+.

LON

King's County Bxi

A GOOD ATTENDANCE.

GRAND SPLENDID EXHIBITS,

[SPECIAL BY TELEPHONE. | GEORGETOWN, Oct, |

Tre attendance at the King’s County Exhibition at Georgetown, to-day, is good and the weather all that can be desired. At half-past twelve, Hon. D. Gordon, Pres- ident of the Association, made a_ brief speech, at the conclusion of which he pre- sented Premier Peters with the following address,

T'o the Honorable Frederick Peters, P of P. E Island :

Dear Sixn,—On Dbebalf of the King’s County Exhibition Association, we have much pleasuge in tendering you an hearty welcome upon this your firsc visit to cur grounds. We desire (o express our ap-

preciation of the interest you manifest in the affairs of this Province, particularly re- lating to agriculture.

We hope you will, upon viewing the var ious departments of the Exhibition, be pleased with the progress shown, and, also, that the exertions made by our Associa- tion towards the improvement of the ground and buildings will commend them- selves to you and have your encourage- ment. You will notice that the Exhibition is mainly agricultural, and we have tor consideration the appointment of a Mini- eter of Public Works. Special attention should be given to this subject, most im- portant to all our people. We also draw your attention to the importance to King’s County farmers of a river steambvat ser- vice around the eastern section of the Is- land.

We sincerely trust that you may exper- jence satisfaction with the exhibition of stock, etc., and the few manufactures, and that you will epjvy the maces which are a new feature under our miinsgement.

We again welcome’ you to our County exhibition,

For self and Association members,

D. Gorvon, President.

Mr. Peters made a neat speech in reply, at the conclusion of which he declared the exhibition open.

The show in the drill shed is very good. The display of apples, plums, damsous and other fruit is larger than that of last year, and the samples shown are of a superior quality. The show of butter and cheese is not so large as it was last year, but the quality is excellent. Of roots and vege- tables, many splendid samples are shown.

Mr. Jordan, of Murray Harbor, shows samples of codliver oil and the emulsion of

liver oil, prepared by himself. His exhibit attracts considerable attention. It tuck a diploma at the Jamaica exhibition.

Two miniature ships built and exhibited by Henry Gordon, son of Hon. Daniel Gordon, were much admired.

The desplay ot fancy goods, mats, etc., is highly creditable tothe exhibitors, and the showing of flannels, druggets, etc., is ex- cellent.

Mr. R. W. Stewart, of Brudenell, exhibits a splendid collection of stuffed birds.

The show outside the shed is also very ood. There is a splendid exhibit of horses. ‘he animals are being judged inside of two large rings which are surrounded by interested spectators.

The sheep and pigs are of good quility, but the number is not large.

The cattle exhibit is larger than it was last year, and include some splendid speci- mens.

The town baud is on the ground furnishing good music.

—— > + Telegraphic News.

Montreal, Sept. 29.—The Star says : News reaches me indirectly and on high authority that Oanads is in imminent danger of an influx of Russo-Jewish refu- gees. I am told that agents of some great steamship lines running to Montreal are busy booking large numbers in Europe, and in order to avoid a renewal of the re- cent troubles with the government inspec- tors at Montreal, the emigrants are being booked through to various points in Can- ada. The agents naturaliy care chiefly for their commissions on the tickets, but those concerned in Canada’s best interests think tte Government should intervene and in- form the steamship companies that landing will be refused to those without visible means of support, or who are otherwise un- desirable.

Sir Charles Tupper is still here, and has not received instructions to proceed to Washington. Though the engagement was to renew the negotiations with Messrs. Blaine and Harrison on October 12th, it is expected that, seeing the lateness of the Ottawa session, the ministers may ask for a postponement of the meeting.

Quesec, Sept. 29.—The three judges to compose the royal commission have accepted and will arrive here Thursday, when steps will be taken immediately to organize the court, appoint officers and get ready gener. ally to lay the details of Count Mercier’s political iniquity before the country,

a

Up in a Bailoon.

