...~~.~ ...RHN refrlltll-"rilnatlzwg o.’

_ >ry ..- 1a.. .*..F..T:_- .. . ‘ ' - - » I om‘ YOUR SEATS NOW FOR THE . l INTERESTYNC CASE = MAE ‘EDWARDS PLAYERS ‘ l a - w 1 OF CONTESTED WILL 1 A“ N” PLAY‘ o °“°“E““"‘ . .1 l I - - V AUDEVILLE -— POPULAR PRICES ' i . _ .. . . _~ ~-- ---T"tT-~'_ 1 ‘ i "'I'his is the loot will and testn- I Lfuch. nferest centered In the fol- mam of me Ame“ Mcwuulm5_ Mk 1 A __ . _ glowing Judgments delivered on Sept.‘ Iy of Charlottetown, bpt new uf West l - . | 9th in the supreme court in the mat- - Gill? in l>rince county. Prince Ed- - l . ' l .. . . 1 'a'd 1:1 1. c. t1 " 1 -_-fi_-_-_-fl-:,~- =_-..<.-A--_____ -_ ,-----—-__~_-__--_~.-_:___..__ —-— . - "'=* 1 1.‘ z Prmfla Edward .1." °‘ h’ w“ "1 ‘m? “m1”? “'11 dircqcrtrthatenollzmggly Just debts others vrlsenve. nfllx our puma as ‘ " ‘ ' "l. ' . lj .: , 1151115‘ w" M west cape m “m”: funeral and testamentary expenses ‘Mlflesei- 1118B In!!! lb! tllfilttfll n! thl tee- f Q O ' b’ I F - °°‘““1' 1“ P““°‘ ““'“'°'Ji1““"- 13'1"“ Pflld m". of my welt by my b- ‘Slld-l BUT" MCWNALD tetor he drew tho meat will. which 1- * t . . _ _ _’ 4, JAMES a 02111114910111 - a . . " lPéase-d tesletc- The nerves to lhqeffflmls 1lFl°1t1‘*‘“°;“"‘l°F1-t I Tm W“. w” mm‘... m cnmmnnh in lteell Iran prml of the sound f l‘ 3' 1 1 s E1111! ‘flare wlgmghlvels?“ Mcwflmmts 1 Dhew nxlllllaame lyenlsomnaglllétlhflxfiisngf formumd P11111816 lhéfeyvl Blamed $91 mflno ’ o’ m‘ ‘auto’ n“ M‘ at" - 1 “ ~ - 311‘ “m5 ' ‘““1’1°11 “s "M" "1 wen capt- Fur-hie: and Motley M . ~ fuf attention to the cleansed canal " l . . ~ ‘ ' ' . l " l: th xecutois therein named on the - “ h . . .. . . - . ‘m’ °1 11" 11”“ “"11 "1 1111"“ 14°‘ Bell of Summerside ln stud county. q a lion of the heneflctarlea aince t2 . . g nor-cu. T-cuv-“nonq. Wm“ d H L‘ M Ham“ luamaw m b n, Ex w‘ 2nd day of April A. D. 192a. _ . 1 _ mi. dawns: . IPPE all . I ~ 9 l 9 fi F _ , . _- Bell will had been matte. Two 1.;

1 I 1 I beau“ "h" Edward ‘mam is 1mm Liqsmne respondent qrs of this my last will and Testa- On the Petition qf Mps. Jone Lid w” mm d m ‘he B," ‘m u e

.' l " _ " ~" ' , , ' f . ment. 1 st n . a niec of th testato d one e 1 - 1e‘ ‘“"

l 1 é‘ sealed with a rout ofsuperfnr gal- I Followmsds the ‘text o1 the iudg ‘ “I devise and bequeath [mm my arch; heirs and “it or- 11: cm“ mmed from m’ m,‘ “ML one’ m?

l f 1 rantzing locking out the koiet- i "W"! O5 C1"?! Jlllllcf bl-llhletvlli _ nephew Stewart Mcwiiliams of West “on was issued out o! mg'prob W testator said because he was now 1n‘

. ‘ , n are. =I1d locking in thi- llllrtllty 1 h September 111110. ‘Cape the sum of Five Hruuared Dol- court 08mm “pan m: e ecmm 4m bemr clrcumnmcu‘ ‘m. m. other f‘. “M” I

