p

a1

PAGE SIX ._ L

THE CHARLOTTETOWN GUARDIAN

(‘IIXRLIE

CAPITOL

IJST SHOWING:

“Caught Cheating" f

\\'I'l‘ll

1111111111: axu SIDNEY

lcoliiiyo i111; TIIRILLS ,1“)

' I I trim! a 1111!!“

'l‘i"_‘.' us for Your Next Meal. Days Iloliduys iiiill Dine Herc. Blezi] 'I‘ickcts on Stile.

' PALACE ca !{!£L'Ilvi4.X.!-: .‘1ll£.\l..\‘ Rl-Jllfflil) T0

46c

I I I I /I _ l'7.€t).‘-iI"i‘:-~1ICII‘/I(

(live Wife a Few

"5??s-1i-.11l-1wi<

QUDTIUTKTWIICKVYO?IOFJWIRFCFZIC‘Oilitltﬁﬁlﬂmﬁlfllftliﬁiilittfli)? 0' Ci 13K‘ iﬁUﬁCfOlftlif OE

E. R. BROW

33339333331566

146 Richmond Si"

Ti<3L¢85fQi0I6£31>33l4>

Iiiiili" (it iiqiiui" oii tlic road n

.;ii1l 111 Il\‘lll‘_V 11nd Albert,

up. I \\'.'ll]l It) ;',l\(‘ you :1 drink." (3 »\‘.'liE1"Ii (it IIlClll told y'all that?

‘$11113

It

‘7/6 from Oregon

"N "I want c/o/bu ' ,' "rarxnxervanlx

.. biz/ﬁrst afall

Dici they get what they wanted in CHICAGO ?

1"1X.§() (nails or 1111111 AN!) 110111111X

Q-Who were IJITFOIII?

(Q-Aiirhsdy" else? A“

'\ 1" 1y ~11 1 1' ma‘

(L Iliiy 1..i.1i1....rd ta th 1. QLIII, Qﬂndd you arranged w _\"1~u "n5"! i . ,

‘Illlll? _

A-Nri. 111-1. a word.

ow dill you know he ivtis WITNESSI Nothing. I nm Just ‘l

/\--’l‘liejv told hie that Jul‘ Iiurl 1'1 1d he ' ‘our:

the

FRINGE EDWARD

LAST SHOWING 1101111111‘ MONTGOMERY

ARIIIJRIE

n,” lb hrilavnvncl

TDMIIRRDW

grvoneniv "- from Kansas

' .1 "Iulanl In lire I-I life, be 4 part aft/i: bear! of Ilie big ri!y.”'

LORETTA YOUNG

JOHN WAYNE

meet ling you.

A~-I (IItIli'I. I just nccidéiitly" inc’. MR JQHNSTONI You arc liiiii raining out. the door. I said t») "PW mlllllllwmlli lﬂdiVilIllﬂI. aren't A Ill-mgr; that Joe (‘LIIICKI ziiiili

3-‘ 1' 017-5 G-

Chn rlottetovun

l 0033

I Fire, Life, Accident, Sickness and Plate Class Insurance

Lu C) vji 1,‘- ill l?

at Lowest Rate.

Agent at Summcrsille, Lloyld Lewis

'1

olwziocotilxccszz-"ot voooczcsczcerac~1slsocaa

*9 FJ. .0. % 30' :5 $5 _. EVIDENCE Continued 1' AA Q_-I caused tin: :-1il111'o:":1;1 to be irsucd. It I\]J1l(wll'(‘(I IN it i". were for the pros :'>i1. tI.rI it‘? A-"I'hat i. 111:, it irad. a: far a", I know. rSulipncna ll1"'\'I=~ ‘L’ Q-Thls docs not suv it was for the prosecution, Mi". (‘ t. A-Well. tlrit is‘ \\ the 1.!- torncy zidriscd me. any .-..1_\'. Q~You live where? A-Mouiit Stewart. Q-L believe _\'1lll :ir1- :1 l)‘.1‘lllI)"'-',(Il" p“. l’ of the Provincial Executive? i A- A-Ycs. Q-Did you have an IIIIFI".‘I,P‘.'." wit]; the defendant Albrrt air-l Gulrk? |

