i. anion" 525.1521’- y . *' lldlifilltt

l I , - I I' Iljlfilfiillltlfi! B ehltfl It ha! offuylfz-"Ildzred, aldhgeaie declared It ll"- : ‘ h" been received _ om ' Byollflllltll Mixture-libs , 1 wonderful remedy, wh ch .9,» do its duty. It ‘yglltllll the way this medi- .. tea the germs of eoldl, mnelllfll, 1n lrllllvl. lulla- poetors stand amazed at Its healing power. This selen- pound [is 20 times stronger QflQCIIVQ than any other iciln. Just think of lti “l; like maple and brings "1114, end. after a few more mid entirely disappears lee is ‘llle. per bottle: and 10s is sold tinder I. guarantee ’ , pub. if it fails to, snish i , With Bueklefs. Blnri- i i "nrs on lisnd, you can laugh v ,1 the troublesome throat and 1 meme. Act quickly. Accept l 111ml Look for mv slgnn- ; 1- saln at ll Dru tores or . m... w. can ._ my. pm- 42 MUTUAL SIBEET, TO‘- |

slksttrtt lb ? Darker Grsylllir

I‘

‘eAcK rra ooton AND rRr-z wlJ-n en Name's sacs TEA its P!

mull garden sage brewed in- llulry tea. with wulphur and l nddednwiil turn Iraymtresk- l‘ beautifully dark- and lus- . Mixing the. Sage Tea and 1n- recipe at home, though. is me. An easier way Is t» 0 rendy-io-uee preparation - ell by the addition of other- ients u large bottle. at little at drug stores, known as 0's Sage and lSul-phur Com- d," thus avoiding a lot of muss‘. la gray, faded hair. i, not sln- e all desire to retain our .1 l appearance and attractive- .By darkening your hali- with ‘s Sage and Sulphur. Com, .1 no one can tell, because it ,tsklng one sum-ll strand at a zlw moraine all any haln . disappeared. After another lt so naturally, so evenly. You dampen a. sponge or soft brush iii and-dram tliistlirouglt your tion or two your hsir be- benutifully dark, glossy, soft luxuriant and you appearyesrs l I“?

< M MUN I 1

date such as enables

OUR STOCK OF l

Community Pitt's . n both ADAM and wa-ralclau terns is always very complete.

, . w. WELLiE-R 1.11).»

ce 1868 .

Back hurt you? .Csn't straight- l up without feeling sudden pains, Ill-p aches and twingesf ‘Now ton! What's Iumbsgo, sciatica,

maybe f-rorn a strain, and you'll t blessed relief the moment you b your back with soothing, pene- llng "Si. Jacobs Oil." Nothing se lakes out ~173Mb", lameness

stiffness so may. You simp- rub It on and out comes the pain.

1-.

‘ right the Government continues In

lnnnllll llvslnlsll. in. i IlIil-iiIH-Ygfilliilii

Stick by the National Policy oi Protec- tion and t0 Ignore the “Snatoher” Party

Mr. DONALD NICHOLSON:

CHAnLorraTowN GUARDIAN‘,

of the West. r One of the iatterklllifacleen) is in his right Illicit-rm! colleagues represents a riding Mail's Lend- I-le-trollld 110i hi" which under the present fiscal sys-_ been elected in Nova Scotia, so he tem enjoys more protection than now in IIn-e with the Government of any other manufacturing centre in that provincé, I mightfeey that Canada. I-Ie did not tell his in connection with the alppropria- friends that in 01111 West, Whit tioul to aid the province in the would those friends think of that" bulldlns of roads. a contract was The same statement applies to the Iet_by the Government of Nova hon. members for Kent, Ont. (Mr. Scotia under that highway scheme McCoig), for Nlicolet (Mr. Trahan). ml‘ Sl- Margaret's coed and $280.- for Juliette (Mr. Denis). and other "000 was supposed, to'do the road hon. members. I should like to work. but $780,000 was spent by know if they would support the the local government. Gentlemen hon. member for Broule (Mr. Mc- down there say. they are Liberals. Master) without the protection but they are anything. That work which they enjoy. cost the province ;$’l80.000-—and

