s

HUHUXN UUNFT 1929

~~- -.,»~- ~~~ ‘ ' - `--_-,-- _ A == =p g

‘W23"i;;';i;;'*,-‘""'"f"~“_'i"'“' _ ' "-~' <v~~ ~ "fs ., ,_ _ ,_

,_-S o .~L _ .

v if . .

_ ,_ _ _ _ .. -you _

1 Text' Of Judgment 1 ~ sl‘in.'“.;u.';:°.°:..f":.'i.':.z°:°°:iz1 _ _ _ _ “ ‘Ig .Ertmdiridn __l~¢,`gse. . AL war s e F111 s 'r wi T H _P R o vlan _IM P R o va M E N 'r s

_Q 1 _ ~,__l _fir _ 1 W 11' ed ‘At to 5v,mfn_¢*S1d€ :1‘l:.:::.2‘

, i

i ix

1 t

irouovnng is the ndi int oi tho ohiid hm _ii_vii<_it;`l'5_#,ll`:a{ii\1'in'_l;l'¢'e."_iiiii*v:_i _ ~. __- °*’3°°"*°“ _ ‘

i' '<. . .

lud t ie 'b J dge Inman in ing the' ut `nionths.durlngyh`1ch ' i ' ' _ Y lhegrgrlclilraclltloxn cyaseuof the Com~ 'time hill-J£i`@`\ril2&4re_qlwt1y-y=€¢h,`bDl¥\»l.. .G°=l'.°.°~°l fm' °).‘°"°°“‘°d¢!'°°k tm’ nonweiilth or Massachusetts vs. Ma~ `,viLfe~ai§;i.l`i5i§`¢£f§'5‘f\~*/'file ~é°\i_f_»1,3ivi<i- °bj°°“°“ th” M A°"°’1V W” lor Clark, tried recently 'at Bum- 1ivll;'¢'.<w.i_th liissilother. b0tlfs_ .C°;mp°l'°nt ,f"P.’.°V° th’ 1°"°l¥°

merside. upon which an’ order for ex-. of th¢°fl`\'.l\"itGf"lj_1‘@i`i”"2i1¥B' xi: :;`;nm;~.»~

e sta at duri.@l file' bait wi _ _

tradition was mad . _ ' ' .v _ lined.,-jlil _"" '_ _ ‘_ .__ . V _ -

tThe warrant in ths_oase was the _both .N?1\'l“_l""_B_1d fr°51 Etnsgllnlted M ni-st extradition warrant to be sign-'_ CHml'11°l¢_i8¢' ~PUTi§£:g§'Pl§\'§.'$2,'_C1i1F4¢°"§. ` ;.-;°»\-.he ad b°°n 23 7”" °“ th'

able msm d mawhlice hrcy of Cambridge and that

ad by President Hoover since his el- - le, ,_ _ - _ - _ lotion to office.) ' DuD1l0'I$P "*5!"i“\@"'l;95l'§“W\l>5¢u"ms'm° 9°" nine-yn" h° hd

A' she received $5.00 a week cash from ld°“° “H me P°"°° C.°‘“'9 W°1’k 101:'

This is an application from the

Commonwealth of Massachusetts soél-:ing Extradition of Major Clark on

the charge of non-support -'.~f his wife llqiowsytlais of his igrsorial knowledge, \Th“ 11° ¢0l1gi\lCtB the &-deep! desel- Jennls cidrh and his minor child, as h" hHS.'ei\'@,1_\ Of _"S personally fvri _ ~ David Clark at Cambridge, Mas'-‘~ M111 Cl`“fk4`f°\" 'ld' in ‘ms 1“5m“¢.‘C°urt` And dhl. ,h° hu hem in th' ¢husett_.,_ tion. That Mrs. Clark and son have lm“mm°“l*‘1 Bureau ,ft th’ P°u°°

