know all the farms upon this road. Ile says be would not give £100 tor this farm, because could not be bought for less than £100. Besides, bis brother being dead, he has a right to vote ona share of 109 ucres which he held. not give £100 for it. The house, it appears, is on the part that was held by his brother, ~ The vote, if it stands at all, must his brother's property. I think there is a strong doubt raised stand on the 50 aercs. upon it. lion. the PRESIDENT —The last witness says the land is! Hon. Mr. LORD.—Mr. Stephens’ character is well known. I have had dealings with him for @ long time, and always: found him a very correct man. The auctioneer does not say | that all the property was sold. Stephens’ offered the property | to me several times. The price he asked, if [ remember right, | was £500. I believe Patrick Stephens is not the man to) swear that he had £100 worth of property unless he had it. [ haye no doubt but this piece of reserved land is worth £100. | Hon. Mr. BEER.—He did not vote on the reserved piece, | but on the mortgaged property. Besides, he did not vote as| a freebolder, but as a leaseliolder. Hon. Mr. WALKER.—If the land was sold it is not very, probable that he would be receiving the rent. [ believe it) was on!y a sham sale, merely to value the property. 1 do not! think that 9 mortgage on the property ghould invalidate the yote. Many men yote on property on which there are mortgages. Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL.—We are very much in the dark about this vote, and | think it is Mr, Stephens’ fault, as he has not sufficiently described the property on which he voted. [t is sither the fault of the voter, or of the candidate for whom he yoted. It bas been said that the voter has a valuable piece of land in another place, but the evidence does pot show whether that is included in the mortgage or not. My impression is, that it is included in the mortgage, and we ape threfore confined to the mortgaged property. Now, it appears that the property was sold, and it was incumbent upon the voter to show that he had an interest in it ta the amount of £100. He should have placed his title in the Sheriff's hand. If it is a leasehold property, and mortgaged, then it does not belong to Stephens, for all bis right, title gnd interest is signed over in the mortgage, and becomes ab- solute in the mortgage, when the debt becomes due. It has been said that he is an intelligent man. That I admit, and the more explanations would be expected from him on that account. It has been said that it was a sham sale; but if it were tried by an action in law, he would not be allowed to say that it was asham sale. It is — that he may re- taka an interest in the property to the amount of £500, but it dues not ap so by the evidence. I think the evidence shows that he has no right to vote on the property. Augustine MeDonald says he pays £25 rent to Stephens; but if the term of the murtgage has expired, the mortgagor may call upon him at any day, and compel him to pay the rent to him. If the mortgage allows the mortgagor to receive the rent, that is no proof that the property belongs to him. I think it is one of those ences where documentary evidence should have been produced. I would be inclined to deal more strictly with an intelliggnt man like Mr. Stephens, than | would with a poor illiterate man. When an intelligent man attempts tu smuggle through a doubtful vote, it is a very bad example. Hon. Mr. LORD.—The reason that there is not more evi- dence before the Committee is, that Mr. Stephens was not aware that his vote was being scrutinized till after the She- riff’s Court was closed. ‘There should be no fault found with the voter for his property nat being described in the pull book. The opposing candidate should have pres such questions as would have elicited 4 description of the property. I do not believe that Patrick Stephens ever attempted to *‘smuggle”’ in his vote at that or any other election; and I believe he would have gone to Georgetown if he had known what was doing there. 1 do not think jt is using a respec'able man fair to insinuate that he smuggled his vote. Hon, ATTORNEY GENERAL.—I said he might have an interest in the property te the amount of £500, but it does not appear from the evidence ; and in consequence of the doubt thrown upon it he should haye shown us that the mortgage has not deprived him of hie right to vote. Hon. Mr. BEER.—I think some of your honors who have spoken in favour of sustaining the vote bave thrown more doubt upon it than the evidence, for you have shown that the property was mor for more than it sold for at auction. Hon. Mr. LORD.—When property js sald at auction it does not always bring its value. Hon. Mr. WALKER.—Did the property sold by the Sheriff on Lot 66 bring its value? Hon. Mr. DING WELL—I think it would be better to defer this vote for futare consideration. When the written evidence is so unsatisfactory, 1 do not see any reason why some other evidence might not be brought that would be more decisive. Hon. Mr. YEO.