aE

QE ear ee

ee

hw = rt a.

<4

—

sali Alii

— or = an ye

a

“of a hatchet

iui casseeetdedtnsdiidinaeemumnmeensmananemmacrd

MINER, 2 > Se

erences meneame

THE

FEBRUARY 4, 188s,

The Millman Trial.

trial of William Millman, charged murder of Mary Tuplin, has il-

rut with the lustrated the truth of the saying, ‘* Ye are Not the be-

reaved and suffering and dishonored famil

members one of another.”

ws only, but the entire social fabric of the Provines, bas been disturbed and excited te an unwonte! degree by the tragedy of the Southwest River, the pistol shots of the assassin, the unfortunate girl sunk in} the river of shame and death with the

bullets in her head, anl the respectable young man charged with the awful crime. Man for human life, however insignificant and ap-

cannot live himself alone. A pare tly unimportant, cannot be cut short without affecting materially the ‘‘ country at large ;" and when « human life is ended

by means of a pistol in the hands of & brutal and cowardly murderer, the coun- try at large shows that it is materially interestel by the crowded Courtroom and the reports of the trial are seanned and eritt-

conditions of the

'

the eagerness with which newspaper

Cised by all classe . and pe ple lu tris case the interest has been great y enhanced bf the positions occupied

by the families immediately concerned. Both have lived long in the Province, and beth are widely known and respectably connectsd.

The conduct of the trial reflects creJit Hon. Mr. Sul-

livan aud Mr. Peters presented the case for

upon all concerned in it.

the Ceown with very great ability; while the defence was ingeniously and a lmirably

couducted by Mr. E. As for-

the counsel

J. Hodgson. ensic efforts, the speeches of engaged were remarkable. There can be no doubt that, given the occasion opportunity, the Burristers of this Province are able to acquit themselves as credit bly as those of any oter Province of Canad.

Uader the direction of Judge Hensley, the

tris procee lel sm ot'ily and s utisfa:torily, |

Sheriff Curtis for fully meting all the reawnab'e requir-

and we have t> thank High

ments of the press and the crowd.

_—_—o-m «

—~We hoped t» have jiad a verbatim re- port of the speech of Mr. E. J. Hodgson, Q. C., in defence of the prisoner Millman ; batas the speech was « long one, and as Mr. Hodgsun iseme of the most rapid of speakers, a verbatim tepott is “out of the question Mr. Oxenham 's repert is, how- ever, a very extendel one, though it does not, of course, do Mr. Hodgson full justice; and, as Mr Ho lors um has not been abie to carefal y revise all the proof-sheets, may be incerrect in some particulars. We shall endeavor to have a revised repoit for the Weexity Examiner.

The New Biskop of Nova Scotia.

The qualifications of the new Bishop of Nova Scotia are thus anneunced : 1. Dr. Courtney is an Enylishwan, and has con- siderable experience as « parish priest and incuiubent of Eny ish parishes, as well as in the United States. 2 he following is the vfficisl record concerning him: (») Edueat- ed at University of Glasgow ;(b) Ordained decom (1364), priest (1865) by the Arch- bish por Camerbury ; ( ) Curate of Had- low, Kent, Buy, 1864; ( '() Perpetual i urate + f Charles Chapel, P youth, Eny,, 1865 1S7U 3 (¢) Incumbent of St Jude's, Glasgow, Scot! nel. L&70-18 6 ; (f) Associate

re to vi Sc. Thomas’, cttyant! diovese of New Y¥. rk, 1876 ; (u) Now rector of St. Pou’s, Bustow; (0) Tue following extract

fron te t mony

7 written by #«) ygentkeiman heidmy a

lie : : + public position whe kwows bim = : au is Weil qua ified to judge from his mentary of the reyuiremeuts of this Ciloce se, 8 sak — > * 6 » 3 ° peaks for itselt ; ** He is gne whe draws wen te him whe would slip his arm into that of the cleryyman, and be his counselling bishop, Without f Tryettinyg to be >

his syatpathisiug

THE: DAILY EX

; DAILY EXAMINER. PHS POPLIN TRAG&DY. ‘Trial of William Millman. |

and the}

He is the kind of man!

