THEE-E LlViES LOST IN

1i l] '~'

l'l

m».

<%UI'=uus~_-_-¢~.Q1 ,._ , , __ , ,_‘,,‘_,_

"_. lives wot-v ]..>|_ n. which rulncd tlll- .\‘_\'lll|£'l‘.!l<* ‘in the centrt- ol‘ n». may. The (loud: mo... sixty; Mrs. Emma I'm‘ Uld Miss Alnry lfltritti, til.

.- . »---¢ ou-

R

illllll»

.a:'l\. w»

t

lw

I .l till-la‘.

*-""~‘<*0I> lli pain-canon ll. ‘ll \\lill lti\'_\'l'l\'.~'. with \\":1l.»'~

, i] 011i‘

$10,000 FIRE m DIGBY

- > providcd ‘ tDlGBY. N. s‘, ‘tw- thls morning d. droj-vl 1..

‘ =1.» as»

Go l; tbs uitice with new vigor- thlow of.’ that feeling of weari- tlcfs and fatigue with

PE. ‘SLAR lit‘ NAME‘ TONIC

For overworked mcu and women. for Labia folk of old age and for

n»

' dcliclte children. this tonic is * highly recommended. Lz-fi. i‘. help you-it surely will if

ptcpttly ial<.cn-75c and $1.50.

l-lickcy 8: riicholsofis tliiidlil TWIST

CllEi-tdlldbi TQBACCO

The tob.'tc:o that i131; lovely flavor. growing popularity with il;._

Zlznusalllls

llJll

of mcr. by its The steadily ~01 ulwM-rs has given it the

'I'l‘|(.'t'c ls n~ .olltcr like it.

greatest prcmrrczlt’: any tobacco cvcr incl.

~ -..~.¢._,,,' . , a ‘I so w» Java-a. v-"(L>

Hickey at; Nlr-lttt-l.-zctr= 11th;

Manufacturers

co u... Lid.

Charlottetown

42¢- w» Fifi“! l’?

or»

A

till‘ orvr .=ltlt\\' curt‘

*l_ i

.\\'c lrcs ‘land. and lhcrc and Iiurhaps '\\'.- vollllllll uw- acquire a Fllllll (l pvrly ‘k311i [ll't'\'i‘lll its

., 1 ;f;.- “v-nty _\UZH'S ol’ re-

.l\ltani,,lr“ iyptglngs \ and lrespnsses evidence‘ broke down, the jury uuluiw‘ a 1.1g“, “f “my over- tne brought in a verdict of not guilty 1 ,,.0‘,(,,.',\. M- o," neighbor Mach he and the Judge told him that he “name to prevent by qorce or Wflllll. from the ICourt without a J . ~. r fll_ build up m 11-"

tl‘l“- H M “m” “ v Wmdo.“.5 ‘Whether this .was a fact or

‘against our nelglllbif" _ land shut out from ltllll GOdB

nun-d; t‘; tho philosopher “gut out

\\'.-rn.- inlntlwr

rragn Hlghl- cltannc] wilholtt I l‘\iti‘l'l-l arc ckpt-ri 41m tu llu- 0\\'lii'l' tiirnrls tin» watt-r or llscs n all io

l .

lYu lid.“ tt\\'l]<'l' oi tho lower tluuriuht .\l‘ notion against him. tnonnt-wi on runnors Wm,‘ l\\'t‘lll_\' d1 and tln- ownor of the lowcr

l‘!

‘G a .7”; air i< an lncitlcnl of ltropcrly and

/// b y s lzbm

l

positively that bis client is 3 801116 He would prefer not to know o 1| asud llltikljallullllfifl)

him in an awkward position. Judge o" ‘ who ’ ‘ many criminals, stated once in course of an address before Law lstudents Association as lows: ‘ “ln the course of ‘my long experience at. thabarthere was only one "client" who‘ “came “out openly and told me that he was guilty. 'ln‘tha.t-case'~-the“ Crown

the the fol-

{lass upon our ncighbofis by cnlnmlt a legal n lnoral wrong. But ‘l! ihc act ottl-il enough vcr that pro- whicll no law in tho world from doing. Phus

merely "pointlnll moral or adorn-

good ing a tale" we will never know.

tor

. -. --. - n ‘t n wrong islilillfilwvpmllult.) ,.,,,,np,..,r m but it pretty well describelthe at- " > tltude of a client ‘towards his

