' one unionist meters. ‘_

subject through the mug qffolly with which it stands con- these letters.

7 . at r d lcbiit ” and to have been “a man most elo- - ' extracts . C o R R E s P o N D E N C E' , . great findings, and, skilful in the Scriptures." (Hist. of nectad,” to close my remarks With. the fpgluo'wglngd learned Just look, Mr. Ednor, and

' d by a p . d . . ,

, useb. “1.32. from a, work recently publishe land at the characgorm p03

1 To run horror. or was Comm“. Hanan. Farmer, i, i), no, a mile matter that“; Eusebiitils,.besides having Minister of the Established Church :-— m “l e r” for himself and his m‘hmn “that. .I V

l 4 . . . . . dis ara ed the authority ofthe Apoca ypse 'an‘ insinuated not I k on Millennial views a rmatory 0 l . ' 1! us that the m m. . . ..

" Annals Plato, amlcus smut”, sad mag]: “ma vemai." it ‘5” gerhaps the work orcerinlhus “'6 flonhie’ was decidedly tor’cfigzzeayilli: gzwslimd the precious resdrrection ofhthe flout? of me country!” and, may , ,.

- minted with the flrian Heresy which ren I s 18 views liable to . 1- ns and 0 “mg the W; to at ei- er , _ , k I

SlBi—‘l feel that a“ “Pillogy ‘5 due bow to you 33“] 3'01." suspicion on this point in mordrcspects than theone naincd. The figsgfifgmxellfigviiggn ’m {hefibllowing tegtiymony of the la'te ed Wilfh llhzrgilzm :1. Eggebmedch? ’ tenders for the further.hbeny 1.3m “’9‘” to take’ m “gum Mnsdeburgensia" cemurimo" thus in?“ M h'm.‘ “ "mng "PW Bisho Van.Mildert Who, by the extent of his learning, and tin moraity, e 8i_| the .

Introducing to your notice a subject which I acknowledge I about to say some few things concerning the dOctnne ofEusebius, erg, subrxet up his judgment, is at the fanliestremove from Mr. Editor, to 88851 . t0?! 4, ill.

gen . Y ess and umwgance,_. trymen, or to undervalue their utility;

approach with extreme reluctance and difiidence—conscious we first give this admonition, that Jerome every ‘whpre hold's . r “dn I '

as I am that the diacussion of such topics in the public him forth suspected ortlie error ofAriamsm. Forin hls apology “11‘sfiihhci'flfisomzw cenain ,han timi the scriptures clearly fore- bye and arrogant pro such clam. .. E;

_ Newspapers is not approved ofby many intelligent individu- against Ruflinus, he says of husebius, “ that he was indeed amost tel me conbversion and restoration or the Jews,_and that ill miss! comparigons were Just, and his cone)“. . VOL

l ‘13!“ “m being calcu'med to lead to “"y beneficial or prnc' learned man? but “m v“ Gullah“ If. Familial"? m the us-ageSp satisfactory pledge of the fulfilment ofthe prediction: is ndi'enery: 1y does it become a mambo, .f “In,

1 “cal result; I have! lbw! briefly ‘0 “8‘9 that my P'eVlm‘s orlhe word-m [ho-5° "mes’ "m a" 0.02’] can “roughom 5" 0 iven by what has actually bee".b""“ghl l9 Pa“,In ' 9" .ISP f ri ht of summoning, sevoraler “19:16 . 5”"

