, . . . . : ‘ ‘ ~ a .

)

‘versity is losing re money each idence (partic— ) because of the applicants.So mop up these osses? Hit the t? we're easy to ith and are al- . suggestion, ‘ monetary onesi everyone knows residence fees aised another 9 third year inku curse this most 5 another dec— idence students ently another in- the following ’ Chain reaction tedly continue are no resident all. Who can y that they can 50(single) for - Memorial Hall? y sane people at. ke to suggest a_ mliCY that should plicatedra long garding the mar- cies that the ion‘uses toward ces, because usiness iSn't it: ration sells its rthe student, in e services of If my calculations the administrat- ave been much r~ if they would e residence fees l of three years lor double accom- f$850 for single) {in this instance is of my example. a capacity of app- 108 students. ‘ltiply this num- "you get a fig— 000 which is gross he University. ~ent situation, 5 students in at $900 a head figure of $49,500. loss of $31,500 ‘this increase in ‘fee hikes are vCreased costs. _his increase in ' in itself? ‘h is under the that the residen- fused to capacity S assumption can fl by the fact "not get anything W much less than Year.So why can— Ces‘be filled to zksy, just keep SXed and stop terms Of rais- ‘ed fees every > all, have you 7%ney growing

ien Belliveau

THE CADRE, APRIL 3, 1973, PAGE 7

my:

.Due to the contemporary structure of our Society, with its values,institutions, and so on, educational opp- ortunity was provided for all so far as theory is con— cerned: however, the econ- omics structure was (and id such, that to maintain its- elf, it required the dom—- ination of a few over the majority which contribut— ed enormously to the inL equality of the citizens. Educational opportunity was, due to its control

by economics, very great- ly limited.

we have the rich and the poor-one is necessary for the other. Most men must therefore work for the few.

'In order for the few to

maintain themselves as sneh, it is necessary there— fore to keep the majority, (the ordinary worki g man) poor and, uneducated(the reason for this being that an educated, enlightened man will give the "few" trouble by asking questions about their state of pov- erty and so on. This makes it difficult for the few (or management to maintain control).

Whenever the mess "get out of line", management may resort to such tactics

‘ ON WORKING NTAN's OPPRESSION

Stan Dalton

as l. changing the rules

so as to give the mess

less rights, 2. exert various fbfms of pressure to shut them up"(E.G. making them buy their own uniforms When before they got them free: making them adhere strictly to rules which they were before all- owed to be lax about, etc.) All of these tactics are designed to put pressure on the working man to make him keep his mouth shut. It doesn't matter whether he is not making enough money to support his family pro- perly, all that matters to management is that it runs smoothly. Obviously this is inhuman in every sense.

In its stupiditv,manage- ment fails to realize that a happy, contented, worker will be more efficient and effective and will, in the long run, enable manage- ment to run smoothly be- cause everyone concerned will be able to devote himself to his particular function since insecurity

and fear for his family‘s welfare is not "hanging over his head."

Workers, how can you allow this domination of manage- ment to continue?