wiwmaiarnumlatnnncdicnwosc.

RONALD COLMAN KAY FRANCIS

CA PI TOL NOW PLAYING

MAKINEE 3.15 u... 11c, 28c. NIGHT ‘I i: 8.45 .... 28c, 31o.

cumin. iaunnuun THE » ’ rain column 3"; m Queen's PHANTOM

inc: roman ___, ow PLAYING

fan-truss 3.15 m. 26c.

THE ‘REiD iSTUDiO

TD DRDWNINB

County new: of local intense but ml- vu-tlning of n nuuy allure In! b1 lunar-ted at 4 cents u word strictly

your 1 a sis-cu. m. 45¢. " numerous mrws AND

cvuuui ".

PITT! -— TODD COMEDY

_PRINDE EDWARD THURSDAY.

MATINEE 8.l5—16c. 26c.

NIGHT ‘I b 8.l5-—26c, 87c, 45c.

SEE THE BAMBINO OF THE' _ LAUGH LEAGUE IN THE ONLYi’ ;.STORY EVER WRITTEN THAT’S'

'AS FUNNY AS

Poor Little Rich B

JOE HIMSELF!‘

1000 LAUGHS A M IN UT E

0y Musical Revue

And Beauty Spots of the World ‘i

“NEXT MONDAY

“DAVALDADE”

llPPiii;iii t?li

(Continued from Page l) i ' J

‘he plaintiff claims that he has sulfur-ed damage “by the defend- ants wrongfully depriving" him "of e Chrysler roadster motor car by {losing to givg it up on. demand."

1e particulars of special damage the plaintiff sets out:

"Loss of use of car from August so, mo to April 21, 193i, 234 days at $3.00 per day-$'ll)il.00"; and for total damages $2,100.00.

The defendants first pleaded the following defence:

“IQ The defendants admit the statements contained in parnuiunph one of the Statement of Claim. ‘

2. As to paragraph two of the Statement of Claim, the defend- ants did not deprive the plaintiff of a Chrysler motor cur by ririi lug to [rive it up on demand.

3. As to said paragraph two of the statement of Claim, the de- fendants never were in possession of a Chrysler motor car of the plaintiff.

4. And as to said paragraph two

of tile Statement of Claim that the

said Chryzslcr motor ear was not

the plaintiff's."

And afterwards by leave of the

Court the following pleas:

"That the said motor car was in storage in the defendants‘ garage

name of L. B. Flood, the plaintiff. The price was $1,250.00. The plain- tiff gave in exchange his old car valued at $200.00 and $100.00 in cash, the balance to be paid in in- stalments at, the rate of $50.00 a TIlUXlthwID appears the memorand- um of sale and purchase was signed not by the plaintiff but by his brother Raymond Flood and that Raymond Flood at times used the car as did one Joe Flood.

Plaintiff says he missed the car about the 19th of July 1930, went into defendants’ garage and saw it there. He says he “just walked in and saw it" and then we walked ont again.

From the 19th day of July until the 29th. of August. 1930 nothing appears to have been said or done in the matter. Certainly the plain- tfif made no claim to the car until the latter date when he and his brother Raymond Flood went to the defendants‘ garage and the plain- tiff delivered to the defendant Hollis Moore s writing of which the following is a. copy:

“August 29, 1930. Messrs. Moore Bros, Charlottetown. Dear Slrs:

I hereby demand of you and re- quire immediate delivery cf a Chrysler roadster czrr, serial num- ber 9750576, which is on your prom- ises and in your possession and which cor is my property.

The license number of this car is 8955 and she is registered in my

and was brought t0 the said garage‘ name,

for storage by Commission who had seized

of thr- said motor car to the plaint- iff.

"That tho s=uicl motor car was at all. times while in storage in the defendants‘ garage under the sole llld absolute control of the said Prohibition Commission who had placed the same in storage and rif- terwards removed the same, paying the storage therefor, and the dc- fendimts were responsible for the safe delivery of the said car to the

said Commission and to no oi-hc person or persons virhatmcvcr.