“*A friend of mine was watching a balloon from the Naval Exhibition passing over a London suburb the other day, and, seeing a number of handbills floating down, he care.

iessly picked one up, being struck with the!

heading, ‘Telegram from the Planet Mars.’ ‘Oaly an advertising dodge,’ he said to him- self, as he found it reterred to somebody's special whiskey. Turning it over, however, he found a coupon ou the back, stating that on presentation of the same to the nearest ageut he would be rewarded with a bottle of prime six-year-old Scotch whiskey. This actually proved correct, and probably, while the Exhibition lasts, there will be many on the look-out for balloon missives, although i don’t know how many coupons may be found among the thousands of hendbills. Any how, it is one of “the smartest advertis- ing dodges of ‘up-to-date’ tradesmen.” Extract from the Kensington Express, Messrs. Lawreuce A. Wilson & Co aamtwenh, the Cauadian sgents for Mesers. aeeemines _Brothers’ celebrated “Claymore” — Whiskey, state that this same balloo. . make several ascensions during the ‘position here and distribute thousands of elegrams Cnring its flight over the city,

WEATHER,

NOTES FROM OTTAWA.

1

[END OF TARTE-McGREBVY,|

--————

‘Lister's Vain Attempt to Ruin | Haggart.

|! SPECIAL CORRESPONDENCE OF THE EXAMINER |}

On Monday last, the great debate on the | rep yt of th » committee of privileges and elections in the Tarte-McGreevy case com- menced with a speech from Mr. Girouard, the chairman of the committee, in an able and impartial defence of the findings of the 'report. One important admission made by Mr. Girouard was, that cases like the jone under discussion should be tried by a icourt and net by a parliamentary commit- | tee, Such a change would give a greater 'vuarantee of justice, and avoid deciding | such cases by party votes.

Mr. Tarte tollowed Mr. Gironard ina speech lasting fur over four hours. I am not going to attempt an epitome of what each speaker said. The case is decided now, and for Heaven’s sake let it not be resurrected. But I think it to the point ‘hat at least one or two sentences of Mr. arte’s speech should be published. Here they are ;

“I mast immediately say this much to the yedit of the Minister of Justice: From the very moment he perceived I had a case (and I have his permission to say so) he sent to me the two couneel forthe Public Works Depart- ment, Messrs, Osler and Henry, on the very day that Mr. Perley was proved to have re- ceived a bribe, They came to me and to my lawyer and said, ‘It is better not to say pub- licly that we will work together as much as we can, but we have been authorized to come to you by Sir John Thompson.’ | asked them, ‘Are you going to take your orders from the Minister of Justice or from Nir Hector Langevin?) ‘They replied, ‘We are taking ouc orders from the Minister of Jus- tice, and we are prepared to work with y>u to find out the truth as much as we can.’ [ say they helped us, aud my lawyer wili say the same thing. ‘They helped as much as their delicate position, and the delicate position of the Minister of Justice allowed them to do. I think it is well the world should know that when a great and momentous question like this is thrown upon parliament, the repre- sentative of Justice is prepared te stand by his duty, howeverdlelicate and difficult may be the position iu which he is placed.”

Ananias Cameron wound up Monday’s debate.

On Tuesday it was resumed by Mr. Coatsworth, one of the Toronto members, who was followed by Mr. Davies, who made the speech of and for the oppositicn, reviewing the whole case in all its bearings, and concluding by moving an amendment to substitute the minority report prepared by himself and Mills for that prepared by Sir John Thompson, Girouard and Adams. Mr. Dickey, of Amherst, who ia one of the th ugbtful men of the House, replied to Mr. Davies, and that finished Tuesday’s debate.

On Wednesday it was resumed at a late hour by Col. Amyot, who was so discursive in his range and so wild in his assertions thatthe House, which contained only a handful of members, and nobody in the galleries, was fora time a perfect bear- garden. Bullock Ives of Sherbrook, spoke of Langelier as a bovdler, and Langelier gave Ives the lie direct. Laurier, white with rage, demanded the adjournment of the House, and when 64 members had been scared tozether, some of them routed out of their beds, Laurier’s moton to ad- journ was defeated by 36 to 28. Then when Amyot had concluded, at 2 0’clock in the morning the House adjourned,

Oa Thursday, Sir Adolphe Caron deliv- ered an eloquent and powerful defence of Sir Hector Langevin. The Minister of Militia takes so little part in debate that his silence is attributed to laziness, and a disinclination to be bored by work of any kind. However this may be, it is a fact that Sir Adolphe can speak ably and well, as he demonstrated on this occasion.

