WITH Tm "llvoki? ii O D

1i _ i" ;

0* a? e Isl

‘U ‘a

Q ‘o!

W11... ma,

c/l

CLASSIFIED ADVERTISEMENTS»?

Advefllsilcnts under this lending. 2e pet word ‘n: sash 1i.-

lenlnnn

W ere copies some to our one to be

I!!!

an lllovvel as one vI ‘On!

a ,1-

psits. In nuance can this rule bebzvuloekedu

w-

u .- ',- a.

.u>- 541-11.;

uson ‘slice-Hum! snows m Qerdllfllfl-blfl for pinning under carrot.

fioentlemiatdsiardisn emu.- » » -

. . FARM‘ FOR SALEF- SPLENDID at Milton, 6 milesfrom Charlottetown, near churchos,‘ school house and saw 1111i]. _Apply to L. Moore, Milton.

MALE IIELP WANTED

farm "or" 44 acres

spare time writing forms. instruct and supply work. Service, 57 3., Toronto.

you with

IsALssman Maurie nexus; mill a self respecting salesman Whose ambition is beyond his

added to cost to cove! IGIQIIO. etc. itkntnetionn count as one word. but llvq llgnlellu 01300)‘ 4

remittances to cover out Inst accompany all advertise-

IIAKE MONEY AT HOMI ~1- B15

to 860 paid weekly for your ehowcards No‘ canvassing. We

West-Angus lflhow Gard Golborno street

v~

knurled. In cents. 4

Ad"

lugs; married man ‘preferred:

v HAMApply to Mr. J‘. C. McLean, Bell

second floor, Riley, building, Queen St... opposite Prowse Brothers. / '~ .

misonprmivnous c" '1 1 _

‘ALL UNOALLLD FOR' IUITS‘ suits and overcome froanour 80 branches throughout Canada will bosom at $14;00 Odd tr _$9.96.-0dd vests $1.50. In many casen this price is ‘less than one-third their actual v - ue. Merchants buy these go for resale to their custom rs. Wise men will buy two or this suits and an overcoat. Iior sale at our storo only. English. ‘f: Scotch Woollen » Company‘, 158 Richmond ‘Street.

your women folks need mater- lals in good, qualities for their dresses‘ and suits’! We have thousands of yards that will be

present occupation might find m“ u ‘ow ,8 $2375 pm. yard’

n“ .. ' mmlqfili-‘b; all ' ,1 ,1 Bl‘

ma imom ‘ .- , fllfll _, ‘$001111! '11:. ex- °- ° ‘"91" i‘ m“ "l calm opportunity‘ to get mater

clean - character sound

__ed with far above average earn-

TIRES RANGE LOWER THAN PRE-WAR ‘RATES

Arc nutouioblle tire prices rezil- ly low‘? A curcful Bfllilyllls. indica- ics that they arm-lower than prc- war prices, and considering mil- ugc. lower than ut any previous time in~ history.

When the B. F. Goodrich Com- pany, of Canada, Ltd, announced n reduction of 20 per cent_,-a new price level for the season of 1921 was, established, bringing their prices down to a point 15 per cent. bclowuthe per-war schedule as re- presented ‘by the 1913 levvcl.

According 'tn Bradstrecfs lndcy general‘ commodity prices have risen 23 pm- cent. during this same period: dt is surprising. but ncvcr- theless true. to find that in 1910 tire prices per 115 pcr cent. higher than today. ~

Andadiscusslon of‘ tire prices.

howcvcr, is incomplete unless. com par-alive values nro considered. Tho extent .of tlro improvement. is not realized‘ by the motoring pub- lic. Ybt this increase inbervice is actually measurable.‘ Then, consid- er the actual increase in size. For instance, cord tires, made by tho loading companies, are uniformly 10 per ccut. over the rated site. ,,\ fuw years ago lho only cotton zivallablo in commercial quantities wag gqunro woven fabric of medi- ocre quality Today the finest long slnplo cotton ls being widely cul- tivated‘, and the spinning mills now produce the spucial weave requir- cd In the modern cord tire.

similar progress has been made in the compounding of rubber lo produce the maxlmun (168119 0f strength. Better cotton and rubber have been supplemented‘ ‘DY im- proved methods of manhillctll"! and the result is n uniformity °f