“That the plaintiff at the time o! the alleged refusal by the dc- said motor car was not entitled to the

zfendants to deliver up the

possession of the same."

The jury returned a verdict for

the plaintiff ml- $1,250.00.

On the 6th day of February A. D.

1933 the plaintiff gave notice o

motion by way of cross appeal that the-verdict of the jury herein he varied by increasing the damages awarded by the jury to the pinin- tiff‘ from $1,250.00 to $3,750.00 on the-ground that the amount award-

ed was inadequate.

‘ In June 1930 when the plaintiff pgrced to purchase tho car he was working on a fox ranch at South- port on wages ranging from $60.00 to $65.00 perrmonth. The car-a registered m-the 2nd of July 1930 in the

Chrysler roadster-was

the Prohibition‘; the same under the provisions of the Prohibition Act and the clefcnzlanis noting in pursuance of the orders mid (lirections of the silld Commis- sion refused to give up possession

Unless this car is delivered to me forthwith I shall be obliged totake action to recover same by suit in the Supreme Court of this Prov- incc.

Yours 8:0. LORNE B. FLOOD."

On direct examination plaintiff says that when he read the demand to the defendant Hollis Moore the latter refused to give him the car. but on cross examination he says "there was not any talking to be done. I had the demand." The ev- idencc then continues: '

"Q. You asked him for the. car? A. Certainly, through the demand.

"Q. Just handed the letter and walked out? A. 'l‘l1at is all I did.

“Q. Was Raymond the spokes- man? Who spoke to Hollis Moore about the car? A. I don't remember.

"Q. You were not there? A. I was ‘there and passed the demand to Mr. Moore.

"Q. And you did not hear Ray- mond say anything? A. I don't rc- member.

“Q. Did Moore say anything? A. I don't Pcmcmlior,

"Q. Did Moore say he could not give up tho car because it had been taken there by the Prohibition Commission? /\. I don't remember him saying that.

"0. Will you swear he didn't say it? A. No, I won't savior he did not say it."

If tlic evidence of the plaintiff as to thn demand is to be taken Strictly. it. vas confintzl to the Writing imairlr-rl mid unexplained by any spol-itn word. It demanded

1'

f

CAMPING OUT — COMEDY AND TRAVELOGUE

DAPITD sis-rue

BUCK WITS.

MATINEE 8.15 u... 11o, 26o. NKIHT 7 b $.15 ..-. 26c. 37o-

BROADCAST

THURS.

or o AND wirsl

Rough riding ~ Rough go- ing drama~ with a smash r o m a n f i c e n din g!

Rut

RIDES THE DANGER-PAVED

TRAIL IN A BATTLE 0F LEAD AND

ANDY CLYDE —— Comedy

AND SERIAL

serial number of 8750576 and a. li- cense number of 8955.

At the trial the plaintiff swore that the correct registry number vvzm 7005, while the registrar of car's testified that the registry or license number was 8984.

If then the plaintiff is to be be- lieved that the “dcmand" was made in silence, it was for a non-exist- ant car and he cannot complafh that he did not get it.

Here the defendant Hollis Moore comes to his aid as to the identifi- cation of the car. He says that the plaintiff and Raymond Flood came to his garage with a lawyer's letter which defendant read, then he says “they asked me after I had read it what I intended to do and I made a statement that I could not very well deliver the car to them as the car in quest ion I was storing for the Prohibition Commission." "They said if I did not give up the car I would have to stand the con- sequences."

At that time the defendant Hollis Moore testifies he did not. recognize the plaintiff except as introduced by the letter.

The cur remained in defendants’ garage until the folfowing April when Haywood, the Prohibition in- spector who had put it in charge of the defendant, came and took 1t away. Shortly alter the car had been taken away from the defend- ants’ garage this action was brought.

The “demand" in form and man- ner seems to have been better adapted to secure refusal than compliance.