See ithe cichAeiahanths accgemnenndemendeimeiaetantedadanteetenn matters eee -

em

ADDRESS

On Behalf of the Prisoner,

| | |

|

( Mr. Oxenham’s Report Coutinued. )

AFTERNOON SESSION. GENTLEMEN OF THE JURY :— You will ‘remember that before recess I Jaid down (for your guidance the principles upon ‘which I conceived this case should be tested, and pointed out what tests should

! |

be applied to the _ evidence sub- mitted to you before you can bring ina verdict thereon. I will not re-

peat what I then stated, but will ask you tou bear in miad that these are the tests upon which [ base all my arguments. What I lay down for your guidance is not my own, but the statement of the best authorities on law, which have been handed down tous. That a foul and terrible mur- der has been committed there can be nv doabt. It is not my inteation to go through the whole of the evidence submitted to the court in this case. There are a vast num- ber of circumstances which | dv net question, and which | therefore will not deny. 1 will not contcovert the et stement that a boat crosse | the river that evening, aud thatthe

bn ys saw

A MAN SITTING BY THE RKOADSIDE,

as these facts are quite consistent with client's innuceuce. Kuowing that you took neves ou all these pornis, and assuming that the whole of tue evidence is fresh in your memorics, 1] shall direct my attention to those facts and circumstances which ldeem it proper for me to comment

my

upeo., The hour at which this event took pace isot the utmost importance. his 1s ulways so in matters of this nature. The

difference of a few minutes may be sufficient to iead to the convietion a3 to Whe.her the man fbefore you is guity or not. We have no right to assame that any witness’ clock on wateu was rigid or wieng. Wemust take the evidence as we tind it, aud MAK< THF BEST WE CAN

of it. JT wish t> direct your a‘tention ‘to tie evidence ywiven by the litle Adanis girl, as to the time she suw the man cross the river ina bout and f.sten her. That is one of the mos important points in. the “hole case. Twill} siow that whoever crossed the river in ihat bout dat soat about 6.20 o'clock. The girl ssid that it was between six and seven v'elogk. She says, “Liovked at the clock a minute or two betore I wens out, aud it was tea minutes pas; six, and it woa dtake me about fifteen minutes to walk to the place where I sew the mm ia tie boat.” Give her the advant Le of every tioment of the time and we stall tind thacic Wold be about twen y-five miun es p si sixo'cluck when the m at cross in ihe boat, Lhe: Joseph Davison said that the tine was betweeu talf-past six <ud half- past seven. Bat an examination of . his evi- dence wul show that half-pewt six was the proper time. He says that after secing the tan he went up to where they “were repairmny a house; there he remained an hour and a half; he then remained fifteen’ minutes while they were h+rnessing a horse; dnd it took hiin fifteeu m nutes to waik home. and then he states; ‘*I got home etore dark.” Now add: the hour and a halt and the two tilteen minutes toyether to half-past six, and it will make Lisli-pist eight—just before dark--wheress I have proved that until afier seven o'clock Mill- man had not left his house nearly two miles away. There can be no doubt whatever that half-past six wasthe hour. Whoever was in that boat it was not Wiiliam Millman. The man who crouched about the woods with ferns around his neck wight be the murderer, but William Millinan could not be the may, Before you can be cer- tain on the matter,

YOU MUST HAVE THE CLEAREST PROOF

that the man who committed the crime crossed the river in that boat, and that that man was Millman.. The Crown Law Officers will, of course, attempt to argue that this is so, but it is iuspossible to beliere that it was so. I know that many per- sons are watching the progress of this cass with a keen agovy. Only a ‘nother, father, sister or brother can feel it in the fullest sense. The mother of the pri- soner was placed on the stand. Her \story was a clear, plain, unvarnisbed one. the Milliman family, on the evening of the murder, cousuited together abont going to the cuurch meeting “ome thought it too late to

she Sew

brother He is rebust and he ilthy, about fi 'y years of ave. Intellectucily he is ab'e, of naturally fine powers, highly culti-

Vated.a preache r, and, more tlian that, an c ral er s at . »

Orated He isa mode rate high churchman, and enthusiastic lover of and believer in the Anglican Chureh, and cherishes a beauti- ful, ornate and reasuvable ritual.”

i

Attempted Murder.