A—Nob with Albert, with John McGiiirk and Henry Nlcﬁulrk. I i211! better _iiist tell you what happen- ed. because-

Q—Y’JII hurl better just lln'i\\'l"."Iinnnfnnl n; my questions. as you 11111111311 to be] A 31.11111;- my witness". You harl an IllICl'VI(‘\\'IivP1"e n11

with John and H1 nry MrfGulrk? I

I; One rack at ._

Hats zit

. -—>~)'1iii I Q..1)Q yell I‘(‘l!‘.(“.lII).‘l' \‘.I\"l1 1hr. i I

Illllllllli’ l

i?’ 11¢‘ “'35 1"‘ll11'"-“I1'~“ 3 and that is what he told inc. Alontiirziiiil’

I"*'-7“'i“'7" the whole truth. tat-u- Mr. W“ Clark. there is no doubt about that. the 01d ,s1.orc.

IJIIVIU"! rlroccr-

_.1i harr- bun: I da:1‘t,;._.7

QWI believe the}: told you 51110::

', lh.'~_\' ]‘il‘!lfIll("‘(I their sirii- A.._‘i\b,(»/-_.)_~;_ .ii:1:ii"-1"=.

il1".' ‘-\'t'!'4‘ iii t1":.i:‘."lr‘.

Q-iklr. JtillllSltlllll Did tlry pro! A.__1u t J91,“ Ifpnfy and L 11111-1» the summonses to you?

I1"1' IP31 “ll! III"? “FPYPII was coming to Charlottctoirn. II

POIFYYYCII I0 111C UP)’ Iclidnt know what this culled for.

Q» are sure of that? A-Ycs, I A_Y1~':.

:'.i1I tlicrc irzis a bottle of liquor l'lllIi‘1‘ the bu h.

Q--Wlio had tin-bottle?

A~Joe had :1 lioitlc of liquor 1111-

l

tier the l 11d to "conic and II1l\'t‘ r.» (Ii'lI 'I‘li1~_v ivciit up and ‘hr . . 1 » Henry‘ said l! .1 IIlt‘ Iiqirii" “'11:: too; f’ {wing i1» drink \'\'|IIlt)llI. \\".lI1"l‘. They '11“ Drown’. P) tarh-d t1) 1m lirr the ivutcr but t_IlL‘ 1.

-'.I‘i"1>\"iii1-i:1l I'uli:c 1-111111- along and

Ivzuieht tliun. Eilliri" Ilciiry or Al- Ilisrl lIll'(‘\‘.‘ uiviiy" the bottle. I can't 1y which. O11: triloxr threw it a- ‘ and the other fcllcnv picked it’

c. AIR. JOHNSTON: Itaras a coli- i1 with the ziceuzscd.

-‘SS-—I llflliCtl Iiim t0 tell

Q-— I Mr. Jehrsioii i: Now.

You i"c.1":tc what you are saying?

A- ~ Furc.

11c : ‘tkllifllt nnyuheim-i’

(‘-411 any Court?

lfOll IIIPHT‘?

I Q- lx. that the whole story? . I

A--Wcll. John wanted to know If! looked zit this subpncna- and

IEO when John asked iiic ll I wasI ‘grain: to town I said I hud some,‘ business" Lﬂl1l(ll'I‘(7\V mid he said‘

:1"'~uld lic Cfllll‘ with me? and I said y.

I.\llll‘(If)('I{I “fhtisc men clulin they -"°"- HOW 1111111)’ times did you scc lwcrc only treating. It is a 11i"cttyj-\'1urd°9k MacDonald- IIPIIY)‘ charge." “Oh." he said, "we've MR- MCNEILL: I Qblecli I0 BII got three more against, them Nloiitziguc." »

11R. ll/ICNEILLI

in these questions.

