2 lsat “ae a ae

a

mimes es

a

i ” ’ 4 ' i ‘ * : ' rT

aw

mre ote

c

RE a RE eg oe — “ ae

Ti, Bll oR ae ae ee ae.

NNR SAO PN ie

Ae

THE

APRIL 25, 1878.

“Phe Corruptionists.”

we 7

Tis Patriot asks, “Who are the Corrtp- tionists ?” and has the hardihood to deny charges which no Grit member of Parlia- ment has dared to deny. Each of the charges preferred by the KXAMINKR we are iate by direct or cur- and we defy the Pat- y of them.

prepared to substan! eumstantial evidence, riot. toyprove the falsity of an

We are unable, for want of space, to criticise all the Patriot's denials and equ- vocations. We direct attention to one. By We

one our readers may judge of all.

charged :

‘That the party by which he (the Premier) is sustained has, by overwhelming evidence, yiven on oath before the judges of the land, been proved to be black with corruption.

The Patriot responds :—

‘<Black with corruption, the EXAMINER de- clares Mr. McKenzie to be. | That is a yery pretty phrase, ees but will the oe point to a single charge of corruption 19 e against any member of the McKenzie Cabinet which has been proven before the ‘Judges of the land.’ This charge is like the next, that a large proportion of ‘his (Mr. McKenzie’s) fol- lowers in Parliament have been condemned for bribery in elections.’ It would be interesting to know the name of the member in Parliament who has been so condemned. We were of opinion that a charge of that sort proven in the Courts disqualified the man from sitting. Sach a charge is, of course, not capable of

prool,”’ The Patriot, it will be observed, distorts

the charge and contents itself with denying what was not charged. But the Patriot 1s i aterested to know the name of McKenzie’s supporters who have been condemned by the Judges of the land. To gratify its curi- osity we submit the following list of the mémbers of “the “Party “of who have been unseated for bribery and cor- rantion since they undertook to “‘eleyate the standard” in January, 1874:— DOMINION PARLIAMENT, Ayimer—Richmond and Wolfe 5 bribery by

a gents. "Bigger- i Northumberland; bribery by azents. 2 Uameron, M. C.—S. Huron; bribery by a rents. Tr

i‘ook-—N. Simcoe ; bribery by agents. Coupal—Napierville ; bribery by agents. Cushing (disqualised} —Arguenteuil; per: onal bribery. Devlin—E. Montreal ; bribery by agents. Dvmond—N. York ; bribery by agents. Dumont—-Kamouwaska ; bribery by agents. iliginbotham—N. Wellington ; bribery bj azents. ” trving —Hamilton ; bribery by agents, dordion (disqua' fied )—Chambly ; personal bribery. kerr--W. azents. . Macdonald —Cornwall ; bribery by agenis. McNab—Glengarry ; bribery by oo Mackenzie -W. Montreal; bribery agents. A wi tried Maclenuan—-N. Victoria; bribery by agents, Maedongal, J, 1.—S. Renfrew; bribery by agents. MeGregor—Essex ; bribery by agents. MeKay—Colchester ; bribery by agents. Muraay——N. Renfrew ; bribery by agents. Norris—Liiicoln ; bribery by agents. U’'Donahoe—E. Toronto ; bribery by agents. Prevost —Two Mountains ; bribery by agents Shibley—Addington ; bribery by agents. Stuart—S. Norfolk ; bribery by agents. Tremblay—Charlevoix ; bribery hy agents. Wilkes—C. Toronto ; bribery by agents. Wood—Hamilton ; bribery by agents. Walker (disqualitied)—London ; - personal bribery.

Northumberland; bribery by

by

' ONTARIO LEGISLATURE.

Barher (disqualified)—Halton ; personal bri-' bery.

Cox—-W. Peterboro’ ; bribery by agents. Currie—Welland ; bribery by agents. Ferris—Northumberland ; bribery by agents. Haney—Monck ; bribery by agents. Neelon er, nnn iiabemmecinacmad — Lin- «oln; personal bribery.

Oliver—S. Oxford ; bribery by agents.

Paxton—-N. Ontario ; bribery by agents.

Smith—N. Victoria ; bribery by agents.

We might also remind the Patriot that M. Laflamme, Minister of Justice—charged with bribery and corruption in J wMCqUES | Cartier-——-was only sustained in his seat by the decision of three Judges against those of Chief Justice Richards and Judge Strong—beth of whom decided against him. , Laflamme escaped, like a criminal,

by a disagreement of Judges.

