THEVUPE'I _SUN, Thursday, November 15,: 1979’, page 1:

ed Hora I " . '~ 2 a p "The UPEI‘SUN is amber “De’ac'iine' fox-all .'

Hats off to-the people who organized Symposium of the Canadian University submissions is Mpndgy '79. All their work showed through when the actual Press (CUP) with.exc1u31ve noon..‘ ' “ , 3, ' ~» event took place, and everything seemed to go without national advertising'v_' I The staff meeting is a. hitch. . ‘ , rights held by Ymrthstream, every Monday at ‘7 PM

Watching Symposium '79 was a pleasure because every * 310 Davenport Road, ’ 'in The SUN'B office. event had value. First came the lecture from Dr. ' Toronto, ont§r10.' ~ fourth floor Main, Leslie Harris which suggested what a university The UPEI SUN aims to East ends 3; '

Should be, and set the stage for things to come. 7 .be';E‘E;aE§;;aént. ~ V A sincere.thank you . That was followed the next morning by entertaining r ‘ . ‘nhubpaper published and‘ a helluva lot.9f , and thought provoking speeches from a panel of _ \, weekly thrOushout the ‘ gratitude to: ' ' he students. The afternoon agenda featured a panel of . academic year by the: w ‘ ANN HlGPON.

faculty and community people, and they, too, handled UPEI Student union, 'MAUREEN HARTMAN themselves well. ~Scheduled around the panels were Printed by the Journfii_f gAUREEN MURRAY question periods and discussion groups in which Pionéer in Sumn;;;§§;‘;nd v ALERIE WALKER Symposium spectators got involved. The final step 333E;Eshtéd throughout ' LAUCHLAN MACQUARRIE was the presentation of resolutions from the discussion the campus. . CLAIR ROBERTSON groups. 5 . Contents are the SE? ifiggfiaAM

The entire Symp031um was a success and so were each ' responsibility of the - KEVIN GAUTHIER ’ of the events in it. Why? Partly the success was editor.. opinions are DEfiWIN BANKS because of good organization, but more importantly, those of the Persons ,* TODD MACLAUGHLAN it was because of good attendance. Students, faculty, . expressing them. All RICHARD LEE and various administrative personnel attended _ letters and articles‘ ‘ PATRICK KELLY Symposium '79. Their presence and their participation imust be signed even ,for all the work the made it a time of lively discussion, deep thought and 'if the hafié is £0 be' ~:did on this veek's .y' shared ideas. The result was that no one present \ 'withheld from Publication_ .1ssueg‘ up ' 7 thought the day was a waste. * V a , ‘7 _ l . /

So the Symposium was a success, you're thinking, , _ _".-lgglt9r;' John 5‘ Catrns . but what results will it achieve? That is a difficult " ’ ShotosrsphetsrésDerWln Banks »- question to answer, yet at least the Symposium (i , r \ A . T?dd MaCLaughlan: resolutions are on record for posterity. They may ‘/ ,7 rRlcpard Le? ~’ -- mean nothing immediately, but in the long run some AdvertiSing Manager — KeVianaUthier of them may bring change. In addition, the Symposium 'TYPiSt - Pat Ingraham ' certainly told some students why they are at university, *x' 'P??°f%SEE§5-La22}an MacQuarrie

and doing that was the reason it was all organized. I _ 7 Even if students didn't learn why they are here, ' ' ' however, they were still exposed to limitless

theory about what a university is supposed to do.

This week's letters;) are continued on page 6 \\

The Symposium was able to educate in a way both ’,_5§\__W more unique and more profound than the ordinary -===:;:t;$;} .£:::“;’_:::; ,

Classroom experience. To conclude my comments I've got one criticism and one:

one last compliment. The criticism is for residence students for not attending in the numbers they might have. The compliment goes again to the Symposium organizers, and because I think they deserve so much credit I'm going to list their names in the newspaper one last time. Here they are.

Rory Beck Dan LeClair

‘Alan Buchanan Barry MacDonald

Marsha Gaudet Holly MacDonald

Larry Green Kent Osborne

Bob Kelley Joanne Peters , .a

Mark Ledwell Don Stewart ‘

to the editor ' Mr- Editor: interested in their dispute.. _ 7 _ Regarding the boring Albania is NOT a burning 7%,. h, \ v ’. ‘.» V L. a”

GXChange 0f abuse between issue on the UPEI campus. A" ¢fl ' . "' 1' 1 I N. WV, , Kate O'Connell and Kevin Disint'erested ! LEI-19‘s 1 Epfl'm. . _ 5 ' (v Gauthier may I suggest. Student ’ _"‘V " ' ' ." '*' A J 7 \i ‘- ~‘ - that they correspond, P.S. Who can tell?...It " ' one to another, inasmuch might be the Start of a as nobody else seems ’ romance_..... .'

EDITOR'S NOTE — CORRECTION V Several weeks ago a SUN story about the UPEI security force included the sentence, "And, as an

added surprise, three officers are qualified provincial police." The word "three" should have been replaced by "these". All UPEI's security officers are really qualified provincial police. This particular miscue was not the fault of the person who wrote the article. It was instead the result of a mistake in lay—out.

IF YOU FIND MISTAKES j a w

in this publication, please, consider that they are there for a purpose. we publish_something‘for everyone, and some people are always looking

. t,f92 mistakes; ..._l; , it ,:_ a. , r r M.