Waiving for the present the quee- tion of its sufficiency as a. demand, was there a refusal or such a. claim of right by defendant as would amount to a conversion? In Clayton v. LeRAJy, reported, (191!) 2 K.B.D., 103i, this question is carefully con- sidered by a. bench of distinguished jurists.

That action was for dctlnue of a watch. The wife of the plaintiff had bought. for him an antique watch from the defendant a jewel- ler. The watch was stolen from the plaintiff and he gave information of the theft to the defendant. The watch was afterwards pawncd and sent for sale to the “City Auction »R.ooms" and there sold. It came from the purchaser into the pos- session of the defendant, who being aware that it had been stolen and finding out that the plaintiff was the true owner, wrote to him that he could procure it from the pur- chaser at the sale at the City Auc- tion Rooms for what it had cost the purchaser. This letter was treated by the plaintiff's solicitor as a refusal to deliver up the watch without payment and they forth- with commcnced a. suit.

After the issue of the writ the defendant definitely refused to give up the watch and was therefore served with the writ. The principal defence was that the sale of the watch was mode in market overt and therefore conferred upon. the purchaser a good title.

The trial judge, Bcrutlnn J., gave judgment for the plaintiff for the return of the watch or its_ value which he fixed at £100 and costs.

The defendant appealed and the case came on to be tried before the Court of Appeal consisting of Lords Justices Fletcher Moulton, Farweli ‘and Vaughan Williams. The Court of Appeal (Vaughan Williams L.J.\ dissenting, reversed the decision of Bcrutton J. and held that there had

been no wrongful refusallto return

a car of a certain type, having nthe watch before the date of the

mire of the writ and that no cause of action either in detinue or trover arose.

Fletcher Moulton L. J. laid!

The authorities show clearly that a man does not not wrongfully in refusing to give HP DFODBYlY 1m‘ medial/sly on demand made. He is entitled to take adequate time to inquire into the rights of the claim- ant. '

The claimant contends that at the time there could be no doubt as to the person to whom the watch belonged, but I think that the question as to title was one which might most properly have. been a subject of inquiry. The moment had not then arrived for defend- ant's final decision.

Farwell L. J. said:

In an action of dctinue or of trover proof that the detention is wrongful and amounts to a con- version forms the jist of the action. There must be an element of wrong, the mere fact of possession of the article is not enough to sup- port. the action. A very apposite definition of "conversion" is given by Bramwell B. in Burr-birch!» V- Baync (5 H c: N, 300)-"'I'lie re- sult is you must look in all cases to see not whether there has been what may b; called a withholding of property but s. withholding of ii: in such n. way. that it may be held to be a conversion to a man's own use." And a further proposition is Stated in plain language by Lord Mansfield in Morris v. Bligh (8 Burr. 1242), that refusal to deliver up property upon demand to the true owner is not in itself a con- version but is evidence of it.

Vaughan Williams dissents 0n a point not material to this case and says:

"A man may not assert any oth- er person's title but he may never- theless do an act which is incon- sistent with the dominion of the true owner. Very often such an act may be justified, as, for instance, ifthe thing is detained for the purpose of making a. reasonable inquiry about the title."

The mal question in the present _coae is whether the true inference from the conduct of the defendant is sufficient to show a withholding by the defendant such as to amount to a converting of the property to his own use.

I-lere the defendants were con- fronted with e. total stranger com- ing in off the street with mletter purporting to be signed by himself demanding possession of a car forthwith, and-getting the only suitable answer that n. person in the position of ‘the defendant. floffis Moore could give, vlz., that he could not very well deliver the car to him as he was storing it. for the Prohibition Commission, — the plaintiff went away and never re- turned nor renewed his demand.

The evidence showed that this cor‘ he'd brcn delivered to the de- fendants for safekeeping by Officer Haywood, an Inspector under the Prohibition laws of this province, it having been seized by him for an infraction of "The Prohibition Act.“ There was no question as to the power of the officers of the Prohibition Commission to seize a car used in violation of the law, us this car evidently was at the time of its seizure, and in the words of the statute to cause it to be "for- feited and dealt with by the Com- mission in any way or manner as in the judgment of the Commission may be deemed best." No action appears to have been taken against any of the officers bonccmed in the

pueblo in ndunou.