— Nn

Brown’s Flour Duties.

The Monetary Times has an_ariicle on the flour duty which Mr. McKenzie’s sup- porters tried to force upon the country. ft explains:—

‘* Both Canada and the United States or- dinarily produce wheat, for example, in excess of their own wants ; and both look to Europe tor amarket for their surplus. In that com- mon market, they must at last, stand an com- mon ground. But there ‘may be reasons why Canada should consume American wheat, and why the United States should use Canadian. As a matter of fact, we believe, a good deal of American wheat is used in our lumbering dis-, tricts; and it is used there because it is ofa a relatively low quality and price. One of the reasons why American wheat goes into con- sumption in the Maritime Proyinces is that a cheap quality 1s in: demand there. A duty which should compel ‘the substitution of Cana- dian for American wheat in the lumbering dis- tricts and'the Maritime Provinces would com.

i these classes of consumers to use a

earer quality of grain than they cesire to purchase... In New York, and other large cities, the superior quality of our wheat may well cause it to be in demand for consump- tion, By this exchange, both classes of pur- ehasets get what they want, and no oue is the

a ee —————

jured by this exchange? In

- ” oo } - q ‘ ] DA LLY Kix A MINER e | gets the best customers, because these custo-

Purity” ts under the sun has a_ better record to

, cities.

~ es Sy ae mewee

both cases he |«

mers get what they want.”’ ; The Monetary Times consequently agtecs with Mr. Pope, that the imposition of the proposed duty would not be expedient. it, however ,adds that it may be allowable if their exists'a probability that it would con- tribute towards a revival of Reciprocity. But the question whether or not there 1s such a probability, it leaves open. It simply , says —

‘To levy duties for political reasons —as a means of forcing the Americans into reciprocity

is another matter. ‘The use of such a wea- pon is allowable, if there be a probability that its use will be successful, but 1 no other case. Such a policy, unless it accomplished its object, would be injurious to this country, by putting a needless restriction upon foreign conimmerce. o2-- —a-eor

Senator Howlan’s Speech on the Financial Situation. A SUCCESSION OF DEFICITS, AND HOW THEY, ARE OBTAINED— INTERESTING COM- PARATIVE STATEMENTS.

(Irom the Senate Hunserd. ) CONCLUDED.

It seems to me an. extraordinary fact that such a large sum has been. wasted to bring immigrants to this country. I find im 1861 the population of Canada, was 3,432,000, and the annual average increase during the ten years preceeding 1861 (during which time occurred a year of great depression) was as follows :

Ontario, 4.37 Quebec, 2.50 Nova Scotia, 1.85 New Brunswick, 2.60 P. E. Island, 2.07

Now, according to these figures the popula- tion of Canada in 1871 if it had the same ratio of increase, ought to have been 4,- 700,000, while the last census showed, it was little under 4,000,000 or an increase of one per cent. annually. Now this is an ex- traordinary fact: The ost stagnant na-

show than that. It is rather strange that having the millions of acres of land we pos- sess, and a large immigration inte the coun- try, the inerease of our population has been s0 low. Look again at the decrease that took place during that period; you will find about 80,000 native Canadians left this country. Jt isa favorite expression in the United States with regard to the State of New Hampshire that it is a fine State to emigrate from, and if we are to judge any- thing from these figures, this must be an equaily fine country to emigrate from. It has been estimated that the cost to the Bri- tish nation of training a soldisr 1s two hun- dred pounds, sterling. A Canadian, twenty-five years old, onght to represent as much as a soldier of the line does, and the hon. gentleman can calculate from this what a loss we have sustained by the emi- gration of 80,000 et our people to the United States. It is, therefore, for the people of Canada, aud especially of the Government and this Parliament, to ascer- tain what are the reasons for this loss of population. It is impossible for any coun- try to stand still, and particularly a new country like this. Is is said one cause of our lack of pregress for the last three years, has been: the depression. {fam not going to deny that it has had a great deal to do with it. But one interest in Canada has not been depressed; I refer to agriculture. It is a well-known. fact that the farming population of thjs country have not felt the depression that has prevailed in our One would naturally conclude that this great depression in trade would neces- sarily lead to a reduction of the cost of col- lecting the taxes of this country, but which has not been the case, for the cost has gone on steadily for the last three years. Judg- ing from the cost of collecting the revenue, there has been no depression. What is the outlook at the present time? The clouds are breaking way ; the sun is beginning to shine—to use a common expression, mat- ters have touched bottom, and a more pros- perous cra is beginning to dawn; that is the time when the Government should ex- ercise wisdom in assisting the country to regain prosperity, On that point we have, at all events, got the opinions of gentlemen who are leaders of the two great parties in Parliament. Any thoughtful man must come to the conclusion when a depression has taken place in the trade and manufac- tures of a country, that some remedy must