An Awmberst special to the Halifax Herald reports that a terrib'e tragedy ws enacted there on the night of the 3lst uit., the result of which will in all probsbility be the death of a man. A boy passing hloby ble street in the town, heard the cry of : MurJer”™ in « den vecupied by Richard Brundage, on 1 on entering the house found a stranger c¢ dled Peter Carroll with a ter- rible gash in his forehead and covered with blood. The alarm was immedi wtely given, and Brundage was quickly anestel and put in jail, Carroll was placed in the hands ut doctora, who report that there is h irdly n hope of his res very, the blow in the forehead having broken open his skuli. The blow was inflicted with the sharp edge while Carroll was he'd on the floor by sume one e'se, said to be Brundage’s son. He was alsu struck with the blunt side of the same weapon in severid places about the back of the he id. Carry ] has of late been working at «Fallerton’s mill, at Athol, aud was probab'y in town for a time, as he was seen during the day badly the worse of liquor. Brundage is venerally rui-sorked, the present occasion being nu exception.

ew - --

_Poruatiox os tue Uxtrep Starrs. —The New York Tribune pablishes « carefully pre: pared estimate of the prob:ble population of the United States- at ihe present” time and puss 1 at 62.025.5.7 pesons. This figure is arrived at “by allowing the ratio of deaths and births, which past experience bas revealed _ wlding excess of births and iutlax by im- eieee ee during each year to the population

60d og Oe SMMS Of 1900 Which Guus amd they POdgreed hefare

Union row, about the most lisreputa- |

a

winws FF

go. but Mis. Millman got ready, washed, dre-sed and went off witn ner husband to the leaureh, and these facts are also depos. jto by Johu Millman, Mrs. Evans, May, | Jobannah and Bradford. Gentiemen, if these people wants d to come in here and lie to you, how easy it would have been to make a state- went different to that made by them, and which it would not have been possible for mo: tal man tocontradict. They could have

said it was seven o'clock before they started for church, But upon no siugie vint dil they attempt to deviate from the trath. If apy man or woman

told the tru h it was the father and mother ‘of the prisoner. They went to the meet- ing and Jefe their son bebind them at Lome. ‘A yood many people were dt the church betore them. ‘That meeting was caled tor huf. post seven o'v o:k, and tne children toid them tucy would be too late.

THEIR SON, WILLIAM, REMAINED AT HOME

for five or ten minutes, and was then seen by bis sister with atelt hat ou yoing off. to the

river to bathe. I «kfy anyoue to believe tiat Millian coult have been in the boat that erossed the river at half-p s;

six, or thereabouts, alluded to by the turer

witnesses alrewy referred to. In order jtu be in a position to commit that ‘crime, he must have crossed ia that boat. Forty miuutes after that time,

j William Millman, was with his father and motier two miks from the p'ace where the boat was fastened after it wad crossed tue river. If you break one link in one put of your chain of evidence, the who'e cise suspended fiom it fal’s to the ground. The whole chain is only as stiong 43 the wesekesc link. Bunt tre material part of t ¢ evidence re ates 10 the hour at which Mary Tuplin last ‘left her father’s house. Within a’ week after the event had taken place, the investigation was held before the Magistrate, and «several witnesses Swore that it was uine or a little’

after nine o'clock, when | the ‘girl: lefe© her |

father’s house. I will point ; nuce of this evidence, point out the imp

} Before

' ort. n the testimony: given the Magistrates all .the facts” were

_ clear In the minds of the witnesses who -were |

occasion. ‘Shes: witnesses Welt swan nad al- towed to tell-their-own story in their own §y,