_~-_-

is the longest day in the you.

June 22nd. Orchestra meats.

.__._-_-_.—-_._

PEESONALS

visit to Halifax.

ii

are now at their home in Orwell.

now at their summer home in Or- well.

The many friends of Mrs. P. J. Gallant of this city will be glad to

ter her serious illness.

Mr. and Mrs. D. R. H. Shaw and Miss Marlon Show who went over

Music degree on that occasion.

MacKlnnon, 181 Water St.

1th‘. Carl Tibert, assistant marl-

city last July.

young son have returned from

greetings from the Oddfcllowl and

oes and the Dominion of Newfound- land.

BAPS BRID GI PARTIES

LONGEST DAY-TOGIY, June Rl,

WELCOME INN opens dhursdav. and Refresh- 1294-6-21-21.

Mrs. l-l. R. Ellison, the Birchea, returned Monday from s pleasant

Sir Andrew Macphall and Colonel J. A. Macplmil arrived by the 5.5. Dominica on Monday evening and

Dr. and Nlrs. Uonel Lindsay and family, Montreal, arrived as pas- sengers on the Dominica and are

know she Ls convalescing nicely n- not get it. Did not ask for money ilmrsday evening before his

death. Did not speak about his, ‘room and toilet for prisoners hav-

for the closing of the Halifax Cv.\~.- night Apﬂ], 39th, servatory of Music, returned Mon- w“ ‘i; w; 1191;,” between 9 and day night accompanied by Miss Nan 19 o-cjock the night “m- me d”. Shaw, who received her Bachelor of “mu-woe o; John Davm He tom us that on Friday nwrning st

Verdict By Coroner’s J ury In Johnson In- quest Given Yester- day.

A verdict of death due to drown- ing in the waters of the GT8“

River was returned by the Coroner's jury amps-queried to inqllim m" the death of John David Johnskm- The inquest was concluded yester- day at Dimdae, when the follow- lng additional evidence was beard: Eugenia. MacDonald, St. Georges, was the first witness. The ‘eceased worked for her dining the year. Paid him some money. January 10th, to the 80th, $10. March 3rd. $2. Did not work for her after that date. Gave him no other money this yea-r. Saw him Thursday be- fore his death. Came to her house,

cral times. Did not ask for money. Had asked for a loan the time he received $10. Asked for $350. Did 9-“?

marriage that evening. Adolphus Johnston-On Saturday Alex Johnston

breakfast table deceased said he

Mrs. Giddings 0f Boston, scoom- w” go to Montague on Satur- panied by her daughter Miss Mary, d”, mxxing to get m‘ Deceased and son, Master John, arlved in the asked u w. the w“ o! the m,‘ citéydast nisltlst On a. visit to the fr:- and Sam he swposed $40 would m rs parcn . MY- "l"! M“ 5° n buy one. Alex said: "You had bet- ter get two." Alex about money being produced. He k f h t l ht. ha h - ager ofihe Bank of Nova Scotia 2:0; 313w atmnrvim Ste; tgpge; arrived home Monday evening from witnesa’ éuggeswd gem“ mow; Montreal and Toronto where he boat to dmg on Sunday gm l to has been receiving treatment for Search could not Weaxfwe d the past two weeks for injuries ed wile“: body w“ found ma: sustained in a car accident in this w“ ten feet long with m; It“; oodfish hooks ‘attached. Witness d dra . ursd four - m. and ma. aw; McNair and ‘f: an“: ‘on T‘); ma;

til hooks pull! Elm-onto where Mr. McNair cttend- $1M, t] ' m; m’: he wait“:

ed the Grand wage’ independent the shore to sec if boat was there

gjzﬂwggreodifflww‘ ma’; ozﬂmdwui Thought J.D. had taken boat to st. Gelrges. Did not sp m alarm. un-

sold nothing

til Saturday afternoon. Alex did

aha Marl - mbek 0t n“ um‘ Prom not say anything about going for clams.