be found to restore, at all events, the equi-

librium between the expenditure and rev-

enne. But what is the policy of the Gov-

ernment? They say the country is like a sick man; all that you have to do is to let

him along and he will get well in time. [ say that it is an extraordinary policy, and [

contend that some step must be taken to

save the country from the effects of such

treatment. We find one body of gentlemen

—those who hold office—are free traders, | while those who are opposed to them are

protectionists. Tam one of those who be-

lieve you cannot have either free trade or

protection in a young country like this, I

believe free trade and protection, as under-

stood in Great Britain, cannot be ‘wpplied

to a young country like Canada. It is ont

of the question to suppose that a policy

produced in one country myst necessarily

be good for another. [ don’t think I shall

be going far out of my way to give my hon.

friend from Halifax an authority for which he

must have great respect. I quote from the

speech of the hon. the Premier, delivered

at Sarnia last year. He said :—

“When people accuse me of being a free trader, they accuse me of something that does not properly belong to the disenssion of this question. We do not discuss free trade or protection at all because free trade is impos- sible in this country. We have to discuss a Customs system which pnts free trade out of } the question altogether, ard, in. the abstract, Sir John Maedonaid is asi much a free | trader aslam. It is true the gress party! qt) dead contains a larger number ef free traders than

considered, the other, absolute protection. assumed that, in this country, neither of these principles is applicable to c \ and, as [stated in 1874, the question 18 re moved from the sphere of

of action in relation to trade which are to be The one, absolute free t I have always

we

our circumstances,

political discussion, because not even the most extreme protection- ist has adopted the idea that we are to Tose all our revenue for the parpoes of preventing any

one coming here to sell his wares.”

That is about my opinion with regard to free trade and protection in this country. It has been used asa bugbear to frighten people. T will now quote an wuthority who | is considered a yery big one on questions of

political economy. | read from Lang's

Political Economy :

‘* Political economy is not a universal Scie ence of which the principles are applicable to all men under all circumstances, and equally good and true for all nations ; but every coun- try has a political economy of its own, suitab< to its own physical circumstances of position on the globe, ‘climate, soil and products, and ty the habits, character and idiosyncrasy of ite inhabitants, formed or modified by such politi- cal circumstances.”

So I say with regard to this Dominion, it is necessary that the flagging industries of

depression like this by the Government, which all look upon as paternal, One in- terest, at all events—the mining mterest-— is prostrate. The $12,000,000 invested in the mines of Nova Scotia are almost com- pletely idle. _Wesaw a_ few years ago the mining industries of the United States were in a prostrate condition, but they were pro- tected and they revived. What do we find in Canada? The very coal used on the In- tercolonial to heat the cars is brought from the United States. Hon. Mr, Power have no anthracite. Hon. Mr. Howian-- For years we ‘ased none in the Maritime Provinces. In the time of Joseph Howe we used our own coal. The United States, so far as manufactures are concerned, is a new conntry, and you find them protected there. Go back to England, and you will find it was one of the strongest protectionist countries inthe world for a long period of years. After,a time she became a free trade country. Why! Because sheshad brought her manufactures to such perfection they could compete with all the world, and, besides, she had very lagge commerce. The neighboring coun te was free trade in the earfy,history of the, coloniés ; but from the time it became in-} dependent, it has protected. its manufac tures. J was surprised to find recently that silk is. now very largely manufactured: in the United States. Last year 108 firms were engaged in the industry, the capital invested in it was $14,000,000, and the value of the silks produced was very great. We have in this country, if 1 may be al- lowed to use the expression, a good milk- ing cow, if weonly milk her. Here, in the neighborhood of Ottawa, there are inex- haustible mines of the yery best iron ore, yet our iron is manufactured in the United States and other countries, instead of in the ‘Dominion. Without being either a protec- tionist or a free trader, I think the indus- tries of this country could be aided by ad- justing the tariff to foster them. After all, that is, what is required of the Government. What we want is, not free trade or protec- tion, but a policy that will bring dbdut ‘the best results in developing ovr industries with- out interfering with the revenue. Our coal interests possess more importance. than the mere intrinsic value of the coal produced. Tn the Legislature of Massachusetts there is a picture of a codfish over the Speaker's chair, to show what was the foundation of the early presperity ef that colony. Amster- dam is ;bailt on herring. bones. ‘So ‘it is with our coal interest—it is a» school of in- dustry, Like the fisheries of the Gulf, it is trating school formen. It‘is the strong est arm which assists’ the bedy poli- tic in working out the destines of the country through its own resourees, In 1876 there were 275,748 tons of coal mined in Nova Scotiay gnd distributed s¢ follo Wat | Ontario and Quebec. .....4..65.4.4)-. B4T78