I Objﬂ-t to a1] \'.'(‘II Illkﬂl.

conversation, Q-(Mr. Johnston): Dld the Mag- wn": when tl1e acrircd 1)ci"sn11s were? ‘I

Tm; CCUf>_T‘_Thnl i5 quire right, instruct. Mr. Johnston not to per- whnl about rlst in these statements.

the conversation with the afagist- MR» JOHNSTON: Yoli don't know

Irate?

I count": It

tevidrinc‘.

MR, JOHNSTON:

is certainly not MR- HOLMESI If hi? i5 801119.’ to

yum-ﬂocknqqcnonnid the Court, of course there is

WITNESS" . f. . . ,. lliE C\)[JRT. I do not 1.11m. _ “Those are Ind cab

it wright that evidence would i0 MR. MCNEILL: ‘That is not: cv- idcnec. THE COURT: "There are certain | rule". of evidence. Tire only’ matter :iic the whole txiiili of the matter yd“ m“ ‘Mm-m, Onlymntlcrthnt is “R JCPVSTOBP “PL is whit evidence, ls whether or not you ‘ ' “ ‘ " ‘ 'ki1o\v anything about ‘llbcrt Mc- ".\e \'.'{lllI. to get down, 311111" Honor, Gum, having liquor m his my

XVITNESS: No; only jurt what ilenry‘ told inc. THE COURT: Then I am “ _ iinti-rl-Ftrd. It is not evidence. We (Qmmm m“ ‘my “mt (l‘y'l‘b‘ar“l"' ivouid 111"‘. iznow where to draw the I A_Dﬂlbm"l(p1v Sm!‘ Abwumxw Ilinc if you were to tell all the con- ‘ “ " ' ' . ‘ VFYFIIII-‘lll you had with the Mr:- 1 Q-Ycu are ])l'1‘1'llll'.”fI t1 make that Car-Wk,“ If you know nnynﬂng ‘bout: Albert having :1 bottle iii l slou on thc 23th of May I will take that. but clear of that- A-YCS.

l i l FVIITI,‘ Q-Tlicrp “fro _lii=t the three of

110:1;

“IITNESS: No. I don't know an thin): about that.

THE COURT: Well, there ls n0 1151- wasting i111.’ time and the coun- Sal's" time.

Q-lMi". Johnston): You had a lconvcrsntion with the ‘about tlicsc two cares? A--Yes.

give the evidence now.

viewed the Magistrate?

1110115 WES.

question.

istrate says.

know if you don't know.

-\vit ‘Ss to give already? 'cvidencc.

,told his story.

1pc ting’!

bout there cases? question.

only-

wci" that question.

time?

that is ivhat he said. I will ask him again.

\VITNESS: You arc a little sore jiidgcship. that is all that is troub-

IVIR. JOHNSTON: And ivhzit is‘ troubling you?

as lmppy as can tic-feeling fine. a

THE COURT: Your objection 15

rate in this case say to _\'gu_ MR. HOLMES: I suggest that you

what I am going to say.

lsdictlcn o! the Magistrate. I will take them and consider that point. MR. JOHNSTON: I am trying to

Q-IMr. Johnston); As 3 matter of fact, you and John McGulrk," the father of the two young men who are up here charged with vio- lation of the Prohibition Act, went. to Charlottetown and you inter-

A-Just asked him what the sum-

THE COURT: I have already stat- cd that: you are not to answer that

MR. JOHNSTON: You are not to answer that question, the Mag-

Q-—(Mi". Johnston): Dld you tell John McGulrk 11nd Henry Mc- Guirk that you and Peter Slncluir—- Clem. of them?