Reference was made in this de- that is characteristic of the history

and I feel that the statement of the hon. leader of the Opposition cruelly misrepresents them. I also wish to say that of that ninety-five per cent n large number‘ were the sons of Liberalsmvho had support- ed Sir Wilfrid Laurier during the fifteen years of his administration. I can further state that these young men at that time wrote. home to their parents to support the Union Government. It therefore ill be- comes the leader of the Opposition to indulge in such aspersinns. I am surprised that a young gentle- man who aspires to become the leader of a Government in Canada should misrepresent these ' young men who, without reward, valiantly went to the front. and patiently stood the hardships o! sucha ter- rible campaign by alleging that

(Queen's P;E.I.) Iifr. Speaker, I have not been requested to speak and I do_ not know lin what political character I an: to be recognized, whether as a Liberal, a Progres- sive. or a Tory. But I want to speak to-night_ especially from the Tory standpoint. First of ell I heartily join In the congratulations which have been extended to the right hon. gentleman (Mr. Melgh- en) who now ablyleads the Gov- ernment upon his elevation to the high position of Prime ‘ Minister. i alsowish. to congratulate the mover and seconder of the Address In reply to the speech from tile Throne on the excellent speeches which they made. I

An hon. MEMBER-Louder.

Mr. NICHOLSON: If my hon. friend will be patient. I will speak in tones loud enough for him to hear‘. Theeneech of the hon. mem- ber for Dorchmfar (Mr. Canon) who is one of the first lieutenants, I presume, of the Opposition lender (Mir. Mackenzie King) interested ma. The hon. gentleman stated that the Prime Minister was a Tory. I am glad of that. In my opinion the Tories have done a good deal for Canada. My hon. friend also stated that the Prime Minister was in favour of contri- buting men and money In order‘ to carry on Canada's share In the wnr. The statement was heartily applauded by hon. gentlemen oppo- site, cven lby the small group of Progressives. If thcrc is one thing of which we on this side cordially approve. it is standing by "Great Britain when she is in trouble. The adoption of tlllat policy by tho Government accounts for-the large majority which they obtained at the election in 1917. '

Tile leader of the Opposition had the temérity to demand by what

their votes as they did.

Coerced! That is a very impro- per word to my mind. How were they coerced? Did. the Commend- cr-irl-Chief oi‘ the Canadian troops threaten those young men to com- pel them to vote for the Union can- didates? That ls what my hon. friend would imply. And. I novice,

Sir, that his hon. friend from Dor- chester. (Mr. Cannon) to-night re- peated that slander, for It is "noth- ing less than a slander on the free, independent young men who went from my county and who vo- ted for me. Not only that, Sir, but the hon. gentleman comes down to Chlarlottetowrl and on a public platform states, by implica- tion, that I have no right to repre- sent my constituency, because his friend who was on thc platform with him lost the sent by some wrong doing on my part. As a mal- tcr of fact, so m-zlny men from Prince Edward Island went over- seas that the Government was generous enough to send repre- sentatives from encll party 10120“- dllct the polling, and I never beard from one of those representatives that there was any wrong doing. I

,met hundreds of young men on

.thcIr return from the front and I

asked them the question: Were you influenced to vote for the Gov- ernment candidates; were you threatened in any way in the event of your voting against tho Govern- ment candidates? Not one answer- ed in the affirmative. I have had hundreds of letters from young men who were ardent supporters oi’ tho late Right Hon. Sir Wilfrid

‘Laurier saying: Here, we knew it was ll critical time. it looked as though we were going to be de- feated, and we uumted help from home. It lill becomes the leader

-~ of tllc Opposition to stand up tborc

dud say that those young men were coerced, and l take it that when an appeal is tirade to tho people

office. My answer to that is ‘that tho Government continues to ad- minister public affairs by virtue of the mandate of the people. o. man- my hon. friend himself tosit in this House for tile County of Prince. for the balance of the present term of Par- liament which euda in 1922. In the course of his speech. my hon. friend also referred to the elections" of 1017 and stated tllni. tile men overseas were coerced into sup- povrting the Government. That statement is my chief reason for rising to speak‘ tonight.