; , ‘the Magistrited ‘dasa Wee Biue Ovlecs bela Mary dep ow

bee dy “e

+ ose aes Sie *

a en pea ee

- SATURDAY, FEBI

4 1\8hGae es

UARY

2 en en ne te , ne - Ae P ————— et a scent

left her father’s house ou~the night of the murder. John Tuplin, the father of the girl, swears to this statement: ‘I went out to look for Mary about twenty . minutes after she went out.. I went te George Profit’s.” Now, George Protit says: ‘*Johu Tup'in came to my place about hvif-past nine o'clock.” Now, lupin said it would take him only five minutes to go to Profit’s and return home again. ‘It is very clear then that it was

SOME. MINUTES AFTER NINE

when Mary Tuplin left home on that night. Then little Donald Tuplin, the girl's brother, said that the'sun was just setting when he saw the man in the woods. He came to his fither’s house, and ah hour'and a half after that the girl went oat. These three persons all unite in the statement that when the girl left her father’s, house, it was past nine o'clock. Now after leaving the house she and her murderer had to travel down a wet, bad road, a cuw path a mile long, and to cross ho less thah seven fences. She was then shot, placed in the boat, a rope and stone procured, and as there were no Oars In the boat, the latter was poled a quarter 0; @ mile down the river and the hody put out there. Now, if Millman was concerned in this deed, it would be necessary for hiuf to do all this and then” afterwards travel no less than three-quarters of a mile after that to reach his father’s hoase; so that the whole business had to be done within a single hour, including. the going” home, Was it possible for mortal man to do all that within so shortatime? It is said that they met tovether to talk about a marriage. Well, it is not usaal for git!s to go aud meet their young men, with whom they hope to arrange w marriage, elothed as this gitk was in a cot- ton dress with no petticoats and bare head, It is unlikely she would go to meet a young nan in such a dress, I am informed that when young girls go to meet their young men they dress themselves. differently from that. Mrs. Tuplin herself and Donald her son both.swear tnat it was after uine o'clock woen Mary left their house, To say that she reached the shore and was murdered and laid in. the river, @fd that the whole mutter was gone through in time to allow young Millmim to re teh bis home a few minates after ten o'clock, is drawing ‘too lirge'y upon the credulity af any, living. man ani is mere than any persom coud be expected to believe WHEN DID THE PRISONER ARRIVE NOME?

Aecording to Rev. Mr. Reavh’s testimony the necting ca® oat abeut ten o'clock, «nd he favs to prove that his time was had been eorr.cted by th: station clock. There con be no possibility of mistuke in Mr Reagh’s statement. He positively swears that it was le ween fife atl seventeen minutes pist ten when he entered Mr. Jaias Evans’ avuse, after putting away his hnse, and that -Milltaan’s pure iis must have been home hy that time, Mr. Reagh had» walked to James Evans unharnessed his horse, watered him, fed and bedded him, and carrivd articles from his corriage into the house. Vohen he entered the house he compwel-his watch with Jam-s vans’ clock and found it was from titeen t» seventédén minateg past ten o'clock. What is the testimeny of the father aud moher of the prisoner? The mother states toast wuen she got home she went tnt» her réom, where she remained for ciyht-or ten niisutes, and when she came out sae saw Wail. ham in the kitc:.en, quietly going to bed and bidding bisanether vood wight. Que cannot, «f course, tell to what depths any mn may jail. But that .scene doesnot bring before o's mind the picture of a murderer just from the murder of his victim, an burying her in the river. Had it been other- wise, sarely in this half-grown lad there would

xives US correct, as it

have been some sigusy of pertarbation. He would never have been the quiet young man he ‘showel himself to be in tlie evening, wishing his father good night

before he went to bed. - 1f he-were guilty, he would have heard ringing in his ears that deith scream of the murdered girl. Hf this young min dii the deed, he must have had