THE COURT. You med not go A_Yes' I said I was absolutely that argument. But: the questions any further with that; question. I

'll£\\'C 1111a you that any conversat- Q__D,d you m, nnymng about was Yul" ludilement the other day iciis with John and Henry McGuirk Inrc not evidence, and you should

MR. JOHNSTON: What about thc statements you allowed this

THE COURT: I disallowed all the MR. JOHNSTON: ‘N... 1111111 he l "mu COURT: 1 115111-11 him i: he knciv anything about the posses- sion of liquor by Albert McGulrk,

and he said no. Then why are you

Q-(Mr. Johnston): How many itimes have you seen Mr. Tweedy n-

THE COURT: Don't: answer that WITNESS: I didn't: see him THE COURT: You need not nus-

MR. JOHNSTON: (To witness): You say you only saw him the ﬁrst

THE COURT: He didn't say that. You made that statement. MR. JOHNSTON: I understood . __._

scouting this, and he said Murdock _ _ AIacDonaId, and I went; to sec him. THE COURT :Yol1 needn't.

A—Hcnr_v and, John and inysc1f.

Q——\_'Vhcre vi':is__lic?

A—Over in the Provincial 13111111- at 11w because you didn't set the

ion.

Q--(Mr- Johnston): Did Y0" threaten to sell John McGuirk out? 11-1 would like to m Mme money he owes mo. Q-You didn't answer the ques- ion. 'I‘HE COURT: You needn't ans- wer the question. Q-You don't; want to tell these things? A-I am not ashamed to tell any- thing. You have nothing against: me at all. -

1-

Q-When John McGuirk and

down .1n Montague?

1 _ he has been permitted ‘ m ask cm” Examination by Mr’ Holmes’ them. I want the same privilege.

THE COURT: You know, in dlr~ milk 01' cream. And what a

______% JUNE 24. 1931 DTiT-“i - "'“-——~ -'='-r:_-_-_- THE COURT: This is a dlﬂerent matter. The only question: Mr. h Holmes asked were about McGuh-k. W a t MR. JOHNSTON: But all these conversations will end up with Mc-

I . Gun-k. t v Q-(Mr. Johnston): Did you tell _ a

him that you had 80h a man or!

‘l 11m. MONBILL: Object! .9031’, 56th)’ ‘PI-IE COURT: Don't answer that g ' (i; Z | question. . " ?°?' MIR- JOHNSTON: Mr. Holmes R has been asking questions, and ICE KRIS

'_ ' ruzs vrlsr,» they actually p

ﬂavor! Crun h ' . ect examination you are not; en- _ c Y r100 grain; Henry MclGulrk ‘were atmyouz? of- "ﬂed to this‘ --[Qa§[ed gone" crisp! ﬂee did t ey ma e any H?! o N_ ha n . - . , A_Yes‘ they told me they MR. J HNSTO . I ve o en Rice Krispies are ﬁne for

wouldn't: vote for me.

Q—Dld you say to them you were c

argued belore your Honour that any meal. Give 1h

Only the other day. I advanced

:oss examination was diﬂerent.

h clear.

them having a bad reputation in Charlottetown and you wouldn't have anything to do with them? A-They threatened to go out

right, I don't want you to vote for may

wouldn't have anything to do with

in this very case.

Q Dld you ten them you they had any relevancy?

‘ford? bedtgme snack. l; o 1 est. ad to be material, you said. That awe: packargierf

THE comm": 1 think that was a, L°nd°"' 0"t“"'°-

good Judgement.

MR. JOHNSTON: Very well. Were . and vote against me. I mid: “Au Mr. Holmes‘ questions material or

relevant?

"rt-m COURT: 1 don't. see that! RICE

suppressing any charges? 5a A-Ycs- _ ' to MR. JOHNSTON: NOW I claim

was raid. and I would like to have yo

THE COURT: Go on.