1 that renders long life. and tie- 1 1"“ 1-‘ 1"‘ 11119531 11°11‘ m“ 111d? Inf’ ‘$1,901,111 1‘ y voppeared to have been Paid off. e

; . , 11 d b.“ "m" or m Honour [he Jud c m- Iclevise 11nd bequeath u11to my ne- prove the will in solemn form, which _ - ‘ ‘ e

k z p. a pen :1 11.v. :p bl’ I $ u P ‘me Lv. ‘tthich phew sgymoul. Maw." o, w,“ Owe proceeding resulted m the decree op '1hc proof up to this point show‘, _

» . ; r 11 or 11s 1'0‘ e ‘_ -‘ - . ' 1 - - =

1 1 . °' P1111111" D1“31'“'15RY 590110117101 and dew-owl mu the wiu QZ..TF."‘.Z15OTE‘Q°. Hunqmd and may l 111° su-"psaw Judge o‘ mxum’ new ' a 119511?“ cmtipmrp 112d aplmrtinu“

1 u < 1. v 1o’ we Sflld Alfred hlC\Ull1ll1|In‘ dated "I (iv-Vise and bequeath unto my 3111131“ b53111“ by 1'11‘ exwuvars" ‘we. e ‘a; ‘um w - e m1)’ 01.“.

1 ' - ' l tl QRDER 10'1"“ It‘); 7 . d I Feb A 1M5 nephew John Amos Coufllilifi of During the time when the lnstruc~ I he 1w‘ Mm one "f h“ new‘ o‘ H“ 1 11 , '1‘ lax! gm: Odlnutleuailfould be sellcampbellton the sum of {no I-Iund- I tum; m. the “m were bums swam} whom he 11nd fllWflY-i rlriarded and

5 = R T . A m‘ l: L - £1 I mm red aéld HftydD;llerst<i8':-10.00.) _ M“ 90cm‘, ‘lope was prawn with; treated 13s his son. There unqer me -_ . I I ‘asue. rm pro a e 101110 w -~1 i a _ . _ niece l -' - -‘ _

g 1C I was granted to the executors named cm11ZL1'¢1\Z.1.1.-pn§111 fat hcgfnybellton 111' 195131111“ The 11111" “'55 111W 9°11‘ tlfgfxlgdcztrso! 211:‘ Sign .3211:

P1 i .1 Summerside-(‘horlmtrtnwn lumrcin on m, and My o. May “D ‘the sum of ’I‘\\'o Hundred and Fifty ed in and the iestator signed the lttendan“ hge lppnréd Pwmha“! ail

t_‘. ’ .1 .. _ . , Dollars $250001. lwill with his mark In the presence " _

F o‘ 11923 <nou1u be ICSCJIGCI. and that n1 defise and bequeqth unto my,“ the doctor and nurse “.110 were- the freedom possible t: a man ln hi5

3 . W119 "$15 5111111111 11¢ P316 1111i Q1 111° nephew Wallalrc hfcNcill of 805E011! _ , 'condi'.ion. Why should a will made in _

*5 . l l"? estate to both the petlziuner. Mrs. Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars 111959111 a1‘ the séme Lme- _ such condition; not b, uphfld In the

1* i 1 British and Chinese delcsatzs t= blowout». and to the etecutors. 13350-001- 1f 80:; ‘Se? “lining: lteshfiid a?‘ ilbsrute of undue influence or fraud? ' ' “ 1

f 1 - l: ._, .. ore eugeo roaeaso e _ , ~ _ .

E . 1 =1 1§g..:2if.:$.f..'t.i:;: ...:'.:.:.:1:1'. "Y m. l» ~l ~11 .6‘ S’...‘.‘Z.“‘".'.' .11’: “We "a" "ever ‘W’ belle’ FM 1"" l" bell" C0"- . . - ~- ‘ ' ' " i ~ 1 ~ ..t l1 ts 1 .1 hremcver . l .111 ell-n in S - - -

E l 1 m league cnvziinni i11 n form that would Alfred lvlcwilliams, e farmer liv- srjiuaattez ‘lsigevfigahngnbeqffveseth unto in“ ‘ma’ Dr‘ chlmplon Smd _11‘a‘1|~.,n,ed Jud" of Prob”. m“ m", dltlon! We 15 due to your In!‘ 11 . l" 5c "u" ‘111 “l”- 1"°1 5° ma“ 1"" m: It West 0111c in this Provlnmymy field lwlmé" wimam Nelson m. hb 11111111111111 6011mm w“ an 1111111111 were "circumstances of wiPlPloh lnflfll FOX BiSCI-litfie" 1