That is because we

New Brunswick.......... ake tis « beck 6,800 Prince Edward Island: ... 27...) 4.22 40,000 MCI... a cena < 5 a © cde 119,000 Newfoudilland ..5.6,,5...0.00.. Pho. OT, 868"

United States..... Pe Jae kg 18,987 Now, it will be seen that the litile Pro- vince 6f ;Prinéé Edward Island consumed more ot the product of the mines of the Maritime Provinces than did the United States. Those who have- been: acquainted with that trade will remember the time when 200 sail of vessels were continually engaged im carrying coal between | the col+ onies and the United States. This is en- tirely done away with now, and while the Government think nothing of spendin

$280,000 on the Fort Francis “Lock. whieit! they adino pledge toybe »@ -bhunder, they refuse fo foster this_ important industry. Tf the money they have throwtraway on that work had becn used to promote the edal trade of Nova Scotia, the country would have xeceived some substantial return for

a duty (off30 cents per | to ob coal, the people df Ontario-will Abmiand's Similar duty on flour.” Let us see how the account stands: In 1855-6 Nova Scotia ‘imported from the old Province of Canada $504,000 worth; in 1874 Nova Seotia consumed $1,- 305,000 worth of the products of - Gptario and Quebec. “invetnrn, Ontario and*Que- ! bee consumed only 84,000 tony pf Noga‘ Scotia coal. {f would like to call “attention to 4 statement jof the tradé! between) this] country and Great Britain, to show where the channels of tgade are, .In 1872-3. the imports from Great Britain wore 862,000, - 000; in 1876-7 they had fallen to #40,000,-. 000, showing a. decrease of 872, 006,000.

i

Now, letws look-at the trade between thi! country and the United States. In 1872-3 we imported from the United States $35,- 000,000; iy ASP +7, 921,000,000, showingan increase!.o sh sy 1000. And while out imports from thot country have been in- creasing; our exports’ to thent have beea diminishing; showing clearly thére is some- thing materially wrong so ‘far as the mer-

ing to build up a nation here, we must take ‘a national way of doing it. It 1 finding fault with the arrangements m with British Columbia. “We | must them into effect, and do more* than send a handful of troops to the North-West to keep the Indians in check, an a progressive policy.

this country should be protected in times of | we a jo see whether Canada wit

it, J knowritwill besaidy ‘You ree country, who has so intelligently put it be- i becanse fore the country, and who has not been

jto h

om ‘eecneeen egis attain +

a ee ng, marron

~

Wace oe epets Sale

no use

carry

‘

lf-other Provinces are British Columbia has been, the Confederation” list? 1 say it is wecessary, ime the interests , of this country that the Pacifi¢ Railway should be built. We owe it to ourselves to construct “it. States for delaying the payment of the fisheries awarts though «1 believe, and I have always “contended, When “the smoke passes away they will pay over the money, and I take this opportunity to coimpliment the Government on its conduct of that case. It would be disgraceful if they did net; but ‘equally disgraceful would it be to Canada if we did not carry out the contract with Brit- ish Columbia to build the Pacitic Railway.

treated as how™ long ~will

a eee

generally pu 4

——:0:——

SUMMER ARRANCEMENT, 1878,

V

ings.

every Monpay and WEDNESDAY even.

pay and Tuverspay mornings, at 7 0’ * Leavibg | Charlottetown for “Orw

evening, at 3 o'clock. ' same _ Returning irom Orwell to_ Charlottetown

We condemn the™~ Urittet] ame evening, arriving at Charlottetown

8.30 ofclocks yt rita ah ant: fonvé> Charlottetown for’ Anbu subbed

every WepNesvatjand .F 4ipay mornings, at 4 o'clock.