NERVES OF TRON AND A CONSTITUTION OF STEEL,

In order. to do ..it.. in 30 ‘short atime, he must have deliberately planned every portion of it beforehand, and s» arranged matters that when his father and mother vot home from chure he appeared to be as little concerned as if he had never com- mitted the deed. ‘The penance of a murderer cumménces ftom the mument the fatal deed is done. He sees every day the phantom of his victim, and at times he has been knowa to break oat in wild exclamations in his sleep, dreaming of his terrible deed. The ‘vision standsa~before him when he sits «down and when he rises up, It pursues him wherever he goes, It is by his bedside when he tries to sleep, and appears. before him when he awakes. To assert thatthis young man committted sv brutal a crime with all the hardihood of a miduight ass issin whose victims could not be numbered, and then to speak of him as a weak-minded man, is, under all the circumstances of the case,too much. for auy reasonable personty believe. Gentlemen, not a sign of weakoess could have been exhibited in the panning and performance: of this foul deed. . Its perpetrator must have been one of thé strongest nerved men who ever com- mitted sucha crime, [ cannot imagine that a boy of nineteen years of age, wao had never even left his. father’s house, even to eome to Charlottetown until he caine ~ ty con- sult with me aboat the circumstanzes which tuok place at that time, with a view of pro- tecting his character trom aspirations sowzht to be cast upon it,

COULD HAVe BEEN CAPABLE OF COMMITTING SO

REVOLTING A CRIME,

It was deliberately planned, whoever did the desd, There are some other matters to which Lingst vew refer iu conaectiorn wits the ease batere you. It has beea siid that there was a motive’ i athe committal of this murder on tae part of the prisoner at the ber; th wb he hid seduced the girl, and thit he wast» be the father ot the chitd. It is Strange and to be dep.vred that such a statemeat has been made, If it can be proved thit he had no exmection wih her untl the 5:h Jauaary, i8s7, and- that the fatus is a six moaths O.8, Low is it possible t'»t he coud be tie futwer of it? Further evidence is needed be- fore such a chuge cau be sustained. The six months ha.l uo. eiap-el frou the due a. luded te, The evidence % ven was to the effect that the fetus was between a's x aid s-veu months ove, Itisthe duty of the Crown to PRODUCE ALL THE EVIDENCZ

necessary to thiow light upon all points. It 13 more important than ary other Jnatterto Hud out the exact time when Mary Taplin left her father’s house on the night she was mur- dered. She had Mrs, Sluven's hébe if her arm3, an! before going out, handed it back. to its mother. Why has not Mrs, Slavin been produced by the Crown law. officers as a wit- bess sn this case?” ‘That wom. is living at Malpeque, and could very easily have been brought here as a witness. In auch a casa as this no witness should be left out who could give.ans evidente Dearing upoa it. Idont say trab this vo.n’s bestimopy .was ‘Rept-hack,

“t'Tit he drove home a n

And “now¥- I .come te

pias aeye; bard ‘a pistol shob with two’ shrieks. “OAC was'a prolonged ‘seregn,” Aft Me and eipequkttace

wud loud thab ie Wee twouty .mauaioe to ory rs in i wee. ae i ¥ a owe

grounl that the enl justiist ta: on

ba. itsho:ld fe secured, as it would t's

: ae : 7 Res ’ < tind to

nov eee before a -crowded Coupticem in | clear the young man. © “ed ‘ee -— dijon e A ao ae 6 > ei » Ste ° ‘ :

presence of 4 large audience, as on the present | thetime wlien the-shots weredired: Mr. Wodd-

eleven. Hé thought fifteen or twenty min- utes intervened tween th ‘time the sit was fired, and he looked at the clock ue he had only one and # half miles to drive, That would fix the shot at twenty minutes past ten o’clook. No doubt th t was the tine of the death shot, Woodside remembers the fact well. The shriek forces it upon his memory. For never before had he heard the shriek of a woman who had been shot and was dying hard, Lf it — one of the witnesses fifteen minutes to drive one mile and a quar- ter, how long would it take this man to dv all that was done, ant then dispose 0 the corpse of the young woman 2 You can easily see that the prisoners inno- cence is quite consistent with all the facts of the case. Edward Warren says: ** ] went out of the house just before going to bed, just before 10 o'clock, when I heard the shots.” Nota single witness places the time of the shots