. . . - ' ' law- dam tgcs and lln~ costs ot a . . . lawyer _. u . 11-)‘ l<\'('li be otdcrcd to - I§T:II\‘)\.U(Ihs‘(“)l)ill~uc‘ion and in tin: We would ‘be properly shocked

lf a lawyer. without his cxpress wish, got up in ‘Court. slated that his client confessed his guilt to him and that therefore he. could not. conscientiously defend’; him any longer. and retired from

u‘. his snnlicltl." bul it‘ wc tlfl "ll rltiilllllllillg tho wrong oftcn UlIitllRil wiltionl punishmctlt our wrong W‘ culnvs a right and no lltflVtlflUl tltc law can ltnigcr lntcrfcrc \\'lll us. _

\\‘llt-ll a man owns land through m" H159‘

tin‘ owln-r 0i tbc lowcr laud in lroct-i\‘l\ tln- lvatcr in llS natural any lntcrlcrclicc r in lltc tluantlly or tptality. lint lf ‘iv _ ihc higllcr laud "“ l

l. gnarl 0i His ..\lajesty's subjects. "rho contradictory nature of the cvillcln-o glven at many shows tho necessity of having vvory t-uso properly defended by counsel. '.

nor binmtot to do. ' this realm that the

m. brou-n such a splendid sated

this olrn pupposcs or pollutcs it the land has a llut ll persisted in for bcclntlcs. a right lnnd has no longcr an)’ Yvlllcil)’ lit!‘ llll’ lwrlultg contmittcd. ‘Fln- right. not to rccnivc impure

this wrong is

years it

The rt-cords oi‘ lCourts of Justice from all time show ithat ttruiih- can- not in a gremt! nnmlber of cases tried, be reasonably expected. Ev- en when wltnetiises are honest, and have no intention to deceive, tthere is a ltalural tendency to exaggerate title facts favourable to the cause for which they are appearing and the only means known to English law by ‘which testimony can be stilt- cd is cmss-cxantination. '.By this agent. if ‘skillfully used, falsehood ought to be exposed and exagger- ated statcmonsrt: reduced to ‘their true dimensions. 1t can also be equally utiskillfully ltsed and noise in cross-examination is [sometimes mistaken for energy. |Mr. Baron Alderson once remarked to la coun- sel: Mr. lllank. you sccm to ltllllltk tJllut the arl ut‘ cross-examination is to cxalnint‘ crorsly.

or any intcrfcrcnce with this right an action may be maintained; ittltlg to the tlnpurc air -t‘or twenty years the owncr of thc property may be compelled to R0 on rcccivitlg tho alr in a polluted tntc and has no remedy. In the snmc way he may be compelled i0 llstcti to discordant noises from certain trades. It‘ Judge Alley had submitted to thc "smoke, soot and clndcrs from Duchemilrs fnctory and lbc nltisc tremor and vibration caiuscd by tho working oi the Inachinory" in said factory for twcltty years ltc would not have {SUCCOQGPG in gaining the flnnous

casc of Alley vs. Duchemlxi t2 Zita.» znrd & Warburtotrs Reports 266- 340-3601 and Duchelnln and (‘onl- puny would not have been cont-

pcllcd to remove their factory to DmgcT AND

thc \vntcl'fl"nnt. OIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE Tllcsc acquirer! rights growing ‘

out of wrongs arc callctl cziscnlcilts. m» (\\'](]\l’_1l'(' w the» evidence

This may scent a contradiction, as they are not easily acquired. They nrise out of one person taking for over twenty ycars thc risk of being

0i‘ a pcrsoti .prc.~'<-l.' when the not wan c..ultt...l.d. Jircunlatanial ovi- detice is the cvldcncl‘ of surround- ing circumstances from which an

., rca-nniblc uucstion and one which

sued for continuing to contmli. the wroni: and tho other submitting to

inrvrencc may b. :a\\‘n that, ttlho crlnto was commit .1 hy ibc pcr-

tho injustll-o fur illc same length so“ accused. Dirt-ct orldcnca ltt" limc. Another and perhaps n is L-gngjdgfpd l1... "Hm. “.11. more approprialo sounding nnmc able of t.h‘(lse l\\‘\) t" es u; ma.