7 o'clock, Leaving Charlottetown for Mount Stéwart same evenings, at from 2 to, 3.0 clock, accord. ing to tide. Return to Charlottetown same evenings. ' Leave Charlottetown for

{t is thought that the Province of New- foundland, will by-and-bye came into QGon- federation, but +. can tell hon--gen

from a conversation | had with: a man in that, colony, 1 know. th

fai Pritish~ Columbia, and “the dis- position that has been shown to repudiate ‘that agreement has weakened the hands of the Union party in Newfoundland. So I

the resources of our country. I aim strongly convinced no plan has yet been suggested for the building of the Pacitic Railway bet- ter than that of Sir John A. McDonald and his,associates, unless the Layperial Gevern- Railway, guarantee our bonds, nation is like a youmg man.

assisted until it reaches maturity.

It must be i say it

is our interest to see the Pacific Railway By

that means we can convert our deficits into

surpluses and look forward to_ prosperity. ‘ Apply to Thad abet han wating te nis den ae

built and the North-West opened up.

and/adidents of trade change: the . so as to cover the expenditure. amused by the extraordinary statement of my hon. frind from Helifat dbont the yar- chase of stéek Yails—that they’ were pur- chased for the purpose of supplying the pub- lic-vailweys of the Dominioy. » 7¥ some things ard to believe, but which one would rather believe than dispute. OF all the extraordinary thmgs ever heard aj) Pare liament, it is that: the Government should be congratulated on their foresight and

forethought for buying.’ tails’ and ‘laying

hem-on the railways two or three years

efore their time. How.any man can so far impose upon himself as to. sup one. tbat any man _of intelligencé would credit such'a statement, is incomprehensible to me. In making such a statement and going back to 1858 to look for a parallel for the present condition of affairs, the hon. gentleman seemed to forget that the country is older and should be wiser now than twenty years ago. I remember when D’Arcy McGee was taunted with having been a rebel at the age of 25, hesrephied “*{ was Fite aba pnt I am a loyal man at 40, and’ an wh is not, is simply a fool.” Every man and every nation should gain wisdom by ex- perience, With regard to the item of Weights and Measures, it will be remem- bered in the struggle which took place in Halifax a few months ago, when the Min- ister of Militia was elected, he himself on the platform, admitted the Weights) and ote hy wat} eifmndet and a ah did he condemn it there, but if hon. genitle- men will take wp the Hansard of last year they will find a remarkably clear exposition of the whole matter by him. If that is not sufficient, let the hon. Secretary of State take up the Montreal and Toronto papers, at they will find that the wine measures of one cityare being segt tosthe other, and what {Bock ; the act Pile he that What may be good for one portion of the Dominion is not-suitable for another. I say this law is one.of the most intolerable humbugs ever placed on the statute books ef any country. said so last year and I say so now, and I believe it is the opinion of sevel® Wis’of the merchanis® ; county e Government d cy selves by saying they did not pass the Act. Ave we always to be told that whenever they do anything deserving ‘of. censure, that their predecessors did something similar, and, therefore, they are not to be held responsible? If that is. the case, they hnd better stay at home and let somebody tmnt up the antecedents of ¢ wihio pre- ceded them. I am one of those who be- lieve that every Government necessarily makes. mistakes, and I believe further that the Government that has the best opposi- tion, alwayséthe best fer the country. .1 would gay in.canclusion, that the thanla of the House and) of the country ave due to: the hon. gentleman who has sovably opened up thisGuestion «of «the finances of the

raid, front “his ‘place’ in -Parlianient, to express his views and sustain them by facts and figures which have not been contro- verted.

ery sas

ee | gee ene

MOLICE 1!

a a

N givi.g up business in Charlottetown, the

undersigned tales, this,. opportunity . of

nking his jnany, customers. and patrons for their liberal support. since. his commencement in business, and would intimate that he will sell his present stock of

JCBOOTS & SHOES -

at cosy, till Ist of. May, by) which date! he

woald respectfully request persons ,indebted setile their respective accounts. *

aes vonexpired Ferm of a Lease the Shop on Queen Street willbe’ dispose

of at a bargain.

Ch’town,

——

worse for it. In what way is the farmer in-

me

.oh OF eo i

+ e 4 > . . . . 10, , ldak f. hie wrt iT = our opponents, though of .course every, rule he Sey te national interests ¢ ; ow E for the . Y EX: jar iancepion, ie: ae wo. penlplep hs ay ab cbebiened TE we.'8xs SoU lor das pet ete eat Re pa published Shs Ciera anes

say with regard to the millions of acres of

fertile land lying ito the west of ws; we ee 7 Me a m1 should fill them withisettlers, and to do so PULVERIZING FARROW - ue Bits tT nut dt

we must establish manufactories and develop

ment do,’as inthe case of ‘the Intercolonial A young

[ was

| FOR SALE, —

Valuable. Freche Farms. and | Building Lots OL Pw Te

Fg pps \Vinsloe ‘Station;’ Malpeque Road, five

SarurpaY, weather and tide

trip. ©

town, otherwise. they wall owners.