' _ ' ‘also during the ~past`year__.receiv-ed th°’° “ff .5 V95" 554

of police of Summcl-side and a War- laid from Cambrid80 Weméle U“i°I\ th” hs” in °h"3° ° .° D°P“'!"

rant issued for the defendant. Mich is °~D°'h=f ¢hPf1i"b1\ ‘°5°1¢“°` mem °l D°“‘°‘“° Re". °”‘ in P°'

_ ‘ "‘ ”- _ ilicecortand inall' eCo'u.rtl

Information \\'a.s laid bv the chief

~ V . ,_ rm =. ‘ " . 9. i

at the i of rho herring the pro- “fm in- CH “isa mul which hw- li _ - ` _ ~ _ recutlon ca0l;Tn¢loiii»d the charge in elven 4=10ilil;;¥to"b0v»11‘the mother :Th°" had' P°"5°"““Y handled I '

this institution for herself and child. ‘and also her groceries That he

I CBU1bl‘1d89 Public l char- ~ iitable organization in wb! tha poor-.'

ition of wife and children in this

i

iE'il‘

1|

ati*

_ land Umm dmhm me past won. That many such cases from start to nnish _

regard to the min silpport ot' lhe V _ '_ '_ - .d W u “kite 1 wife, but claimed Extradition as lireviqv-sly t9_~111s_1eai'iiic.Cambridulfi 0! “S f'f°€,‘5‘; Wd 'th th’ against the accused in regard to non- BCCU-‘fd ‘Md 59011 8!'N?Sf0d'-0_5 im-'_ , B mn' ° ° md “bud

~ other charge of lion-support of his 7 having read it mmy “mes and mv

‘ ~ \ _

luppogf the minor cmd' I ' rsonally handled c es of this N O ‘ U N ‘

The roceedlngs herein are under' ` “`1f€~ That 1'10"|U1@\*' YhlV`11C°‘5U\'1 9-'“5=lm8"pe . 54

_ . _ _ _, .l

the iaxtrndlilon /lot, Revised stnuues Jennie Clair had ifvedungether ais~_l_’““d 1°’ “in” ¥°-‘“' pf Canada 1927 9,,-U 3-1_ Semoh man and wife. Thai in regard to the? A P°“‘°“ FW" th° “fell” “W ' ‘_

extradition' charge hcrcin lie knew`l“'““t s°tMY'¢h° °°“"° "5 V’ hu °°m' ’ `

three of the said Act together the

H Cmon` Trém of ,922 (R s_ that .ie’nnie` clone had gona-i~ierm-of P¢i=H¢v~ anmknowledse and he il

arvey c. isza p. xx. xxii and the pnhll- _ a Grirmi Jury atcamndev, Mm-Q25" :ll°”m°‘*<_ ;°:a§::d°'*;°:;°° fx CWD" Of fm" lam' TWMY in ‘helmarmng m°.“°°uiS€_.°l wth n°h__€up.`lwit:rleas" -ir suiiicientl conversent- Canada Gaz:-ne <Exti-di of 14 0¢.lport of and son Dafvl_d,__an_de _ »_= t Y

‘ 'that as it result Phe ‘ sn'1d Grahd l’°1°h'n`5‘ b"“°n ° the 1°' °f MU' '

tdber 1922 form the foundation upon

which Extradition proceedings hcrciil;~l\U'Y liiifl' brought fdown ¢`n~indi¢t- NN-1' lil-Wt!-5, *Dil-W9` €V1d€l1°° il'1€!‘¢0" 1

mem* in the Superior *Court* of Mhs W-“the” ‘he b° “W-`d "1 “P9” °f

are based.

3. Section fhree is as follows:

In the rm nf Any foreign state I taining six' counts. That in connec- lsd' 5“3?T"Zl°" U" ‘°"ld°n°° wth Ed~

L; xt di . ition Wnhf the Said, moueedmgs .hai V91. 2 386.1425 In further p1'(X>f Of

with which there an e ra tion ‘ . arrangement this Part shall applv . f`aI'1'if`d the mdi<"m°“i- ff°\T" me m5°lthe “reign 'hw there is me "Be M

during the continuance of such ar-l rangement; but no provision of this

Part. which is inconsistent with anyl of the terms of the arragement, shall I have effect to contravene the ar- rangement; and this Part shall be so read and construed as to provide for the execution of the arrangement.

