{- ;...r.-’: “'79:: fl writ? nabs-grant? i-n--w--e--’vf~\—~.——<4-.nle~w..— a .3-...>._.. .

cont'd from page 4. Chaplaincy Centre was the Exchange. Maybe some of.you might have been lucky enough to Catdl a glimpse of the placed around the campus, but for those who didn't and would liketokncwwhat the .. ﬁxchange is, I'll tell you. It's simply a coffee house! What could be more simple and down-to—earth than a group of people gathered at one place‘to share ‘ conversation, music and poetry— all without the need for any alcohol?

’Ihese people that came to the Exchange enjoyed hot tea and coffee, cookies, complimented by candle-lit tables throughout. With soft spotlights upon the platform, it presented a very warm atmosphere in l which everyone could relax and rid. themselves of accumulated problems and frustrations.

—-,’Ihe evening got off to

a late start due to ' slight technical diff- iculties but everything went smoothly when Plan B went into action. It wasn't long for the performers and audience to feel comfortable with each other. Good times were had by all. I ' \ —-—As for the people that performed musically and read poetry - mainly ShaWn, 'Iheresa, Marg, Melody, Robbi Robbin, Steve, Walter, Owen, Paul and Scott - I'd like to thank you very much _for sharing your time, talent and energy with all who were there.

—-Set—up and running things would net have gone as smoothly as they did if it were not for the generous assistance of Kirk, John, Pe Pete and Joe (who was probably on the brink of ' starvation before we got it set Lp) . I mustn't forget Dawn, great job! Also the guys- that helped us the next morning, the maintenance and

a - LE P . o0. LTD. GRAFTON smear . 7394-4746 J/zahomegf good 3/2055 50255. 1902., f

v»-,

’ time and effort that . V —All the energy that went ' into it was well worth the

, looks like every Wednesday

-. visit awhile.

in Toronto — are you

1 <3.

' a g ,

grmv‘ci

i.-.-v....c._,._.. _. - _

You P.E.I. is sensible because we remain the only province in Canada without a censor board. But why do we need one? Were you aware that

‘ a New BnmsWiEk Censor Board reviews ("censors") materials i.e. books, magazines, films, coming into P.E.I.? You"'re L right — we don't need a censor board because PFA ‘ are censoring for us. Get with it, Editor,‘the citizens of PEI, if anyone, should be the ones on the board, not New Brunswickers. That should be your gripe. And I'm sure that once you get your head screwed on straight, you will clearly see my point.

student union (especially Kevin) , Audio-Visual Dept. , and Music Dept. , and also the chaplains for the use of the Centre. There are many others that involved their

deserve a word of thanks. Sorry about the loss of ' sleep, Steve! ,

reSults, I think, and 7 perhaps those that.didn't ’ drop by will do so next

tine, which at present

night. So whynot stop by for a coffee next Wednesday and Say hello! We'll be gladto have you

HAVE A NICE DAY.

“Al‘ It seems rather_odd, to me at least, that you would’ be against censor— ship after having viewed our campus newspaper (I won't even give it enough recognition to mention its name) last year. This is a very local case of what happens when there are no restrictions put on any- one or anything - where everything goes. The junk that appeared in that trashy newspaper should. have been censored or burned ( and I'm inclined to feel that the latter would have been more effective) . t was degrading to think that I was even a small part of the university of whidi that newspaper(?) was a part. It seems to me that any person who read (looked at, whatever) that smut would at least be for partial censorship. I_'_ml not even for total censor— ship, but some discretion is (was) obviously

\ necessary.

Dear Editor,

After debating with myself about whether or not to "bother" responding to your editorial of November 10th, I finally concluded that it wouldn't do any harm to comment on it (but I am al— most positive that it won't do any good either.) You ' call yourself an honest pervert and I tend to agree with you (nothing personal). I would put you and your ' cohorts, who are totally opposed to censorship, into just that category. You are obviously confused about individual rights and their limitations. Individ- uals have rights only inso- far as these same rights do not interfere with the rights of other individuals, and more importantly, with. the rights of a cormmmity as a whole. The, -~; availability of porno-k graphy (for those kinky individuals who dioose to View it) is quidcly ' lowering the calibre of our society. 'Jhink for a

moment about Ymge Street Well: Mr- Editor, the

problem certainly can't

,be solved‘ with your . attitude. The problem has . arisen, however, and int- erested citizensof P.E.I. realize that we just

can't let anything go.

prepared to see Grafton Street in the same state?

AGE [SHOE

And, yes, a minority can decide on what the public should view if that viewing would otherwise be detrimental to the . society as a whole. We. must stand united to keep P.E.I. "Island like". We don't want a Sin Strip in Charlottetown but be— lieve me, we'll have one eventually, if we all acquire your attitude.

Thanx for the space. A-E.

Dear editor,

. After reading your editorial

on censorship,I feel you missed the main reason be- hind it.It is not to protect our society from "3qu " as much as a deterent to organ— ized crine.

Recently,journalists in the U.S.A.,did a docuement— ary on television concerning pornography in their larger cities. Their conclusion was that pornography was not harmful in itself but that it brought in street-walkers pimps , pushers ,muggers , etc . which brought in organized crime.This is the true harm done by pornography.

In the CBC special in September concerning organ- ized crime,the subject was also mentioned.It referred to the post-war pornography boom in antreal.This was . said to be one of the causes of the increase in organized crime during this era.When the cause (pornography) was removed the result (organ-= ized crime) diminished dras— tically.

I do not think you treat” ed the subject fairly last week.It may be true that it is a form of suppresion but it is in the best interests of Canada.After all not all silver linings have clouds.

Dear Whom Ever it may Concern,

You may have considered your ARCUP convention a success

in conjunction with academ— ic atheivement , but as

far as conventions go it was painfully typical. Many of the members managed to get in the usual bit of carousing

I and tomfoolery .

For those of us who remained in Bernadine on Thurs-

day night, we had to put up with people parading

up and down the hallways from one till three in the morni— ng. ~, Now, you say, residents sh— ould be used to this kind of behavior, but when these persons persist in banging on *doors,stealing

our exit lights and

breaking our outside lights, it"s enough to make a person $¢&#@ mad.

As for you members of the student newspaper who may possibly haVe gained . from this weekend, you are minority, as your conventioneers managed to be

God Damned disruptful to the larger part of the members

of the SIN The Readers

One Hell of a mad student, Susan Vatcher