I may say, Iiir. Speaker. that I received ninety-five per ccnt of the votes of the young. men who went to the front from my constituency

e . 1v d.“ a‘

. / \ [Scllrc-ncs". _» _,‘ U; (its! 1.3,,

It is perfectly harmless and'dosen't‘ burn or discolor the skin. l

Llmber u i Don't sufferl, Get a small trial a from any drug store, and after using Itjllst once. you'll forget that you ever had backac e, Inmblso or sciatica. i16- cause our back will never hurt or (mm any more misery. It never dllflillpfllllla and has been. recoounen ded for 60 years. .

am sorry for him, because he is n. young mow and will, fprcsume. perhaps sometime hold a promunont position In the public life of Can- ado.

to my‘ mind, la political heresy. Hc stated that the hon. Minister of Customs and inland Revenue (Mr. Villignwre) and the hon. Minister of Public Works (Mr. McCurdy) had not sufficient majorities to show that they had the confidence of

pllilirllo ill7vlilllldlli_l_i_illll_il§_it ' 'e.=..-'r~.~i:-.":""“ "a"

’~ ‘ ' ‘ Ilnlvelll eest-nsteeee-lsnis l:

lerllels. e 3513-3.‘- qent one no in» Illa Nickel without conference

‘xnxn x QQ A.‘ x;-

son sane

been IIIIII

v7‘ '7'“ t’ the _ ‘ . Well, that is a most extraordinary rluatement. The hon. Minister of Public Works had n 2,500 majority. and the hon. Minis- ter of Customs and Inland Revenue had a 4,000 majority. What size maierity does he went’! I consider that they both had good substantial majorities on a. straight clearcut |iasue. I hesrd in this debate the hon. leader of the Opposition mention

lignnm (as Ill)

he nsknewlellel- -

MIBCELLAN E0 l? B

‘ALL-Q

"Z wt.

'00 SALEP-A raw Tons or "Billed straw. Apply A. ILMcKfl Lswndale Farm. _________________.___._. llli sate - mo: s ROOM cor use in desirable pert or city» "W: all modern Improvements‘ llrze m; llltuatad 102 Richmond‘ 8t. Apply to J. D. Stewart. | i

° sat»: - el-lonrn rm ll" can a months old null ms ‘Wllh- Just passed combinat- l°ll tuberculin test; price rilllt- l ‘Tilly. RredT. Melisa, Cheriqt- ' ‘downs. n. No. a ’ l

. w ANTED l

W ran-soc m oooo aalnv er. Address '1. Weetherhie ~_ lms. p. a

.- rie-rw‘ p» n 0a

~»l.

‘that the right hon. Prime Minister

. "”""' ”" ' ~ had stated alt a meeting in Truro ‘I’: a! gguaghx.’ 1:25:11: that our friends on the other side oonllliiylllfllit for New York or were connected with the Bolshe- Loadon market. Satisfaotafyg“ 1 viks. I was at that meeting. and V160, Nomi" 79mm‘ ' ' 7- ‘ll can affirm that I never heard a MP- Blllllmmlll“ P-h- " "' 157'! r n 1 kl d f th _ Ian.“ N" yo“, statement o t a rl rom e l“ Wm “m ri ht hon. leader of the Govern- E 0F FAT B AUCTION SAL ‘ment. JTOGK at n?” allaagmggm‘ The election In Patel-borough was rum 1B°iy lasagna’ U: Eridny, a misunderstanding between our fill-ti 131,11, qqmmencing at 3 own friends. Mr. Ilurnham is a Conservative, and I n/m inclined to

o'clock 10 choice steers. B180 1 para Ail-WU" “m Tum‘ think that he was not treated right. As a matter of facrif he had been

.13", a J. CARTER. Anc- v elected I am sure he would be

I standing on this side for what is right in the ilscei arrangement

‘i

. r ' - NURSING PRIVATE NURIII um l1! 1'0 gnyhnw.

wig; “WW1 115.1111“ hon. leader at one

1 u.‘ 3,11“. 9| Government made a tour of the .1 ~ _ .

they were coerced into casting‘

they will resent that slander. l1

He also in b-ls speech proclaimed, I

;bat.e to the Canadian Mercantile of Nova Scotia Liberalism. lMarine. Our hon. friends from The party on this side has adop- itho West have had their say, and ted the name National Liberal and our hen. friends from Quebec have Conservative. I do not care about. the name-it is too long. But I

had their say, so I think it is time suggest that the name of the party

;that I said something on behalf of ltlle Maritime Provinces. opposite, judging from the speeches

Mr. MICHAEL CLARK: ‘that have been made by some hon.