The words of the Treaty covering

the offence herein are as follows: "Wilful desertion or wilful non-sup- port of _minor or dependent children.

" ‘ Procedure

' The procedure as to the hearing of the case is governed by Section 13 of-_the said acfwhloh provides that .subject to the provisions of the said act the Judge shall hear the case in the same manner as nearly as may be as if the person charged were brought before a. Justice of the Peace Oni _Preliniinary Hearing for an in- dictable offence.

By subsection fb) of Section 2 of

me Extradition Act “A Fugitive"

means "a person being or suspected 25 CCC 84 Bmrmed m 2° DLR

v i

sachusette 'aga.inst7'¢l\e‘ aticiisad con~

rtict Attorney Clarlgs Office to .the

said indictment was produced before

ed sir ooiinmms folrovis: '-~' =

1. Non-support of wife, Jennie

Clark. .

-2. Desertioll of wife,~Jcnnia» Clark. 3. Abalidoning wife Jennie 'Clark, leaving 'her ‘a"- burden on' theepiiblic.

4. Unreasonably neglecting to`pro~

vide for The support 'of' his ininor ohlid David clark. ' '

5. Unrcasoniiblyq neglecting to pra- vide for the support of certain minor children named' David Clal'kf`

6. Being under a. legal duty_to_ pro- vide ‘for the support or nik minor ohiid named David clark did aban- don and leave said minor child in danger of becoming al burden on the public. ' A '_ This indlohne.nt'wns` found' by n

Grind Jury of the County of Middle- sex, Mass., 'on the first Monday of November 1928 and in pllrsuanoe of said indictment a Warrant was is-

me duly duthentlcmd 1 iihd `e‘on'talh‘.':

'point -"

‘-‘1m‘it\ls_.vlrinto'olicii." Phipsori 6th

ire Deering (1915), 23 D. L. R.. B18

Grand Jury Room. A oopyifof; tlie__.‘élted.»hY the`;l~l'!'°};¥\9Y 1°’ ml Wm"

monwealth of' Massachusetts as an .authority :or - :rin .proposition 'that' the ior.eign.1aw»misht be inferred or presumed from the indictment for the odence being found in the for- eign state. This case was decided by the full bench of the Supreme Court of Nova. Scotia.

The attorney for the accused, how

0‘Heam Co. Ct. J, refused to follow the Deering case on this particular

` ' ' ~` Jndg`e'|' Ruling ‘ `

' 'l'he'Iearned Judge held that no inference could be drawn or pre- sumption arise from a document not admfssable in evidence. Reference to the last paragraph of the judgment in the Wagner case shows that when it was written the Judge’s attention had not been directed to the cases of Re Goodman (1916) 28 DLR.. 197;

5 Scnnilnw-Gnliuikanao

-_.iv -vi

c 1,.-»..-.,»» -_

,~ s,»_~ .

,__

` t

5.. ml.

,az

:__ ,

>

\<.. ` t

‘ . vi,

_ _ Electro-Dynamics!

New moo

;;°;;,°°_‘;;,;‘;;°,;;,“,‘i;,f_;;f=,;,5_ .= ._ All-Electric. and Battery Sets

N[®il)iEiL§

Consoles and Table Models and tl1eNew

' These__new`sets'have'passed`every conceivaB1e`tZ~st`-lmder all chmatiirsonditions-ln

if ` "" the laboratory,' in ,city and country-in skilled and unskilled hands. .. an _,wr w -» \ 'H V _,r ¢

of hem in canada who is accused sued thereon out of the Superiori _ ; ` ' _~. AII\0I!1€llt’S trial. COIIViI]C6 yOu that 81°C far thB mOdB]B

°f °°_f1v1¢f=d Of an sXt“d*_“°“ mme- °°`*"~°f M"“°”‘*‘°‘“ ‘° “‘°"”h°“‘f igiigifle :glow imfgezoeiliit li »~,;_'_ .-' Kent has ever made-and the whole world knows what (hal meansl.