Mr. Laurier followed Sir Adolphe in a bitterly denunciatory speech of Sir Hector Langevin and of the Government, and, for the moment forgetting his character as a gentleman, descended to slanderthe mem- ory of Sir John Macdonald, whom he charged with having taught the Concerva. tive party the use of corrupt methods. Adverting toa speech made some years ago at a banquet in Quebec, he charged Sir John Macdonald with having said: ‘*Qur opponents say that we bribed the constituencies, but we bribed them with their own money.” Mr. Laurier then pro- ceeded + ** Did Sir John Macdonald deny the charge! Did he attempt to explain it: did he execrate it? Nothing of the kind; he rather gloriedin it and that was his answer. Such were the ethics taught to his party by the late leader of the Conser- vatives. If his party was to be kept in power, and if to attain that end the con- stituencies had to be bribed, bribed they would be, Before history, Sir John Mac- donald stands answerable, not only for the fact, but for all the consequences which have te follow, and have followed, and of which we are to-day the humiliated wit-

nesses. That was his doctrine and what was his practice? We remember that, on the eve of a general election Sir John called

together the manufacturers of Toronto in secret meeting. What was discussed there ? Affairs of state? No. If affairs of state had to be discussed, Parliament was the place to discuss them; and why of all men stculd he call the manufecturers together, but in order to have the funds necessary _to bribe the constituencies with their own | money.” | Atthis point Mr. Laurier was called to order, and evidently recollecting himself, {continued his speech with more decency than he had commenced it.

After recess Mr. McCarthy took the , fluor, and the crowded galleries prepared \themseives for a great speech; nur were |they disappointed. Referring to Mr. Laurier’s attack on Sir Joha Macdonald, | Mr. McCarthy said : Brt the hon. gentle- | man was able Lo satisfy his conscience and | to arrive at a conclusion that he ought to ; 4rrive—-no doubt unwillingly, but on poli- tleal grounds—his opponent from public life by appeals to passion, by invoking statements which were not always ac- , curate, by charging, for instance in one ex- ‘ample, that the leader who is no longer in this House had openly boasted that he car- ried and bribed constituencies with their

ee

IN

Ath. Tw

—_— *

a cencnnemneeenat

cen la A NL CL CTC te

own money, and the hon. gentleman said, what should we expect from the followers of that honerable gentleman, from the se- cond in command, than that he should, have followed that doctrine and should have carried out the prectice what the late | Sir John Macdonald publicly stated was his rule of conduct and practice. I think, Mr. Speaker, that the dead might have been spared in this enquiry. I think the hen. gentlem 1 must have been hard pressed in making his attack upon the late Minister of Public Works, when he found it necessary to quote statements which he said bad failen from the lips of him who has recently left us and of whom, in my hearing, the hon. gentleman himself spoke in the very highest terms on an occasion which which wi!l be memorable to us all. But, if the hon. gentleman had not the magnanimity to abstain trom attacking the memory of him who has gone, we might have expected at least that he would not have garbled his satements in the speech to which he referred. I had some recollec- tion of that speech, not very accurate I ad- mit, but the hon. gentleman’s stale- ment did not bring to my _ mind the utterances of tHe late Sir John Mac- donald on that oceasion, and by great good fortune I have obtained the words of the Hon. gentleman, and I ask, and I feel cer- tain that 1 will not be denied, an apology from the leader of the Opposition for the garbled statement he made. As the leader of the Opposition stated the words of Sir John Macdonald, they were :

‘The Opposition charges us with having bribed the constituencies. We'll we have bribed them with their own money.”

There the Hon. gentleman stopped. Willit be believed that he stopped not merely in the middle of a paragraph, but in the middle of asentence? Will it be believed that the Hon. gentleman, in ut- tering these words, which, if they were as he gave them, could ouly have been made in joke, did so without giving the context ¢ Here are the words which the late leader used ; ** The Opposition charge us with having bribed the constituencies. Well, we have bribed them with theic own money, and the charge amounts to this, that we have so wise- ly and equitably distributed the revenues in the different parts cf the Domiuion as to gain the approbation of the country asa _ whole.,’

Surely the Hon. gentleman can see the difference.

Mr. Mulock—We are just complsining of the distribution.