‘ ‘ 1' > ‘o that would have appeared to be h q g 1m 134%.. gcquj- d “Wvilliams nbiflllltfily- 119111155 15 m "11 “T15 111711113 - 111° 3 “a 1. ' - E3. . '1 1 l? :1; odd c: mauon. and even today Viflllliéilfiafifflslg of 0112:1500 acregeaud “IN WITNESS WHEBEOF I MW Same as 31111811511, and he had known 1 L111} 311111111118 111111111811 ar\'l?l."‘l'111u'1sl1o): I b 1 ' ' ' ' f 1 1‘? l u it l! not without its peeuliurifieo when he died r11 the 221111 dny 0f 5811:“, lhindDmlciliéeiu mu 30m d“ 118m for twgmy yew-s. "His memall 31111 fiihuagllldl 18f “Mu it! T18 0V6 1s an ‘testlrnony 1on1 one nf 1 : 1a ‘ '” ' ‘ ' of pri . . '. . . ‘ _ . cc 1' 1 o 1o pres mp on y - u

1 l’ "“""‘ " D" ‘m ‘° m‘ ‘“' "s“‘““" “m” ’“"““‘§°‘ t“? l 11111:“; 115$??? Tiff! "mi ‘Ff n" t......~.....= fiYld ........... .1 1... 0111' Island s leadme Fox Ranches. wluch has an Inter- ... - l‘dbtl Are; we e e.-~v\' 51*.“ .. . . ' - .' . . .- 1’ ”‘ X°..'I§i’"...7.§*'§.§“..'IIZ§ZZZ"’§ZZ T.“ fiilvlifind ..‘§..i‘.‘.’£“‘..“%'.‘.‘.l c. n. ......- 1...... Miss R... Mcuonalcl °~"~~'“; 1'" “"1" "1 **=“""~" llfltlollal lovutatlon fol highest class foxes. and ulhlch “ cl , l v - 1* ' * - ' ' ‘ .- ' _ - u. ‘ _ ‘ _ _ ' of the ncunwnt find cgpgcity _f t‘ - - - ~ -

1,11‘. n: FOR ucd at 5:50.110 anrl his personal pro- I:1‘;vguufflgoglefigfgzgé‘ gulf. jvhofntrtenolnd fiom‘ tcflatsh" ‘1. fegdg Impepla] FOX Blseults hbvglvally, 115mg- at lgast one i. M r . perry at $48.2l9-74, with practically time, who, qt hi; request and in his . c 931mm; D 1s B“ 1 “as m1 I_n coming to such nlconcluslw‘ and one half tOnS lTlQnthly.

31* a sh 11° “*1” oreseiwe and the presence of etwll 11"’ °"°1--“‘"1' 1“ 1° 111‘ mam“ °°“'11-arn¢d Judee of Probive 1 1 ' 1

1'1 Pure Island. Nova scotio and Que- He had for e considerable timelfihel’ 1'11"‘.he_1€u21'o subspubed 01111111110111 1'11“ she 1.0mm mm mute, "verlookeei an ecsental fact FGBd “Im 8111313” 1'8 11131’ y and llberall lll O

g 5p Nfl- 3"“ "Panwh- 111"" ""1" lbecn a member nf the Lcg'slature 0f names ijgéfifrgzle“ BFLL char‘ pelfpcfly pawn“ an me d“ ‘h'1t "knoil l c and lPDItHll ' l

v ' ‘ . 1 . . . , -l ‘Ac-z; _ _' l ~ . . . . ' ‘ .