—LE we are going to examine evidence be- fore this Committee we may sit here for another year. It has been said that the sale wasa sham. I thiak the yote is a sham too. The following resolution was submitted by the Hon. Mr. Beer, and it ed in the affirmative : Resolved, That there ia not sufficient evidence before this Committee to show that the vote of Patrick Stephens is valid in luw. The evidence relating to the yote of Edward Sullivan was then read Hon. Mr. McDONALI,—There was only one witness pro- duced by the petitioning candidate on this yote, and he does not know the farm. [le says that the Hon. Mr. Hayiland wae at the election with a long list of tenants who were in arrears for rent. If that waa the case it looks very much Jike intimidation. The witpess does not say anything about the ‘value of the farm, and if there was 9 large amount of ront all clear bat 10 or 15 acres. If that is the case there would) be 35 acres of clear land, whieh, at £3 an acre, would amount to £105. He says there is a well upon it, and that would lead us to infer that the buildings were on the 50 acres. It) is very clear that he caunot vote on a part of his brother's | property. tion. Mr. LORD—The first evidence says be will not ewear that the land is not worth £100. It is probable that he had made up hs mind that it was worth very near, if not quite, £100. Hon. Mr. BEER—I think your honors must be pretty wel! satisfied from the evidence that the buildirgs are on the bro- ther’s part of the property, because it is said that they are in the middle of the block, which consists of 159 acres. Hon. Mr. RAMSAY—If the manthas 35 or 40 acres of land clear, I certainly think he is entitled to a vote. Hon. Mr. McLAREN—There is a great difference between clearing land that is covered with heavy. wood and land on which there is scarcely any woed at all. Tho fire ran through | this land about 40 years ago, and several! times since then. | The stumps were ail donnged away, and there was very little trouble in clearing it. Hon. Mr. DINGW ELL—We have always valued cultivated land at £3 ap acre, wit! out considerating how it was cleared. If it was cleared by steam I do not see that the value of the land would be depreciated thereby. If the man has 35 acres of land clear he must be an industrious man, and we should not deprive him of his vote. Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL --T am not quite satisfied that the land is not worth £100. Hamilton dves not speak in very positive terms. He says he will not swear that the land is not worth £100. We have no evideuce that the house is on the 50 acres, but 35 acres clear, at £3 an acre, will amount to over £100 without anything else. Hon. Mr. Walker proposed the following resolution : Reselved, That there is no evidence before this Committee to invalidate the vote of John Germley. The Committee divided : Contents — Hon. Messrs. Attorney General, President, Walker, Ramsay, Dingwell and Lord —6. Nonx-conrents —Ifon. Messrs. Yeo, Anderson, McLaren, Boor and Henderson—s. So it passed in the affirmative. The evidence relating to the yote of Dennis Mulligan, polled for Mr. McDonald, was then read. After a few remarks the Han. Attorney General submitted the following resolution, and it passed in the affirmative : Resolved, That it is the opinion of this committee that there is not sufficient evidence to invalidate the vote of Dennis Mulligan. Vote of Thomas Clenton, roted for Mr. McDonald. Hon, Mr. McDONALD.--I think your Honors will decide in this case, ag in the last, that there is no evidence to invali- date the vote. ‘This standing witness, Mr. Hamilton, has again been brought to throw doubt on this vote. He says he never was on the land. The whole amount of his evidence is, that he would not swear that the land was not worth £100. flon. Mr. ANDERSON.—One witness says the soil is very poor and light, and that the house is qf yery little value. Another witness said, at first, that he would not swear that the man was worth £100, but afterwards, it appears that he made up his mind that the man and farm together were worth that amount. Hon. Mr. HENDERSON.—The elector gt first refused to qualify, but afterwards done so. It would appear ag if he bad got something to make his conscience a little more obtuse. - Hon. Mr. LORD.—I suppose the man weighed the matter in his mind, and considered that he couid conscientiously take = See a or thinks the map was conscientigus in tuking the oath. He would not swear that the not pe £100. eee Ifon. Mr. BEER.—I think we must admit that the evi- dence of Mr. Hamilton is very impartial. We must take the whole of his evidence. Hegives a description of the land, and of the buiidings. I do not think there is one of your Honors who can say you have no doubt but tho land is worth £100. Hon. Mr. RAMSAY.