.__‘,An advance party ha fprepare

PAGE EIGHT i‘ THE CHARLOTTETOWN GUARDIAN

’._.. .

Photograph shows Manuel f‘ of Philadelphia and hie bride by proxy. Four years ago they were sweethearts in Portugal- |\he bride's cousin acted as the proxy. and the courts forced open i the immigration gates to her in America "

left Washington for Nome, ‘Alaska. to

for the proposed ﬂight of the Shenandoah this summer-

Here are three of theexpeclition that were‘ to make pnrt of the polar journey]!!! do: Iled

GRETNA GREEN WEDD ING§ STILL LEGAL

Recently British court; were asked to decide upon the legality ‘of a wedding which had been pcrio rmed by the blacksmith at Gretna Green. the little Scottlsh border town; in accordance with tradition. The marriage was sustained. The p lctiire "shows a ceremony being performed by "the blacksmith. who had inherited the unique "poet from the days of th: postehalse. when sp lrited couples from England dashed over the border and called upon hi m for his services. According to Scottish laws and customs. marriage can be very simply performed

by a declaration botore witnesses. .

‘ that ho wag h-hiiihg i“, unsweryllllﬂllll) n shall prohibit transac- _ from the Hon. David nun, ltlinisltlml“ ln Iliuwr which take place l8!‘ 0! Justice. regarding qhqgiiousiwholly within the Province oi‘

" ‘hm- lll "llllclimtion of in

nulnister ot Justice reguriil m thplcllllllllll-Plmvu intoxicating liquor|

; He had also tcl h 3"!" Jlllm niggiiiiiialiil m the

_ prohibition ‘bill that h

lllolilhlllllil Movement in

_ _ "TITZJIEMEQIIII (Continued from Page l) [to pronounce upon its constitution- ~ i-iiiiy. Tho bill was absolute in s: on the Government with its il-i ‘alsllfOOlQULKQ~“ftlcgxllglﬁgﬁglllz: quest. The Government. in rcp y.‘ i n. uiporii on l . v asked the Alliance to have u bill That. ii Dominion luw nlone could drafted at the Government's i-x- ilo: but, it‘ they could not gut Unlu- pcnsc. While the commitlct? ivnsinlon prohibition. they could iii proceeding with this work, they lﬂlllli slOll llll‘ “ll? 0i liquor. hi9“, jnhnqngi] that hi; A01 apply Si \ir.il zimt-iiilments lo rciiilcr ing only to the city would not he iii-fact more .~lrinizviit worn moved consldcrcd by the tiovzriiinont in ccmniitiii- bi "l9 (lilllillllllﬂn They were thus obliged, in tho nnd riljvctt-il. 'l‘lir- lllll. in lll-l orl hope of getting any lcizislntiou ieiunl form, was iaussctl by u unnu- whiilcver, to llrellare a gcncrul iiuiins vain uf ilio iictizlilliitiixiic. ‘AQL _ nfttlr t it‘ puss m: 0 in l'lllL‘l3

0n May 24. 1900, n bill was [l!‘i3~ll‘:l\\'lll'(l lsiuuil Prohibition liuuqtlio sentctl to the llremicr and zueiii-‘Njlllilllllﬂ lil\\' Wlwmlilllllell lllvlllld berg bf the Legjglaiiii-q by i. (iiiiiiii-ill)’ tho (‘ouri of tho King's Bench “(ion fepfgggntmg the lending tpni-llll Manitoba. in view of this (l0- perance organizations of’ the Pro- cision, it was suggvlﬁlell Illa! Ill" vlnce. The ileputatiou uslteii illilliollel1ill0ll oi’ the Island Act bu sun- the License Law pagggd (he pfQ-lllfllllﬂll until thc powers of the Pro vlcuh year be hbroghieib hhii ihhgfviuce should b» defined by the do the Lgglglﬂture ehhci we hiii pyqyiclsion of the Supreme Court of hibmhg the 531g b; iiqum; whi¢h,Cnimtln or tlii- lmporiul Privy Conn hhii been prepared with chi-him i-elicil. 'I‘hcrc was n [car exprr-sseil gnrd m kegping ivithih the ]gg\§]ﬂ.lilll\t chaos would result from an ut- Live powerg of the proving... ii In-iyillillllilt lo cuforco the law without vided for no interference with tlislil SPlllPlllPlll "l llll‘ 9359' llllli-Pad Scott Act in the counties. but was!“ illsllelllllllg llIB ﬂCl, ﬂOWEVQT. l-lle to take effect in any county if tlieiGllVl-‘flllllﬂll DPODOBEII; in April. Scott Act should be repealed by itllllll- the follow-Ins: amendment. vote o! thﬁ e1eqibi-b_ ii was i0 gciwlth the liien oi’ making the not into force September, 1900. ‘doubly sure oi‘ suiorcement:

‘The Premier told the delegation, "w ll‘? lllls ll" l3 llllelldéll l9

submitted to him concerning pro-lpllllce Edward l-“lllllll- (‘Xllelll l“ vincial jurisdiction in prohilitoryjllllicrivise speclﬂll)’ Fllcvlllcil btv

Prince Eilviaril island ,

‘MARCH 8, 1924

. _Q~4~'..~_. _4

M. TSURUPA

(‘me nil the three joint-presidents of the Union ot Soviet Reptibiics oi Russia. The Chiei ot them, Rykoii. in now suffering iron brckcu health.

to tho Government; pwniiil saloon buildings to be hciil . tor the penalties incurrcii by I “its by violating tho‘ luw; iii.» (m: legalizing of the whotcsalt- ir- oi liquors within the Provinci- placing oi further restrictions upon the vendors appointed Llllilill‘ iin: act.