- ten-u a no, _ _ u... P,..,....,,,, m appears m havellslld 1H MEL ‘UL-Mm t... w.“ w... made. .1 week or twobc- m] m; or L.“ {,1}. M m i faut-h and secure the same g1 atlfylllg‘ iesults. . . . . . . ._ . 5511M“ w51‘113°'\- 1 . ' lfore he died his mind would some- ' 1‘ 1 Ty“, \';||¢y_ [been a shrewd and capaole man. In l _ Y, _ _ _ (-4.33 depm-d "p4," a llpnesun, I? ' l d. fl W . t ' _ I. ' t 14g7.1g.1_gg 1905 he married a widow M“ “fing- (Sqdp ALFRED Mcwflfhfhl/IS times wander. VOthcr mtnesses. 111-, n w” prov“ by evidence m. u" O] S8 Q by 1511]] )UtOlb 11'] 1G3.‘ 111g’ Gen 1E5 O1 C11 3C, ‘—“ 1°“'- H15 11°u§911°1d 111$" 1119111171911 1115 In me mu M 1927 Lam-fie‘. vwwd 011mm“ 1111151 “Hmam N31501: Mc‘1v1l'.cn11cl11"i'.'e kinri. vlzn that tnr ffflm FaQtOFY tvne her son Bert by her former his niece. Mrs. Lidstone. and accord- llama. testified to the llpc effect. -- > ‘

_ ..._ _..... ....--.--.__..-__~ .._-.-e.-..._

POTATUES ‘All! TURNIFS

We will he buying Potatoes and Turnips every dgy at our Warehouse. Hogan‘: Wharf.

J. L. DOUGLAS

Warehouse Phone I119

fifififliffififillilfliflifrlbfibhbfi)

M Queen Street London, E, C. l. Englnno

Shipping hep will he furnish- ed without charge b! ennlyh: In B, T. flolwan. Ltd. Sum- merafde. P. E. l.

die-presented by

Alfred Fraser. Inc. 212 Flflh Avenue New York. N. I.

marriage. his nephew William Nel~ son McWilliams, herlnafter called “William Nelson," and from time to time some other relatives and ser- vants. It. appears to have been n large household. changing its mem- bers from time to time. the two con- stant members being Alfred Mc- Willlams and William Nelson. B:- ltwecn these two e special relation appeared to exist. The Judge of Pro-

son testified "Alfred McWilliums

| that the testatnr 011 the day or about

and property. "that he had adopted him as his own. that he alwpys rc-g carded him. 8s his own boy."

Removal tn (‘hnrlottefown

Wort Cape to Charlottetown and with: his wife took up residence there. H's. wife died in September I925. but he, continued to reside in Charlottetown

t,v and returned to West Cape to live with William Nelson. h’: wife and [family in the dwelling house m1 the old homestead. which had been con- vlYOfl by the testator to William Nel- son by deed dated July 5th. I899. There he appeara to have kept his books of nccount and documents and in a room described as his office tn have transacted his business as a money lender. H: had been accus-

periodically to the farmhoine to meet his client's and debtors there. end after the sale of his

ing to her account remained about

1925 and remained until about the‘ 4th of February 1928. On that datel

three weeks“ He returned in January 1

tents of the w ll were dlctaw-ci the tesirt-r t1 the person who d1‘: it. that lt was a substtuta for the "Bell 1‘.'1ll." (hr validity of which had

lptervlm‘ With Tcstutnr

On the day the will was mode the

he returned to his old home. where 1 Pet tllmel‘. Mrs. LldSt-One. he remained until he died on the 22nd ‘ brother, David Coughlin. had an I11‘ day of April, 1928-: period of f1 terview with testatoi‘ and found m week,“ lMr-s. Lidstone says in her evidence

on (m. 13th o; Febyuafy 1933 the "that he appeared real well. Hls men- leztatm- being ill, Dr. champion was tal condition appearedvgood." Lusi- called ln to attend him, Under the ly tl1o Jildga of Probate found that

and her .

not been quextionad. It accords wLh the d-xlaratinus of intention mac‘: by testatsr before 1111:! after its exe- Jlmnn to the mflmhera of his house- llfllil. as well as to the doctor. the

i Phone 121. I

1mm» and otllfv-I. and is substen-v§h§=gfi—m"—nf—}fi=g§{kcupt_ hi;

fVallr tlwjmw as b‘: lost will made l bu“ ‘ppomud Chaim,“ o; m, 1n the omen cf his solmtor in thel

Imperial. ' Riocuit Co., Limited

Lfharloitetown, P. E. I. - ' Box 446;

T127351 rfiblTTtTlii-a“ ‘I e

thet hp might have ‘given the testqt- of the authorities e clearer .n_..'t11_'(,

The fnct of the Bell svill Bllllcars

was made. The nurse testlfled that

_the time the present will was made ill? lflfitillfil‘ 551d 1W UIQUShi 1° “"13 we Wm

Terms of New W;ll

On the 27th day of March I928. Dr.

