l O I I Insidious

Pumping and Pounding

Mrs. ma P. Averill,‘ 136-l2th Ave. (mp-y Alenqwriies i-"I was botbe gs much with my heart l could not 513p, 1 would wnken up ill the night screaming, and my _he.s.rt would start pumping and pounding.

5 neighbor lady told me to try

Igtartedhkingthernandlcantrutbi 53y I am n different woman. Al- together I only took two bores." Price 50o a box st all druggists and gums, or mailed direct on recei t of r3“ by The T. Mlibum £10., 9d,, OIOMQLQBE ' .

CHAMPIONS exclu- sive sfllimanite insulator is practically impervious to carbon and oily deposits. Special analysis electrodes re- sist pitting and burning to the utmost. That is why Champions excel in service.

Chhumunum SPARK PLUGS WindsonOnL

A CANADIAN-MADE rnonocr

p Why be a

SKIN DISEASES

when you can procure

“Pellicura”

lliat will remedy all thcss troubles. To be‘ had at all drug stores. Price

$1.25

sufferer from

r-.

l-28-6ipd.

'45P" - l , - ‘ ss-rvnosv uroiir-‘Q D0 you need any Pointfii

‘ __ We Handle w‘ BRANDRAM - IIENDERSOhPS 1' IT'S THE BEST

llfennell £9 Chandler

i " f; "oven

‘i

i

EFFICIENT OPTICAL‘ SERVICE EYES EXAMINED, GLASSES

surrueo AND FITTED. csnsrur. ATTENTION GIVEN r0 nsrsm WORK.

j J. w. JOHNSTON

Registered Optometrist

i5‘! Kent Street Phone 752-1.. Charlottetown

¢¢mm

Eye Strain ’

We nle this adjective ad- visediy,

Suflcrers from Eyestrain ma! have perfect vision and there- "?! do not suspect the presence l! any evil defect.

The motive power of the > Entire human organism ll Nerve Energy.

Normal eyes, it is computed Utilize about 80% of this Nerve harm bot when Eyeetraln u "omit. a much larger propor- tion is required. Hence defective Ives through their consumption of an excessive amount of Nerve lnergy may seriously affect the fnoetioningiof other "Iona of the body and produce ill health.

RAVI YOUI BYE! ' BXAIIINID '-

G; Hutclieson -

PIOITIII

yfvw-y

E

a having been found by d Grand ‘Jury

~ disclosing facts ih real"! W “l” 4"“

Text Offidgment

(Continued from Page l0)

"It must be remembered that the mflkistrate investigating n. cage 0g demanded extradition is not in quite the same position as if he were de- vldlns 0n a charge of crime commit.- ted within his own jurisdiction, m the latter case he has full discre-

there is a prima facie evidence oi Built, the circumstances are so ob- scure, the intent so doubtful, the testimony so conflicting, that he thinks a Jury would not be likely to convict. But in a case of extradiion he cannot consider these matters. If

l0 iustify a committment, the ques- tion of a probability of a conviction is not one for his consideration."

Defence Cannot be Heard

Iri view of the above authorities it seems to me that Lcannot, at this hearing. consider the matters of de- fence put forward. All I can do is to decide whether there is, or ls not a prlma. facle case made out.

Counsel for the accused raised the question that the evidence of the De- fendant shows that there was no Mons Rea. That raises a matter of defence and it is not for me to try the case.

The case of Utah vs. Jones 4i CCC 355 has been cited by Counsel for the accused as an authority in sup- port of the letters contention. ‘The charge in that case was in a general way similar to that. in the present one in that it was for non-support and desertion of wife and child and in pursuance of the Same treaty of 1922; otherwise the essential facts are different and the case can be distinguished from the one before the Court. The head note of this case

indicates that it decides two matters

namely: v

(l) Thé law of a foreign state

cannot be proved on an application

for extradition, by the certificate oi-

the official of that state who is cus-

todian of the Statutes, certifying

that a particular statute exists. I (2) 1t is not sufficient to establish

a prima farie case for extradition

under the new clause, child desertion

for the wife to swear an affidavit

that the husband has violated the

law of tile foreign state seeldfl! 9X‘

tradition.

The Jones Case _

In the Jones case the foreign law

was proved as stated negatively l"

the hcarl note, while the foreign

low in the instant. case WES Dmved

by a person familiar Will} this Pa!"

ticular branch of the law 0f tho 1°13

eign state.