The iucctinl! RPDOlYVW-‘ll _ll llllll‘ miltre to obtain lcllill i\'l\‘ll'\' =lll'l

legislation. iihis act. and shall restrict the con- ‘ ln June, there was mti-oiihiihi iuiﬁlllllpllﬂn 0t liquor within tho lim; the Iggiglatiire‘ "hi n“. measmpllts of the Province 0i’ Prince Eil-i asked fm- by we tenwerance dwivarii island, it shall not uffecl, nnd lcgatiou, but a hill "For lllg purjls not lnteuileil to affect bonn liilcl, pose of pi-ghibiiing me sail. of mvltrauszictions in lliiunr between n‘ ihxicating liquors with“. ibis projpvrsou in tho Province of Prince; vncc where the Canada Temper. Edward lslnlld and u person in< once Act does not upply except foriml‘lllll‘l‘ liroviuco oi’ in a foreign; sscmmqhiab hiadicinai and muuhjlfﬂllllilﬂl’. uuil thr- provisions of this‘ nnicai purposes by vendors were-tnuict shall be construed accordingly." specially appolnteihunil by pliysl- Th" “lllemllllelll ll“ "Elem l0 clans, chemists and (imggms w without. iliscussion and without der ‘certain conditions. also by cllﬂllge- '

ivholesalo dealers to vendors, phy- “he” the law “as ﬁr“ lllll llllO siciang, chemisis and “rusglstmforce sonic little friction occurred aforesaid. and to othr-rs ii’ tho liq-it'll the ‘lllesllllll ‘ll ‘Vllefﬁ llle reﬂ- iior sold ls not intended for con-iponillllllltl’ ml‘ l" ‘lllivlcemtllll sumptlon within this Province." 8mm“ He" Th” Cll-Y cllllllllll (ll Phls act hi” impose“ “m” and Charlottetown decided by resoi". penalties for violation ot its iii-gluon ma‘ the "llllllllllllll Dllllcﬂ 0f

ment to uppulnt inspectors w supiprosociitions under the ooh hmi EH15‘, “a enfommnenh n was loilllill the enforcement should be loft comeinto force on iiiu 5th dny oflwnh m? Plimllllollll G°vellllll9lll~ Juno, 190p in ti“, opinion or “hbffiie liquor interests hoped by this imnpsranco ivorkcrs, this meusuiv.-lmllnns to mock m" mlerallml" ‘ll was much weaker than tho one usk- the um‘ Thu" lllllll“ “m”? "ll!"- ed for. ' gllcil. however. by tho action of the [h moving n", “m,” mm Con» ollllﬂflllﬂl of Police in scrvllig the inlltlce for consideration o! tli» Pi-hfpdltihs _ 155m“ llY "l9 BllDe-ﬂlllllfy ibilion Act oi! 1900. Mr. Fill'qlllI£il'~\-ml.l=~l§lilile in compliance with his son said that he was going in tulfllboan‘ m svrllce‘ lllﬂ promise made at llltllslliigs“.TllllViillllliY of tho lﬁoliibition liiioughout the chum“. m give a‘ iiu uns ileliultcly cstubllshcd by measure prohibiting liquor sclliu ‘jllllgnulut m m” Sullralll“ 99"" "l to the (lxlbllll 0T llrnvincinl jaunt» “M” Ellllllril island, (iclivcroil Oill lilo m“ m“ lllmw how the minoslltwmml‘ l} “ma. Th“ mmlgllllll on would void n" how“ lbw lllgl insult oi the action nil would support ihc bill. but tlic Got: vhflll: ‘fit-Unpaid.’ iviio, being COIl-i‘ ctnment could ca“? H Mmonrilinieitiny ‘lino siipaudinry magin-i » is llllfll- 1901 r k limonelowl‘ m‘ ‘lllll’ 22-‘ Bu". he hsd telcgraphoi] ' ~ “Y lI-"Hlns lllllillvfully 59h] inl

question. or Provincial _l1i.~' llWi-oiiirury lo the provisions oi’ th . l-tllt. had not yet recelrlilrlﬁdlcllmli’Prohibilion Act e ‘ d n ruill - ' sought l” have “l?