' - ev o gg l o v

comn;itted_ within the jurisdiction of' the °°£'j'5,°d‘ .°' `»°PpY °f which W" which cm” decide mn m mum! any °m‘m ° “ °'” V ' tion proceedings a foreign indict- Byf s“b"';€§-ti-°n (b) M “cum M °t ' “H39 in Warrant , = -- 'ment il receivable in evidence und!!

said_Act provided "in the case of . . ' semen as lu! me Umm* Euan” ' '.‘_‘i‘“"’°1*‘°°“°‘°“ °’ °~" °"°’“‘”“°”. The charge' rn the Winans oov- set. 'rho aheorirlg' caps was followed crime, if *wth evidence is produced er, in A general way th-:‘_'s1x cdmts | mzlmituh Commbh H; "_ Y_ v_ “_ “S “`°“1d':’“_’?°"d1”3 W the 1“W_°f in the indictment. There is also at- raelowitz 29 0.0.0. 823. canada' S“b1°°t V0 the P"°Vl5l°"5 °f _tached to the copy of the said in- No decision oi’ our Courts on this this Pm-'1\.‘-’"fY hi’ °°”“°*°i“1 1°' dlohnont on nrildavit _oi the me point cited and in tno._a\»¢ iris)-_if ill_=~9;irg\° had b°°_“ ¢°°_““1*° Jennie clark rioting thygohs is -the saline of hlhdirmauthority 1 mare Wi if\_C°'=\“\_» .i»h¢ i“f18° 'hell 1-me wire of Mayor cldri€j'wh*o;_~st|nds'lli- thrpooring om as a precedent to his W“"‘“lt fm' the mmmmll °f 1*-M dicted in Massachilsettsfé for non- which due recognition should be IU- fugmve l° th” nearest °°“"'°“i°“t support of herself and minor él'1ild,fen. On'-,the chlrge (fohn nofiirof the

rison there to remain until surren

rant. hw beonitduly proved before me.

ll

~ .. ii

i

._.,.,

<7q{(b» #Lf

I 4

» - give the word “radiog a new meaning. 1

. 1

.*‘

C \ 9 /

On view at .your dealers shortly!

Get all details including prices See them! Hear them!

P ‘ That she was married 'to ac§lisedf6l'1'min'al C0de)'=being read tothe ne- ` ' '

» . _ ._ gl __ _ ._ _, 1 . i ' _

dered to -the foreign state, or dis- wth Januavry 1919' and that hé' Li cused he “ned he would ‘ive evb / nnnxu _

on..-so _snoring to nw. me ,mr of M me vm 01 _ on hu M ,,,,,,,,_

‘_ d b0y denc

2- If Slfch evidence is “M 1'-“'°d“°' David. That she has not received The prisoner came to the bm! and ’ . f -_ _ _--V -

ed the judge shall order him to. _be any support from amused. m,__hér_ w“.mq_n_ The praouum .gggl-my hu ¢‘mh_m“_ ,nut ‘bout ‘ ye" qui” meh u that before me_ In pre_ other papers wmch would rob bl determined on the trial before a pe- in U5. v. Webber ZDCCC p sued!- discliarsed." _ sm or said mmo;jchud`sm9e 'mhlfobjwwdlw the unused., gmnzjny ‘qc ha “M ‘Q nm” mmm m_ ummuy Inquiries under the crlm_lcm ‘mm in Bu. Au this is rzueg bi tit Jury." see also judgment of Mar- Also n Rosenberg 3| Man L lm 439

mspechr Ackerlf. .remmmy May, 1928 and that she and said evidence save ll i0_ th* _¢°f°.U°°5_ and with the remains of 111| mgghgg- inal Code which procedure governs way of defence and whether the un "uns CJ' in G'°“b"' V UM' In mm' m hgndmm th’ 1" U