To the jury: ‘ride was coming in.

more than half up when searching.

Aeneas Maxilvlastcr, Primrose -

oomplained about his thumb rev-l

Ernestine Schumcnrr-Heink,

gave her prescription for health:

bridge parties."

NEW YORK, June ﬂit-Madame cele- brating her ‘lznd birthday, today Rood

"I never drink or smoke or 5o to

She regards bridge as "nothing but cheating-trying to be slick."

‘was searching for deceased April 30th. Witness‘ wife called Alex on road for a. cup of tea. He told them when he sot up Sunday morning he asked if J.D. had got home. They told him no. Alex went to stable. Horses were home. Went t0 shore. Boat was there. He looked upstairs to see if deccasecfs clothes were were. They were there. Iiook- ed to see if money was in the pock-

Women who are not forced to be- come breadwinners, she said, should stay at home to take care of their children.

After more than b0 years of grand opera. and concert singing, Mme. Schumann-Halal: is not wor- ried about engagements. She said she will sing until nobody will lis- ten and "then go out in the desert and yodel.“

seizure, detention and confiscation of the car. The whole attack is made upon. the defendants who were merely storing the car for theCommission. It does not even appear that the defendants could exercise any physical control over thecar. Officer Haywood had taken away the registry number plates ‘and some other things when he dc- livercd the car to the defend

I think this application should succeed also upon the broad ground that the car when the dc- mand was made was in the custody of the law and not of the defend- ants, who were merely holding it subject to the orders of the officers of the Prohibition Commission. who were acting under the author- ity of "The Prohibition Act" of this province. To adopt the language of Farwell L. J. above quoted, I can- not conceive of anyone in the po- sition of the defendant being so foolish as to hand the car in ques- tion to a man whom he had never seen before and who presented no credentials in wrting. In my opin-

A!‘

ant to refuse to hand the car over to the plaintiff.

The verdict cannot stand and there is not any reason to antici- pate any advantage to result from a new trial.

The verdict will therefore be sci: aside and instead thereof let a ver- dict be entered for the defendants with costs of the trial and of this application.

The notice of motion by the plaintiff by way of cross appeal to increase the amount of the verdict

is dismissed with costs.

ion it was the duty of the defend-i

ct. There was no money. Witness‘

father asked "Did J.D. have mon-

ey?" Alex said, "Yes, he had-MO on him." Friday morning he said ~713- Wﬂﬂ 801118 for ring on Satur- day. Asked Alex if he had any busi-

ness. Alex told him he might get

9W0 Tings. He said tiren J.D. stood "P. took roll of bills out of a. pocket and said. "I guess that will buy s. ring". My father and wife were

Present at the time. Alex Johnson

did 11W My how much, only that he had those bills. Did not men-

tloa going for clams.

To the fury: Yes, Alex ma he Produced mll of bills.

Mrs. Aeneas Maolvliaxlc, mm. rose. I called in Alex Johnston. Alex said he was up on Friday ev. ﬁling to the bridge. he and A.D. 3°11" David Came 810118- Alex asked J.D. if he was coming home nqw, He said no. Alex said 1g he was coming home they would take him home in the boat. Deceased 5am he had to g0 to Bernie Mam/fosters and round the road to Paul Mae. Donald's. Alex said lie and 5,1), had rowed down the river to home and done up the chores, then went to bed early that Fdday night, Next momma he asked u an. came home. someone answered no. m; looked for horses and boat. Both were home. IDOKE‘! upstairs for °l°th°$ The? were there. Looked 3°? mime? in clothes. There was no money. He said they would have 5° hi1!“ ﬂsht alwav- He again m. mated tho story. John David pun-

/ed out a roll of bills and said, "I 811°" I cw buy a ma." Alex um

m” speak "bout coins for clazns. MEX did not describe the notes J.D. had.