\qiiality‘ unknown a few 3'61"“ 118°-

llndar tho Goodrich plan if n fab- ric tire proves defccilve iodny it is adjusted on‘ a basis of 6.909 “"93. and 8.000 miles if the tire is fl- cord. Contrast. this with the adjust- ment basis used u fcw years B80- 3,000 mileiiu ' '

It is' not a, fur-fetched conclusion tn say.’ that tlros today give from 00 i0 100 per. cent greater 11111011211 than‘ 15W years ago. Thcrnlorc, ii’ the ‘tmyompnnlos wore- actually selling Tinilefigo today hi. hlltiw-‘i!

pique»; mama's» pa

hi‘: d up»; a um u

0L on»; ‘flllnvr

rah s» t‘ om all tutors.

ii iii

in mind and body, of strong personality who would appreciatg s. life posn tlon with a fast growing concern where industry would be reward

ialsin listtei-“qualities than ns- ually found in‘ women: fabrics, and also take care of the child- rsn needs. Call at our store. Eng lish & Scotch Woollen Company, 158 Richmond Street. »

price level, tlres'would cost from $5 to $25 more than at present‘. Based on comparatlvecfnileage ser- vice, iircs cost less today than ever before. '

A cumPseA-i- CANADA'S Aofli» CULTURAL WEALTH

A tzuble given in the report of the Dominion JMlnister of Agriculture .i'or the year ending Match 31, 1921 -

places the value of all t-he field crops in that year at $1,812_915,500 and the value of dairy products at ‘$247,531,352. The number of horses in thc country is given ‘as 0,867,- 360 the number of bows 11505549,- ‘437, other cattle as 6,696,574, “sheep 11s 3,421,958 and‘ swino- as

3,040,070. Except in swine these

niiffiilrers nro slightly in ‘advance

of those given in the prcviousryesr and s\vinc_ are. quoted mo. more numerous than in 1915,1916, and

1917. A‘ notowor-thji ‘statement is |thst in three years of the war the ‘Imperial Wm. Officc- was supplied ‘under the supervision of‘t‘he Dairy ‘branch of the Department .with .hay_ oats and flour to the value of

$98,631,568, representing. 481,260 lions of hay, 10.405221 bushels of, oats and 984,702,080 pounds of.‘ flour, for which approximately. 24_000,000 bushels of wheatfwere required‘. Another statement of special interest is that the live stock that came under the"supcr-‘ vision of the officers of theimar- . kets and intelligence division of the Live Stock Brunch, durin the year; ,‘was in excess or - 2.2100, 0o head. ,vnluod at over $200,000,000. During ‘the yoar_ 3,788,138 pounds of wool ,were graded‘ by the branch for farmers’ ' co- rative organiza- tions. 'l‘he dairy business is slipwp |to have developed greatly especial- Ily in the Prairie Provinces wh re Who output of crcamnry butter as ilncreasedin a decade from 6.478.- 804 lbs to 25,350,711 l-bs.; The num- be: of publications Issued (luring the year by the Publication Branch of um Department was 2500000. in eluding 200,000 market reports. A

en in the departmeniaLJ-e rti, which details in a compbelfenfiive.‘ woll digested way, the operations- during the year of all the wxxperimsn

ltui farms and‘ stations and "all the branches and divisions ' ' '

"a. ' i ‘ .- ~ _<. - - BLUBBEIRITO BE ‘FRlIQ-y-i»,

lt now seems fairly ceriniuibll)‘, ,

ltqnrl Daub-s Isandru. who;

past 00 months, has ‘been Q0 '01; out of the dlsslmoiifance. wi -. {out trace, of eleven women to

. great favoritswfth tbs $110010!" ms w w- one. . ‘ l~ cactus-w...

'GLO‘TH,' CLOTH, CLOTH— DO-

' ‘ the country";

trial on charges ofmurderirog- "

whom he hndipromisewimerniagy .,- hflgltrfa will some before the Yong! w ‘ altos la July. Landruhal a .

gift" om ’ ‘ “AI-av w. fir» icfllflili

-. . I .-‘»,,

‘_ x loquziuueai‘ _ '

.-. - ‘Iihaivs read the flfitfdiflgg, p.