Rc-dircct Examlation by Mr. of

Q-Wlll you tell us now whether to you threatened to sell John Mc- to

body and bones?

could he tell that? MR. JOHNSTON: Don't l-nter- tor Q—(Mr. Johnsbon)—You have Mr

A —(N0 answer.)

A-(No answer.)

you allow them? I a-m asking the

H i ht t quire as m what THE COURT: Well, I can't grant ie rg o en

. examination. a ruling on that point’ Q-(Mr. Johnston): Did you do

this? Dld you tcll John McGuirk— THE COURT: Quite a number

Johnston you- Q (Mr. Johnston): Dld you say

Guirk out? Did you go to John soaked before Tweedy? l\IcGuirk's house and tell him If MR. MCNEILL: object-l

he didn't withdraw the subpoena THE COURT: Don't; answer! against you in connection with this Q-(Mr. Johnston): Did you say eiise that you would sell him out. that: to any of the McGuirks? ‘THE COURT: It ls not: admis- MR. HOLMES: There was not sable. any subpoena ‘against; him. How MR. HOLMES: He shouldnt be allowed to make these statements

Jere. Q-(Mr. Johnston): After you saw . Tweedy did you see John Mc- told 11s these things under cross cx- Guirk again? aniinatioii. Now iin-wer my qucst- THE COURT: Now Mr. Johnston. MR. JOHNSTON: This Is not a

conversation. It: may bc very re- Q-—Il1 the presence of M1". Af- levant. fleck, did you not siiy that? Q—Dld you want to have these ' prosecutions changed to another MR. JOHNSTON: You are not: offense? ~

MR. JOHNSTON: Then Why 11111’ KRISPIES I

me privilege that was extended Mr. Holmes.

u the same privilege In direct

times. I have already instructed

Albert McGulrk that it he came J. J. Johnston he would be

1

the press.

EYE so °P in

_ 0m I

children for supper, €nlig$ usy a TQd-zind-

ro - grocer. Made by Kenllog};

"I say, Briggs, don't; mu pm. m; your ivifc out with you in the cur?"

“No fear. I can't conti-t both of 'cn1 together." Echo.

1d “um ‘i111? rpool

dumb. WITNESS: Docs this concern the case, your Honour? THE COURT: No, but; Mr. Holm- es has opened the door for evid-

ciice concerning the conversations. Q. (M1". Johnston): Did you tell John McGuii-k that If he did not ivlthdraiv the subpoena that had been issued and served upon you,‘ you would sell him out? A-Well, I asked John McGuti-k why was I drawn into this mat- ter. I didn't sec why I should be. Q-Answcr the question.

continue to disobey the ruling of

s. remedy.

Q-—t1\'lr. Johnston): Did the Mug"- islratc suggest to you that ch13 charge ivoulrl be changed 1° a

THE COURT: Objection sustain- cd.

of the Court-

dlnn newspaper, bill; I can answer crery question. I have nothing to

stand that you do not; pay any attention to theevldcnce already

THE COURT: It is all ruled out.

THE COURT: No. it ls not; not;

MR. JOHNSTON: ‘That; Is be-

1 MR. IJCNEILL: I object to that. THE COURT: The objection is siistniiied.

I i‘ t, Q-lIe caliic with 1711i?

'" 1DDIIBLE DOLLAR DAY SPEDIALS

AII (‘oats elwirln" I-‘I discount A few at h lII 1n" Q—Wh-V m‘! Yo" 3° HWY‘? A-I irantcd to lind out One rack I)rc,-»c~‘-. Crepe -m1I flzltin . .. . .. . $71.98

One ruck Summer I)i"c:~':<c:4 1'; I‘RI('I'}

Pour Minnnfu ink a warm dhh. Rub linimnm [zmly in; ilien lpply i1 “cording lo

you'll ‘got nlloﬂ

AIIOIIICI‘ assortment tr) clear zit .

Sweater Suits clearing at . ..