before ten o'clock. One says it was abvut |

this time, and another about that; but all agree that it was after ten o'clock. One witness in his wagon thought it was a gun sot which he heard, accompanied with no cry. The shot accompanied by theery was no doubt the one that took the girl’s life. Mrs. Millman’s testimony was that the young man (her son) told her he had been smoking dt the door when she came home. It is certain he did not come into his father’s house panting after a two mile RUN FROM THE SCFNE OF THE MURDER.

His boots were left in the kitchen and his socks were placed by his bed. Mrs Millman fully describes all the work she did after she came home, and says it occupied fully fifteen minutes. She and her husbaud then talked over the prosp:cts of the proposed church tea. Che futher seys it struck eleven after he weit to bed. Gen-lemen, is it possible that the story of the father and mother of this boy is un rue? You will either have to accept it as true or that they have perjured themselves, and that their innocent little girl did the same thing. J believe in my heart that_ if

stating one word tiat was uatrue would have |:

saved their brothg’s (the prisoner's) lite, his sisters would not Mave said it; neither would his parents have said it tu save their son,

rison -r went to bed and slept that sleep w Gould not come upon him had he beew hor of this crime. I now come to tie

- of Somers, as to the man he-stw in the bhsh that evening. I must say t at James Somers did vos impress me us a truth. ful young men, The las: word was net out of the Attorney-Generai’s mouth — befue Somers began to reply. Ll never saw a witness 80 wi ling to testify agaiust another, but when I spoke iv him his tongue seemed paralyzed, andthe had to make Sone pauses. At first he stid the min he saw wore a straw hat, then w black. hat, amb.othen a brown hat. Yet the Atturuey- General permitied that witn s3te come oatef the box withaus pro- ducting the hat’ ia hs possession, and placing it in the witness’ hand. ‘The hat was not, therefore,

IDENTIFIED Bi THAT WIENE33 as theone he ssw worn by the mun in the soals with ferus about his neck. That im- portan$tink ia the chiinis wanting. You kiow that whea a meu is putine jail charged with a crime like this, ever thing he has is ta rsacked for evidence of te deed commited. ven the prisouer’s letters to his mother were subject tothe serativy of the p vsecution. Por six months tais yong men did not utter aword tiat they were neh aqtaused wits. They even paced aminin ue cell fw tie parpose of torturing hin — into a~ couf -ssinn,. aud te get something out of him timt would eondema him as yuilty of th's eeia@s—>1 tae bts. After i plaved my witness on the stert ti- prosecution produced the hat whith hoe act taken fiom us, but they did not dare ts ask their witness if this hat of Millinan’s eves ve- sembled the hat the man in the woxuls wore, and the Crown prevented me fiom doing se not producing the hat until their case wes clused and all their witnesses fad ieft the court. Certain _little boys, when driving their cows hume that eveniug. are siidto have seen this man intie woo is. They were ‘Donald Tuplin and three vthers. Four boys are mentionad. Somers says that alter he

SAW THE MAN IN THE WOODS

he had some talk with these boys, yet the boys do not sty one word about tht conver-

sation. Now, you can see why the Crown permitted Somers gto leave the stand without producing the ha’. Do you think the prosecution forgot it? No. Somers said: ‘I saw the man with ferns about his neck just for a

second, and saw him put his hand.up before his face.” He could not tell what height the man was, neither couid he tell aayvthing about his general appearancs. He could not even tell the color of his hair, yethe hid the as-

surance to s.y that he afterwards recog- nized him at the Magistrate’s court as

the mw he saw inth2 woods with ferns about hismeck. One thing Somers is clear about, the man in the woods wore a straw hat. Now, gentlemen, did Miilman wea- the straw hat thatevening? I think you cin safely say that he did net. His mosher, futher an.l sisters swear that he had ona felt hat. Therefore, although the crowa hal the straw hat in ‘‘ourt, they did not dare to ask Somers if that was the one, or even like

the one, he saw worn by the man in the woods. We now come to the mitter of the pistol. Unquestionably