Ch'town, P. E. Island, April 25, 1878. ©

Leave Mount Stewart for Charlottetown at : it A Vidi Ja. Pa

ae ey ‘Steamer ‘Heather Belle,”

Leave Orweli for Charlottetown every Turg.

:

Crapand e

every Alternate Saturday will? make a retarn

All goods should be prepaid at Charlotte. Stored at their destination, at the risk and expense of the

JOHN HUGHES, Agent, —

3m law pat pres her ne ar law 3m

a atta: ~ Paty.

ate and terms reasonable.

MACKENZIV & STOMBLES. Ch’town, April 25—wkly 3i

JOR SALE—3@' Tons god Nut Goal, I ie « Round “ 4 SHUGHD MONAGHAN,

Crafton Street. April 25—-

.

; g 7

pi ees a > : hy applying ‘to*the subscribers: moder-

“iat (* conti" _s Pe

miles trom Charlottetown.

HKenwith, former! Mate Hon. J.’ M. Holl. The F sists .of about Six Hundred

cleared and has beert for several years in

the country, and is surr6unded by plantations and a park-like farm. It ¥ make a delightful residence for a gentleman’; and being only five minutes’. walk from the station, atforda such an opportunity to farm— and yet be within easy distance of Ch'town-- as does‘hot often'oceur, © 6 ER ‘The property has frontages onethe U and Lower Malpeque Roads, old North er Road and North River, and will be sold in lots to suit purchasers., For further particulars

apply to 4 w HALES, | «. MARINE INS, CO, Gor, Great George and: Lower Water Sts.

Chitown April,20—m & thurlin, = *

ise Sagi CE etiam E subscriber has been instructed to offer — _ for sale that splendid‘ Property known as the residence of the con. Acres’ ‘of ' excellent land, a large portion of which is ‘ture ; the rest is covered with ae

fencing materials. The substantial’ ‘stone Dwelling House commands a ago | view of

“4

a

;

)* ODD-FELLOWS? Natal Day Celebration 1

ora iabs

- ~

. “

WHE Gh 1 Hah OS

¢ Ge

—ON--+

a oh .«<-CONSISTING @F— Tastrumental Music, _ Vocal Solos, = -Charac og | _ Readings, &ey, by the hest talent in the City, © er ree

has consented to give selections onthe

oy occasion, |). Prof.

Musical Departynent, __ + eae ; Oddfellows’ Entertainments in the past have

“Ue

public, to have taken a front; performanees- and commi

nO to nr ipiritee ‘best of the: 7 i be rv ' Seats, 50

served do., 25 ¢ ‘o be Drug

Land Bookstores; tit the the Coe,

H. IFAS. PALMER, J- WELL. McLEOD ta a P

Pe ?

; PE ace -CHALLENGE. hia sa ete asineaee kk dha al _ i » tain genthenen of that town: claj ‘ein

the CHAMPION SixceErs,"T now"

failirin ilerin, waliriny O” » in: and “Cabar, Feidh”, in the vernacular. Compe-

nt and mutual judges to be appointed, « Apply at the office of this paper. ~ Aprib?d, 67S

ta 4 hee

2 ' e

Irony Said vinwe)

; wen ae fb oat vilevyell ; L 7 1s . ; - ¢ ; ‘ “sf ai o TAD 2 « ', FOS - .

4 :

: : : re ofb 5s 4 “¥olt f ! : . C

astic that)

The Charlottetown Orchestral Ulub

Earle will take! charge of the

A

sf WF oe

A

, iM. r yTae 4 ; . Ms ~~. : . . j yWweytoet) AN tht aati ; ' ,

lag Voy. er? _ arket Hall

: ie

"4

. ; f

been acknowlelged, alike by the press and thé inamateur oe

: ols

¥ ; se : Un eM

OebaHROCS ||. Sh Seedan SHS: ua _ April 12, "78 pat 2 taw gre en}

sh.

DENGE ANY PERSON in the’ Province, ee Moncton, to sing, in the vernacular, “str 0%

:

id ‘A atie 2014

jack

i niga {LL leave Charlottetown for Orwell)

-

?

ee eee

al teat cle eel ee ea ee

caer, anes

; 4 4 7

fo

ee aa RR Reha acs pt ats