. f child Wen? ’°_°°mn§ “id .!"?!\1..Csm-. ment1U.1\§d _iii 59,6340” 15 °f‘fl'\° 5** for burial having a return ticket gnq that of the present case it is open to same is a valid defence at law or not qu” (Wm 3 DLR' 3" “li 9 no' ‘M nm' '!‘°°d ‘ll 7 zu

John M._ Ackerly, Police Inspector bridge Public' W`t'=1f_arc_ " tradition Act which mentions'-Uw0¢1mm¢|n|-ggi “tum w mu,-chu_ the accused ii' hsso wishes, to goin- is not my province to determine in thu' °f w°u"°°' E"l“'ldm°l'l -N480 (UUNUIUU 0° 7*” ul

Of Cambfldie M555- We-'M596 9* f0l' In ““°m@1'5 5fmlV!¢"°méd f1@i‘éiH' 'defences av`\_il¢\§1e 'namelyz That _the _,,m_ -[mg on hu "mm W we in his full defence before the Magis- a preliminary hearing such as this """_' A K'

l0WS= That he lives in Cambridge. she states." that- when . aeoiuedlieicmaenoe shamed is or it political nat- gn,” mm, M ,M stopped by th, ents but the lattter cannot try the under the Extradition act In the M°-”_¥*¢h“5°“°- KMWS the °¢°“5°'5 C“mb’l‘l9F~ nm?-5 1" 11335-'h°~\1F¢ 0! “U55 *DG OUUHCG °hl\‘K¢¢UB H05 rnlnnlgrntlnn `u¢h¢,-lm, mam, he case nor weigh evidence as between case of Ric Latimer 10 occ 244 Maier Clerk. and identified him in was ioinished' -lui funds 't'o coder in extradition crime:-.siting mare- M4 mt gompmd with ,,,,,_,A,, ,m_ the parties. it is for the Mnguirm (being extradition pi-ooeedlngsi slit court on .tho person for whom ex- all orpeiueat-~°`iaéida1hg'~ hlyrshirrl. inént‘4s.'seugiri :la coo izs; U._s _v._ m mon “OM to oonslder whether or not a pi-inn on o. .1 nf, 241 5, ,

_ ‘ Q O

_ _ lar mul: 'rho : _

tradition is sought herein. That the That _after 1-ig,-,iglpgin May-108B__sh0i Webber l0_00C at p. 5; _and-Re Ros- "mm Umm, sum wopégmxt facie case has been made out and ill D y ' ` accused left cambridge the latter did .n0.t{_hea__r;_,' Irvin. ,him ._I_°1'.twn neberl 18.Man L. R.. 'at p. (60. ‘On ,mi .Bom "M fix; had tu plus such has been done it is his duty] "This constitutes the evidence that

Dart of April 1928. He knew the r-ite months. when he' 'sent a letter 'en-_ the other hand in Crankshaw'| Cri- ‘mm “penal ‘nd mt hnhu um to send the case up to the Supreme ' has been “duced mime thu Conn. 5]*

of-'rho mused. .ionnlo clark and oissmf ii1.oir"iiiii dh”-"h‘éeiin{;~ fiiiin5’aii‘ir'i»i1'<a6dé <im_i,|u._,p_._is'1_i at in their son`David Clark. That thr xc- himfshorllllit hh‘ld'et\tin¥~s!|#’ ‘istatslfonfthe authoritypf I"or_d and

Sault Sis. Marle,'