- ' - his books did continquIy- declare that Orwen was ofthe 5'qu 5. - - R s 60,", the Mmenmum, or reign o . , h I ‘ m . letter to you’ Slr’ w" called forth by the appearance m-tbe faith with him—i e of the Arian falsehotiid." (Hist Ecrles. 5‘0" “.nd Preservmmn' e p gfl h even“ aha“ have m, the legislator am I e awyer, o a 1 Royal Gm of ‘he 9m ult‘ Of a "mewmt lengthy "Ml-8’ cap. it. sect. 3.) Bishbp Jeremy 'l‘avlor,in his ‘ Liberly of Prophe- me films on earl'h for 1030 Page: viiith ofcotijecture. Whe- and dellbemtely Pronouncg the.” 05"". _ taken from ‘be Bruin]. North limeriwn Wesleyan Mailed”! gyms” "m only says on'im’ that hé entertained Aria" sentimenm’ ken plu‘ci’ iiihemalslirc‘i'wlliii': the Chriii’tian church, and some in moral .fllld 506ml Pmudmfit to hll own . Magda“ f" May! 1842! and Wh'Chrlcahn?‘ hell) Observ'l‘g’ but that he is not clear of a suspicion of having endeavoured to me." w'“ 8.: 7‘; of madam times we are ,0 expect, that a re. point of literary attainments, entirol -

"i m mam’ appears to me pacuunrly defimem m that Spun corrupt and faISify me Nicene creed’ «0" Ed‘ P' 954') Which Will "MM"? npasd 07' m Ii of the suinis shall precede the general and, consequently, in this realm“, ll V ‘ ’ N f 0f mam and Charity WhiCh one would natur'auy expem, account forwm“ scuhe‘us lays orhim’ [hm thong“ imme-dia-tdy sud-(iiciiiirltie:iilrre:ii‘iin? or whether we hold with others that it is as the stream cannot rise above it! soured. this coming as it does from such a pure and unsulhed source! after the Council of Nice_he seemed to have returned to his "gilt 22" m be a reign orpe’rsons raised {mm me dead, bu, ,, who",th leled arrogance can. for the uwm m offlis This article, I have been given to.understand, was intended. mind, he never did cordially believe the ctr-Efquulily of Cllrlsl. mm of the church, flourishing gloriously f9, 1000 years, aha, Editor, this writer must be altogether in. W I”! in the first insmnce’ {Pr the egpecml benefit Ofa Rev. Gentle- mlh {he Fatheriorlyow’ n ma“ ilviw can befd'ltsll"gm'iliioli§ e-noulgiii llle conve'SlO" °rlhe Jewst “"d the fl°wmg m or “u "Fe "mixer Stitutes a man of intelligence, 0.! else i by Puh m in d" neighbounng colony ofNew Brunswick’ who has lo ms'dmalie fallgi'n awilicgmtelrit Sign? iii) thi'lancldn ziswthe '0 the Cl‘rlSlian faith 3 it in not necessary to flaming“; a": a large number of his brethren in till. I: Island! m0“ untowardl-y—a” some? SUPPOSQ‘flnlbmced ‘he hrdmd cap g a "u . y . P ~ ,-5 former interpretation seems to afar the least mo em; 0 6 never dam, in an enlightened co uni”. . said f8!