Mr. McCarty—Well, | do not know what the difference is between the conduct which the Hou. gentlemen support and the con- duct which the Hon. gentlemen deaounce. They devounce the late Sir John Macdun- ald because he distributed the revenues of the country in a way the ‘psople approved of,

Mr. McCarthy concluded his splendid effort by moving an amendment which re- cited that gross frauds had been perpe- trated on the Government in their dealings with Larkin, Connolly & Co., and that these frauds were accomplished by a con- spiracy between members cf the firm and Thomas McGreevy and one or more officers of the Public Works Department. That owing to Mr. Perley’s illness, which pre-| cluded the completion of his examination, the House could not proneunes upon his complicity in the frauds or determine who among the other officials psriicipaced there- in, aud for (he same reasun the House feels unable to decide whether the conduct of Sir Hector Langevin was to be ascribed tu # blind confilence iu the integrity and efficiency of his chief engineer, or to a guilty connivan:s. That in addition to the foregoing reasons the Houss has no hesi- tation iu recording ita opinion that, judged by the well-known constitutional rule which makes the Minister responsible to Parliament for the administration of the department over which he presides, the late Minister of Public Works cannot be absolved from his ministerial responfibility, and in that regard merits the censure of this House.

And the House recommands that in ad-| dition to such activn xs may seem to be called for under the tindings hereinbefore expressed, such legal proceedings as may be available be taken against those who were concerned in the conspiracy, and for that purpose the books and papers which were before the Committee be retained or so many of them as may be necessary for such prosecution.

Finally that the House desires to record its conviction that the enquiry directed by the House has been rendered unsatisfac- tury, incomp'ete and in some respects abor- tive by what the House cannot help char- acier zing as the wilful perjary of some of the witnesses exsinined befors it, and the tluuse recommends that Nicholas K. Con- nolly aud Michael Counolly and such other Witnesses as the law officers may advise that there is evidence on which indictments for perjury shou!d ba preferred, be prose- cuted therefor.

The debate was continued by Messrs. Curran, Davin, Edgar, O’Brien, McNeill ; and Mulock ; after which «a divisoa was‘ taken on Mr. McCarthy’s amendment, which was defeated by 184 to 2; only Messrs. McOarthy and O'Brien voring therefor.

Before Mr. Davies’ amendinent was put, Mr. Tarte arose aud expressed his intention of | not recording his vote. Mr. Davies’ amend- | ment was defeated by 104 to 83, a majority of | 21; and Mr, Girouard’s motiva adopred b; | 101 to 86, a majority of 15 Messrs McCarthy, | O'Brien and Davin voting «gainst bo h | Vavies’ and Girouard’s motion. Mr, Fauvei was paired with Mr. Warle, and had no righs | to vote ; Sir Hectur Langevin, of course, uid | not vote. Mr. Joncas was absent without a pair, and Mr. Tarte, during the debut: » hav- 4 ing announced that his temporary connection | with the Libcrals had cessed, aud that he could not approve of their fiscal policy, he should be reckoned as Conservative. This | would make the Government majority 24, | without the Speaker, in a House of 213 mem. bers, counting Kingston and Quebec West vacant, and allowing for the two seats held by Sir Hector Langevin

Some weeks ago it was whispered around that the Postmaster General was to be im. | peached before the House, were presented, the rumor had almost been forgotten. Bafiled in his devilish attempt to ruin Haggart’s moral character and to stomp | him as a libertine, dared vy Chap’eau to arraign him before the House Mr. Lister on Tuesday last revived some old | charges which had been made against Mr.

vestigation, regularly before the House and, in short,

amourted to this, that in 1879, while a mem. ber of the House, he had under the name of.

(Senator) Peter McLaren, become beneficially ‘nterested in the contract for the construction of Section S. of the C, P, R., and that the

but as no charges second prize at Provincial Exhibitions.

over and over again gree), 3 years old, owned by H. W. F'eizer

Hagyart twelve years ago, and demanded in- ojq On Wednesday the charges came Jens

THURSDAY. OCLOBER 1.

contractors had subscribed largely to election funds lt will be observed that the indict- meut did not charge Mr. Haggart with any eorruption or dishonesty, but sim~'y with yaviny violated the Lodependence of Partia- ment Act.

Mr. Haygart Immediately rose and gave the charges a specific and emphatic denial, Not only so, bus he pointed out that twice already, once before the C, P. R. commission and again in the suit before Leacock vs. McLaren, he had denied the charges on oath. Mr, McLaren had also denied them on oath, and he undertook to obtain fiom Senator McLaren, when he returned to Octawa, a statutory declaratien which would reiterate his denial, Myr. Haygart proceeded to ex- plain that at McLareu’s solicitation he had arranged the partnership between him and the other parties and had overlooked the earrying on of the contract and the final settlement. For this, during five or six years, all that he had received was his travelling expenses and bare hotel allowance. But he (Haggart) had no interest in the contract and had received no share in the profits arising from it. Neither had the contractors, to his knowledge, contributed any money for political purposes, nor had he acted as the intermediary between them and the Government in any way.