Manitoba "H"; t _ . Premier otliure‘ Hlzlprteoxloli ‘ﬁguring’: "lldtlhﬂ" - ' "rﬂwnvottiil, ' . l" H!

u" bean alitfjgtxgzohlieliiltiwlr: Act was ultra vlrosi

lure A din as mi [lisfmma m“ “nacwll “I - copy h-oiiiii m, “m to M" l . ic .is it cni-rohL-hiiii "pun,

. 1 as soon us it wn l“ "Kllltllinn oi trade and I‘ n-l

, s out or the i . '0l';hll3.l1l;l8. Dr ut lgilernﬂﬂxll subiect which, by BOCIILIIA

e rinct- Ed l‘ _ - -» . '33 umici- th 4 _ hibmon Act w“ zrgitriiolgiiizgtfiétzjfln of rin- (‘nuiulizin llnrllutiizcl-lrlilillnr

feci for u your. 'l‘hh¢ i, i _ _ Tlll‘ “Cl “'11s ll-‘lll ‘iii ll nh y]; to gli-q the lllinistcr of llllilslliltullgilggg€gigiiygvglllllg it ill_“lll with p pup}; . A r

Bills lEl l . - . m on-Jlgbaora"). “H "(Hlthwlil {"9- merely luw" "l" lll'l\'ltll uiil in lllﬁ rovi i. -- . H ‘.‘_ j l‘ ll “L ‘l-l Ho. i5 .iio.i h; ii_ _\;_

'- '1‘ ~ t lli‘ ticiisimi vi mi- llillliflill

AN noun- »mn ‘m: olWlnuon-oennn Men‘ e! _ turned the eeeort for the- Govereontknbfdli Loni lying. wintry-ﬁlament was opened on Thursday ieet. M __

,l‘i'i\-,\~ (‘ouncii h-..~ t.

‘tuba ummr A‘; i)rillli"'l).‘ili).“i.lll~i lllllill ‘ell l9 ﬂlvvi" the c... om- H" dpm“ "fl lsiiinii hi“; m“ m

‘bum m, surly with

uililod fﬂifp u, prim‘! Ed was lei-is sirin

g3 l . I étl-Plla ini-nsuro. n "n" H" Mm“

Th . ltAinglm lllvllllllnlii ftilr liiplviiiilliuiisnrlﬁr lllllillit-“llililiiitlllaiatll will! costs. - s in the iriuinpli

.0!‘ tiic or lii' . ‘WUTlRbIKE m “"0" hm- ‘Plllllﬂrnnrrc

g ‘on y“. . "t. mm" mm

ll ‘llllsr Biluiltments o; the vltiggcilllo?‘ deem“ Mm‘ the “w: counsel"!!! infrectton o1 °ll 0f the liquor;

visions and authorized the Govei-nﬂlcers should take no pnrt in tho .

lndoptrd ii,

7'riiici~ Rii ,

Wars Islnntixslnco the island LAi-t .

Q on. mecunnouou

yin died oi e l’

prepare n draft of such lillltlllil- mi-nis to he lilllllllliitlil at illi‘ Lllllll- lng session oi the litlﬂltlltlillfﬁ ’i‘li»~ committee was also lnSiTlltllWl Io urge upon tho Premier iliv‘ uni-r» sity of appointing nu oifitiiil m: sistnnt prosecutor, with ]l\|\\i*l' lil bailiff, for tho more llitvruxiuli ‘ll iorceuient ct the [lfﬂllllllllliii l‘|\\‘, nnd the prompt collection 0i rim ~

The amendments inlroiiiic-ii by the Legislature in the iiilF-Sllfl vi 1902 were as follows:

ill All ilrugglats anti lﬂllllillr‘. were rciiiiireil i0 make‘ i‘<liii'i11~ v1 all liquors sold.

(2) fhiciciiihs‘ giving iriiuilul- cut prescriptions were llnhlc lo n tine of from 20 to $40.

(fl) Rirht of scorch was RFillll-‘il and force might bra llEllTll to rip-ii entrance to suspect-rd place.

(4: Liquor sciztrl w.» lo it.» iii =- iroycil. <5) l-‘nr iutrrl‘ inn: Will!

corn in it»; rlisclirir, i» iii ll‘ l ii tine or $100 was lriiilililﬁll.

i6) Bevcrngva contniiiiiii: 1'- |"'l' cont. nlcoliul were to be rnn-iilrr- ed intoxicating wiiiiin tho uu-wullw of the Airl-

lt was now strongly ilriiid by the tciupcriiiiw- ilHOilll‘, illlll. tin inmin clnl luw offi-rril licllcl‘ lllil-llllli l)‘ for i-ufivrc-‘iui-ui nnd \\'il~ :i. thrr lll(ll"‘ ' factory‘ lilili (‘oust ill! . .\l'l um r counties. \\‘lll\".1 l: ill l ihu isiiill‘; Fllll-‘l was thus brought - unilor ivrtiiii clal prohibition.

flp€tll€tl in i‘

lllnvinsiei- lenient Officer oi Heeitti. who aye that Qhilpld0ml= elwdlﬁlpﬁ at Winter and! its I 1'0 l eve Inlllithﬁl 79° 07' MIL». rifle aniline um no in the district ‘Ollﬂlld W neted.’ None -‘\ ' ' Wl\°

vaccinated. 0m me I in oh rﬂlef ,‘ 0 b" lnilnlvz: 5.000 ‘ireelllllltlﬁilrsady been vaccinated.