PAGE 12 ‘SPORTS
UNIVERSITY» OF PRINCE EDWARD
In an action-packed game, U.P.E.I. completed its bigwin oer M
é
.5/
ount
played his last game in collegiate football before turning “pro”.
U. P. E. i. Panthers Conquer Mount Allison
By Vic Renfro
The University of Prince Edward Island» Panthers fin- ished their first football sea.- son on a winning note as they dumped the Mt. Allison
University 28-0. The Panth- ‘
ers defensive unit was the 'only one able to hold the Mounties to threaten a score only once; the Mounties were held outside our twenty the entire game except once. ‘
The Panthers took th e opening kick-off and march- ed sixty yards for the first score. Panthers started the drive on our forty-yard line, and Jim Foley then gained a first down on two end sweeps. Next, split end Marty Cole
Seniors
snared a Foley pass and raced to the Mountie five. Half- back Dick Yost bulled in for the score.
Mount Allison posed! their only scoring threat of the game on their first series: of plays. Mt. A. had a first down and goal to go on the Panther eight. On a crucial third down play from: the three Mountie halfback Dave Church attempted to squeeze in, but was smothered by guard Dick Webber and tac- kle Albert MacDonald.
The Panthers missed a golden opportunity to score mid-way through the first quarter, as John Hurley set
up quarterback Tom Aitken and! picked off his pass on the Panther forty yard line, and worked his way back to the Mountie twenty-nine. Th e Mounties were called f o r rough play and the ball was advanced to the thirteen. Fullback J e r r y Lajeunesse rambled in for the major. Foley danced over the defend- ers for a two-point conVer- sin, and the Panthers lead 1 0.
On the Panther kickoff, Albert MacDonald walloped Don Hollaway and end Brian Conway came up with the loose ball on the Mt. A. twenty-eight. On first down
_ Foley beat the defenders to
Crush Juniors
llison Mount1es. St
lSLAND
\3
the end on a sweep and dodg- ed the Mounties up to the five yard] line. Foley handed off to Laj-eunesse for the score. Tight end Jimmy Burke snagged Foley’s pass for another twoepoint conver-
sion. The Mounties now trail- »
ed 22-0.
Coming back at half-time the Mounties realized that they would have to gamble on third down situations to win. Mt. A. took the second- half kick-off back to the twenty. Two rushes by Mountie halfback Holloway and one by Bruce McMillan picked up ten yards and the first down. Holloway darted ofif-tackle, only to be met by
ar of the game wa J1m ole who
NOVEMBER 21, 1969
Mike Darcy and Ken De Honney. Quarterback Aitken then hit Holloway with a short pass, but he ran into the cordial hands of Clete Dunn and Rod Schanf. On the important third down, Aiken was rushed by Ben Poirier, Darcy and Bob Con- naughton, and threw a. pass yards off target.
The Panthers then took over and moved} up to the ‘ twenty-one on Dick Yost’s explosion. Foley his Don- Mur- ray in the end zone and the Panthershad a commanding 28-0 lead. Neither team again threatened seriously, and the Panthers subStit-uted freely to end the contest.
35- O
70 POWER COMPLETE 3 YEARS OF INTRAMURAL FOOTBALL AND FINISH WITH A FLOURISH AS UNDEFEATED CHAMPIONS 3 YEARS IN A ROW
By An Obvious Partisan
Coming on strong in the second half of the intramural football finals, the class of 70 (S e ni o r s), resplendent in their bright green, white and
red! uniforms, crushed the Juniors 35 ,to zip. Combining an impenetrable defence with a fast-moving offence, the Seniors had com- plete control of the game. The
line, averaging at better than 200 pounds per man, out a swath for the speedy back- field, under the direction of Quarterback Charlie Day, to drive in for five touchdowns.
Coach Kinsella had his players using the Kinsellama— tic selective system, and com- bined the “I”, “T”, and “Kin” formations to provide an un- defeatable defence.
Since this is the last year for 70 Power, they retire their uniforms after winning the championship 3 years running. After winning 16 games and losing only 2 in 3 nized as true champions.
SECRET AGENTS AT U. P. E. L? 0R «NA-RB, NARC, WHO’S THERE? ~
By Dennis MacKay
CHARLO’I‘T-ETOWN (OPS) — Despite R.C.M.P. reports that there are 300 speCIal agents with Tommy Guns on campus, it is very likely that
there are. The CADRE ask- ed the following people to comment. Here are the com- ments on the question of Narcs on campus:
President Baker: “No, not
that I know of. I think they are totally justified in inves- tigating narcotics, but I hope they would contact me first.”
Junior MacLeod: Chief of security farce U.P.E.I. “No,
not to my knowledge, and I would know if there were.”
John Smith: Dean of Arts, “I know nothing about it, but it would not be surprised if there were.”
We also contacted th e R.C.M.P. The Desk Officer said there were 300 narcs with Tommy Guns on cam- pus, but he did not wish to be quoted. Asked for a com- ment he said, “No comment.”
COMMENT
By Carolyn Hortie
$13"
There is a tale about two seas in Palestine; the Gali- lee and the Dead Sea. The Jordan River flows into both of them. The Sea of Galilee is clean and very beautiful with lush green scenery all around. But to the south lies the Dead Sea where nothing grows the air hangs very heavrly.
And one may wonder that both seas receive the Jor- dan’s flow yet one is “alive” and the other “dead”. The Dead Sea takes each drop the Jordan brings and hoards it within its vault. The Sea of Galilee recelves and gives back; its waters
THE GLOVEIS IN THE RING
flow and never stop. The moral here is simple — the moral of “giving” and “re- ceiving” and I think all peo- ple today can be categorized as those who “give” and those who» “receiVe”.
It is so easy to sit and absorb all the benefits that fall along outh paths. We
have what we want, so why ’
should we go out of our way to help the “causes.” surrounding us? Oh, my feliow students — where is our esprit die corps? Why is our morale so low? Why is there no interest in our student government? I think “apathy” is a cover- up word . . . are afraid to give . . . to give ourselves
‘1
. . . to take part Are we orbots moving from class to class, nodding acknowledge- ments to our friends and
making trite conversation,
in the coffee shop? I have heard students say, “It was different w h en we had Prince of Wales and St. Dunstan’s. There was real
spirit then, everyone really
cared. Now we are one big nothing!” Is this how we really feel? Because this is \the image: we are putting forth. I have lived in many parts of Canada and conse- quently have attended many different schools. really had an alma mater but I think I had school spirit, for whatever school
I never .
I attend-ed as far as I was concerned it was the best school.
Who does it benefit to cling to something that is past? Are we like tired old men who can talk only of the “good old days?” Are we afraid of the present and future? Are we afraid to open our minds and give this new university our sup-
' port? Are we afraid we may
jeered by our comrades for betraying a past a1 m a mater?
\ From our earliest child- hood many of us have been taught that it is in giving that we receive. But what are we giving now? We will
fl '
not always be students and when our studies are com- pleted and other students fill these halls, do we want to be known as the “gray- , age”, the age that didn’t care? But most important of all, we should learn the meaning of involvement. If we do not learn the ground rules now we will carry on through our entire IiVes content to rock our rocking chairs and spin yarns of past glories. ‘
We will miss so much, for we have the chance to lay the building blocks for U.P.E.I. Let us pull togeth- er — let us be known. as those who cared and want- ed the best. i '