Sir John Thompson took excepti»n to the formin which the chat yes were formulated. Even if Mr. Haggart had violated the Independence of Parliament Act iv 1879, he had been three times since elected by his constituents to Parliament, and was thereby absolved. Supposing Mr. Haggart was guilty, what could the present Parliament do about it? But Mr. Lister had taken no responsibility upon himself in making the charges—he had not charged that Mr. Haggart had violated the Independence of Parliament Act, and had left himself ample loop-hole for escape in the event of the charges being dis. proved. The time of the House could not be taken up in invesigating such indefinite charges. Twelve years had expired since the affair had occurred, and now within a week of prorogation the House was asked to in- vestigate it. Surely it could keep for four months longer till next session. Besides it bad been twice denied on oath, and Mr. Haggert had in his place again declared it vafounded. The present charg.a only in- ferred, and did not sta‘e, a breach of the Independence of Parliament Act, and as tv the charge that the Government had received contributions from the contractors, it was not stated that even this were so. The con- tractors had been given no undne advantage, and further the charge was against an ad- ministration of twelve years ago, of which only one member now remained on the treasury benches. Sir John then moved that the House, having heard Mr. Liste:’s statement and Mr. Haggart’s denial, proceed with the ordinary business.

Mr. McCarthy supported Sir John Thomp- son’s argument. After a number of other members had spoken, Sir John Thompson’s motion was carried on a division of 102 to 78 —a majority of 24.

Itis very amusing to witness the great. anxiety of the grits for the purity of Parlia ment, when we recall their own practices when in power. To-day, they would con- cemn a member for an offence alleged to have been committed twelve years ago; while, | during the MacKenzie administration, when it was proved that Speaker Anglin had received some $20,000 for Government printing, and had thus forfeited his seat, when he was re-elected he was again placed in the speaker's chair. - Their Minister of Militia, Mr. Vail, had also forfeited his seat for being interested in Government contracts as did also Mr, A. G. Jones, of Halifax, for a like offence. Vail was defeated when he offered for re-election, but what did the Government do? They immediately ap- poiuted Jones to the vacant portfolio and | he was returned as Minister of Militia. | Grit professions and practices are wide as.

the poles asunder. W.C. D, VV . [ S| HE BRIGI. “VARUNA,” to load

next week for the West Indies, has room for

A Few Horses on Freight. Spaee should be applied for at once.

FENTON T. NEWBERY. octl—dy 2i pat

PUBLIC NOTICE.

7" s following Pure-bred Stock from the Stock Farm will be sold at PUBLIC AUCTION, at the Provincial Exhibition Grounds, on WEDNESDAY, 7th October, at Two o'clock, p. m., viz.,—

_One Ayrshire and one Shorthorn Bull, rising 5 years (superior animals).

3 Cows (1 Ayrshire und 2 Shorthorns), one extra beef.

6 Calves, 3 Sheep and 6 Lambs. ' A Mare and Foa!, and a number of Pigs.

PETER SINCLAIR, Chairman Stock Farm. Ch'town, Oct. 1, 1891—tl dte

AUCTION. Apples! Apples

T Sal -sroom, TO-MORROW MORNING at 11 o’clock :—

75 Barrels APPLES—choice bran?s,

R. BEAIRSTO,

A vetioneer, PURE-BRED STOCK 5 E will sell by Auction, on the Exhibition Grounds, immediately after sale of Stock Farm Stock, the following Stock, the property of B. F. Longworth :— 2 pure-bred Shorthorn Bull Calves, 1 ” % Heifer, 3 years, This Heifer has taken two first and one

octl

—-- ALSO —— Pure-bred Shorthorn Bull (registered pedi-

—— ALSO —-—

Pare-bred Jersey Heifer in calf, 3 years No, 293, N. S. Register, owned by oseph Taylor,

And several other well-bred Cattle, Terme at sale. :

EK. H. NORTON «& CO.,

sept29--eod wy li Anctioneers,

eee ee a

Th a os » AT) Amare ae Be PEGG US wlan 4

FOR LADIES! Wuiat is <ashionabie?

