Al ~ r LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL. NN NNO LOLOL LOL ll Mla Sarerpar Arrensoon, April 12. Hon. Mr. PALMER, on rieing to move the order of the day fer the seeond reading of the Bi to eon firm the Award of the Commissioners on the Land! Question es L- few wa Bill of wre alle portance to the Colony. ft is that measure which propowes to con term the Award of the Land ¢ omrmigsiqhers, which hus Seen before the public tor some weeks. The BM is formed on very «i uple prin iples It iacon fined exactly to the Award as it is given, and pre view ti inet as it was intended | to operate by the very able Coun.issioners whe made it One partof that Award, us ia well known to} your Henors; and it may be termed a most material | part, where the price af land cannot be mutually | agreed pon, ta « wesidered rather Trinny rteet tn tts! constituent pr inmmamuch as it does not pro vide for the Appointment of a third arbitrator, inthe event of the other twe not agreein It isto Le iameuted a good deal that that prineipie had not heen carried eat in some more definite manner by the Award. Whether it was owing to an oversight, wr Wa Practionl ditlieglty, | am at a loss te sav ; bat thre it ic, ‘And the country umst deal with it as it i New, it may be the opinion of many i hat when we sit down to legislate npen it that the ; st it shail operat neiple, to ome eTeotus remedy ix in our own bands, and we might as well | proces d to devwixe some means to obviate the apport ment 4f the third arbitrate: Jt is very true thet mirht be done; bat I think jt wan ’ *? ' . gre uf ELE p pede ¥ te atte: in the Bill now consiiered legisimting upenm the i t« *’ yofore us: this Bill can searcely be Award. There is} no compylsery means for the appointmentoft an Um pire, in the event of the twe arbitrators not Agree fiw, avd it is fox that reason that legislation ie called forth upon the matter ja consequence of the l te confirm it not receiving the Roval sanction, is a \ ery inoperative docament, if people chase to say we will not eam. | ply with Sat Howe gitempt to lay dewa any plan, in thie Bill, to dispense with the appointment of an Umpire, it would put it inte the moutha of | those Who are disposed to be eaptious, to say, the | Levisliture bas gone further than was intended by the Award—it wonld panish them with areaments. | Ll suv, to reject the whole Award. It is therefore eefest fur us, and all whe wish to see the Award eonfirmed, to confine ourselves to the confirmation | of it in ite pure terms, thouzh it is not all we could | wis. gPhen we have the peeprictors who signed the reference bowud to abide by the degjsion of the Commissioners, as well as Her Majesty's Govern ment pladwed to confirm this Act. But if we vo be youd thisand attempt fo sup vLy those defeets which we @ ja the Awanl, and which we lament, it will bill Therefore, I look upon it, that the great chance of obfajning the bevetits of the Award is by keeping within that bond of faith whic! @Xiste between the Propricters, the Imperial § i Vernigent and the local previou lt | endanwes th A two first named oreasion to say, you hav, broken faith with us, and thegefore we are at lib opty to vive our dissent to the Award. Since the present Bill has been prepared with that obje . in view, and having eentined onrselves te the Lonfirmation of the fwand in simple tera, we wy fouk forward with confidence that the Imperini Govermment will not refuse their