. gentlemen on lh-at side, should be

Mr. NICHOLSON: Let me callWSnatnllcr" instead of "Liberal." the attention of the Government. to because they Slim-ch B-i Bvfiryfblllg; the Plctcu-Charlotteiown-Magdalen they snatch at every poi-icy ima- Islands route. The Government ginable. should take this service over and The hon. senior member for Ha- bulld a suitable steamer to be oper- lifax opposed the Iililiitnry" Service ated in connection with the Nation- Act. In his opinion it was an al Railways. There are some awful Act. He was against the l8,000 people on the Magdalene Is-lgiaoty In 1mwer—the Tory party at lands, hlprlly fishermen; yet, theltllat time. My UOII. friend from service now is not as good as it Red Deer (Mr. M. Clark) had to was forty years ago under the old ‘get in with tileTory party then, Tory government. It is a. crying‘ and he ronounces it now. Tory- shame that those people are so ism. he saYB. l8 not fol‘ "8860111-5 grosslylneglected. There should but it is to be remembered that ‘also be an additional boat for the the member for Halifax and other P-rinco Edward Island route. I hon. gentlemen have been enabled ‘have it on the-authority o! the man- to bold. seats in‘ the l-iouse by vir- Iagement of tbs Canadian National tue of legislation passed by. this Qltallway system that they recog- Parliament.’ If they are consis- gnize the necessity for and are iu tent they will do wlult has been ifavour of providing an additional done ill Great Brit-mill In cases of lbqat at an early date. My opinion this kind. They call it the Chil- 11s that the Government had better tern Hundreds. If ‘a gentleman {give n contract. this year for the ziisugree-s with the policy of tho ibuilding of such a boat. Tile pre~ Goverllnlclrt over there lie says: fsent boot is taken off tJllle route for "I am nut satisfied with the Gov- nearly two months each year. and ernmcnt; l “m 59mg llflllll l0 illll lthe service provided is not "satis- people." But not ollc of the 58n- ‘factory to cur people. ‘I know tlelucn opposite liiduhal. and we on that some hon. gentlemen will this side stand here defending the “.1319; we Me used u, 111111 111ml or policy that was inaugurated for the flan: from Prince Edward Island, Iwrwfit 0t Canada. and that province has cost the Do- Nml’. l Wfllll l0 tulle llOIl- t-telllltt 1111111011 l1 large 511111, Why, 011a men illicit u little; and I can take of @1111 11011, 111111191915 ls an flbggllllp Vi)". hall-k further than some of you political paranoinc", be thinks tllut Ir-lxllornon ll1l11l<_ l will take Y0“ we have w good 11 110111 S91v1“, hwl; to ill‘) days bcfuresthc Notion- , when Prince Edward joined the wl ‘.'.»Ii<-.v was inaugurated in this

Canadian Folleraitlon in 1873 we -'="‘"l":‘ when the people of the were free from debt,- NeaYlY ‘°"""" our-doves were lenv-‘ns; by fifty years ago we 1111111 a 111111-0111] lhc iluzrdrcds and thnusands~ and ---wlle'n you gentlemen ill Sllskat- \\‘1l.\'7 7700.)’ “'81? l-rolnil t0 U18 NEW cllelvan were only in your swndll. England Suites in order tn obtain ling clotlmg-qtt a cost of $3,100,- Blifllfbvlllltilt. Lust your I beard, 000 and. subsequently bonded lt"l think it was the hull. member over to the Dgmlnlgll Govemmenp [or Iiiaisonueuve (Mr. Lcnlleux) One year alter we entcréd conto- szrv illut there were at lcnst 2.000,- (lpraflon Canada gbtfllned an 110011111 (v00 French Canadians in the Unl- Qf $5,500,000 imm the United tad States. Iloes the some coll- 3:11.090, $1,000,000 of which 11-1151 fllflllli prevail now? N0, they do 11111111811 over to Ngyvfflunfllflflfl, l not 1:0 to the United Stntcs to find hope the Government will give evurloylnelll- When our people ileed to tho earliest representations»\\'lflll ‘l0 We llll-‘WPIPS 0f New 1 have 11111119 W111; 11519161114, 1o 1111?, I'I;iIIl|‘.Sli'li'(.‘ and New England to two glanmglrs l have 11101101911911 obtain employment. ivllut did they and have u contract arranged for do there? They were manufactur- 111 .511 early (ma; lug bouts, cups, clocks, everything ‘ I want ‘to say this with regard In the United States for use down 1,0 the Iflflgllgflen 51111111111; 1119 M1115. In the lower provinces, and French dalcu islands were settled before Canadians and 090019 {Film "l9 there was any settlement at all on llllvfll‘ lllllvlllfiel-l W8"? llllIlTfl-lllll-Z lll 1119 511,6 of wlm; 15 110w .1118 oily nr thousands tn tllc United Slates. 11111111199“. T119 people 11191-9 11m The reason why they Iefit this conu- fishermcn, and they have not been ll)‘ W11?‘ l-lllll- "WY will“ "m m‘ weaned prgpgrly by any Govern. employment in Halifax. Charlotte- mem o1 Canada" 1 have 111111113 m. town or any other city in the Inu- presentations on their behalf; Ior- l0 lll'°"l"¢°-“ b°“““~"*° 3‘“‘"1“ “'6'” 4y year; ago 1 was 11 11191111191- Qf allowed to come in free from the ‘the delegation that came to Ottawa. Ulllled sl-iliflS- Y0! lwll- Quill-iv to make certain requests with re- "W" Opposite any: "Oh. lot llil gum 1o 111,11 111111119}, we 11941 a hnvo froc trade." Tho boll. mom- good 01d To“; guvemmmn 111 11111; her for Red Deer says: "I believe ume‘ and Lhgy 11511111311 10 0111- re. ill freedom;" but thcreflin a freo- wesenlnuons 1,1111 gubggquénfly p11; donl that is" ‘not right, and some on n. service. which was maintained k111i" °f "eemlm “I? "My “"0”- 101- yeam Q11 accmm; o; 1119 Wm- We want to protect our industries. and other considerations, there has Mill l llm "(l1 llllllil gall-fined Wm‘ not been in recent years as sutis- llle Gllveldllllellt- factory a service as we ought to 30m“ lldll- MEMBERS‘ have for these people. ll?“-