tys bo said . Every person is familial" Jhollrct that many persons can witness tho 811.1110 41¢! taking itlztce and tthcir dc- scrlpttlion may be entirety difroreltt in many respects‘. Thcii- .ltJ('0lllIltl though dlft'ci'elli lnay p11 be perfect- ly honest. Dlfferencu-t in keen- ncns of eyesight may elccount ill part. -Somc 900W" can see ob- jects at a dizauticc “more clearly than those close at lmnd. lMany pur- sons lWilh far sight or falling cyc- slght will bold writing at arnfls

is scrviludcs. This is rénlly what tin-y arc. ‘They are scrvltudes or suflktrings that by lotig submlssioti tllc sortrlcnt tcttctncnt is compelled .o ondlurt- from rllc dominant tonc» ntont. v

A prrblcltl that oftclt troubles thc lay mind is as to whether a lawyer can (‘tillkltfifillllflllfliy defend a clionl wvhonl he knows tn bl- guilty of tbt- offcnco for which he ir. being trlod, and as to wbcthcl" his plurals must necessarily suffer in so doing. ‘Fbls is a perfectly

- V c} 1am mu "cctn difficult to laymelnllellgth and see it plnlner lthun close ‘-_ “MID l. o l v lt a wcll known principle otfltl. litanll. Sometimes they can scc _' V p p; _ _ . > l1, British justicc that a man is pro-Di! nor acre-as bhe slrrct than near S ft: if? sumcd to be innocent until he is 8d. hand. Sometimes lltc relative

r". n ‘l/‘lflll . . . w . ‘ PTflVnll guilty. 'l'llcrcfol'c. a lawyer P031410" 0f Petr-sluts girl's mic a

- 111i‘; ‘r15 it in taking up a c for a client is “wamr ‘"19" "l?" allfllllcll Hilllvll . ‘ ‘l l‘! l‘ '. : a 8 varyng tcsvtltloil 1 t l.»

» ALMOST Evillvlnutl: any mm UP T0 mus S} t! “ lJlIJKiLEKLEJXt{livesto- ’ ‘y "° ’

-,‘ _ . 4 V M “a,” mo, i} ~ mpmly ha“ an" tCircumhtantlal evidence is at.

é \ A Splllfldld lmc of Woman's l; t!» intcrl" .~. in‘ his client. sees “xalilfi looked union wuth more sus-

/ . inch Lnclng Boots at $1.98 ll tam bt- guts a trial yflhin Hm 1.1.1,... Deon u an d rent evidence, al~

" Prli another of High Boots. V‘ o." British Justice-dual no lm- lhmigh some alhncal“ ‘>7 Q-"cllm" Oxfords and swaps‘ broken i V Drum". pvmenm is ‘Hhnmwl “gains. eltantlal evidence say witueisses can

I01; and size: at from 25c to his U|iGlli.-----]70lllI.i out tho wcak- m“ bl" (Ylifclllnutaltccs cannot.

.. ...... . . . . . . .. 98c ness in thr: evidence of tllc crown "hvmlbrm “this mqdenc“ i“ Mum‘

k

the tllon direct cvldetioe. Paley says:

K ’ mm ‘,4 and the strong points ill u , - llevidonce lfnr tho defencc. Not (‘omcjdences 0f 1mm‘ ‘"9 mnum‘ And many. many other bar- i. once does he state whether or not Guam“. m" really [he ""1119 "f Elfitll!) that could fill all the V his cllont is guilty or ln- these {W0 kinds m evmmwe do‘ ' , nmerz. in thc province and noccnl. This! is for ille jurynends "m" We “was of every case" 1 then thc half would not be " tn dotnrtuinla and they must bomemmes cirmlmstancea '11“ i“ a will‘ \/ d" so on the evidence submitted. more dangerous fashion “an man‘

—--—--m

Boots made

a guarantee

mattshlp. Worth $3.50 for _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . $2.75 ' 9° Pairs Men's Brown

150 pairs Men's Brown

" CB" 40 pairs Brown Oxford, t, double sewn goodyear wettcd soles. recede toe, wide and roomy 7 a - Landon toe. A stylish good boot and last 35,50 f0,- _ _ V _ _ I _ _ __ $353

[Odd fltter- Worth $5.00 for $2.98.

Specials in Shoe Findings

i dozen but leather um 10c pair or 60c per doz. pairs.

1 dozen Brown Laces 10c.

12 palr better quality (inc) for 40.