' 1- th t "- ~ 2 » In 1912 the testator removed from 1 Champion. who had been summoned mg mm a mmnnqmnc 1 J“ “"1"

by William Nelson apparently for that purpooz. attended at the tentat- 01"s bedside gnu took lnstructions frpzn him to prepare a IIEW will. Dr.

Morley Bell had previously drawn his will but that it hftd been mislaid and could not be found and that the will he was about to make was in- tended to replace it. He then dio- tatad to the Doctor the terms of the will. calling attention to a slight var- iance between it and the former will. The will ls in the wordfi following:

1th; provisions of the will should he, "met-l 01 Fvvruflrr

w. “mun-Han an that’ day he was sap . ourcl TCIJHVCS but the large gifts

r-rfujrsl crrler of things that m. should have made such a will as is now in question. l

iurniuuegl by the person

prlllluundiug l

In this case it is contended on bc-1

“Cr H“: Wm’ was msuuluuml mTlllflllld be art. aside and the probate ‘procuring {he exvcutjon U‘ we ‘will tiirroef retctntlerl. The reasons arel ‘land had therefore the Q1111: cast upon , numerous and m" "511 1° 61355111131 him of removing tne su>p1einn aris-

Proof nfKnowlcdge i think the Courts ever vent so for as}

u, ham ma; . Demon in wlumm| Through proof of knowledge by the

“Mann-s pmmon‘ Wm, mew“, 5cm. tost-zter of the contents and future

for ‘the physician in attendance to] ‘11 11“ “1111 "@1115 n m? °°n°1"l1“'~

m", me mflintk-S M“ “nhom 8'3“ the Jifclge of Probate takes a difler-

the making of the xviil, should bc1 "11111111 11" 1"’ Tfiqlllllcs I utlmlne an plgqggj in m. same 99133313., a, one lizstrumeut in 111111211 the person ebo who dflw or caused to be drawn a 1-‘ 11l~‘t1"lm91"ll°1 1" l11'°P'-’~1‘1"F 1t 1‘ will in hi; 0W3 favour. There l; not, 1l1m51111 1W3"? 1191193191. 1 5M1 mill)’ ‘a pqrticle of evidence to show that cirfllllllililnfiti Whlch 814330“. that 1h: 1 William Nelson ever suggested what 1@‘""1'11-°1' ‘11'-1 ""11 "ill" "lit "It! rim‘ 87th was his r1111 I He doubtless had his expectalipns| ll" 1ll'~=ll<l l! l8 Sllfhi‘ lllld he qua as

~11 Allrttd McWlllinma of West oaoe:@nu_ m. hams and W°ll1‘1 11° 8mm" 11°11“ ‘"13" Y‘ P1480611. ‘lililll 6i

Prince Gounty. Province of Prince

by me made. I appoint William Nel- son Ivicwillfiams (with whom I re- side) and Dr. James B. Champion of

‘concerned that a will should be madcl L- T~~ N- 5» 5'13» ll" d-fvtum of sir

thirty end forty heirs 11nd next cf lkind to share in the estate in that

@111" to see thrt the tcstatar resolved PPJPPF find Independent edifice ctr-i

before ahe died. The Duncans claim-

mt v. Lawless 11... a. 2mm), 4091 nndl

. .- - . -» . - . the v-"lll was executed vrlth the uccés- gourd of Gu rdians for the work» or independent legal advice. This the present of proof that a tutltel

. l t b t ‘s. .11 t b; m t n v doctors mstiuctions the patient was l _ a.” _ __ v _ _ . I .. . . _ t . . .. l.

flu" M" own tisteatbtplifctqgd 1m ‘foltgrlngfatlier i: put to bed and a professional nurse. say-V mlmalll-fl-i. and from U16 W“ 11.101 71.111131?‘ ' was sh°w_nl1w115| 01111 11W 5900MB acquainted doctrine of independent advice is_knew the contents and effect of b1; qwwmwmmmnmm William Nelson 11m William m1 Miss Ruth McDonald, 011519241. fdcnce from both sides as to he. mcn- 11 m; symwhup, mam 511“ 1" 1*" l with Mary Bradley four or or: week; Tully dl-lwmd in the 11”“ °1 PM" l“’111~

Instructions for the will, that. she was not of sound mind. that she did

James Banner; to the Jury may have carried effective advice when confin- ed to such an atrocious case. but. as a statement of the general lew relat- ing to will; it ‘will mislead anyone who follows it.