t - Nicene Creed , and who can apparently veer round iii u . Mont, . But our _ “In, I ve‘ d fth M II rians! This entleman Iam also . . . . . . t ,9 undissnp (med by great an J . h _ We can-me. o e 1 ena - g ’ o inlons on an Im ortant doctrine and yet in heart remain ofthe guag‘. "fsmp u .’ p h d , "mu-mm, the unwarrantable comparisons c has . d, informed’ on a recent occamon we"! so far as to preach a P ' i'l - l ' ill b, sus ected of havin been in- ""S‘ "' “'9 P'om'ses "fGOd depends? not 0'” .e a e ‘ h erudite and deeply read Ministers 3"“ # sermon iinbodying his vieWs on these subjects in so tangi- game OEI-mfin-fis lhniwnaoyp ‘luliizlelfis b pule D inio“ of?“ Em e_ of this question ; since, whichsoever interpretation we adopéi l 3 I ) d rivate emlemen in this bland" ‘ t mg the Ne she h b ld t 'bl be m' tak n It a - Hence I"- “ c “a - se r- y -p ' . -p splendid predictions ofthe inspired writers, both in the an are, an p g _ . n V , Acres. . I hope I: atthey can it: Postal y I’B‘ If - ror, who, in the Council ofhice, took decidedly ugalnstlAl’llii. New Testament will doubtless be verified, enher m a mew] 0,. ed, dull and uncukwated bang“, who, u, ‘hipsa r 0 ti re 1- - ' ' ' i _ . . . . , , .why":.:°';ht:..;f“taunt;"croissant 3:3.12.35.?35%2‘1123?“35351323355“iii..‘i.~"i“m"’"2‘53 a '1, Master":- i233: .2132." gill-mg, thgmv'aggsmchggm ." gang: ' ‘ ' ' .i l - ’5 '- ' time, the condition 0 tiec uro antece on y .0. . . ' mac ergo yo . , -. , i 0,. i o, unanim&usLy,t;-leqtiested tutti;I to Ipubliéh the sermon i2 qiufs; Braol. 3 Elements of Praphettcul Interpretation, pp. Oils—()2. d Pham mm, may reasonably be quected 'm alum 8 d1 v emf,“ replying are a fair spemmen of me p H , 7 Joya“; not}. it \IB repueatd I; ev. en email Slgnl ett u The .above extracts are rather more lengthy thanl coul scene urn-int and yiciory, ofperil and deliverance, of depresiiion mmgence of the country,” ahd ,fme g.- l wrl ingness to comp y, an t e necessary preparatory 5 eps have_w18hed,but they are so much tothe pomt, that l c. ld not and recovery, shmia, ,0 whm ,t has huheno undergone. d such rhewdc as they coma", be me u . “- were lcmllly lake“ bV mm ‘0. 3"" " are“ l“ "’9 me‘fn' posstbly curtailthein, Without materially lessening that force. The sentiments also of the learned, humble .and pious Ma e [em ence in the Island, the“, an“, “in. p , , p l time’ his Rev' Brethren’ taking the alarm’ perempmnly Dionysilis, Bishop ofAlexandria, is then brought forward may well weigh with those who really know his writings. He 3 Lot

remarks, “I incline, on the whole, to the opinion founded on condlllont “idfhe Prospects of “3 mm: ‘ finer! the sentence ofsi. Paul, 1 Thess. iv. that all the righteou _will But, Mr. 'Lditor, let us take one tho i n such or rise again during the course of the millennial kingdom: but in a invention m polmcs which'A .Lic . " L05. f certain order, according to that of the apostle, (1 Cor. xv. 23,) brought to light—a representation in the a" 5

ordered him, on pain of suspension, doc. to desist from the , . undertaking, and altogether to abandon the preaching of those doctrines. Whether the individual adverted to will

by A LOVER or nu: 'l‘iinru, as the accmer of Nepos. Here 1 shall, with your permission, insert two or three further ex- tracts from the work above quoted, with the View ofshow-

com I with this in'unction or not remains to be seen. . . . . . v _ Buii,yto come made immediately lo the point in hand, and "‘3 holy fur 'mllomm.” '8 m be .anucbed to t.h,e (I’plmon ff first, in the very commencement of the Millennium, the Martys, dagogqus. Novel idea! in what prof ;‘ g ting“; go be u explicit as ossible, 1 have to state that a volume D'°P¥""5t on the “lb-lee" and “finch; I "ash “"1 a so clear y then the rest, according to the decree of God the Arbiter, and that hatched? An mm, the offspring ofthe _' '3 cm] of Lectures on the ration q/‘llw Jews iiriapared by twelve exh'b" Who those “other “than!” “’9’ Who’ “ccqrdmg to “'35 is called lhefirs.‘ resurrmw’h.” ‘h‘.""“"’.““"" "f ‘1” Just" tive powers of a licensed teacher P-or ' Binds Eminent CLEMYM" or Tm: CHURCH or] ENGLAND and de_ our correspondent, have borne eqnqlly successful testimony to Luke xiv. i4. Afterwards, the Millennipm being completed,ilie by the combined energies “our author 7 n M livered by them during the solemn season ofLenl’, 1841, in the lurema’l nature 0t “ these d°°trlnes:”- wmked “fill me i 'he “'5‘ and “New”. JUdgm‘im be mhmplewiiid’ minary in that bright constellation—4‘"; ' ‘ liar “ ‘_ the E iscopal Chapel, West Street, London, and dedicated, Wllh Ollge" “ new 9"“ commenced l" llle l'lSll’rY "l. PlOPllcllc the” m be """stldow" ‘0 me filre‘ anhd thfi-filmztgr eigfunh country p” Happy the individuais that ,, ~ : first of i. “by gig LordShip,s kind permiSSion”’ to the BISHOP or britfling-iiiiizils, bfniinnd Jeeiiii'izrigfwigguiggfazimfhgl:L‘iifogifiifi “CitrigtihalIdiuvriiitiin'iizgdliiiiiikwwlflifr; gyexllieet two advent: of Illustrious even in that illustrious fr ;, tirymls - . . . . - . . . . . - _ x , n