All kinda of insole: lncluq. lnfl fibrin cork. hoof, etc. 10c pair.

Polishes Black, Brown, gm. 15c or 2 for 25c.

Rubber dressing 35c for 15o

100 pairs Women's Patent Straps.

Waterproof dressing f" hravy leather boot; 15¢ now 2 for 25c.

miulum heels and mm m, $3.50 for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.00 ', pairs of regular 33.CO Patent Strap Shoes to arrive In .1 few ill i and sell m . .. . _ 52.110 ' OI crane patterns In the lot.

GOFF BRO

Shoe Trees $1.00 for 50c. 15c for 10c.

S., ALTI).

100 pairs Men's Solid Work by Coils and stamped with name whleh in or honest work-

Broquc Oxfords $5.00 fur $4.50

y.

ltTltc prisnuci" is entitled i‘ ll . -l JIIFY ho is, in the cye of the law,

to mhedord ttguth ils eiitrflnzetr tlhian fiotlon bonctil oi cvcry doubt. and utttiltan '1 Q ‘co no dances of error’ we the last doubt of his innocence isiforllfiaous concourse of “Venn m“ rcmovcrl from the minds of the Iwme mes gwe an Mr or truth w

an absolutely false charge again-st‘ Ialperson. Still itt ‘is angler to mad

C l .t ‘—th

at at.’ .....3.;.“_“.’.?.Ji=l“‘.f.?§fi

not guiltyfilt will, therefore. readily .bn seen that tho

llllawye" i“ men“? “s ‘m aid t° m“ to probe the infinite variety and

‘y. 4pc

t t

/

l i

CW1‘! and ‘lnrv in sifting out the com 1 x; I | , I“ "v ‘ Dc ties of human imotllves and cv llllHP lt would b0 a greater emfimms which may (“snort [the

= . inlllsticr- to allow one innocent man ¢m1_h_

r it

to lvc convicted on improper mvidcncc than that many guilty linen should go free. This is the reason tint the tCourt never allows Anmm d 5 a _ a prisoner to be unrepresented by cling 1n tire {Zoiffhlll 5923203,’; ‘QT. flmln-‘inl- If the prisoner ls lmablo ten deceived into fbellevln-g that

l got. counsel the Court assigns Grpgrgong am a 419mm.’ who are counsel in represent him and biting-angers m them are weujmown “Kilt-arson are paid by the State. Atl_ffiend~g_ (How one“ may you 1m“, l sta-tcd. a lawyer never assertslthtought that you saw Mr. Jones tbc lmioccltw of his client. It. coming towards you. On closer would be had form to do so andlotrsorvatlon in! int-m out m be one

DEFECT IN TESTIMONY

Bringing Up Father

I'M BECINNIN’ ‘I - ' TO THINK ITLL v TAKE A COUPLE ‘ y ' OF‘ DAY5 TO LEARN .. ' "n-us JAPANESE " ll - LANGUAGE‘. V

THE kinlttrmroivu‘ A AUARDlInN

ulltyJclose enough for full identification f his had sholl a man guilt. This knowledge might. put wltlh h swear the murderer. jury are en oibion upon the weigh tln- criminal prisoner ls of every doubt and the evidence must the conv gore luhfly arc entitled verdict.

UNCRRTAINTY OF HUMAN TES- TIMONY

mony and the necessity of having

ly scrutinized b)’ abundantly shown from th

client's Y0"

NEW HAMP$HIRE FlRt: 1-1 a to». w. 15hr» A,» _ “Mm m. vymm. Ho“... 'l‘herci‘orc lt cannot be very shoulder. l“: ‘ _J“_“ H W“ “I m MVP“ilwllm-Iltibllci‘ land it is tltc right “Tmlg mr a lawyer to do m? her lmtlkemmok FMANRYLIIIQ, N. ll.. “ltiwli ' :'.| l. .| lisp-rip.- inn» ‘ ‘ ‘ that which would be very improper Some purchase. s

ll ls fortunate for tlhe people nlmn the Ymllh W11" latlvl band on her shouldc * rested i around the llve‘s and liberties nurse in bis nit“? ltalned no money.

l

trials! lunrks and swore that it was

l

l

l“"“'l‘| "(>1 strengthen his case. ltlwho ie an entire stranger to you crow whey-g Ouch , n

' . . -‘ ' t - l its very seldom that a lawyor knows lf this stranger before he caime what he was doing, ‘ma: x“?e.,§'.1f,

and run away. yon-l orror, lwould be prepared 1° that your rrtend Jone! Wtlfl ln civil castes the titled no give their de- t of evidence.

cases. lhoyrever. "l9 entitled to ttlhe benefit.

incing to thc Jury be- {to givc their

The uncertainty of human testi-

the evidence before a court clear- counsel can be B lllllll- convic-

bgf of JUIOWI] GITOIIEOUS i ll

tlone that have taken Dim“ Courts of Justice.