In the Jones case the only Pf”!

and support of the charge wit! m!

Affidavit of the mother stating in

the words of the Statute of her having

been left in destitute and new-iolffl"!

circumstances-there being n0 1W"

disclosed lIl the Affidavit in record

to her circumstances. On the other

hand 1h the present ca" "° M“

before us proof of an indictment

in m.» demanding State in respect of the charge under consideration and also the oral evidence of a wit- ness from Cambridifi Wm maimed

tltute condition of mother and child and ma; flqgy were receiving support "om pubii; charitable institutions. ii. Cor: not HD9951‘ w m9 m“ the decision :1 this case assists us in nny material way. In the JOHN M“ the charge-was wilful desertioh and hon-support 0f Wife End mm“ mud‘ ren in destitute and ecessitoos cir- cumstances. The learned Judie 1" that case said that it had not N" made clear that under the law oi the demanding state non-support 0i the minor child was an offence cpl" from the non-support o! ‘he "1"- That difficulty does not present lt- self in the present case as we have before us onthat 11°11“ m” ‘"115’ m‘ evidence of John M. Ackerly but ai- so the foreign indictment containifll six counts. three in rflilfd '0 49'9"‘ tlon and non-sulwm °1 m" W’) and also three distinct counts in rs- gard to non-support of the minor child. I think ‘therefore that Bio case immediately under review can be distinguished from their 59W" the Court. Counsel for the accused raised u» ciiieciidh that part o! m, chuge . as laid ll HUI- dlteblo namely that pertaining to the non-support of the child and, that the out u to the mfl-"PW" and desertiun of the mother is not eirtradiiabie.

In U. S. vs Webbcr (N0. l) lilpfl P. 2 Wallace, Extradition Judge, rul- cd that he could commit for I111 indictable Oifcrloe disclosed by tho evidence. See also iudrmeflt o! B"- ryminmrpartymomasafllllin ‘I16 at p. m w the who timi-

Another Objection. Counsel for the accused lilo “Oi gypsum to the woceedingron the ground that there m n 411MB" betvreen the law oi’ the drnilliilifll gm; gnd.“ of Canada and that

W"! he may. and often does, dis- chlffle a prisoner because although

28'! and infra Windsor 84 L. J. M C. (N. S) p.‘ 163. ‘Phere can be no doubt ,that the law of both the de- manding state and. that of Canada as well as the provisions of the Treaty must‘ all cover the ‘same ground. But the question that aris- es is must the two laws be in ex- actly the same terms or will it be sufficient if they cover practically (he suns essentials though perhaps the Statutes of the different coun- tries may be expressed in different phraseology?

In Ex part Thomas 38 D. L. R. 716 the head note is as follows: “If the crime for which Extradition is asked is a crime against. the law of

William ‘steggs (No. z) a n. L. R.‘

The 4th count in the said Indict- ment charges that the dofmdant did unreasonably ' ‘ m PYWMB i" the support of a certain minor child named David Clark of~ whom the Defcrida ‘ was the father.‘ ‘

The law of the " is as stated in evidence-is that

"It is a crime for the father of a child w fail- to wovld= for his wife or minor- child. or des- ci-t or abandon them and leave them without funds to become a chl-PBQ on the public."

It appeared that this covered section one of the Act of the cle- manding State and that section two covers neglect of minor ’chi1dren.

there be doubts it must be-rosolved in form of commit-ll anltnot of dis- charge."

In view or the two affidavits of Jennie Clark and the evidence of John M. Ackerly together with pro- " of an mo“ ‘ copy of the Bill of Indictment found in the demanding State I find that a prime

State

satisfy the requirements of section l8 of the Extradition Act.

f, therefore, make an order for the committal of the accused on the ;charge of wilful non-support of min- ‘or or dependent children at the City of Cambridge in the County of Mid- diesex in the Commonwealth of

facle case has been made such u to.

Following the decision in the Deer-

Massechusetts in the United States

he finds sufficient evidence of guilt

both cmmlries and is in substance! to be found in the Treaty, although} under different heads, effect is to; be given to the claim for Extradi- ilow _ . l '1 cwumuficmsoswmmermmm

ed . from the fourth

ing case (above) the law is presum- count above stated. The law in Canada is as fol-

of America, and I commit him to the Common Goal of Prinre County rendered in the demanding State un- in Sumrnersidc in said County (be- jv; the hciuest convenient prison»

is

ad.a is only obtaining money or goods by false pretences, which ls likewise an extraditabie crime, a. commital for extradition on a, charge of steal- ing will stand."

In re Collins (N0. 3) 10 CCC B0 it was held that in determining wheth- er there is such evidence of crimin- ality as according to Canadian law would justify a Cflfflmltment it the crime had been commited in Canada.

{there to remain until siurendered t1; the foreign state or discharged sc- cordlng to law. Under Section l0 of the Extradition Act it is my duty i0 inform the aroused (who is now in Court) that he will not b9 my. til after the expiration of rift-zen any: and that he has the right to Willy for a Writ of habeas corpus. (at the trial before Judge 1...... Mr. J. O. C. Cunpbell appeared for

‘guilty of an offence and liable upon |lndictment or on summary convic- jtion to a fine of five hundred dol- jlars, or to one year's imprisonment, or to both. who, as a husband or head of a family, is under a legal iduty to provide necessities for his {wife or any child under sixieeri years of age; or as a. parent or guardian under a legal duty to provide nec- iessarles for any child under sixteen years of age; and who, if such wife

regard is to be had to the essence.

of the act changed, and extradition!

yous circumstances, is permitted ii there exists the com-

~01‘ child is in destitute or necessit- wlthout lawful

the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Mr. Heath strong, K, c._ rm- m; accused).

ponent elements of the imputed of-

This decision the case of State of Washington vs. Fletcher (i926) 3 D. L. R. 426. Mc-i Kenzie J. in delivering judgment‘ states at p. 430. I may add that in f deciding this as well as some of the oiher questions arising in this case.

fence according to the Canadian law. I is approved of in -

support of minor or dependent child- l

iexcuse. neglects or refuses to provide , ‘—"'—'——-—_— ‘such necessaries." . x9 W014!!! lfl-Ptest motor lifeboat. The words oi’ the Treaty of 1922, M “ “puny ‘>3 30° R0919. W88

.as covering the extradition crime in x recenlly laumhed i" 9°"!!- Eflzllnd.

l both countries are: '

“wilful desertion. of wilful non-i‘

. LUMBAGO

ren." ,

The law of non-support of minor] Quickly Rubbed Away

D

ABROAD, among foreign makers as well as here at home, Nash enginecrin is recognized and re- spected an followed. .

en ‘neenng organization, one of the

u in the industry, created this ormtandin motor car ohhc 81000 field-the candard Si: t-Door Sedan. It is a big, roomy car with full S-pas- senger capacity-as richly impressive in ap rance and in finish as many very ‘gh priced cars.

In performance and in costly car fea-

eliverecl Gzmfklcér .EquzPPeJ_-Arotfiing/llom loBuy

» bearin , high compression, foil pres-

Tlic skilland science of the greet Nash’

{children though worded differently in , ilvlassachusetts and Canada to my i ‘mind covers practically the same of- ‘ ‘fence, and is in both cases covered‘

I have relied for authority upon the decision of Duff‘, J. in re Collins (1905) i0 Can. C. C. B0, fl B. R. 5.

For the piercing pain of iumbsg , arid the tormenting aches of rheuma-

tnres, if is equally exceptional.

its great smoothness and power are

developed by a big Nash-design, 7-

436. wherein he appears to hold that : while the imputed offence must be: a crime under the law of the dc-I manding State, yet, in determining? whether there is such evidence of? criminality as according to Canad-l‘ ian law would Justify a commitment

if the crime had been committed in i Canada, regard is to be had to the

I tism no liniment is so eflicient, so by the general words of the ‘Ireaiy. quick to mm; comm.‘ and "He, u

good old Nerviline. This wonderful linirnent penetrates through the 11g- sues quickly; it sinks at; one; to m; core of the pain. draws the blood from the congested area, and thereby relieves the pain in a short. time. Those who suffer from stifl joints,

Authorities Cited.

-It was held in Ex part: Feinberg‘ 4 C. C. C. 270 that upon e. prelimin- ary inqulry in extradition proceed- ings, any reasonable daubt must go

Delivered. Fully mama, m... Range of 23 N...» "400" Models, $1270 f0 $3200 including Touring, Roadster, Coupe, Cabriolet, Victoria and Sedan Models

NASH MOTOR SALES

CIIAILOITITOWN AND SIYMMEB

I u‘; .

sure iu ricated motor with torsional vibration damper, and genuine Bohn- alite aluminum alloy pistons, with Invar struts.