“nowwsonic- to what I-will-call the -~ | I _ __

tax clause: '" "*

-- .Tbat, yvhils recognizing that

"saluting ‘financial rehuirements of 1 ‘ius-nuuhlliqu demand uhsiluslhrs- "3

fiance ‘of u_'cuutdms-‘~“1:urif‘r. ‘ "the

- House is unable to concudin the"

declarations by the Government nun tho tariff should be based on the ‘principle of protsctlbii "the ta- riff is a tax- ' “ "

"libs tariff is a tax, mind; your . -~mnd thsnim of legislation should be, to make taxation as light as circumstances will permit. -

"Just keep that in mind. We recognize that for-good’ reasons we have to have s tariff, but it should not be protective at all. lt should not be based on protection, because ‘the tariff ls a ‘mere tax. See ‘how that fits in with the next paraigraph:

That the almof the ‘fiscal policy

of Canada should be the encourage- _ ment of industries- A Now may l ask the hon. memiber for Red Deer, which clause is he voting for? “Did 111s ‘hon. member ‘ever hear about encouragsng indus- tres by taxing them? The- tarifl isl a more tax, just for the sake of raising money on" account of our financial conditions, but the fiscal policy oi‘ the. country should he the encouragement of. industries. Now lf there’ is‘ any human being fmatUcan put those two clauses to- gether and get his mind on the same side‘ of tbeboth of them, supporting them‘ ‘or opposlng them, that is, if he is honest with his mind, I would like to see the speci- men produced. The amendment goes on: I '

That bhe aim of‘ the fiscal policy

u; u! Csnddebihmdd‘ be the encour-

asemsnt of industries ibased on the natural resources of the ‘country, the development of which may, reasonably be expected to create heallbhy enterprises giving promise of enduring success.

That is good enough for any party. lBut if such is the case, haw is it that the tariff is a mcre tax, to be maldo as light as pos- sible‘! Let me go into that for a moment. The aivm- should lbs "the encouragement of industries" based-on the natural resources of New wihat are those industries? The‘ hon. menrber for Sbelburne and Queen's told us: he gauge us the ireyWo the wholothingl The industries ' I ‘ would. encourage by a tpriff taxfhe says, are those,‘ tbehraw/ materials of which are in this country: That would be one class, than.» ‘mentioned steel; steel was >_ very rnippropriale,‘ “very appropriate ltndeed. ' ‘Why,’ of w..." ' he would pro- ieoiP-tha steel ‘industry. Such an, industry. would The one lbnsed on, our natural _resopmes. But hun- dreds tof industfies’ in thisicountry get the bulk s‘: their rawvmaterials in Canada, and the purpose of a tariff, ‘in so far as its protective ef- fectz goes, is to develop the natur- al respurces 'of a country. Ho says lfurtherithat those that ere‘ based oniour ‘natural resources get- t-heir fuel in bhis; country. ‘That is coal. You see where the hdu. ‘gentleman ‘comss/‘hi. ' ‘Sofiti-hs" coal and. steel are Isoncarusd ' he‘ can goi m‘ Novfrscdnh and’ say‘? "l ‘stand up ‘for protection‘ tothese industries." than that; he said that if an in- dustry were bssed con water-power, he would protect ‘it. He says; "If ‘they 161-3’ ‘ifshfi water-power: why, ihenh-thatda as Inatursl‘ re- source, and l would ‘encourage'~ that too." And in case he should accldsnitallydsnve anything out, and thereby get into trouble any- where, he included another class.

vast variety of informatipu‘.i;1“?i_v~iii-Ilia?1- "Y0" 1M! 110W indus-

tries built up only upon the brains of the promoters of such indus- tries"! and he gave us a beautiful

illustration. He said there was a msifin Scotland, in Glasgow, I ‘tbflnkr- .- , ,

1.11.3,

pa w. _. .-

.=-.-,::-,::.- llfiffiiihfit

llllell

Guaranteed

tiling. lop uh zrrzils o habit-fa m1

t

If! tall

HID.

, asspranoe that" such

.tions from his words.

‘ down-lo.