The J11?!‘ asked who was present "he" the body was um dealt with, whether or not blood stains were on the overalls when brought in. Mimi Nmher alcout shirt pocket, What was in it and who removed the "My Din from the pocket, The? also asked whether or not tho blood stains on the overalls

were human blood or not,

The lury after consultation, m-

turned the verdict above mentioned.

r <L.-l<(qwkr nflfiﬂﬂ »~. --

M<:>r\i<;i<;rl, hi5,

Grand‘ Jury (Oﬂlbhllld ﬂﬁ PIIO I).

present crowded state and the zen- eral inconvenience under which the various institutions an forced to operate, a splendid condition of cleanliness and general efficiency.

The first buildlns visited was mzleonwood Infirmary. We found 12a patients, 1M women and 21 men. On examination of the food, we foundlt clean, wholesome and well prepared. We also found pot- imts in Red House or Convalescent Home apparently well cared for, and quarters clean and emitter-t- oble. We were much immesed with the cold storage facilities and the ‘excellent condition in which meats

iand other food supplies are kept.

i We next inspected Queen's County Jail and found there 17 male prisoners. We found the build- ing clean and well kept. We strong-

ly recommend a separate wash

in; communicable diseases, and n.1- so suggest that s. sterilizer for disb- es be supplied. We recommend that a toilet be installed in connection with c. separate cell for unruly prisoners, and that ceiling in kit- chen be covered with lurid wall plaster. The Jail yard presented n. very neat appearance.

We next visited whet is known as the slmms Building. We found 140 mule patients, 122 insane 5nd 18 infirm, in very crowded our. rounding: but showing excellent cure under trying conditions. one‘ building was clean and food eup- plled patients was of good quality and well prepared.

The Newson Building was then visited. We found 66 infirm pgt- ients, 37 men and 29 wqxnen, This is a. model institution and reﬂects great credit on those in charge, W"! thine being spdtlcmly clean and the patients apparently all contented and well cared for, really a most homelikc place.

We find a. true bill in the case of H15 Majesty the Ifing versus An. drcw Dunn.

Address to Jury

H“ IordshiFm Addrwsing an members of the Grand Jury m.

llrozen Salmon Moved to Market

8'1‘. JOHNB, Mid, June 20,,“ PJ-Ffreslx f salmon is ma,‘ moved in large quantities by m. Newfoundland railway from the em coast to Bl. John's for lhipment, w Canada and United States.

1X1 on! db?‘ the rallwaypickca u, three cars from Bonavista Bay cm one from Whitbourne, containjna about 40.000 pounds.

Meanwhile salmon" have mgdg u appearance in Bonavista Bay gm Trinity Bay, and the Hudson's n“ Company refrigeration steamer Blu. Peter has left port to continue 0p. eratiom. When the run of snlumn is over in the southern waters, tn, Blue Pater will go on to Englce, n,“ if sufficient fish are not availabiq there, she will finish loading at Cartwright, Labrador.

Paid Work Instead Oi Dole Urged

1-1

HAMILTON. Ont... June 204,-» minion and Ontario Government; were urged w substitute c we gramme ofworksndwagesform

resolution adopted at the “m”; meeting of the Ontario Coimcil of Warren. T116 K680111501! was intrg. duoed by the York Township may Council.

legislation for tluwpmikotion q the young people of the prov-in“ WM Detitioned in mother resolu- tion which recommended that ti" authorities limit the age st which children might be admitted m wrestling shows and boxing bout; It was suggested that children un. der 16 years of age should not b4 pennitted to witness such perform. anoes.

It was also suggested that stem offering for sale undesirable liters,- ture with lurid headlines and pic titres be prohibited fmm dlsplayim their wares in windows where it ct- traoto the Mention of the younger generation.

The Ottawa Incl-loouncil NCOIW mended the establishment of an

' institution in Eastern Ontario for . trio can of the mentally deficient '

andthe st ‘Inca-ms local Council

marked in opening that the docket which was- to come up was unugu. ally brief, and therefore his ad- dress wcnld be in comparatively few words. Their first duty would be to hear the bills u: lndjqtgngnf, and determine whether or not they “mild brill; 1n true bills. mere was but one such bill, and to ntm coming from another place it seem. ed by comparison insignificant, 01011911. far from negligable. The ‘>111 WM against Andrew Dunn who W88 Chi-med with breaking and ‘3119911118 the store of lilmest Pbste on March 3, 1933. .