‘* Everything ’ : far from | our rev* | 6 Jackets are undvoubte dly

wou'd be a aho : 7 > a rt ane ne correct one, We will

5 ,

tO this imp iTtant aquest

Wer, and not : however, mak 1On MOTE expligis ’ ‘ ” “8 popular usever

great variety of sty les in aff. rent lengths ’

JACKETS,

( VILTED CLOAKS, As to material, Serges al d Vint e shown, Ines are th fashionable, but Be aver and Nip Cloths © Most : < ro ’ 4 ’ Si J aa A FUR-LINED CLOAB Srey oe ccreot antuings Fur of ll Linda w decidedly the correct + ing, snd forms at is | most handsome and serviceable trimming Once the

DOLMANS, ULSTERS & CAPES.

Braid and Curly Cloth are aleo used as lea whilst the heavy Nap C.cch Jackets ape w “

if not altogether plain Orn almost Long (Quilted Clouks bave taken a ve place and are very fashionable,

8 th iversal The Russian shape is the mia

| trimming. Popular,

Many of these garmeuts are extremely handsom FOR MISSES! : :

becoming, and no lady can well affor i soe d to be Fithout e Nothing has taken the place of Dolmans : still retains their p pularity, especially in the Ni qualities. The addition of sleeves ig 4 hovelt — | is considered by many a decided advantage, .

ULSTERS and

i Ulsters are 3 il! worn, but not so large. REEFER JACKETS, | y—the Quilted Cioaks’ having, in a eee nnmee taken their place. easure,

|| The new Capes are quite long, and some of the | are undeniably elegant and becoming. — Shot Silks in beautiful combinations are lar

| used for linings, and add very materia}! aely by their rich appearance. : . ‘0 4 garant In conclusion, we believe long Quilted Cloaks Jackets will prove the most fashionatle and popular garments, and we have spared no trouble ty procure the latest novelties for our customers,

N. B.

All Goods are

|

— For Childrev, Ulsters are the favorite whilst

plain ares. } Reefer Jackets are both fashionable aad popular, and are ||__Every week brings additional novelties to ou

guaranteed | Mantle Department from London and Benin,

to be - || The great success attending this Department the exactly | past season leads us to hope that every lady of taste as || may find something to sutt her in. our Present stock, represented. - {| which is the largest and finest we have ever ituported,

Word has just come that Waltham Eloin Watch Factories have decided to reduce the price of ail 18 size (Gents’ size) Watch movements This being the case, anyone needing a good Watch would de well to note that G. ti. 'FAYLOR will give his customers the benefit of the rebate, iSuy now and so save money, as prices may be raised at any time. se

NORTH SIDE QUEEN SQUARE, —

Chai lottetown, Oct. 1, 1891—dy Qaw wky

Our Friends REDUCTIONS, but undersell us.

Envelopes, 2c. per package ef 25; Fook. cap, oC. per quire; see our new Ie. Exercise

Book; Rosebad Scribbler, best in the De minion, 5¢. each.

HASZARD & MOORE, 162 QUEEN SQUARE.

Charlottetown, Oct. 1, 1891.

30 proj} (4a ro’

Sree are talking ihey cannot begin to

ree ee een ee nen A re RAE

A NEW LOT OF

WALKING STICKS

For Young Men and Old,

In many Styles and Woods, including some variously mounted in Gold, Silver and Oxidized Silver, all prices, just receiv

WATSON’S DRUG STORE.

Charlottetown, Sept. 29, 1891 —dy

The Dominion Building and Loan Associaill, HEAD OFFICE, 54 ADELAIDE STREET, E., TORONTO.

= - = = $10,000,000.

CAPITAL, e OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS CHARLOTTETOWN LOCAL BOARD:

= ss = = (x) & Me Lemuel E. Prowse, President; Rob Angus, Vice-Prsident ; McLeod, Nee Quarrie, Solicitors; Lemuel Phillips, Appraisers; M. P. Hogan, oad H. W. Anderson, D. McLean, W. F. Carter, Directors; Uiquam and Brow, Secretary-Treasurers. () : in this city, avd HIS Association will be prepared at once to make Loans on Real Estate re “association. : also to take investments ia iarge or smal! sums in the form of stock int a stock my which is one of the best paying investments offered. Applications for a be made to the Secretary-Treasurers, where full information may be obtained.

URQUHART & BROW.

Special Agents for P. F.

oe, ta OFFICE —Brown’s Block, Charlottetown, P, E. Island.

and

ee ee aee «

ei i

about big :

mn

*-

— i, a aoe 2

i i i i

‘

ay

ET lee