Millman borrowed a pistol from Power, under the circumstances stated by that witness. It is also true that he procured some cartridges. He tells me thathe got five of them. You head where the two went that were fired off, for the Crown accounted § for that Oae was fired as he went down the roid and the other was fired through a pank. The Crown asks us to believe that when Power asked Milunan on Monday for the pistol, Millman ssid that he wanted it for Tues lay evening,--leaying us to infer that it was for the purpose of shooting the girl deal. Have we not thoroughly accounted for the two shots which were fired from the p'stel? Milman told Power that he wanted the revolver particular'y for Tuewlay evening. Now, asta the statement thiut Millman asked Patrick Power to mike a certain statement for him before a Justice of the Prace. I will net attempt to deny it. But I3 THAT CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE

up» which to couvict the prisuner at the bar? Look at the pos.tien of th.t young man at tawtine with the serieus chiurge agains’ him, When he see those circtimsiances han sing over bim, aid knew that this crime did wot rest upon bom, b+ sietully aud wrong: fully and stupidly did au act that wos wrong ; bat it certainly was not an admi sion of his guilk. You mus: remember at that very time theve Was a Werant swore out against him for murder. I hive that warrant here betore me. Jt was swore out against him on the 30th June, and subsequently altered to the 4th of July.

Lorne. Hotel Ce...

Company (Limited) will ba het l + th ociee

of Messrs. MeLeoou & Me Douald, on Tor aay EVENING, the jth inst, at 8 ovclows. A ful attendance En, B. OROCSET ? tA --Gl ‘ a Tvs wore Sop yt4 oD “aoe *

HOME MANUEACTURES.

VERSUS ITMIPORT BD 0 bs ( UR New Factory is furnished with the most Modern Labor Saving Machines.

now able to offer good, reliable home-made Ferniture as imported aud guarantee the buyer

20 Per Cont Better Value for his Moncy

————0

. We are cheap in price as any

We invite careful comp wrisoa of Goods atid Pri . ‘ ces, and feel ave money by trading with us. d feel confident that our patrons

Large Stock ! New Designs! Cut Prices!

70:

MARK WRIGHT & CO,

Manufacturers of Honse, Store, Otlize, Church and School “Furniture.

UNDERTAKING.

Jan. 6, 1888,

FISH MARKET,

—_—_—_——— Slo

909 Quiatals Choice Family Codfish,

100 * Hake,

159 Barrels Labrador and Bank Herviag, ee in bulk, Mackerel, Shad, Salmon, &. K

-

MEATS, PROVISIOVS AND G300RRIES OF ALL KINDS,

“aie

Housekeepers can get on the Premises all they. teqnire, and at the Lowest Prices, without the trouble of travelling from sture to store, Orders by Mail or Telephone promptly attended tu, Mid all Goods delivered in the City free of charge.

J. Hi. MYRICK & CO.

Charlottetown, Jan. 28, 1888.

it is not often really honest goods ave offered at the prices we quote below. But the fact is We have a good many Dolmans, UIsters, Jackets, Jerseys, Sacks and Rediveg- votes remaining, although our sales ia this department have been very large, and we are now Offering all that remains at extraordinary low prices to turn them into cash, before stock-taking. Ulsters worth up to $4, for $2; $8 for $5; Jackets worth $4.25 for $3; worth $7 for $5, and our whole stock at equaily low prices.

These prices are certainly remarkable, but there is no questioning them---we guarantee them genuine. Call and secure first choice.

BEER BROS,

MILL OWNERS!

HY Disstoy & Sos Saw

s —ARE TILE

i

BEST IN THE WORLD,

FOR SALE WITH FILES, CILS, SWAGES, Ko.

—BY-.

A SPRCI‘L MEETING of the Lorn Brey!

City Hardware Store. arhvcataaer dy shine 13, 133 j am