_.—_@-__

.. .uug1s1 ren1 11...... nu aim u. 1...... u i-nll the; Measures Proposed iu liS Successful 0utc0me.

oranges growing in Scotland, and thorej was no sugar rmade there. a certhin man had found a way to makefiilenmelade, ‘and having sous jsonhad established an indus-_ _ lied on one of the natural re- rcep of the country. And a-f- tor,‘ he. got‘ through with that clas- sification‘ he declared: “That is the lgzigldqof, industry I would encour- lilbll: adding the very comforting industries wouidnot need "very much pro- iect-ioivjfl Now. I should ‘llkeio know how those words accord with the declaration that-a tariff should not be based on the principle of protection‘. _ Whatindustry in the world. would come in under-the class named byumy hon. friend from Bbalburiie ‘and ‘Queen's (Mr. meiamgii And he says um the tariff shouldhesuch as ‘to protect these industries! "-~ He declares, in one clause, that the tariff sh uld not bobassd on. ‘the princip of protection. sndl-in “another. clause he says “the encouragement of in- dusf/ry" is jusfwhat it ought to be based on. ‘Let rme ask my hon. friends opposite a very plain, and simple questionz- ‘Is/the. tariff in effect in this oountryto-day based on the principle of protection. or is it not? get an answer, oven‘ a nod, Ido

U". N

ry ‘$811

zontal. one.

is not one gentleman opposite who will tell us in this debate whether the present tariff isbased on ‘the principle of protection or not. Willi. i! they SM’ no, thoimmediate answer is:' What then do you want? if they say yes, then the

tariff. “There have ‘been substan- tial reductions sipcstheir day, but

ts/riif now and if. musthave been there before the reductions were made. The tariff of tlfis country to-day, in every cssontiai feature, save reduction, is the -t-a/rltf pre- pared by the hon. member for She-liburne and Queen's himself, which he lauded to the skies year after year as complying with ovary requirement of protection. Ha tells this House that he has never givon adherence to the principle of‘ protection. ‘I tell my hon. friend from Shelburne and Queen's that ‘he has given adherence‘ to that principle in every Budget speechfwhich‘ he delivered during the course of fifteen years» in power“ “Ho gavendhereuce to ‘the; principle of protection in every _B1_|dget he, ever brought down, and.

only dill-he do‘ so, ‘but he admitted the fact in Budget speechnafter‘ Budget’- apeech after Budgct speech, and l- have them ‘before ma. he). us. sees how the hon. imember did obsisadce to the principle-of pro}- ltectlong. I will take first a~ speech

nomads ___. ‘ m1 116,11. MEMBER‘: .- whee/yak?" Mr_ fG-HDN; ‘It, does, not

matter: ifllt years l will read from anfspeeoh ‘he desires delivered by, the’ n. , gentleman during the- whole; fteen years. » Here is one ifronhtho speech of April 10,1003.’ Having said that you can possibly ,3»; vtoo protectionist, and‘ that fr n '1 ,_posslblo to, go__too far, he e):-

1 mwtnb ‘Vahffurlfiéf, .ple_ined___the.klnd of protection 11c.

was opposed to, doing so in such a way that he could go to any city in Canada and stand by selec- ll-Ie says: The ywtectidngtbat, I am opposed

to is the kind of policy that would

protect the grovrng of tea in Bri- tish Columbia or of lclclesin the north. WelL-vvhh; mm outside oi an asylum would suggest any such thlngf ‘No uncover did that l heard_o_f_., fWo-Twant protection, in this counfrythe ranie as every other -cour1‘f_._ri(___in.'the world has it to-day, sexoebt Greet Britain, and

ty fast, espeoisllygin Vesk. We do not wept an‘ '

v way of insanity lit-protection. You I rs ‘i9.- r

can be“ extreme, mailbag! thins: we all knpw tile »,

. u. n: Jvmcfilb Til-Kile ‘and’ takes. __u..s_§'§:1'

that there may be extremes. Un- But m. 01w.- 9x-

Now, -l should likaJo

not care whether vertical orhorl- But I cannot get either. I venture to say that. there

answer is: Why, this is younowl

U18 PFIHIIYDIB l?! protection is in the ‘

‘in every tariff ho named; and. not ,

Great Britain-ts gettingflhers not: nus. experience of ‘fflieeii

Some hon. MEMBERS: Dundee. tremes in the present tariff? If so, ‘MrMMElGif-IEN: Yes. Dundee. ‘He 151g that, though moi-aware‘ nu ‘