The leernad Judge of Probate fol- lowing. it found that it was the duty of wllliqm Nelson to have endeavour-

tendanee of llt- Matthews. a sollilit-

‘I ' brought wmmm Nelson up and n“ m have been generally known m the fished that the tentator had testamen- i“; 11111311111 “:8 1411W‘5Y$l1‘pl;e311d‘gd under en earlier will and disput- Crelg v. Lamoureoux (L. R. 1920.1 Undue Influence s . . _ " . ,,. . a . lt-rry capocity. In the ordinary can Q a" ‘c1111 re We“ 111' 115 '11“r“ecl the irkpr will. The jury found A. 01.. 349). (*- M- Lflmnsnn a ('o" lgmded hm “s m" 5°11‘ that he a1‘ 11011981111111 “KL £1“ qufsum a‘ whew n11 further tr-cof is required to he 11°‘ w. "1" Ncbtm‘ I: 11'“ 1" melt! t in: ‘tlestatoi- did not we In the latter case the Suveme‘ Consldcrin next the ound of ua‘ uMrrf-ru. wvays lived with Alfred McWilliams.“ 1t 1.11m was ""1118 "flit". 1' ifllll°1l ’ 11‘ l 1‘ ' ‘ 1‘ 3 17‘ -

court of Canada had adopted the due influences. in the cese of 30m view that the validity of the will V- Rflfibmflllflli. (6 H- L.'C-. (Bl UN

l’ bliL‘ Auction Sales ‘l ld her that 1 1 " i t d d ‘in the roam down below which he _ . I HQ‘ 511°"! lllfi IPPYOW? 0! the con- there in question depended upon Cranworth lays down the accented u 0|- vvuunm um}... 1:». sllurvaeyshisnnitoniy called on 0510B." but 1t was not. w 1» 1"“ "1 11*“ llelll-"l-‘Y “I'll Wlllmlr- ...1;1.1,1p,.'111d1'z.m°“1. "1 H" ‘m1’? “1: tent: and that ltW-s obtained by uu- whether the hltibllld had dlschors- Iorlnclule thue: ‘Where once 1t bu “My "ms ‘ mumL‘ ' Nelson. the princpal beneficiary un; ‘ 1‘ a“ 1311'” 1:15 1'°1‘S°“5 “by 11.du_e influence. That charge of itr ad the burden which they held to be 'becn proved that a will held _

upon him of proving that his wife in executed with due eolcmniti M‘! making e. will in his favour had such person of competent underltlntttij complete pppreclation of the conse- land apparently a free 111ml. l!‘ uuences of her notion u probably lburden of proving that it Wu fit: nothing short of independent advice outed under undue influence o o! could heve given her. That view was the party who alleges it. Undul 1y negettved by the privy Council. flucnce cannot be presumed." _

Independent advice. legal or other. Tins doctrine is quoted with lo- wue. ts not e necessary factor in de- lprovol by Lord Penzance in Pnrfltté

. - - . , ed on the dey the will was made or termlning the question of whether a Lewless. where he says: "In tbl 99-25 until the olllllmn o! 1935 when he Ohampons msthnony ls that the in t _ _ H ‘mt View “d “y? “In ‘xmm I - . » _ . _ _ 5 ~ - 1 - h _ F ‘"1’ lmllhl-m“ i‘ W "l! 00"- ‘ 1’ nfterwapda to have procured the qt- |t tutor did or qid qt underetand -——--—--?——{—v ‘1151'°‘°‘1 "1 1115 chammzmw“ 91mm" m mm? 1mm “ed m mm 1' M Mr touts or interfering in any svay with 1 111" vigilance 11nd lellolwy with n n

th| nature end efleet of the conwnts Continued on Plge l2

_ _, , Edward Island. do hereby declare , bllt U18 evidence tapes up iwvthor. lilJ-lll"? Hilllltll. Wlwlfc he says: it ls . tnmed dllflnfl the Déllflfl o1 his fcsl- m, my 1,5. w." 3nd testament and certainly vras a em m “Nah ma,» . ti... My n, my ma“ who ‘xpms to come visit our ranch at Sununerside and see for yourself. dance in Charlottetown to return revoke all former wills and bequests | lacy w“ ‘mdnqirabl’ with mmpnlthag, a Wm 15 m b. “u” in h-s f“. l ‘ " ' ‘ * 1 1- - ‘