A curious cane is related cl n th who was convicted oiflatcal- lug the pockctlbook off a lad)’ (""3 morning while she was ut ntnrkct. lt appeal-mint the trlzll that the lady while stoopftlg over examin- lug some vegetables was startled by the youth's hand laid on hcr Shortly after, on looking to pay for he found it WM

at oncc fell hnd laid his r. Hc was ar- with n lIlZlClc salon which con-‘ ‘Tho market \\'o-‘ man identified tbc purse by privzxtc) l ll‘ one tlrnt had bccn taken from her.‘ li, was shown for dctcnce that the‘ boy had long possessed the ident lcal rtucket-book. The wltncsscu, spoke ot‘ tnarks by which they were able to identity ll. Somcl dt-screpaticies Jtowcver. occurred‘! in their evidence and lcd to tllc suspicion that the defence was al fabricated one. The Jury returned a verdict of guilty. Bezflore the term of Court adjourned two lncn who were plowing a field of oats, through which a putth lay by whiclll the woman bad gone to market.‘ found__in tIhe oats close to the path a black pocket-book containing five 1 pound notes, which on being shown tothe woman was immedi ately recognized as the one she had lost. ‘The prisoner was dis- charged. The woman must have droppcd ‘her pocket-book on tbc way to market and had clearly been mistaken as to the identity 0t’ the one produced at the trial.

gone and suspicion

and found

SUSIPICION a

Dr. Johnson defines suspicion to be ‘imagination of something ill wlthnut proof."

Suspicious facts surrounding a deed of murder have often led to conviction ofvan innocent person. Those may be the person's near- ncss to the place about the tlmc of the murder: words uttered by him bellore the deed, as of angel‘. lmtredmetigeance his words spoken a-ftet- it. his possession of n wen- pon suitable to execute thc deed. Lilo condition of it after, ltearing tnarks of violence or stains ol blood, stains of blood upon hit.- body or l-lnthcs, prints oi‘ shoes corresponding with his own shoes on or near the placc of the crlnte.

A case occllrred near Aids Bridge on the road loading from Oxford to Abingdon. A nran who was known to ho very rich and to have at. thc llmc a bag 0|‘ gold min in his travelling bag called at on inn and elIl-‘tnt-Zfld a room for tho night. About midnight the latnd- lord wcnt with a dark lantern and a sharp knife into his room, only to discover to lust hurrer that sonic- one had preceded hint. that _tllc saddle bags had "been clrt open and the guest's throat cut, and he was in t-ho ugonles of death. Just as U10 dlfiatltltninted and terrible vii‘ lien was retiring two persons arm- ed with swords and pistols who had ‘been awakened by the groans ofthe dying man, rushed into lhc room. T-‘hey inslsati-tly seized thc landlord, and on their ovidmtcc. lu- wes condemned to bo hanged Some years later a person who was condemned to die for another Win16 Cnllfesl-led that he had con- cealed himself ln tho inn knowing that the murdered guest would be there _attd th-nt he had committed the crime and carried ott’ the bag 0f gold without being discovered.

CROSS-EXAMINATION

John Adolphus once in 011,55. examination on a trial t'or the mur- der 07 the clllltaln of a ship was able to confound the star witness by minute cross-examination fromf m“ knnwledlle of sea-faring. ‘Two IAflflUEY-B were on trial for the murl tier of the captain and ‘tho evidence’ 0f the mate appeared cong|.“5|ve_t ln the course 0.! his testimonyfi however, he said that at the time; of tho murder there was great con-j fusion as the ship was in much] neril so that it required nll the at- tention of tho sailors to prevent her striking on a rock,

M‘? Adlllnhus for the defence flaked so many questions as. to the number or the l

KNOWIN‘ WHAT WE'RE. LOOKIN’ ATE

' i