$;OS¢:V:£§ fallen in“; we llémds gfsodrl‘e lid'v'duals 1m establishment of the); papacy. Origen iiourished about the middle Cl'l'lSli bl" Ones namely, flint-In WhLCll :8 Juggentthaentéuml; toasters of P. L. Island! ' charge

, y conceive to i ea 0 rea ing ' em, one u 0m“, ,hird cemury, ngme died abouu. IL420; and ,he papacy and the dead'at his appearing, but t at 0t .IS a fvc l d But, senousiy, wha, are ",9 ground. >

one, on a certain evening in each week, until the whole was (as man), suppose» finnly established by Juslinian in 533, Judgment Wlll be prqtracted'through the period 0 a tiousan ofthe teachers 0, this Island ma Rep ,

'hould he disposal 0ft to '15 mahy “their friends as lhlghl and in the ceniur that intervened between Jerome and this 9- Year“, ' . ' ' o b us i 9 i think proper to come and hear them; and a public notice ,iod’ were an,“ in one 0,, ii“, side urgenuine Ciirisiiuniiy wpim The whole statement ofthe apostletl Thess. iv. 14—18,_clcar. $3321?“ 413:1“; 47; (3:603:91; Md to this effect was accordingly published in the Colonial may not be considered a feeble follower of that father. ' * “ ll “spec‘s lhe resu"?°ll"h 0 "'9 llgl'l‘iwst 3‘ [he c°m'".g 9r members. w'e” because one “bus. .5 Herald ofthe 6th ult. No sooner, however, was this inten- As the system of interpretation which now commenced with "'9 Lord: flhd the" being bmlfglll Wlll‘ lllmifihd When, “"5 '5 t b '. t d ’ d, A Mr T h“ tion made known, than the article above alluded [0 made its Origen greauy afl-ecmd the sense of holy wrh’ ahd became so c-onnected With the statements in the second epistle (uh. I. 7—.9 , mu: f“61 in r0 tuc: . 9 ya, .

appearance in the columns of the Royal Gazette, as before popular in the end as insensiny to carry away withyt the majority ii. 1— 8,) respecting (as the author is persuaded) .he some comlllllg, t 10 _o I einons ra ion . e Ems , stated. The evident intention ofthis decumem is too ob_ of Christians, it must ofcourse be viewed as havmg greatly af- “Pd lthe df'mh‘ll'illon 0f the Mn" 003"! Ill thatcomlng. "-15.00"!- ll' convincing than this. What 1 on are» via". to be mistaken. Such expressions as these_“popular fecled the voice of the Church, and it consequently becomes. lln “he: "1 his Vlewi lhlll the Slums "35 hero“? lhe Mlllehhlumtfijil claim? The LICENSE? Tn‘acnna has not. delusionsfi_u folly”_“ monstrous catalogue of heresies”_ important question, how far the system ofOrigen was compatible bemg generally “greedi (at lea“ by lhme Who h°ld 3' fumre ' ‘ I am not capable of imagining any which i ‘ consist

1” a:

. . . . with the mind ofthe S iri as exh'biled in the liol Scri res. lehhlumt lllfll llle Mall oral" Wlll he deslm 9d before that “95' f ' ' ‘

it fanatics”_u mononianiacs, absorbed Witnonc idea, and lost I, is likewise impmmfi, ,2 obierée, “m, up ,0 ,heyfime 2:90,, sed aera. )According with this, is the statemenyt in the l5th Corin- garrznéhs‘f:da;tle%s $32: 83am": .

, to allOIdea of-compreliending a second”—wrll be found pretty gen, and also in his lime, the system nfexposilion winch chm“. thians, and in particular, the expressions, Christ thefirstfruits; h . g I l . ,ry ‘ an," i plentifully mixed up With other epitliets,equally sublime,in the ierised the two first centuries was 9,,“ prevalent, owing, how. afterwards they that are Christ’s at his coming,- and then someth t at 6 SC '00 mom? m many p am." " ~ 4 Calm}, exordium as wenasin other parts onhis laboured production “or, w the great influence up the leumifig and talents of 0,—3.9". the end, verse ‘23, 24. The Author cannot see why there should ly large and convenient, and the ks.not . Dnus Even “the Church of God,” it is said, “has not been wanting his allegorizing system soon began to obtain with many; iiiso; "01 be «1 lengthened interval belWeen CHClI Oflllese “"98 eVehlS i "y’ I am at a loss to see how clam" - Hose

in her efi‘ons to impose “€07, weak and umtudiom minds pi And much that News, a pious and ,nlenmd bishop of Egypt, was as there have manifestly been above 1800 years between Christ's House of Assembly could remedy these Ans, “the fin,“ aposwcy_, 0 battle of Armageddnn_th° return prompmd ,0 who a book, emhied cThe Reprehensions offlue. resurrection and his second coming. The statement in the 52d purse, even. it the Legislature were wilh a. ‘7 co, H“ offlw Jews to Palatine—the persona] reign of Christ for a goriz ers,’ which was specially directed against those who now verse, which,as the expressmns, and the connection, equally its contents in that Way, is much tool! ht, wlmlc

thousand years on this earth,” it is added, u are no more the began to explain the Milleniniirn figuratively. After the death of nlahlreSli “Elm?” l0 lhe resurreqllon Pflhe righteous; “[8 Sllfhglh dy to all these evils. But were i it tenfo d I terms,‘ GOSPEL OFChrist, than the worshipping oft,” flamnic call; the News: npnflms, a zea’lo‘us dumple ofpngen’ became [3,5th of of the apostle s. desirp to attain this resurrection, 'Pl'lll. Ill..ll; I conceive, be very unsound policy to on N... destruction ofthe Cnnaanitish nations, and the imperial reign ‘filexa'ldr'f‘i “d Peme'v‘"5 "mt [he "9"" "f New“ “Grim”: ffifigiffi‘l’iwc E'sfimcimnlsfi‘ a Spga-géesugeguo-n 3%rwjlsfd ‘0 d0 Wh‘l ShOUld be ParllCUlal'ly “190°” ‘— °fS°I°moni wmrheL-w “Moses!” and. consequently. :33 Bi'.?.i‘5.:.°§.'."5.'3S:L§l..isliéi“‘.;.';“dfii’;iIii." tantrum; a 39 451.3%?) 11.3 ‘l:;.h..’.é‘é'gms.2a swim .iese‘z‘b" children t° d°- 1" the teachers We in

- ~ - , . . . . ~ ' 2 v i 2 . . . . '. ' ' ' 3:31:2an to this conflusttiedmode ofieasoning, “that mmtster his fouuwers: in the villagesfithrsenoim, Euseh’ius preserve-S the servntions. Nor is there anytliiiiginconsistent with them in the unsuitable hoboolmoms and books’ '2‘ [I ah slinbzlgmglsm dWI’Je 3, spends the sacle h0lll‘s WlllCh account. (Lil). vn. c. 22—24.) But he relates also, that Dionv- exPl‘Fss“thr 10h" V: 28: the hour 15' Wilmian the 'LDthh all that {elves to pgocure better' surely. so uh ll

0U emp.oye in the worship of Almighty God, does, sins, in the pursuit of his object, was led to question the canon'i. We in the graves shall hear his voice and comeforth ; they that llal ll bOdy cannot need ibe asStstapce 0| . B

to use the kmdlwst expressron, sadly abuse has {MN I” cal authority of the flpocalypse; from which a ftiir inference may have 11‘3"” 300d ""10 the 7’38"?“7‘80150" 0f life, and they that ha" make the" bargalns or conduc‘ the". con

1 shall not trouble you or your readers With any further be drawn, that he found himself liaid pressed by passages in that fitmewll to illefesurrection of damnation: when the term hour A LmENSED TEACHER speaks of phat . 0x316}! [ll-I'OPI'IHIIIIS literary titbit; neither shall I attempt to pink-b lll’lnshffim. in his Ecclesiastical History, “hserve-‘r “llm '5 ‘1“"5'a‘ed “mi R°mans "llb “NW-90",? C°'-Vll- Brand in 'ed,” as though that constituted a reason ex 1 it t e a racy—not to say, the ami‘scripwml nature_of orig e are i is controversy, an opinion had prevailed, [hm Chri“ suc i a passage as 1 John ii. 18, as well as in the one preceding - - - “Iowa at least some oftlie arguments contained there'im‘sthese hav- w“? to mm" “d feign “_ ‘h°"sa"d yea“ “m‘ll‘ll me”, before the tile ten q“"“"d.(‘l°hn V‘ 25)' manifes‘l)’ appli‘id to the Whole 6' ‘Fv‘ii alRepresm‘miive "'1 the Legls‘amrl.‘ " ‘ ing been repeatedly exposed by pm; abler pens than mine emu-e. and final magniuuon “this worm ;"_u (he, ,his opinion riod nftlie Christian Dispensation. It appears to the author t at {are ’ preflglne t ere u some. can” 0' N- l and believing, as 1 do, in the we“_known maxim mm_ ’ had hitherto met Wllh no opposition ;"—“ and that now its credit the 20th ofRevelation is, like all the rest. ofthe book, symbolic, ' e t? be lmormed how g"_“‘““€' inriug

“ A man convinced flying: his w.” ’ bpggn to deciline principally through the influence and authority vylith literal: eXplanations. We find literal explanations running 3:“ leather our? 0" fireveh} _llhl5- _ swell ; udvnn . . i ." ‘ ’ ° rlgent W‘" OPPOSe‘l ilWllh the greatest Wflrmtli,because it I long t e book. See chap. i. 20- xvii. l5- xix. 8- and so I att e wanto'suc a pnvt egeist e v» I L a l I; oftlie same opi_mon still." tvagsiztgoinpatibla with some ofhisfaoourite sentiments." (Vol. i. go filnd indthz ‘201h chapter, the litera’l explanatibn, whitih is the despised. If so, I have some cold comfort, .5 _ Ma: lw” wit the object ofshowing ,hat_whmever mi ht p. . _ein ; an t is is thefirst resurrection a similar literal cxplann- they will continue to be despised. But it. i ‘ be we Views of our modern divim m; ‘his subject—we hagve In regard to the system ofintcrpreiation struck out by . Origen, “(m- The. dlfll0llllles that have been’mude 0n the subject are as a proof oftheir being despised, than M a, least, the voice opantiquity in our favor, and that Mine”: and which was adopted With modifications. and varieties'by so resolvable into our ignorance. How little is it possible for us to the cause exists somewhere else, and the in N 1 “film ‘lOCll‘lheS were very generally if not universalli held muni' Otherst “‘9 be“ W‘W ofbnefly Cnnveying an Idea ofits ge. know 0ftlle heavenly Jerusalem in which the saints dwell, or of venting it is, by removing the cm,” which" I in the flat and purest ages of“). dhrist. Ch lJi h l nera. character, and of shewmg, that the opinion here expressed the nature and glories oftheir risen bodies, or uftheir being b d. d . h m l t L“ [If "m vou some extra t in [all “m l, t at ofit is not that ofun individual writer, Will be to bring forward equal to the angels, (Luke xx. 36.) and how material must be e lscovere W“ out .‘pec c “I . We'll" w fiALTON whosecshalggtalecturgkdehtfered bty thethev. two or three instances, displaying the manner in which it has llle disllDCIlOH between the"); and me" llVlhg l" lhe fieSh We CENSE: TRIACHE?’ that m an enllggmqed a , - I i . er as a ristian an a sc 0 ar eon reprobated b eminent expositors in subsequent times. may soon get into the atmns hero of Socinianism and‘ re'ect ‘ er ‘ m c ass 0 5°Cle‘yt “or any 0‘ 9’9 m“ - ‘ feel It ll top fiinily established arid too getiei'iilly appreciated to Jerome, who had himself, though unconsciously, in a measure, eyery doctrine ofthe Bible,ifriiystcries and difficultie’s be a stdm- “Part from lhlegl'lly and honorable dams.- . Wet-i: :eet any encomium of mine, and which you were kind Imbibed the leaven ofit, does nevertheless condemn it; but his blmgjbltyck 10 our failllflnstead of producing lheir right élrecli assemont that the “male” are despised’ 80' ' eggpzhaguflzzrgpflyc;u;p;rpe_r o'ftltieF27tl:j ul’t. GTllls, how. afgnllkonnngifiobnz 5:93" tby a referp‘ncle‘lto‘lsulllit: ax, hwho saysfiln a lililaheving’and papent waiting for the manifestation of God‘s date his testimony in favour of that superior s 25 ’l l . l erin us ues ays azetie, who . . 9" emnomya H! W MC “V6 50 0 en w' - * ' eminence of character which he attribute!" ' i'le-E styles lllmselfA LOVER or THE TRUTH- an ' ' - insisted on elsewhere I here once more repent- viz: that the The doctrine ofa near e l ' ' ' - i " Cl n ‘- credit for veracity and sincerity, l must,saydlgtlliiiil§ [1:21.22 Qllllslln“ ShPUldldirect, his first efforts toward understanding the throughout all ages. Tliia 5221?: vsililt‘iafa?lllliiilteiil:iyllr:e The vw-mer or these ameles seems on : "arches have signally failed to elicit anything like a satis_ literal senselfls It is callEd).0f5cripture, which flione is the sub- has "0‘ yet begun, before our Lord’s return, is sometimes, called mammmmg the fight or the- m-achers to . ' - ffictory refutation of the position assumed by Milleiiarians :lmtlc'e olf' fiu'lh imd or Lhmnu" (“Why 3—w.l“°h “'9'” “fl” the 0M.w“yi the "’d Pathsabm l9 it not 3“ “Mlle “Why or "'0‘ that there are Other large b-Odles' m the com. V l VIZ: that these dooti-‘mes were held it by a" Christians th ; "31""! “m "1 he'liour of trouble and temptnlion :—and which dern times? [believe an uncommenced s iritunl advent to be ted: Who have an equal Clalm With lhemi a , ' T l w , I . a w triumph over sin,death, and the gaiesofhell, to the raise and the real novelt . Has it - g - - his own individua c| im for etfulofthoso 0E t are exactly orlhodox’ at the petiod lldVl‘rledto- ahdlummn glor ofGod T, H .. l . P . _ I y any plea ofgenera antiquity whatever . a 5t g h,“- umr of opinion’umt it would not be so vcr dié‘lc I b y . ie a egoricu sense is commonly uncertain, and to urge in_ its behalf? I believe not. Bishop Hall, in his list of ly strong, his conduct seems to savour more r m ' y u t ninatter y no means safe to build our faith upon; for It usually de ends varied opinions on this sub' a‘ ' ‘ ' ' d ' ' ‘ ' ""“hl as A Lovsn or run I‘an'rii appears to su ose t bl‘ 0" human 0 ’ ' d ' v - l’ . _Ject,,,ives nomiimation ofit. Iliave an conceit, than of fair and candid IuVe .,.i,