"eiigl te _ ig

A Ifufnishrd h¢~a.11\.. rIieisilas.¢'+f_l°\ner Quin- 1* P ~.1'!~§Mh9.~.°*¥°°* dit# 4°

want to ' 'That she received no reply to this an Extradition case the seemed at

I v

"Of S|80P nor has the some been returned to the hearing hu the ri¢ht. ui aaeues _ t _ A. _

l , hll Rhllf. Hill* - , ‘ _ ' ' __ _

IM' "°'“ the 9°" °“°° "M th” "Wm" °° °'"‘ , _ oontfxctinglitstimpny which is a magistrate in a similar case under-'~ \(.!!` ` ~ /f

fna_ w ch should be left tn a our law committing him for tha pur- » ~. _ L`___ v ~

i ‘ ` \\T‘ ` i

YEII'

P _ _ ,, _‘i 1 immt. oi 1luth."rmu-¢ui|u»oaH`nu-» uma; -lawiainforoenowandhasbemin he earned UN

force continuously ‘during the past tin year gala to

5 ___ re'

*EPM

,she has _ot heard from him since. much as the_9uthori¢ie| cited were ifraoiitaldniatnr' _ »i|s,qfeiii-_.louise opgugent-mania 1 ‘allowed than 1li2§'=_.¥' _' `_`_ F ' _ l',o‘|q¢q`i§_ st tli3__.ucv'wd l\l\\|i¢°t *P g ne A-,nidno:so ‘aa.iiined.tiif;-.;n.hp»iiih.°»i¢éu¢n,,si» _ina

1 matter of€»_'_'tha_ c!il'l‘gie` fi€i%Ih`wl'8 ,`tlU.¥i!iMfiRl‘3¢lllf1¢¢.".9~`ff.°ll°W“ <

fprovod by John ia Aokerly who eo- what he was born in namutoa in posed that in the Commonwealth Pdnce Edward Island i nlseb. that Mm, hum' .m",:,°f.i'u“-_ 3. “_ found; to return yet. on his way witlidrawing thereon from the ~ - i o..

4)

f i _if no

HUIGGHWAMYIIQQBI

2 3 §

§§»§§;;i§;lri.§;s§i§t a‘§§§§§_§_Es°g§_'§_i #gs

sgiggé iilif slice

tinfto reenter Unit-

Q. 3 .3

nd child val

will in lmihirihhl. he

'oi' Massachusetts it is a crime fora he is a. Carpenter by trade and went and mu M' iwdvu. ‘. mm hom bw; to g.mb,|¢“ M ,om me Im_ Jam., In mm" com” proceedings -

father to fall to provide for his wife _ to United States about ll years ago hh Wu. luhm*-‘t *_.'u m d“_ wma” mb” ‘t the border nut in Ecnmem V (Bum) “tp _ _

or minor child or desert or abandon when he has lived ever since. Hs “mu wchmn* '-,hu hu 'ue 1,, “|'|°m| hum, fp q||-nm-14|, ,M |35 L,m°th,_ 5_7" “yi ..w°'mv° no' ‘

thorn and leave thorn without iunas on nu-ned moe. an me vnu and ,M M hu :cum in not sending for his nimbi-iii tb review, 'mm oi- re( f `

iw become a chars! on the"i'Nblio. in 1914. 1-Ie had one boy by the first um_“mp°d,’_u.h““m,. in dm of ,pglnxndg bg _,wud gm” an mu their mdmnmr du the °xm_ i /

Thlt ltUll !h“I*Hh@. 'HUD ll lm |10 “lm h\§`dl\l0I! &\@@Ul\M‘-§|y|‘n"||¢h ` - A ,f

urs law of' liuséttb “iid 'ninemsn to which umm mm wu<““M‘_wM“-unqhtdmm mmm N mum_ .nm "cmd “ht=d.;“t‘mw__-“_” MM “uw ' wmmtvut _ 1

able l;v§200.00;i1ng.,qneyell_'fQ bam o gbld David who is now In ._ quéaewdn .wha 'whim alainathatile wal notallowedtorh tion of guilt aa- innocence but as _ Mm=R_,_ _

,,,¢.5",,,,,,!_ ___ aac¢_uaii¢i\_ef¢sar'1'aoJl»ppln¢oz»»yua»rlm»fs¢i».¢i»umnao°nt ' - » '

_,_ _ehnoooioa vu o mole of an nt- ohhh _mason-w-me lovof om, _ Q 1. .nuohrlgfdiurdliwr/¢Wii||s1MoUr~f1H|' /75

_, - ,» _ ~ 'l ' V i I

5 ll! an failing io imply with an ini- ma. would iumfy .mo pouuomn. ,

'rlioq thataewerinsilmtgration regulauonotzhe United oamiiiietailirqi-;i;iar1¢ii;¢¢-_-igoim " Umm ms-

ho ' i- ”

Th’ *°°‘1D°d deposed to having stated, this is in no manner a trial

em!! had told the authorities 59°! ml Wifi* mimey on several oc- of the accused. He may belnnocent ‘

_ ._ mm' Mm, to mm, easions while her oath is that he sent or guilty of the oifehca of which he JI/

, dm mt coin. M her money only ,she says, once. Bhe is charged. 'The duty that is laid ' \ ' / I) Island with the in- *¢°'“° 511° WWW Nm Biliinl that upon me is to aonsldervaa to whethl ‘° " 0" _ ’ r

‘ hm bug m, she was in destitute circumstances er the evidence that hu been ad-' Y I 1 ,ur D ,9 um. ‘G "_, while the accused says that he never duced in the absenceof contradie-‘ V ll I lg .4/D

, , .

°* /»

received such letter Here we have tion would be such as to justify a

N17. From the evidence of the ao- pose of standing 111,; ‘¢¢|¢|_ pncqclb . V oiled it would appear to me that he ly it emolmte to -the same thing ar " '

with the intention of returning and the Judge would not be iustinod in

é

T:\\`\\ ( .i

_ U rd & bg 1'. on m d__thu qc- continuum employment. That and what elect. it I give to the stew. He had not on his person au been eemmliisd liroqissg, my _4 ' ’ . gf;

-e-- me-:t mt ~2 or _s°`§;__.\ig-his wife vgéhqwi-m__r¢qM my gi_4_¢ae».ag_ 'hclaiwaoinav mom ei pw and aa urns m mmm wsrvmmm ne, _ , ~_ V

on ht, "nm md "ms un. Court. Buch is also the law in regard and the question then arises as to d

i . _ . A ~ it, .~_ ». as , _ venletly to procure it he re- W |3U`ldm°!\ l>1'0¢°°dihS8~ my duty under the circumstances as ' W d\»\C»ak¢

°““°d h” “"°°‘ 1" °“"“’“““° ‘"1 5" d"S““.‘3F°ef"“}“.l-?‘..S_l‘}_’4‘f"?" £9419. ._ . D'L'“"°° '*’ “"“`_’“ ` " ' "‘ PI-inns' 'mind mana. shown by this évldenoe. AA has been ' ‘ 'fr ‘ hue' / years. The child David is about 9 cd to work n order to supplyther- imrst Yalear s¢§ol'-"Il!iG\l#‘.‘ ~ I

your old. 'rhot the ‘said wire and hoir ond child with tho necemiil " 1iy’%h`r`aconqQ_ ui ,_ .'.

°f 1’f‘?~.Th.° .’,=)_“i~i..]S'.." FH l".‘.":°. ‘I l~1*.°, '_ .,_ . _ .

- -- ~ tio him' nadlles§ed’to;eI<eiisliigt$viif"__1*ll"?iiisi?le¢_at tile" " of

'WQGI and Rllll DOWI1 is-_ nmana insane vi.'nis;aii_i;.al.e.~

__ usse

\ _ _ l

_ lreemisiiee in tho united stem in if in a zrlu wlthtuie .mags ands 1\\ ‘\.' » \ .

clam., “M "tu" al much as he left that Country Jury there was ouch- evidence that \ \ /

. . \~

.f._,»_