‘The duty of, the Grand Jul-y was to put the charges through g, Qﬂ- ing process, and reject all oases which they would consider should not come up for trial. The Jury must also inspect the public buud. inssJrhe jail was one which would be visited. While the jail was n, place for restraint and punishment it W98 ‘W5 D6145 of British proced- ure w mmisn by discomfort. ms lordship asked the jurymen to eb- serve whether the ‘conditions in the jail were satisfactory, to observe jf vermin were present. It was not out of the purlishment that pris- oners should suffer discomfort or pain.

The Jury would also inspect the quarters of the insane and infirm, of whom there were c. total c: 25a insane patient-S and 84 infirm.

Mr. M. A. Farmer moved that Cornelius J’. Campbell, student at liwir, Charlottetown be admitted a; attorney of the Court,

His lordship stated that the or. der wouidbe made.

Mr. R. N. Muclleiii made an up- plication on behalf of Alex w, Mathieeon for admission to the Bar, and asked for permission to make the motion {or mmigwn 5g a later date.

‘the motion was granlkd, the per- iod of right to move being extend- ed to J1me 27.

An order that a. jury use b; transferred from the Birmmeq-glda Court to the queens County docket and be placed at the foot of the jury docket.

Followingrthe rcadins by the FOPHHM of the Grand Jury’; m. port, His Iﬂfdﬁhlp stated that he had ‘istcned with pleasure and ast- isfsction to the report which show. ed that tho jury had m“; 4 thorough inspection of u» public buildings. It must give the publlg great satisfaction to know that the situation was as had been found.

deplored the class of moving pic- tures being shown in theatres and suggwtcd that admission be refused children under 16 years of use.

OFFICERS Bil-ELECTED

WINDSOR, Ont., June Iii-Sh Robert Falconer, K.C.M.G., Tor‘ onto, was named as honorary pre- sident in place of the late Rev. Dr. B. D. Chown at the annual sessionl of the Bociai Service Council oi Canada. here today.

Sessions are being held in con- junction with the 13th Episcopal Social Work Conference and meet- ing of the Federated Council 0i Churches of Christ in America, in Detroit, this week.

Principal ofﬂocrs of the Clﬂld‘ inn organization, all re-elected. are: r sident, Rev. Canon C. W. Ver- non; general secretary, Rev. J- Phillip Jones; recording secretary. Rev. D. N. Machachian; honorary treasurer, Frank Sanderson, all from Toronto.

Miss C. E. Carmichael was added to the list of honorary vice-PW“ dents.

In the edge of a new bread board

is s. slot. to hold o. knife so that it will not be mislaid. conveyed to the muslin Il-utcmﬂi" of fact he t0 110w relatives anti friends were, and would relic“ people of much of the apprehension which might otherwise exist- Hi1 urasmp expressed the approval <>i the Court for work well done. Till court adjourned till Monday. Jim‘ 26, ct 11 a. m.

In sddiiton w the case o! T1" King vs Andrew Dunn there a" m» following civil elm on ti" docket:

Appeall: m Kins, cvvellwi- i" n. u. Cox. reswndent c" “W” from the County Court. ‘

‘ l ircrold

Jury cues, Debt or Dumas"

Margaret MccNsill 1o. Harper. dctlnue.

Wilfred mcﬂallv vu- tome Sent- nor and Poole a Tbmiowl 1M- damages.

wmmn Russell maker. crew“ vs Great West Life Asurance 0°- debt. .

Thom” Qgylg and another vs 0 H. Black and. others. dame“!-

The King, respondent, vs 1W MacKenzie, appellant.

Buns u. Mural-lane

The Grand Jury by their report

y; Abraham Ornsteine. -

preoentlymmofdlreotnliefin|'