MR. JOHNSTON: Nothing that, voureli. or Mr. Clark and the pros-

ion as tﬂvlvllﬁthﬂ‘ you have juris-

diction to licar this case. ls to be conversation, it is a question oi’ ‘ admitted? fact.

MR. JOHNSTON: 1 understand o.‘ Albert McCluirk's possession of your Ilonoris ruling to be that I liquor. I» I A -Johii czinic with me: in i1 HUI; "M tzlllicéaﬁrlllntttapd :0 nifﬂtlzﬁ: 1 iri ncss, i r. .1". s o w t down to Mr‘ Twccd-vs he interviewed the Magistrate or pose to deal with both cases. Al- thc prosecutor with regard to these bcrtﬁs case as well as Henry's case? I L,pI'f)"0CllII0ll-§, and what he said to 1111a" . Jtlicm; ivhcthcr lie attempted to " the fine. was. II.‘ said it WOlIIlI hc= y, _ _ won or mm‘. I Vkpd who “W; prollllltﬁﬂfhf‘ in this case o1 not. Is ' J‘ " ‘ ‘ that coircct? ivltncrs when he should know bet- THE COURT: 'I'hat is correct. tcr.

came to Charlottetown did you pur-

that he persists in examining the

cciitoi", that might raise the qucst- tlnuc.

THE COURT: It ls because there is no evidence glvcn by this man

Q (Mr. Jolmstoru-Whcn you

MR. HOLMES: Objection. THE COURT: I‘ am surprised

THE COURT: Please don't con- ln

MR. JOHNSTON: That. ls not

was just a bit. of dirt and thcn I told him—

charge of consuming liquor illcg- 5°11 mm Out? _ ally? ~' " " ' A-Ycsfihad got to get my MR. MCNEILL.‘ I OIJJCCE. money-

WITNESSK I Suppose the ruling cause I started of! and left him.

sworn to by Mr. Clark? convention?

in any Court. away oﬂ‘ on something else.

cause the case is against Albert, Minister of Public Works that this ls it? was said?

at all, that he had any knowledge him out?

ly false, every word of it.

Gulrk, to Charlottetown. A-He came in with me.

didn't. you?

Q (Mr. Johnston): Did you see‘ him in the night before? took nlﬂcc between Mr. clnrk 11nd John McGuh-k after that?

A-—He asked me if I was going he get a lift in.

Q-Dld you tell him not to go near Mr. Tweedy until you had seen

A-I said: "Why 11m I driuvn in-

MR. MCNEILL: OblIeCII

ton- MR: JOHNSTON: All right.

Gulrk, made similar statements.

have been in the possession of de- fondant was not produced In Court.

said ln part: "I was prepared to

emphatically having any liquor in his possession, or having drunk any liquor on thc night in question. Henry McGuirk and Joseph Mc-

The bottle cf liquor alleged to

In summing up, Mr. Johnston

to this matter?" I told lilm this

Q—Theri you told him you would

Q—-What did McGuIrk say? A-Hc didn't. say anything be-

A-No, no; he is lying.

Q-And furthermore that you $200 and 905$ 0 11t- ashamed of 111 111i In this cnse. would be put out or the Legum- MR. JOHNSTON: Do I under- We?

A-He is lying. -Q--Was he a delegate at your

establish before your Honour, the fact that, these men were asked to Day a small fine of $10, that the charge would be converted into a case of consuming liquor. and they refused to do so that they might be got oft.

ence or that.

Q-Did McGutrk tell you that 1r 51"" out from iwttin THE COURT: It IS not material. You did he WQUICI 113W? Y0" up for WITNESS; ‘He thinks 1m 15 go. a prohibition otlcnse, for treating ing to get something for The Guar- 111m 01'! YOUF "Ominﬂllﬂﬂ dill’?

cnce in: that-ls why.

prosecution.