‘he is_ the father of them. He says:

' Then there ‘are extremes on the other side. There are people who, ffllying upon the sound principles of free trade, sound enough in their propeiwplaoe- t l-iehas never yet told us where that "place" ls. '

-—are disposed to carry them to a ‘point which takes no account of the conditions. They seem to adopt a theory, and they say: You must carry out that theory regard- lessof what may be done else- wherer Fix your own tariff poli-

cy. and never mind what is done elsewhere. Well, I aim sure we

cannot go as far as that. Commer- cial questions are every day oc-

cupying more attention in the field, of public affairs. Thereis great rivalry among the nations; nay, there is commercial war, and in’ a contest of that character, it is. not enough to have a good old theory; you must understandtlie methods whereby your opponentiplays the game, sothat you may be alble, if necessary to modify your views. Does any one suggest that that is not an admission of protective principle? What in the world does it mean? If other nations put

up tariffs wehave to do the same. than is it merely to secure‘ reve-

nue? What difference does it make to us. as regards our revenue, whether they put up- their tariffs or not? If they put up thehj ta- riffs we have‘ to do the same to

protect the industries of this coun- try,-. for if..:wa did not those coun-

tries would have the advantage

"ovcrfizswmrere is as plain an ad- misslom- in the hon gentleman's

speedhyof protection as human lips could uttsr,—unless perhaps a plainer admission was uttcredby the hon.‘ member himself. Later, oaths spit .

‘Vefihave ‘endeavoured to give thc country a tariff of stability. . Every ycar it was a question of "stability," as ivf there was any need of having stulble taxes —-a tariff which, in so far as a tariffbas any relation to prosperi- ty, has been fin-important factor in the development of Canada the last few years. _ The tariff an important factor in the development of Canada! ls a tax an important factor in a country's development? Why is the tariff an important factor in de- vslopmeni if it is not by reason of its protective effect? This speech is an admission of the principle of protection. On Juno 7, 1904, he said: -

This tariff has included a con- siderable measure’ of incidental lprbtsction.-—

As l_ remarked last year, what ltn thpijvvorld, is the difference what ndje tiva you ascribe to protection 'if yo ‘ have the duty? What in the world s‘ the difference what you call lit l

—amd In that respect it will com- unaud the-admiration perhaps of some hon. gentlemen opposite

Iwhb. are more anxious for protec- tioigtban some of us on this side

of hie; House, I think. As to whether or not it is adtrqlmto D"!- tectlona-v, .

Jhst listen to this.

——'V%,havs some evidence of a gra- tifying character that the tariff, without being expensive, is high enough torbrlng some Anverlcan in- dustries. across the» line.-

Gratlfyfng? Not sorry as he is now: not holding up his hands P"

warning to them to stay away if they think they need protection. Gratliying! -In those days he en- deavoured to bring Anmrlcnn in- dustries across the llne,_aud a ta- riff which is able to bring those in- dustries into Canada looks very much more like a l-srifl which af- fords adequate ~ protection. lt certainly, did. Now docs this-hon. gsnfismnn-want to say ‘math. is not an admission of tbejbrfncipls of protection? Everybody knows it is. , Everybody lmovvs from years Shel-

i I

thatrthe hgn. memiber Ifor

“n Wipe lush-us use‘ Queen's believes. 1a nfq

hljillélflfl 01 Dffitwtibllu" I10 GOG!

ppilievo it how up» my one copdt, ‘Far h s rsoond daring those iitteei‘ yum l-lothen expressed belief l1 it on platfolttn after_plat-

“sites for saying in bub-mica» ftilifflpjfifl‘ ‘l have given credit to ' of. ‘a heterogeneous [monument Qlqlm ‘for. adhering to it still, hot- ‘ that he u opposed to n» principle ‘my _ _ ofiprotectiaa, the this; is» too ab hp apdflhibigfriendl would fol-low sum w admit of discussion. The‘ is‘ entirely 11mm: principle if m. mum rmafia tlfn. speech, returned m power.

gggbe fact that be mid

i have sivn him crodltfifer it because! nyit WI! for better’ for limpet}! .

Tflkovcs

break a political pledge, dishon- curable though 1t be, than to bring the industrial faibrlc of this coun- try lhto ruin or semi-ruin. But the hon. gentleman went on: