( Continued fi om first page } When the resolution was read gtanting the sum of £20 to

wards the support of the Bog School, Charlottetown—

tion. Mr. COLRS eaid as this school was entirely under the control of geatlenten belonging to the Church of England, it was therefore a denominational sehool, though great credit was due to thoee who supported it so liberally. t had been circulated that.certain members of this House were pledged to give a grant to St. Dunstan’s Colleve. Now, he eonsidered it due to the denomination to whom that College belonged to state that they had never asked bim to pled,ze his vote tor Buch a grant. He had never given any pledze of the kind, ner did he believe that any member on this side of the Mouse had. Awd he would advise no one to give sugh a pledge.

tion. Mr. HAVILAND asked if the Bog School was 9 de. nominational school, for he ‘:ad understood it was attended ty cinidren of all denominations.

Mr. BEER said there eould be no objection to the school. Elo understood it was attended by some Roman Catholics, which would not be tolerated were there anything desguina- tional in it.

Hion Mr. WHELAN said there was po objection to the schvol ; all that his hon. friend wished to say was that there were great complaints against certain members beeause it bad beon reported that they were pledged to give a grant ‘to St. Dunstan's College, and here was an institution receiving sup, port out ef the public funds which was as mugh denomina- tional ae St. Danstan’s College.

Hon. Mr. HAVILAND maintsined that the Bog sehoot was not a denominational institution. It was got up altogether by parties outside. It could not be uuder the control of the Charch of England unless it was under the offce-bearers of

that Church; and as this waa net the case, it cyuld not be a)

denourinational! school.

Mr. CONROY said he had no objection to the grant even though jt was a denominational inetitution, if the school was regued. It had been stated that it could not be denomina- tional, as it was attended by Roman Catholic children. This was no evidence that the sehool was not denominational ; it only showed the carelessyess of their parents in sending them bacre.

The resolution was then agreed to, as well as the others re- ported from Committee. Adjourned.

Fraipay Arrernoon, April 11.

Mr. Beer moved the seeond reading of the Bill to encourage Steam navigation between Chaslottetown and parts of tne ililtshorouch River. The motion was lost on the ground that the [il] would create a monopoly of the river communication.

The Committee oa soads, bridges and wharves was resymed, after which tion. Mr. Llaviland laid on the table yarieus of- ficial statisties eonneeted with the commerce of the Island.

tlon. Mr. Pope presented a petition from Trustees of St.

Malachi’s Chureh, South West, Bedeque, against the transfer |

ol lond eonveyed for the sepport of the Priest of the Chareh.

‘Yao [louse went into Committee on Waysand Means. Mr Jolin Yeo chairman,

The despateh frum the Governor General of Canada, on the subject ef Intercolonial Free Trade, and tition of certain mechanics of Lot 49, praying for a protective tariff, were se- verally read.

ion. Mr. HAVILAND—The majorit avow free trade principles, but he coald eee no benefit to the Island from ite adoption with Canada. Our importations trom that Colus ¢ are almost entirely of flour, and we export nothing to it save a few quintals of fish and some barrels of oysters. The adoption of free trade with Canada would ne- evesitate an alteration in our tariff. The Canadians manufac- ture spirita as cheaply as white eye is made in the States. At present a considerable proportion of our revenue is derived from the excise on home manufactured spirits. If we adwit the Capad’an artictes free we must increase the tax on tea and sugar and the necessaries of life. The Government is not prepared to» have free trade with Canada until the opinion of the people shall have been expressed. Not only would the

of the House would

ywanufaeture of Island liquor be stopped by the free admission |

of Canadian, bat all other importations of liquor would be stopped, and the revenac would consequently suffer to a great extent. Fam not prepared to support the petition, as it in- yolves a return to the principle of protection. If agricaltural and other implements cannot be manufactured here at a pro- tit, the sooner the business is abandoned the better. The fo- reign minufacturer bas to bear the burden of a tax. In this country the expense of living and the burden of taxation is Jegs than in other Colonies or in almost any country. I[f an

Islander with these advantages cannot conduct his business |

profitably, be bad better turn his attention to something else. Toms state that in the next house some alteration, in the present tariff, which I shal! move be adopted for this year, inust be made, as things cannot go on as ut present. The re- yenue is entirely too small to meet the expenses of education, roads and bridges and the other branches of the public service. The people expect to get everything without Laving to pay for it.

Hon. Sir. CO] ES — The hon. member takes a fair view of the despatch. Young countrics require a small degree of prutection. The Island distillers need not fear the competi- zion of the Canadians, as tie stuff they manufacture would net by drunk here. The importation of American waggons had ceased under an impostduty of 10 percent. If that duty were removed its removal might operate injuriously to the va- rious branches of industry ecceupied inthe manufacture. We gre not yet prepared for free trade.

tlon Mr. YEO—TI see no necessity for a higher duty as asked for by the petitioners. It is strange that parties can come bere and buy our lumber and bring 1t back in a manu- factured state under a duty of 10 per cent, and undersell our mechanics. As to spirits, in Nova Seotia they stopped the manufactare of them from molasses, and the consequence was & gain to the revenue of £15,000 on importation of spirits. There was & number of illicit distilleries in the country fr which no revenue was derived.

lon. Mr. HENSLEY — In King’s County there is but one distillery, so that I take the hon. member's allasion asa com- — to the country. We will dono good hy changing the aw as it at present stands. In Canada the tariff is 124 ur 15 reent, ours 74. It will be time enough to assimilate our riff to theirs when the Colonies may be united.

on, Mr HAVILAND submitted a resolution to the effect | that it was inexpedient to entertain the question of Free | ‘Trade with Canada, uptil the opinion of the peuple shall baye

heen taken on it af the next general eleetion. {

Mr. WAVIES—There is no advantage in free trade with | Canada. We have nothing but some codfish and oysters to rend there, and they have goods of a kind which we now get from the States, and if we got them from Canada frre, we should lose the duties we now pay on their importations. It | iuay be worthy of consideration whether a direct tax, whether a poll of income tax might not be beneficial. The expense of collecting our revenue i+ at present large in proportion to ite awount. As to the petition, Ll consider it unfair tye protect tue mechanic at the expense of the farmer.

lion. Mr. POPE was of the same opinion.

Hen. Mr. LAIRD would put Canada on the same footing as others. An incqme tax might be easily culleeted, but the country is not ready for it.

Hon. Mr. LONGWORLU—I doubt the policy of an income tax at the present time, nor do [ think that it would facilitate the adoption of free trade. [ts collection in England had been found troublesome. We cannot have a freer trade than under our present tariff. The list of exemptions exceeds that of the dutiable articles. The principles of tree trade were re- gognized in England gnd france as essential to the welfare of jarge communities, where facility of interchange were ubso- jutely required. The same argument does not, however, ap- y'y to smaller associations. Our infant manufactures cannot cumpete with those lung established in so peopulons a country vs Canada. IL view the proposition ag mvvlying more than fue ides of an aesimilgtion gf tariffs. ff has,] think, refer. epee to a fatuge goion of these colonies. [t has been regarded in that light in Nova Scotia aad New Brunswick. An acces- sion to it would diminish our reyenue and injure our me- ebanics. 5

The resolution was agreed to.

lion. Mr. Haviland moved o resolution to condemn the ex- jeting tariff.

Mr. BEER would ineroase the duty on spirits distilled from molasses, from § to 1-9th per gallon. Le would, however, in deference to the opinions expresseg, move that it be 1-6th.

The amendment was lost, Messrs, Deer, Cooper, and Me- Neill supporting it.

The Louge in Committee on the Bill to incorporate the Ro- man Uatholie Bishop of Charlottetown, and on the petition of the trustees of St. Malachi’s Charech, South West, Bedegue. Mr. Sinelair chairman.

lion. Mr. POPE could not support the Bill. A similar one had been rejected years ago. Last year JJon. Mr. Longworth brought in a bill weeting all Charch property in the Bjehop. Years ago, 70 acres were given to the trustece at the Sguth- west, Bedeque, for the use of the Roman Catholic Church, with the express understanding that it should never be vested in Priest or Bishop bat to trustees. His father bad been re-

uested as agent to transfer, but had declined. He himself

had been asked, but refused unless the names of the trustees were in the transfer. Ie could not support the Bill, as he was aware that the ee of the district did not wish it— they think the transfer of the lands in the way sought for b the Bill would be injurious to their interests. When the Bill he had reference to waa befors the Legislature, the leading Catholics in Charlottetown had epposed it. In the case of other communions, acts were ine orporating and yegtin the church property in the ministers and trustees for the time being. De would sanction the depriving people of their rights an eed: The Rey. 3

lon. SPEAKEK—The Rey. Mr.McDonald, ai i had told him that the Bil! gave no new ee oe

Hon. Mr. HENSLEY — The Bill authorized tho holding of Jands forthe benefit of the Church. It did not divest the ea- tates of trustees. One clause said that trustees might convey.

Mr. OONROY understood that the Bill was a transcript of

the New Brunswick Act — it merely secured church property

to the — ’s successors,so that his relati ig! i

on eee Bill was for seouring chasah property ot oho ie a If the Catholics liked it, 16 was no business

ou. Mr. POPE had no wish to offer a facetious opposi i

nor to interfere with Feligious denowinatien in Se nagement of its own a ; tut here the r= Ard meme frow members of the Church to which this ill had referenee Sud it wos their duty to notice it. Lf, as had been said, tho

| find no purchase.

Richop already had the power, Where was the necessity foe the Bull, and why was its enactment petitioned against? The | Bill would have the effeet of giving to the Bishop land which had been given to the petitioners on the express condition that he should not have it. Hon. Mr. PERRY—The petitioners had an andoubted right

to petition, bat they did not understand the Bill. It was merely mtended to give power to take a piece of ground for church purposes, such as a burial grand. The right of estab- lishing ebarges for burial and other religious services was in the Bishop. The intention was to prevent church property going by Sevies to private individuals. | Hon. SPEAKER @aw no reacon for objection. They were constantly passing Acts, incorporating churches, and the Ca- tholic members present made no objection to this against which ‘there was but one petition, and it seemed that it would not | affect the case of the petitioners. | fon. Mr. LONG WORTH had brought in the Bill of Jast | session which was a teanecript of what purported to have been an Act passed in Canada, The Canadian Act authorizes con- _veyance of church lands by the Bish» p with consent of his coad- \jutors. In Noya Scotia and New brunswick the Bishop has /merely power to lease fur 21 years; this gives authority to | lease, sell or exchange lands for chureh purposes. lion. Mr. POPE—Then why should it be represented as o mere transcript of tho New Branswick Act? He objected to the clause giving power to the Bishop to levy such rates and charges ag he should see fit. Ile might tax the congnean ties of Bedeque for a eathedral in Charjottetown. If the people of the Roman Catholic communion were ungpimous and un- ' derstood the question, he would not raise his voice in opposi- tion to the Bill. It would be better to let the Bill be pab- ‘lished, and let the people to be effected by it be made aware | of its provisions. Ilon. Mr. THORNTON ~= The hon. member seemed afraid that the Bishop would impose taxes on Catholics, but he had ‘the power of doing so at present. But there are among Ca- tholics, as others, refractory individuals who may require to be stimulated by g little Se There were no complaints against the Bill of last year, and this Bill did not affect the land of those who petitioned against it. The Bishop can’t disturb the possession of thet land, nor can he, by the Bill, put money into his own pocket. Jf the Catholic population i thought their interests were in danger, they would have look- led to some other quarter for protection. | Progress reported. Saturpay, 12th April. Hon. Mr. Haviland reported the Revenue Bill. Read first ‘time. The appropriation Bill was read seeond time and | agreed to. | Mr. McNeill moved a committee to consider the propriety (of an address to the Lieut. Governor, on the subject of the admission of [sland vessels to French registry, as had been the case with those of Canada. llon. Mr. Coles seconded the motion with pleasure. Cana- da having admitted French wines free of duty, the French Consul had recommended the ships of that Colony for French istration. . The House went into Committee. Mr. John Yeo chairman. | Hon. Mr. COLES considered that Canada had received a fron boon in the concession of French registry to her vessels. he Island would be greatly benefitted by a similar privilege being accorded. Instead of, as proposed, an address to the Lieut. Governor, requesting him to open correspondence with the Colonial Minister, it would be more regular to pass an ad dress to Her Majesty, and then request the Lieut. Governor to transmit it. lion. Mr. McAULAY—The reason why the so called boon | had been granted to Canada, was that French built ships cost /much more than those of Canadian construction. It was cheaper for the French ship owners to purchase than to build.

, Mr. DAVIES—The Canadians built large vessels. The im- | pulse to our trade would be great if our vessels could be sold with their cargoes of produce in the ports of France. Before _we can expect to obtain, we must be prepared to give the same | privileges as Canada had. Hon. Mr. LONGWGRTI agreed that it would be a great | benefit if our ships had the French harbour open to them for 'sule; but he had some doubts whether France would admit us to the privileges which Canada enjoyed. The object of the French was to get large firm vessels, which, though not as durable as British oak veesels, Canada could build at one halt the cost of the former. The L:land built vessels were smaller, but the attempt was worthy of being made. It would be ne- cessary to hold out some inducement to the French Govern- jment. The Ilouse could not alter the present tariff, save at a sacrifice of revenue. They mightreduce the duty on wines, but after doing so, their wishes might not be realized. The better way would be, by address to the Queen, accompanied by a copy of our tariff, and authorize the Lieut. Governor to proclaim a reduction of the duty on wines, when France should concede the privileges we sought. ion. Mr. COLFS—The address might express our willing- ness to give the same privileges of fishery on our coasts as the Americans had, on condition that France should place us on the same footing as Canada. As far back as 1548 he had been in favor of giving the Americans the right of fishery on our shores as an equivalent for American registers for our vessels, and a reference to the ‘Islander’ of Nov. 10th of that year would shew that his opinion was scouted. Mad it been acted upon, our ship building interests would have been ia a hetter position. Le agreed that a copy of the tariff ought to accompany the address. | Hon. Mr. LONGWORTI—The fisheries were national, not colonial property ; and the [mperial Gavernment would not allow us to interfere with them in the manner proposed,which, if adopted, would probably lead to complaints from the other /Colonies. The American right of fishing on our coasts was /secured by treaty. The recent differences which arose as to (the limits of the Freneh fishing grounds in Newfoundland, | were settled by the two Governments, as being matters of In-

om | ternational arrangement.

lion. Mr. WIGIITMAN — The extension to France of the pee of the Treaty of Reciprocity with America would

ve the benefit of extending our market for ships. It would be a great boon if we could get the privileges sought for, for our swall vessels. When he was in England some years ago, the docks were full of North American shipping which could If a new market were opened for the sale of our vessels, we could get a better price in England. beeause the new market would not be so liable to be glutted. We have nothing to offer in exchange for French registry but fish, and how fur that offer might interfere with the Treaty with the States he cuuld not say. He would support the address.

lon. Mr. HENSLEY could not see that the treaty with the States would be violated by the proposed offer. That treaty gave no egelusive right to the Americans. The utmost that was inserted in any commercial arrangement between two go- vernments was that the contracting parties should be on the footing of the most favored nation. ‘The question was, as to the policy of offering this inducement? Canadian ships had been admitted to French registry on admittirg the wines of France duty free. It had been assumed that result had arieon from the fuct that Canada built large ships; but it by no means followed that our small weasels would be excluded, for the ratio of cost was as that of size. If we offer the same terms as Canady, we may expect the eame equivalent. At any rate, it would be time enough for us to offer the fisheries when we find that we cannot do better.

Hon. Mr. HAVILAND agreed with the views of the last speaker. ‘There was no use paying more for an article when you could get it for less. e might get the same terms as Canada, and we could with privileges we had in reserve get other advantages. Ile did not say that he would not consent to open the fisheries to the French, if we could not get what we sought without doing so. But the offer at present might stop the proposed negotiation, as Imperial interests and those of other Culonies were involved. e had better try for the same terms as Canada. France did not require yery large chips for all her trade. Vessels of the rise generully built in the Island were particularly adapted for her extensiye com- merce in the Mediterranean.

Progress reported.

Satorpar Asrunnoon, April 12.

The [House again resolved itself into a Committee of the whole fouse to take into further consideration the expediency of having extended to this Island the jike privileges which have lately been extended to Canada, in that Canadian-built ships and other articles, the growth aud production of that Pravince, are admitted to the same privileges in French ports ag are cnjoyed by ships of British build.

Mr. DAY LES said he could not see why France should not grant to us the same privileges in trade as did the Ame- ricans. Lt was true that the relations between Britain and France were not so friendly now as they were some time ago but he thoaght the people of this Colouy should gain these privileges ag readily as others. He d.d not set a great value jon the fisheries ; fishermeg were generaily poor in all coun- itries, and he. thought if our vessels could be admitted to French registry we should give the French the privilege of fi-hing ou our coasts, and curing their fi-h on our shores. The hon. member, Mr. Longworth appeared to be of opinion that their dewand for vessels would be in favour of a larger class than what we could build. Ee (Mr. D.) held a differ- eat view. If we, however, could gain the privileges sought for without conceding the fisheries, ali the better; he would be disposed to give up as little as possible. But he considered it very doubtful that the French woyld give these privileges for the liberty of bringing in their wine here, as this was a comparatively poor Colony; but if they could obtain the advantage of fishing oo our coasts, they would probably readily accept the offer.

Hoa. Mr. COLES did pot see the force of the reasoning of thoae who said, ask this favor of France and give as little as possible, Mut the resolytion which ha pre asked greater privileges than were granted to Canada, bat ia re- turn for this he would concede to the French the same ad- vantages which we granted to the Americaus. The French could fish on oyr coasts in sgl] vessels such us we could byild, and io thew earry their fish to St. Pierre, to be reship- ped in larger vessels to France, ut some hon. members appeared to think that Franee was not to be trusted—that she was of a grasping disposition. But he was of opinion that if those privileges were conceded to her, it wow goa

great way to remove the desire on her part to regain pos- session of these Colonies, We could show the French that we had greater advantages to give them in retura tor the privileges whieh we ask, than Canada.

Mr. MeNELLL was not in favor of the proposition brought forward by the hon. leader of the Opposition ; he thought that by going too far we might lose all.

Mr. BEER hoped the other day, when he observed that

rivileges were granted by the Freveh to Canada that this Taland was also included. But this appeared not to be the case ; and he was happy to see the hon. member for Marray Harbor, Mr. McNeill, bring forward the resolution which he did, 1t was pleasing to observe that no party spirit was displayed in discussiug the question ; the leader of the Oppo- sition appeared to desire to go even further than the mover of the resolution, But he (Mr. B.) doubted if we could go as far as that bon. member proposed,

Hon, Col. GRAY said it was a grave matter for considera- tion how the proposal of the hon. leader of the Opposition would be received by the Imperial government. Ile (Col. G.) thought we should al! look forward to the time when one

Colonies united. Probably not more than 5 or 6 yeare would elapse before something of this kind would take place, and it was questionable whether we should be the first with such a proposition as had been made with respect to giving the French a right to fish on our coasts. We, at least, should not give away greater privileges than we received. — He maintained that we had given more than we received in the case of the Reciprocity treaty with the United States. We should be careful to give up nothing, for all that we possessed wight be necessary to enable us to obtain our rights in the event of a union of the Colonies, [t was kuown that Cana- da had a debt cf about 11 millions, and we would have to bear a part of that unless we could demand some guarantee that we should not be burdened with it. He would cheerfully support the original resolution.

Ilo. the SPEAKER—It was well known that Nova Scotia and New Brunswick had as good a right to the fishery privileges in the gulf as we had ; and he did not think that any thing we could pass would give the French liberty to fish on Our coasts.

Ilon. Mr. WHELAN spoke at some length. He was as- tonished at the narrow-mioded views of some hon, members. Ile thought if this second resolution had been proposed by any other person than the leader of the opposition it would bave been all right. The hon. and learned member for Georgetown referred to the boon which we would probably receive by adopting the resolution proposed by his friead, the hon. member for Murray Harbor, and said we should not grant any right as an equivalent. Ie had instanced the case of Canada,and contended that she had given nothing in return for the privileges obtained. Buteven though she had given nothing she had many claims which we could not urge. She had I’rench sympathies and French representation, and all those influences were brought to bear upon the present Consul of France ia that Province, who had induced his [mperial master to concede those privileges. Un account of these sympathies a greater trade would spring up between the people of France and Cauada, than any other British Colonial possession eould hope to possess. this Island had very little claim on the sympathies of the French, and some means would have to be taken to induce them to concedy the same privileges to us as they had grant- ed to Canada. What injury would it be to us to see the French come here and make use of that which we did not ourselves @ We were more of “an agricultural than a fish- ing people. Why, then, should we have such a selfivh spirit in regard to our fisheries? Ife certainly could see no good reason for not supporting the resolution proposed by his hon.

of the Imperial family would rule as viceroy over these |;

The people of

VALUABLE REAL ESTATE Porm SALE In the ity.

FENO be Sold at PUBLIC AUCTION, on WEDNESDAY, the 2d day of JULY next, at Hl o'elock,acm., the following very valuable Property, being part of the estate of the ale Hono- rable AMBROSKE LANE, adjoining the Kirk of Seothind, avd but a few handred vards from Go yernment Mouse, viz: Town Lots Nes. 3, 4 and 5, inthe fifth hundred of Town Lots in Chariottetow n. ‘To suit ivtending purchasers the ground will be divided into four parcels, according to the following plan :-

=e . Zs 3 %

vis 2 2

5@ 2 2

a 81 feet = a i

ele e

4|2 y = aIZ =

84 feet | 84 feet _ 84 feet

Pitz Re “y Strees.

Trkems — One-quarter down; the remainder on delivery of the deed, in three months from date of ile. J. HAMILTON LANE. Picton, 23d May, 1862.

FOR SALE, Valuable Loaschold Property

AND

Business Stand, Koown as “ BARRETI’S CROSS.” ILL be SOLD at Private Sate,

the above Prope -ty, consisting of 95 acres of Land, 50 of which is ia a high state of cultivation, and the remainder covered with hard and soft wood, running LS chains on the St. Eleanor’s Road, and 20 chains ou the Malpeque Road, with the Dwelling ffouse, Barn, and Out-houses, &e. This Property is situated on the junction of six public roads, and cannot be surpassed as a Dusiness Stand on the island. ‘Terns easy. Application to be made to the subscriber, on the

Premises. MARGARET BARRETT. Lot 19, June 2, 1862. Qu

‘+ Warblingten’’ for Sale. FYNUAT desirable property, belonglog to

= | cee meena te $09 Rate Alpena PAN aes 4

TOT ; att RADWAY’S RESOT. VENT. ‘ Rlood is thicker than\Water,”

RADWAY’S RENOVATING RESOLVENT IS A CLEANSING SYRUP

NOR the permanent cure of Scrofula, Syphilis, EP Or Os meee ,

Fever, Sores, Ulcers, Salt Kheum, Erysipelas, Nickete, Scald Head, yore Legs, Cankers, Glandular Swellings, White Swellings, Nodes, Sore Bars, Sure Eyes, Stramous Discharges from the Bars, Opthal- mia, Itch, Constitational Debility, Wasting and De- cay of the Body, Skin Eruptions, Pimples and Blutches, Tumors, Cancerous A ffectiors, Dyspepsia, Water Brash, Neuralgia, Chronic Rheumatism and Gout,

HUMORS AND SORES OF ALL KINDS,

And all diseases entailed from Small Pox, Measles, Erysipelas, Fever and Ague, Yellow, Typhus and other Fevers, Dropsy, Deafness, Fits, Loss of Mem- ory, dc,

When infants avd young children are afflicted with Sores of the Gums, Cankers in the Mouth, Sore Heads, Ears and Eyes, either from worms, teething or any other cause, Radway's Renovating Resolvent will speedily eradicate every particle of disease, and re-invest the child with health.

LADIES

Afficted with Falling of the Womb, Ulcers of the Womb, Discharges from the Uterus, Chlorosis, and all weakening discharges, may depend upon a spee- dy cure by the use of Rapway’s Renovartine Ke- SOLVENT.

In cases of Chronic Rheumatism, Neuralgia, Gout, the Resolvent, taken, will be found a quick and thorough cure.

RADWAY 'S RENOVATING RESOLVENT IS A GREAT LUNG AND STOMACH REMEDY,

Bad Cough, Hackicg Dry Cough, Stitching or Wrenching, Pains in the side, Pain around the heart, Shertness of breath, hard breathing, sharp pains when taking & breath, and all other painful symp- toms are quickly removed by the Renovating RKe- solvent.

its use will speedily deliver the disabled and disease-stricken sulferer from

A LIVING DEATH,

And restere him to his friends in a sound, and healthy condition.

|

James WILsoN, Esq., consisting of 36 acres of LAND, ina high state of cultivation, a very con- venient DWELLING TOUSE aud offices, a good GARDEN, and anu extensive and valuable OR- CHARD.

This Property has a water front, and is distant from the City only a few minutes walk. As a gen- tleman’s residence, Warblington is uurivalled by any property in the Island. Apply to Wm. DODD, Auctioneer, or to the subscriber,

THOMAS PETHICK.

Charlottetown, April 28, 1862.

Valuable Freehold Property in St. Eleanor’s for Sale.

Valuable Business Premises in

‘EXE subscriber offers for sale that well} known Business Establishment at present occn- pied by JAMES L. HOLMAN, Esq. ‘The Property comprises a TWOSTOREY DWELLING HOUSE and SILOP, 40 by 30 feet, with Kitchen attachea and a never-failiug well of good water at the door a Ware-house, Coach-louse and Stables, all in good order. This situation is second to none in Prince | County for a Trader. Possession given the 20th September vext. ALSO, FOR SALE The Cottage, Coach-house and Stables adjoining the above Property, and at present occapied by Doctor iJanvis Possession given the lst August next.

Merchants, Traders aud others wishing te go into business, will find the above Property in one of the most central parts of Prince County, and the most flourishing Township in Prince Edward Island ; and which Towuship will have, after the next general election, a county town representation.

friend, the leader of the opposition.

appeared to adopt the same course as if we had the right to tuke the initiatory steps in any negotiation, with respect to giving the French a right to fish. had no exclusive right to the fisheries on our coasts. This was a right whieh the British Government alone could concede. We had no power respecting the fisheries, excepting in regard to those on our own rivers.

lon. Mr. POPE hoped that the hon. leader of the Op- position would withdraw his resolution, at it was absurd that we should give what we did not possess. Le would move the following resvlution :—

“ Resolved further, That in the event of the Imperial Fiench Government acceding to the prayer of the Address, this Legislature hereby pledges itself to reciprocate with the French Government, to the same extent that Canada has done.”

Mr. DAVIES said if we had not the right to give the French leave to fish on our coasts, we could not grant it ; but he was disposed to do so as fur as we had the power.

The Committee then divided on Mr. Pope's amendment :—

Yras:—Uons. Messrs. Pope, Yeo, Gray, Haviland, Longworth, Tnornton, Hensley, Wightman, MeAulay ; Messrs. MeNeill, Douse, Montgomery, J. Yvo, Ramsay, Beer, Cooper, Sutherland—17.

Nays:—Hlons. Messrs. Coles, Whelan; Messrs. Davies, Sinclair and Conroy—5.

The Committee then rose and two resolutions were reported. The first, that proposed by Mr. McNeill, was agreed to. When the second was read Hon. Mr. Cules again moved his amendment, which was lost 17 to 5, divi- sion contrary as above.

Hon. Mr. Whelan then moved to amend the said resolu- tion (that proposed by Hon. Mr. Pope), by adding at the end thercof the following words ; “in accordance with such relations as may subsist between Canada and [’rance in reference to this matter, so far as it is in the power of this Colony te carry them out.”

Tie House divided on the motion of amendment.

Yeas :—Hons. Messrs. Whelan, Coles, Thornton, Wight- man ; Messrs. MeNvill, Sinclair, Sutherland, Conroy—8. Nays :—Hons. Messrs. Hensley, MeAulay, Longworth, Yeo, Gray, Haviland; Messrs. Cooper, Beer, Ramsay, Douse, Moutgomery, J. Yeo—12.

The original resolution was then agreed to, and a Com- mittee appointed to prepare au Address to Ler Majesty.

The Appropriation Bill was then read a third time and

Hon. Col. Gray introduced a Bill to facilitate the opera- tion, in certain particulars, of the Award or Report made by the Commissioners to settle and adjust differences respect- ing some of the Township lands ia this Colony,—which was read a first time.

The Revenue Bill was read a second time, and passed through Committee.

Hon. Mr. POPE moved that the House do now resolve itself into a Committee of the whole [louse to take into further consideration the Bill to incorporate the Roman Catholic Bishop of Charlottetown in his Diocese.

Hon. Mr. KELLY said that the Special Committee were hot prepared to go forward with the Bill.

Hon. Mr. POPE said that he intended to go home after to-day’s Session of the House, having obtained leave of absence for that purpose, aud he wished this Bill to be taken up asthere was a petition from some of his constituents before the Committee, which had been entrusted to him. The bon. mewhber for Tignish had stated that the Bill was a transcript of the New Brunswick Act, an] the hon, member who proposed it silently listened to the statement, thus tatictly admitting it was correct. As the Bill, however, was quite different from the New Brunswick Act, such conduct on the part of an hon. member of this House, he considered was hizhly censurable.

Mr. CONROY explained that the reason he said the Bill was a trauseript of the New Brunswick Act, was beesxuse he ynderstood it to be so. He had consulted with the hon. momber Mr. Longworth, and he had advised that he (Mr. C.) should take a copy of the New Brunswick Act to the Bishop, and ascertain if a similar one would be suitable. ‘The Bishop said it was enough. The Law Clerk being otherwise engayed, the Hon. Mr. Kelly consented to diaw out the Bill, and if he had added anything whieh was not in the New Brunswick Act, he did it without the authority of the Commitree, and had introduced into the Bill what was net desired by the Bishop.

Hen. Mr. KELLY said there was nothing in the Bill but what wasin the New Brunswick Act, except a clause or two contained in the Bill of last Session. which, as they had not been objected to by the Duke of Newcastle, he thought were all right. If the Bill was drawn differently from the New Brunswick Act, it was done with no intention to deceive. He had not observed the statement made by the hon. member for Tiguish, that the Bill was an exact trauseripi of the New Brunswick Act. [fe (Mr. K.) did sot insist on these parts of the Bill which had been added, but was willing to make it like the Act referred to.

Hou. Mr. COLES thought the best course was to leave the Bull to go into Commi:tee on Monday, with the uuder- standing that it should be amended.

Hon. Mr. POI’E said that he would not be here on Monday, aud iusisted that the House should now go into Commitiee.

The motion was agreed to and the House resolved itself into Comwittee accordingly.

Ile contended that we |

Further particulars made known on application to

lowner, at his office, St. Eleanor’s. JOUN | St. Eleanor’s, March 10, 1862.

HASZARD.

Jun

‘Hfouse and Land for Sale. pes TWO-STCREY HOUSE AND LAND IN

Dorchester-street, at present occupied by Francis | Stanley. ‘Tuere is a Shop, Office, Sitting-room and | Dining-room on the first, and three Bed-rooms and | large Sitting-room on tuc second fluor, ail thoroughly painted and papered throughout. A frost-proot | Cellar, walled with stone, besides a Cellar Kitchen jand Pautry. The House is well finished, and only two years uld, has large yard accommodation, and is a desirable stand for cither a Sture or Boarding IJouse | Tenms—£300 of the purchase money may lay for | 10 years at 6 per cent; the balance, one-third down, | and the remainder in one year, free of interest. For | further particulars apply to J. S. Carve.r, Esqr.,

Charlottetown, or to the owner, GO. W. HOWLAN.

Cascumpec, March 10, 1802.

FOR IMMEDIATE SALE,

FANUAT DESIRABLE WATER LOT, in

GEORGETOWN, containing half an acre of LAND, with usual privileges, known ,a8 No. l,or Point Lor. Terms Cash or short time on security. Apply to the flon. Josern Hensiey, Charlottetown.

Before presenting this wonderful cleansing rem- ;edy to the North American public, Dr. Rapway

was determined to test its medicinal powers for the | eure of the class of diseases for which it is prescribed in the South American Provinces, as it is a fact well known to all physivlogists that

SCROFULA, LEPROSY, SYPHILIS,

and its horrible train of concomitants, prevail in the tropical regions of the South, to a much greater and more malignant degree than in the North. In fact there is scarcely a family in any of the South Am- erican Provinces that is free from Scrofula, or its kindred diseases. It runs in the blood of all its people, and has become established as a constitu- tional iufirmity, and has baffled the skill of their best physicians. With knowledge of these facts,

RADWAY’S RENOVATING RESOLVENT,

cies of the diseases, as developed in the tropics. | Large supplies were sent to Brazil, Buenos Ayres, Chili, Peru, Equador, Venezuela, Bolivia, New Grenada, and to several islands of the Spanish main, and was thoroughly tested by Physicians and the Priesthood, and is now the official remedy used by the Physicians, under the name of ** Selative Rene- vador de Radway,” (the Spanish for Radway’s Ke- | novating Resulvent,) in the treatment of Serofula, | Syphilis, U cers, Tumors, Prolapsas Uteri, Elephan- tiasis, Krysipelas, Saint Anthony’s Fire, St. Vitus’ Dance, Fever Sores, all diseases of the Skin, humers | in the Blood, white swellings, Nodes, Cankers, sores |in the mouth, deafness, discharges from the oyes, jears, and nose, glandular swellings, dropsy and constitutional diseases. Such has been the unpar- | alleled success of this remedy in curing these hor- | rivle diseases in the tropics, that we do not hesitate

Ion. Mr. LONG WORTH said some hon. members | Il. J. Cunparn, Esq., Charlottetown, or to the | to promise all the sulferers with Serofala and erup-

tive diseases among our own people, with speedy | restoration to sound and permanent health. | Itissuperior to all knowa remedies in popular } u#o as a cleans. ng syrup for PURIFYING THE BLOOD, | and removing from the skin Pimples, Biotehes, Tet- ‘ter, Kash and other offensive marks, and will in a | few days give a pure, clear and roseate hue of health and beauty tu the face and uails, and brilliancy to | the eyes.