The low price, too, is another rent. attraction-this car comes to ou roin the factory fully equi pad with front and rear bumpers, by rauiic shock ab- sorbers, spare tire lock and tire cover.

These are ail included in the factory ‘rice. Other cars usually add these cuures to the factory price and charge you Extra for them.

3m commas the idwivsih deliv- ered price with the delivered price of other cars.

essence o! the a“ charged and. c,“ in favor of committal and‘ not in

. favor of discharge. traditi is ‘t d if th - m‘ xhzneumggn; ewe impftfi; f; Cameron C. J. in Re Rosenberg 2B fence according to ciihsdinh law (see Mm L‘ R‘ p‘ 43° “t p‘ “a m dd!“

also Re Gaynor s; Greene (no 11) leflng Judsinent in a babe.“ corpus U905) w can c C 154,, ' mpplication in extradition proceed-

.ings says "In my opinion we find in these circumstances and the infer- ‘crices to be reasonably drawn from The charge as to the wife having them some evidence to justify, not been withdrawn there remains only necessarily a conviction, but the put- ths charge against the accused for ting of the accused on his trial. non-support of his child, David iThere being some evidence it is not Clark.

Charge for Non-Support.

dwellings and rheumatic conditions should use Nerviline. Where ordina- ry remedies fail, Ncrviiine then will show its power. Safe-quick to act- powerful and penetrating, Ncrviline is best for lumbaso, lame back, sore muscles, rheumatism. Sold in 35c bottles at all dealers.

NERVHJNE

LOWER NEWTON SCHOOL

The following is on standing of the pupils of Lower Newton school: for the month of May.

Grade IX. i Rita McTavish, 2 Mar- ion Giilis, 3 Sara Glliis.

Grade VI. 1 morencs McPherson. 2 Rita. Griffen, 3 Lorne McDougall, l Mary Griffin.

vDrives Out Pain

Grade V. 1 Everett Smith, 2 Finlay McEachcrn.

Grade II. 1 Rena Cook. 2 Helen

Griffen and Roland McDougall, (eq- ual) ' Grads I. (a) Itisdon McPherson. Grade f (b) Sinclair McTagjsh.

m! scorrrsn FESTIVAL n" YANNAPOLIS novsr.

Circumstances have arisen which make it necessary to shorten the Scottish Festival at Annapolis Royal by one day. The dates retained are the 24th and 25th July, and there will be no further change.

"Our minister is so good that ht won't even perform s marriage cerei . mony." _ ‘

"What's that got. to do “with hii f being goodi". " ' "

“He says his conscience "won't lei him participate in any ghee.» oi chance." "

An Ohio editor has discovered that the average life expectancy ~of an undentcd fender in his city is three - days. '

,_-1_

.¢$ J!’

1n ‘ugh eggs Blfldltltifl flfiflld-l

immuidieiiatlncl-hlflll!

for us to examine it sufficiently. If

-~

rigidly maintained standards

RECISIQN

wonri-iv or THE COSTLI esrtcaizs

NOT only in its impressive appearance, but in every‘ detail of its construction _i.n every phase of its performance-Olds-

mobile is comparable to the more costly of fine cars. This all-round, well- exceilence of Oldsmobile Six is obtained in only one way . . by the strict Oldsmobile policy of precision workmanship and

In the powerful Oldsmobile GI-horaepovnr

miles your Oldsmobile bu travelled.

balanced

of quality.

high-compression l0

Gaudet riros. \ ' Dcaierwfor-Prlnce Edward island

trio aarrsia ozaiifiufi§ It's-

road . . regardless of the thousands of

Nothing which could contribute ro true fine-car luxury or performance has been overlooked in the designing of the Olds- mobile Six. Quality features unnpproached by anysave the higher-priced oars, are to be found in abundance . . rubber engine mountings;- rubber chassis insulation; fabric beedingtoprevea: metal-corneal . ymmuhdm I cumin’ contact; pressure-lubricated piston-pins; imprecision in the smoothness, ease of handling, absence of vibration, acceleration. You will find evidence of it

cylmdezhesd..co Todisawerrhe-sariaftccion of fine-car

inrhcbarmoniousworkingtogetlierofall ownarshilhlezusarrangearriaidrivein Oldsmobile pasta-regardless of-speed or

ursmonlal:

PRODUCTOI-GINIIAL H0110]! _OI CANADA, LIMITED

OJ J-ll