Let us indulge In a little retroa- Ml- NICHOLSON Th“ l5 a pect. Mr. Speaker. The 111-31 p111» little comfort to llOll. friends linment of Canada under the Con- Oilllllflllll- YllllllTll-"l" ma‘ ‘the 19118111110“ was 110111 111 1351 T119 C-ovcnunent ought to Impose ulllgll mun revenue 019N111“ 1111 111M ellongli rate 0i’ duty tn prcvcnt time was $13,000,000. 111 137g 1g United States goods from coming. was $24,000,000; in I890 It wit. s40, ' '

Go to it

i i l

Iicnr.

[in here as much es they do. At th pereeent time, too many ‘articles being imported into this country, sud I would impose a higher duty. I claim that this Government made a mistake when they took ‘$81,000,- "000 off customs duties. I would not have taken oi!’ a dollar. Did they gain any support ‘by their ac- tion? Not at all. and I contend that if they had taken off $150,000,- 000, they would not have“ gained any support. I ask my hon: friends to consider ‘the situation in all seriousness. We have to raise $400,000,000 and the question is: I-Inw is that amount going to be raised A prominent member of the Agrarian party suggested the imposition of u. land tax but when lle got down into Ontario. Quebec and the lower provinces, he found thert the people did not want that: that they wan-ted to preserve the fiscal policy that Is st present in force. Wlllen the people of the lower provinces-and the people of the West consider the situation, they will ask: “How lore yml goirg to raise the revenue?" At the pre- sent time we get $160,000,000 from _customs, so much from excise du- Lies and so much from income tax, and I hope more will be raised next your from-tho Income tux. To take the duty only off agricultural im- plements would he selfish on the part of loyal Canadians, and if you take off the $100,000,000, give us your alternative and then we shall know where we are. I listened zrarefully to all hon. gentlemen who have spoken in this debate to find what alternative there was for raising the‘ revenue that must be raised. but not a suggestion did I hear. '

The other evening I listened with great interest to the hon. member for St. Hynclnthe (Mr. Gauthier), who bus weighed tllis matter care- fully zmd who has been a respon- sible pnblic man for n number of years. I-Ic cannot. see eye to eye with the Opposition in their policy, with tllc "snntclleW party, the Lib- eral party. IIe boldly stands up here and takes Ills political life in his Ilands, noting in the interest of this country, and I am sorry to

|SZLY that one oi’ his former 0on- freres (leslgnatcd bim a traitor. The hon. gentleman who made illmt rclnuril is n student of history, a great zlrlmirel‘ bf Liberalism The great (lladstonc. when hc first came into public life, was recog- nized asthe fond hope of the un- bending Tories. and surely my hon friends opposite will not say that be was a traitor. It is time ‘ tn cut. out that sort of thing, and I may say that I consider the bun. member for St. llyacinthe, in the stand that he lock. was a Daniel; Ire stood alone; he “dared to be a Ilnuiel," and I believe tllc people of Ills province will eventually re- ulizo that .hc has taken n. proper course in that regard.