—There is 2 good deal of difference between this vote and the last but one that we had under consideration. ‘That farm was principally clear jand. ‘The evidence in this case does not say how much clegrance thers is, Hamilton says the soil and buildings are both poor. I do not cansider Jand without improvements worth 20s. an acre. Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL.—I am not satisfied that the Jang is worth £100. Besides, there is a doubt raised upon the title. The witness says he understood that the yoter's brother had a claim on the property. A sesolution was then snbmitted to the effect that tho vote of Tiqmas Clenton was not sufficient in the law, and it passed in the affirmative. The eyidence relating to the yote of John McCarty and Feliz Parmer, (polled for Mr MeDonald) was found insuf- ficient to eugtain them, and the Committee resolved ac- cordingly. _ The President then resumed the Chair andthe House ad- journed. be ee Mr. McGOWAN —One witness has.sworn that he would! Church of England can veither pros CORRESPONDENCE, To THE Eprrork OF THE EXAMINER. Sm— I have to request you will kindly insert a con- tinuance of my letter of the 18th. ultimo. I am desirous of making some obaervat ions, which are called forth by rewarks circulated through the town, to the effect, that I am unwilling to con- tribute towards the benefit of the Church, ina pecumary poilt of view. T am much averse to bring myself before the public, but when assertions are made so much at variance with the truth, f am reluctantly cum- pelled to justify my conduct. I have been a resi- dent here for nearly twenty years. Oumy arrival, I purchased half a pew in the gallery, end some months afterwards I was induced to resign the same to the Church, under the conviction that neither the buyer or seller had any right to make merchandize of church ree 1 was at all times desirous of paying for suitable accommoda- tion for my family; and during a period of 15 years I vainly sought, by personal applications and by letters, for sittings, and my " pects are now as Temote as ever. I declined subseribing towards the enlargement of the Church, on the plea, in the first jnstance, that the pews should be surrendered to the Chureb, and then [ should be happy to contribute to such a desirable purpose. [ also objected, under these circumstances, to give any aid towards the curate’s salary, as I conceived it was but just and right that the expenses, Ke. of the Church should be defrayed exclusively by the proprietors of the pews, to effect which a liberal rate would be required. But although I did not wish to pay towards the preaching ot the Gospel for thase who were better able to bear the ex- pense than myself, I thought it but right to give a piece of land worth £100, which could have been leased at £8 per annum, to the curate, and I apprehend that if all the proprietors had aeted in a similar manner, there would be no occasion of taking the bag round to collect coppers towards making up the dchoisncies of the minister's salaries. The only church ageommodation that has been offered to me was a pew year the door at £4 10s per annum, which was taken for one year, till a better one could be. provided, also one near the free sittings, and last year Capt. Swabey's pew in the gallery, all which were objectionable. I was desirous of obtaining the military pew, which was never offered to me. At a Public meeting of the Diocesan Society in August '43, a subscription was entered inte for the furtherance of enlarging the church; and no daubt the late Bishop of N. 5. was much gratified at the zeal and anxiety manifested by the Charch members in writing down their names to enable the to have some accommodation. The nomjnal subscription amounted to nearly £120, and only ane subseriber (uo longer in the Island) paid his money, which some eight months after was returned, as noother funds were forthcoming. warmly supported by the Bishop. stranger at that time, of his Lordship. fault with others. by the House in Session fer 3 pews, viz, Council claim of right is made on the 3 pews in question which is-neither legal por vahd. will eventually ing subscriptious from its members. The proprietors ought to remember that for a period of nearly 25 years they never contributed to the salary of their Rector, and it is lamentable to reflect that after his retirement there shguld be common gratitude as te deprive him of a small annual pittance from political feeling. Surely he does not want to buy it. He says he will not swear that) the labors of this mivister (unpaid by the eongre-| chalowice. it is not worth £100, Another witness says he knows that it! gation) ought to be more than an equivalent for Giebulkow and Gorska. | the purchase of the pews, It is very contémptible to reflect on the fact that whilst the members of the aristecratic ide for their wipisters or their poor, and even will pot give up the paltry value of ther pews, the Wesleyan con- the erection of a splendxt chapel, whick will be an orvament to the tewn. IT am aware that as much as £6,000 have been subseribed, and no doubt it) more is required it will be forthcoming, and the’ pews, IT ain informed, are all to be let and not retained by subscribers. May I request you will de me the favor to in- sert an article, received by the last mail, as appearing in the Carmarthen Jowrwel, Mareh I3th, 1863. Charlottetown, 9th April, 1863. CHURCHWARDENS AND FReeE Seats. — The! Maidstone Journal says:—* For some tine past | the question has been discussed at Tonbridge | whether churchwardens have a control over the | free seats in the parish church. The dispute arose out of a young man, named Chapman, claiming a nght te occupy a seat—a right which the churchwardens refused,to admit. After a) good deal of squabbling the matter was submitted to his Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury, who decided that the churchwardens have a full right over all the seats in the church except those which are protected by faculty, and therefore, ax ticir duty is to seat the congregation according to their discretion, they have a right to put any per- sons into any seat they may think desirable. In) reference to the 328 seais declared * free and un- appropriated for ever’ by the Society for the Eulargement and Building of Churches, his Grace was of opinion that the Society could not overrul* the law which gave the churchwardeus control | over all the seats in the church,” The Examiner. Charlottetown, April 13th, 1863. LATEST EUROPEAN NEWS. ARRIVAL OF THE STEAMSHIP CANADA | AT HALIFAX. Tue R. M.S Canada arrived at Halifax on Good Friday, the Mail by which for this Island | reached here on Monday night. Latest dates are to the 22nd ult. ‘Ths English papers are chiefly occupied with the details of the marnage ceremonies attending the nuptials of the Prince of Wales.—The Insurrection in Poland continues to increase, and seems to be commanding great attention and sympathy throughout Europe; but there does not yet appear to be any good reason to suppose that France or England will interfere in the struggle. The Poles are certainly making a valorous and formidable resistance to Russian tyranny. — Our columns to-day furnish some in- teresting extracts relating to the Polish Insurree- tion, and also to the marriage of the Prince of Wales. -_-— bo THE POLISH INSURRECTION. MORE BARBARITIES OF THE RUSSIANS. ‘Phe Russians are now operating against Lan- giewicz on four sides. Meniczot! commands the corps coming from Gzentochowa, Dobrowski that proceeding from Staszow, Gseugery that which has left Kielce, aud Bagration the troops from Miechow. In Podlaghia the Russians have again experienced a check at Biala. At Oksga, and then at Zalin, in the Government of Lublin, the Poles have obtained several successes, The Poles, profiting by experience, are decided on confining themselves ty 9 war of partizans, which will force the Russians to employ all their forces. Regiments of the Guard are gdnsequently being daily sent from &t. Petersburg to Poland. “A part of the first reinforcements occupy Lithuania. A battalion of the Emperor's Chasseurs has been senttg Warsaw. ‘Ten divisions now occupy the kingdom of Poland, with its ancient province, making 150,000 men. Reinforcements to the number of 10,000 are expected. In that part of Poland called the Kingdom 80,000 soldiers are encamped. Warsaw is occupied by 30,000, and the five fortresses by 25,000 men. In Lithuania are 60,000 troops, which is insufficient te hold that country, it being as large as Hungary. The towns of Wjlna, Grodno, Bialstok, Kowno, Duna- bourg, Polock, Vitebsk, Mohilew, Bobmisk, Miok Pinsk, Riga, and Mittau, alone absorb all these forces. Ta Podolia, Volhynia, and the Ukraine are quly 20,000 meu, who are gbsylutely necessary for hglding the towns. ‘ A letter from Posen reports gnother dreadful barbarity perpetrated by Phe Russians :—« At Krolowy Most, Colonel Nostitz set fire to a hut where about twenty unarmed persons were sleep- jug. When these unfortunates woke at the sound So much for the result of an affecting appeal of one individual, which was fully believed in, and I was a} and was not aware of the | Central National C peculiarities of this Society, and that this hittle | scene was merely got up far the entertainment Issue p I insert this merely to shew | digious effect. that those who are so backward to contribute themselves should reflect before they unjustly find In the year '36 there was a sun of £100 granted Assembly and Military, and on this ground a) found members of his congregation so destitute of of the falling beams and roaring flames, and rushed out to save themselves, they were met by the soldiery, who were standing round the hut, and | pushed them back into the fire with their bayonets. Acts of heroism are aot wanting in this national war. In the eneounter at Lodz, between 500 Poles and 800 Russians, in which 63 of the former were killed, a lady named Piptrowiez, who had omed the insurgents im man’s costume, and per- formed all the duties of a soldier, was among the dead. She long defended herself against the attacks of the Cossacks witha revolver, and then, seizing a scythe, did much execution on ber assyilauts, but at last fell, pierced with a cannon ball. The Cossacks then stripped the body, and piereed it: with upwards of a huvdred bayonet wounds.” A letter from the Polish frontier in the Debats adds :—“ When the insurgents—to the number ot 300 scythe-men and 260 chasseurs, with cavalry entered the town of Sedz, among their ranks was remarked a very handsome soldier, who was recognised as Mme. Micklaska, a lady belonging to the nobility, 23 years of age, and the mother of two children. ‘The Muscovites, who consisted ot two regunents of infantry and 100 Cossacks, sur- rounded the insurgents. ‘The Poles fought with despair against au evemy ten times as numerous. Mme. Micklaska covered herself with glory, and killed several Cossacks. At length, having fallen into the hands of the enemy, she was massacred. Fifty-seven Polish corpses were the next day still lying on the field of battle. As they were st ripped of their clothes, the numerous wounds which they had received could be counted The Russians after the fight proceeded in the dircetion of Rogew, carrying off their wounded, who filled two waggons.” The Czas says;—* The murders and ervebties of the Russians exceed all idea. The Cossacks, when returning from the expedition to the village of Flabogora, uear Miava, attacked the chateau de Debsk, M. Kanigowski, whe was on a Visit to his neighbour, the proprietor of the above named chateau, having shown himselfon the balcony w hike the troops were approaching, the soldiers observing that he wore a gold chain, killed and robbed him. The Russian Goyernment is endeavouring to de- ceive Europe with false despatches, which repre- sent the insurrection as completely suppressed, while in reality it is increasing and becoming more geveral. Each defeat is followed by the creation of fresh bodies of insurgents, who pre- cipitate themselves upon the enemy with an enthusiasin and a contempt af death worthy of the first Christians. The murder, pillage, bre, and ill-treatment which are the constant procved- ings of the Russians towards the Poles, far from inspiring terror among the population, seem, on the contrary, to still further excite the courage vt the nation. ‘Their most evident result is te aug- ment the legions of despair.” The gymnasium of the Prussian town Tazemazno, in the Grand Duchy of Posen, has been order to be closed by the Government, in consequence | insurgents. General Wysezki has beet ‘appoiuted his miltary coadjuter, while the di rection of the civil administration has beet intrusted to Poentkowski. battle are being made on both sides. Poland have tendered their resignation. ’ have also resigned. of the Corporations in that province, all the judges and judicial efficers, aud all independent public ‘masse. ‘Vhese resignations are based upenm the 'the Government in the Russian language. The | funetionaries who have resigued are said to have | the positions they vacate. | MORE MASSACRES BY THE RUSSIAN SOLDIERS. | The head quarters of the Dictator General | Langiewicz are established at Daialoszyee. | proclamation ef the Central Comittee of War- saw confers full powers upon Langiewicz as Dictator of Poland | ‘The Russians have sacked and plundered Mi- Massacres have been committed al At the Jatter place Mr. Finkenstone, corn merchant, and a British subject, was robbed and serieusly woo | A fresh body of insurgents, nambering 1,000 }men, has been organised in the districts lymg to | the south of Lublin. They are well armed, aud ‘have proclaimed a National Government me Hon. ATTORNEY GENERAL—Ile bas no right to vote on gregation, much to their credit, are coutributing | eral places, ' | from one to four bundred pounds each towards | The Warsaw Post Office authorities bare not? fied that the express trains ou the Warsaw Vienna line have ceased running. } the reduction ef the import duty on segar has) ) been postponed to the Ist January. 1865. Dele | gates trom the Russian nobility wee te assemble | to elect marshals. It was thought probable that | the vecasion would give me to political diseus-| Shia. Raeznyushi, ene of the meurgent chiefs, bas, | after many engagements, succeeded in leading his | band, which has been continually increasing i} | numbers, te Pinsk. He has oceupied that tewn | | and procksimed the Natienal Government. The insurgents have been victorious ever the Russian! treops at Ruduika, in the Govermument of Mohilew. | Count Staryenski, marshal of the Polish nobi- lity, bas tendered bis resignation. Guverner, Nazimoff has erdered the arrvst ef 300 landed | proprietors in Lithuania. The military police have just discovered that! large quantities of artillery and provisions are missing from the Gerermment depots, and that great embezzlemwents bare taken plaice. An important engagement between the insur- gents aud the Russian troops teok place ea Mon- day at Lorudek, three miles frow Malsech. The latter were compelled to retreat, aud the town was reduced to ashes. The number of insurgents coneerned in this batile amountad to 3,000 mBa. Reinforeements were seut from Kalisch te the Russians. The Grand Duke Constantine has, in eonse- quence of a council of war, giveu up his idea of proceeding tu the theatre of war. oe THE REVOLUTION IN POLAND. As we expected, the insurrection has grown into the dimensions ofa revolution. Russia is now fighting for the existence of her dynasty in Poland, and if at home she talks of the formatior of a) Vice-Regal Government under the Grand Duke Constantine, abroad she holds out no prospect of concession until the rebellion is quelled. There is 8ome circumstance conneeted with the Russe Prussian Convention which will not bear the light, otherwise, ere this, the Prussian Ministry would have placed the text of the Convention before the world. Europe is not more disposed to believe the reclamations of Count Bismurk than are the Prussian Deputies, and the movements of Prussian troops are not calculated to allay the alarm and indignation felt ky civilized men. From Poland comes intelligence which shows that Russia has to do battle with an irritated and determined people, Sa a leader who acts under the in- spiration of great principles. The proclamation of General Langiewiez is not the frantic and pur- angered utterance of @ mere revolutionary spirit, ut the calm expression ef a national sense of wrong. “ The struggle,” he says, “ was caused by terrible abuses,” and is “ directed against the eternal enemies of liberty and civilization.” The General maintains that, in spite of the unfavour- able circumstances that hastened the conflict, the struggle during two months has gained strength and now developes itself with energy. Poland devastated, demands a central power, so the General constitutes himself Dictator and makes erpetnn for om An engagement is expected on both sides, and upon its result may de 2 future welfare of Poland. re ei The Poles are summoned to a contest with the dominant power of Russian barbarism, and Lan- glewicz commences that struggie by proclaiming the equality of all citizens, granting land to the peusants, and idemnifying the proprietors. He seems to have hit the blot at once, and sees in the elevation of the peasants the means of making a kingdom. Another General, Wysozki, has been appointed coadjutor to Langiewicz, and Poeut- kowski is entrusted with the civil adtiuistration What was therefore at first apparently only a mere armed remonstrance against the conscription, has expanded into a revolution which goes down to the existence of social disorganization, and appeals to the interests of the Poles. They know what the text of the Treaty of Vienna provided — a Constitutional Government for Poland ; and they know what Constitytional Government has dove elsewhere. olier cause never appealed to human sympathy ; and probably Europe has never been so uch nioved as it hax hy the cause of the Poles. The Russian Government, with the blind- ness which precedes destruction, refuses to Europe the concessions due to humanity: and we may therefore expect to see some movement made by France of a warlike character. No war woul be so popular in Franee as a wr for Poland ; and the Emperor knows that Legitimists, Hy eanists and Republicans woulfsupport him in it to 4 man. His necessities may compel him te do that which he may veally bé unwilling to do before the pear is ripe; but Fraace, permeated with generous sympathy for the Poles, may not tolerate a dilatery eres of the duty ef iatervention. The mperor will oon be obliged to do something to bure the atteution of his people from Mexico: and of forty of the students having joimed the ?ylish LeEMBERG, March 11.By resolution of the omnittee, General Langiewicz has been proclaimed Dictator of Poland, and has da proclamation, whieh bas produced a pro- Preparatians for a Cracow, March 12—It is confirmed that the independent members of the Council of State for The , If the Govern-| embers of the Municipal Council of Warsaw ment or any individual imprudently mvest their money in aspeculation to change a Parwh church into a proprictory church, and thus occupy and make a traffic of pews at a time when the Minix- ter’s salary was paid by a christian society, they have only to mourn over their pe-| and ) : ; ’ dent cuniary loss and folly, as well as their ignorance | functionaries, have sent in their resignations en | mm not being better versed in Ecclesiastical law.) : ; a The intention is said to be, to retain only the resolution net te receive avy communication from Councii pews, and to discontinue any further rant; but when the Church is properly assessed, ries y all the pews will be lable to the assessment to) declared infamous ali whe should couseat to fill! meet all the expenses of the Church, without seck- Cracow, March 19.— Intelligence received here from Lithunania states that all the Marsbals | A| and | Private letters from St. Petersburg assert that} during the royal received to his back: gret to state that one the conduct of Prussia never afforded a fairer pretext for the accomplishment of French views on the Rhine. England has not neglected ber duty; for bath Prussia and Russia have been made aware how much the Engiish people deplore the Commer ption and the convention. The first was an aet of bay. barity, and the last is only an act of wilumanity coveted by the politic form of diplomacy, The Caar of Russia and the King of Prussia have eg. listed the sympathies of Englishmen for the Poles who, in other circumstances, would onl have been rebels; but the conscription ole the quarrel just, and the convention sanctified it by au appeal to the first law of humanity, the desirg of selt-preservation. The Peles could not be ex. ected to submit to the conscription, nor could Re rope endure the eonvention. The submission of the Poles would have reduced them te the condition of slaves; the assent of Europe would have destroyed the action of public opinion, and recognised the right divine of kings to act ay ' military martinets. We have now some for the Poles, tor they have placed their cause oq a just foundation, and they may evondfiently re} on Europe. Even if they are worsted in the fight, Russia will be compelled, in her own interest, tg do justice, for the tide of revolution may sw inte Holy Rassia, and shake the fabric upon w rests the despotisin of the Czars. Eart Reussec’s Desrarcu on Inrervey. TION IN Potann.—La France says>— “ Earl Russell has addressed a despatch to the Powers who signed the Treaty ef Vienna, statmg that the present condition of Poland renders diploma tir intervention desixable, to require from Russia full and entire execution of the first article of the fina) act of the treaty of Vienna of June 9th, 1615, France cannot bat perceive im the mitiative taken by the English Cabinet an eeho of ber own views.” The same paper states that Sweden aud Portugal have given ip their adbesion to the vicws of Earl Russell, thas Austra shows a disposition te adept the same step, but that Prussia and Spain have net yet returmed am answer. Rervusal ov AUSTRIA TO INTERFERE OX BevALe ov PotandD.—This Governmend will not adopt the Anglo-French theory of non-inter- vention, althonyh ot disapproves the intervention of Prussia in Poland. The policy of the Austriag Government in this matter dees uet surprise us, as men in office have beew beard te say that Austria was ill rewarded by the Westesn Powers jor the powerful moral support which she afforded them during the war m the Crimea Count Rechberg must be well aware that the formation of a Kingdom of Poland with from 15 to 20 millions of inhabitants would be a boon for Austria, but he will net take the initiative in such a matter, as he belongs to that school of politicians whic: bas a kind of veneration for the things that be. The ed | French note respecting Poland has been replied te, but we have net heard that any written commu. nication has been reeeived from the English Go- vernment. It is, however, certain that Lord Bloomfield has by word of mouth made knowa to Count Reehberg the opinions and views of the British Minister for Foreign Affairs... The Polixh insurgents are aware that Franee and England are well inclined to them, and their leaders baye repeatedly expressed their conviction that same- thing will be done by the Western Powers for the alleviation of the sufferings of the imbebitauts of Polaud. ee CELEBRATION OF THE PRINCE OP WALES’ NUPTIALS. ( From the Londen News of the World.) THE WLUMINATION VICTIMS. From inguiries institoted at the tarious metre politan hespitals, it would appear that theve could bet have been many less than one bundsred persous ‘anore or less injured; and although the tide of pe | pular opinion appears te attribute these oeeur renees in the mata te City police mismanagement, it has new been ascertained that that portion of the metropolis under charge ef the metrepelitan po lice was pet without Ms serious casuultics aba The following are the arts mpow the subject ob tamed from the various hospitals >— from its close proximity to the great seat ef pree sure and crewds ef vehicies passing through the narrow streets of the City, all wending thew way * to the great point of attraction, Ly i bad necessarily to tube the liow’s share of altentiom to the vietins of any disaster whirl might happen in such a crowel within the himeted contines ei the City of Lendon proper. With a praiseworthy ture- sight, therefore, throughout the etening, there was an available medical staff, ready tor almest gy emergency, and freas the number of cases reeris- ed between nine and twelve o'clock, they were kept im full ocenpation In addition te the de- ceased persons on whese bodies inquests have beens held. there stil) remaaiie me Se. 's Hospital the following :—Jahm Howes, me was picked out of the beap of persons om ho toa ‘wear Ludyateldll, where sae ef the unfortansie females were billed, bas received very sesere ie Jory te the abkdbanen from being traupled upva, but is now reperted te be progressing favoura- bly.—Roseita Lyess, whe was knocked down ia the crowd on Saterday 7tb imst., and tran upon, has a compeaud tractwre of the beg, a case is a very coubttal eae—Jebn Nicholls, hr- Ken beg; Edward Capp, ceenpound tractiore of the kuee; George Austin, serious injuries to the back; Saues Yaylor, broken keg; James White, mjury te the head and legs; Pheinas Dunkley, broken leg; Predemek Parsons, injury te the bead; Wil tam Cooper, broken leg; Robert Nesbitt, beokew leg; Ann Howkes, injury te the knew. The whole of the above, with the exception of Rosetta Lyow, are desermbed te be progressing favourably. There were in addition, however, during the eveu- ing of the iluminations, and on the day of the roy al procession, at least between thirty and footy perseus taken te St. Bortheliemew's, who, basing been examined, notwithstanding soue had ev idee ty fractured timcbs and serious bruises, preferced being couveyed te their om hows. Gurt's.—At thts nrstitution there are five per- sons subering from very serieoms, MH not, in some imetaners, fatal injares ;—W. J. Harvey, a fitthe bey, aged ouly eight years, and ore New-street, Hackney-read, was taken by his friends to see the illuminations, In the crus near the Mansien-house he was dragged away fiom them aud threwn down. ble was so frightlully trarmpied upes that his right hand and fere arm were completely smashed and tere te pieces, sud bis beft leg alse wo crushed and fractured, that am- patation of both Limbs was reudered indispensalle, and was abatet nomediately after ad- mission. The poor ebild still survives the dread ful shock, but it is im great danuger—Mr. lease Walker, aged 46, silk manufacturer, of the City, but residing at Standferd-hill, has fractured ribs and serious injury te ove of his shoulders. We regret to say Mr. Walker has since died. It ap — that a colliswe twek place om London- ridge, which threw the unfortunate gentleman from a van he had engaged fer the conveyance of his family and neighbours to witness the illumiow tions. He was removed to Guy's Hespitel, where, botwithstanding every care and attention, he gradually sank, and expired ow Sunday last. An inquest was held on Wednesday, at the hospi tal, and the jury returned a verdict of “ Accidem tal death.”—James Dabbs, aged 44, coffee-house keeper, of Garden-row, Lridge-road, Victoria Fracture of bones of one of the legs. A 1 case.—James M‘Pherson, aged 30, butcher, residing in the Maldon-road, Kentish-towa, 4 broken leg.—Margaret Caird, aged 49, residing in Highworth-street, Edgware-read, a broke leg. Progressing favourably. ‘There were seve- ral other persons with injuries of various kinds taken to Guy’s on the night of the illumination, who, having been attended to, were enabled w proceed to their own homes. CHARING-CRoss. — On the night of Tuesda’ there were several persons taken to this hos tah suffering from injuries reeeived in the crowds in the vicinity of Pall-mall, the Haymarket, Regent street, Charing-cross, and Whitehall. serious which came under the notice of Mr. Tr vers, the resident surgeon, were :—Mary Cock rane, aged 60. This untortunate woman wa knocked duwn in the crowd in Pallanall East, and remains in the hospital with a fracture of the thigh bone of the left leg. She is described 34 progressing favourably, but her age is much against her.—Thomas Wilson was received with an injury to the knee, but ultimately was cot- veyed home.—William Allen, of 28, York-street, W estininster, was received with a fractured rib and injury to the hip and ade, but after being at- ten to was taken to his own residence.—Twe females were brought in apparently lifeless from suffocation, but they subsequently turned out be cases of hysteria, caused by the fright and pressure they had been subjected to in the crowd. At the Middlesex, St. George’s. and Weatmins- ter Hospitals, there were some few cases slight injury received and attended to, but nove of any serious character; and St. Mary's, Uni- versity, and King’s College Hospitals Were for tunately exempted from any extra pressure upou their medical riage. George Parry, park-keeper, who fell from the ladder at the lodge at thd Gehues of H yaoparh, procession, expired at St.George’s Hospital, on Tuesday, frou the severe injures he - staffs arising from the royai wat In connection with the fatal accidents, we re- : : of the untortunate person who was killed in London was a young mail named Bewley, who served his apprenticeship a4 a shipwright in the Devonport dockyard, and oul¥ about six weeks since exchanged with anothet workman to leave for Deptiord dockyard. to relate, almost at the same hour that he met with the fatal accident his wife gave birth to 3" iat Se a a young widow and three small children, and his wother idyw besades, at Mori¢e Town. at, oo witew Sv. Bar THOLOMEW'S.— This noble institution, » The most J