.la'll .

should b‘? I" 9V"? household. Stops

011 the ground

THE COURT: ‘There is no evid-

MR. JOHNSTON: Because I was g the evid-

MY- MCNQIII summed up for the The Court fined the defendant

r three months in

IIDDUEIRS’ Egyptian Liniii-icnt

A-I think he was, yes.

Q-On the same day did you Ewaymﬂammﬁtwﬂ mid MR. JOHNSTON: It is not nec- take M1". McGuirk In on your shop cssnry, then, to contradict him in Premises» beam’ m” convcmlﬂn. this Court? and give him a. treat?

MR. MCNEILL: I object. This is Q-Wasut it In the office of the A-What?

Q-Jfhat you threatened to sell A—N0.

Q-That you gave him the treat? A-No: nothing to it. Absolute-

Q-You came in with John Mc- Q—Wcll, you came in with him, A-Well, I owned the ciir.

Q-Had you arranged to take

the next morning. He. said could

YDIIR OIIILD

often work Wnnderg,

“—_“——————__.

THE COURT: Now, Mr. Jol1ns-

Albert McGulrk, the defendant in‘ the case. was next sworn. He denied

on}

lot $ttu|ii1l_ Handicapped

The seeming stupidity o: many school children, l; directly chargeabh

I fall"? vision. o

Correctly fitted glasses

Ha"? Your lchild’s

eyes examined

from Montreal

$2805

from 'l‘or0nt0

First Tour

leaves MONTREAL - July 10th ' 22 days

I leaves TORONTO - juiy ilih ‘

21 days Second Tour

21 da ‘s All Expense Riucs From MONTREAL $111) and up‘

Prom TORONTO - $_)0S11ii1lul'_‘

Rate! from» oihcr poims ~11 npplicaiiun.

I/Iuslmlrd book/r! ‘may be air/lull!‘ om: c. A. ADAMS, 11.11. - Granhr- 0-w-

I I MARTIN KERR. B.A., 4 Beulah Ave.

Ihnuhon, Om. . A. l-I. BRYSON. 44 Silverilinrnc Arc- , TOIOIIKIL-Qllf. Ma"! 0r any aicnt n]

' 1 HARDWOOD FLDDRIIIG

-v¢‘__.>

Bountiful Birch and 01K ‘m’ loading 0M!!!- Ml thicknellﬂ

ALL - Expense Escorted Tours

Nothing to worry aliniu. Fvcry Iast- derail looked alter for you. AII you do is sit balk and enjoy to the luII the scenic gems of} (Ianadlfs great west. jasper; Minaki, Ban”, Lake IMIIISL‘, the’ Canadian Rockies and the IWJU‘) tifuI cities of ilic Pal-ilk (J1me, -—- Vancouver, Victoria. Princei Rupert, Seattle. ()[YIIIIII.’II side, trip to Alaska at additional lust.

- Leaves MONTREAL - July-Hill I 22 days

1‘ leaves TORONTO - Jill)‘ 15th,, I .

Wholesale prices on all ntIr-r 1,1131!)

_ ‘IT-IE COURT: It would not bc evidence, Mr. Johnston.

The llogiic.

rule's attitude In this case is not

MR. JOHNSTON: The Mnrglst- what value It would have.

THE COURT: Unless it is rel-

MR. JOHNSTON: Dld you see

Mr. Tweedy ﬁrst? A—Nc. cvant to this matter I don't sec Q-Dld nu see Mr. ‘Tweedy?

F. Gordon Hutcheson

F. IIIITGIIESOII """"°'" '°'°"""°

from.

MR. MCNEILL: We object to this MR- JOHNSPON: This ls not. evidence? John McGuh-k after that? I: that convex-cation.

THE COURT: If you have any question ruled out?

grounds Ior-nblcctlon tn thajur-

MR. MONEILL: It is not evid- THE COURT: Yea. - @1100-

Optometrists-At your . service. . ‘

MacDOIIALIJ-IIOWE

woonwoaxmo cm LT"-

one Ml Chlﬂoﬂeldﬂ '