8. -Phillips, E.G. "Unive— rsity Standards" in Unive—

rsities Quarterly, vol. 13, May 1959, pp. 283-286.

9. Rubin, Jerome. "An Innovation in Academic Te— sting" in Improving Colle— ge and University Teaching, vol. 18, Autumn 1970. p.305.

10. Westland, Gordon. "The PhiloSophy of Student Ass- essment" in Universities Quarterly, vol. 23, Summer 1969, pp. 350—360.

11. Yates, John C. "The Finals ,.. God Bless 'Em" in Educational Review, vol. 84, Jan. 1970, pp.67-68.

N.B. Items 4 & 8 are to be found in the Vertical File in the Reference Room und— er the heading: EXAMINA- TIONS -- COLLEGES AND UNI— VERSITIES.

The purpose of this letter is not to critisize, but to ’outline a real problem ab- out which the student body is well aware, and perhaps. someone can come up with feas1ble solution. The proL blem being that the student parking lot is not safe.I‘ Many incidents of theft ha— ve been reported to the Security Police but nothing has been done to stop the thieves. Three men in the New Residence have had tape players stolen from their cars, a man in Memorial lost his car battery/to a crook and another person actually had two snow tires taken off his car and repl- aced with two bald tires! My tape player was.also ripped off last Monday, so the criminals are still going strong. My car doors

"were locked but this pre- sented no problem as the robbers apparently had pl- enty of time to work. This due to the fact that app- roaching cars or persons can easily be detected from the parking lot.

The Security Police, along with the college should be held responsible for thefts in the student parking lot. I realize that the Police have only one patrolman on night duty and that theyf are doing their best. How— ever we are forced to park in the student lots because we receive tickets for pa—

rking elsewhere and our Cars are ransacked when we do park there. Certainly a solution must exist: either more patrolmen, better 11— ghting or even a closed circuit T.V° camera have been suggested. But as it now stands, eVery car in the student lot is open ga— me to these thieves who obviously are doing a pro- fitable business.

mg ' ‘CAORE’.’ TUEs. ."Nov. 27;" 1973' .Paqe 5

gEMMWE “Wmnnummm , To MAKE LIFE .ABflMuE COMFORTABLE -4bswnt ‘ warm r11!

_If action isn't taken soon perhaps the students should' vacate the student lot and

‘park elsewhere on campus:

like behind the dorms or next to the Security Office? then maybe the situation will improve.

Kip Puiia

Mr Editor:

While reading your respo- nse(in the Oct. 23rd issue of the Cadre) to my letter, for awhile I did not know whether to believe that I was"holding the paper" or knew I was holding it. In fact I was not even sure for a moment whether I really knew I was even reading yo- ur letter or was only bel— ieveing that I was reading it. Or perchance dreaming-— Nay, there was no rub, for in that sleep such dreams mgy come when we have "shu— ffled off" all rationality. It gave me pause-and soon I was back in touch with reality-—- after all there was no way I could deny the "reality of reality"--for very long. You were certain— ly lucky to have "extracted such criticism". With a li- ttle more luck, I have faith that you can still be saved from drifting away too far from the realm of rhyme and reason. Now that I have ar— ticulated my faith, I hope you will Egg the resulting knowledge for self—benefi— cial purposes.

At first I had only belie- ygg that your philosophy (expressed in the Glass in- terview) was an instance of the tyranny of words and a call for HELP. Now I know. Interesting of how the ar- ticulation.of my belief (in

my previous letter) finally

resulted in knowledge! In other words, your articula- tion of your faith in your belief about belief and kp- owledge has only strength- ened my faith,in my belief that your knowledge about faith, belief and knowledge is really only your faith. It's only because you've articulated it, that it gp- pears to you to be knowled— ge. The fault lies not in your stars but in your ep— istomology, which makes you believe that you can artic- ulate your way to knowledge.

Heal Thy Philosophy and W The following comments are meant to corr— ect the articulations of your faith which you mista- kenly believe to be know- ledge.

1. All these combinations are logically and psycholo— gically possible: a) you can have faith ip you know— ledge as well as knowledge gf your faith b) belief in your knowledge or knowledge pf your beliefs and c) kn— owledge pf knowledge--one who knows and knows what he knows.

2. Articulation of your faith, belief or knowledge makes these communicable -- but does pp; change their logical or psychological status.

3. Finally, when one loses the ability to know (and discriminate) the condition in which he is knowing from the condition in which he is believing-—he becomes a case for a certain type of institution. Dialogpe—— I or Thou? With the faith, beliefs and knowledge that you are entertaining at pr- esent, even a Socrates, we— re he invited, would rather go for the hemlock. And Bu— ber would have withdrawn into his 'I'—-leaving "thou' forever! Then there is this strange ambition that some have to die with their boots of sanity on.

With no apologies this ti- me, but still in good faith (gosh!--but the articulation of my faith makes it know— ledge--therefore I may be denying the reality of re— ality of good faith--so that I should really not express my faith--but I know it i§_in good faith——there that should set it right—— since now I am only artic-

ulating my knowledge—-but then does that make know- ledge something else--I wonder? See what your phil- osophy has already done to me-—my sanity, my sanity—— a kingdom for my sanity!) Wishing you all the luck you will need. Yours truly with the courage of my con- victions! M.M. Rahman - Dept. of Psychology- U.P.E.I° _

¢on't to pg.6